Purpose: To investigate the validity of urine color as a metric of hydration status using CIE L*a*b* color space, as compared to the commonly used subjective 8-point scale. Methods: A total of 151 urine samples were collected from subjects (N=28) in various states of hydration. Urine osmolality and urine specific gravity (USG) were measured in each sample. Urine color was assessed by the subjective 8-point urine color scale and quantified using CIE L*a*b* color space. RESULTS: The correlation between the CIE b*-value and urine osmolality (rs=0.89) was determined to be significantly (p=0.004) greater than the correlation between the subjective 8-point urine color scale and urine osmolality (rs=0.85). The correlation between the CIE b*-value and USG (rs=0.90) was also determined to be significantly (p < 0.001) greater than the correlation between the urine color chart and USG (rs=0.84). Lastly, the correlation between urine color as determined by the 8-point subjective urine color chart and the CIE b*-value had a strong relationship (rs=0.92). Conclusions: The correlations of the quantitative CIE b*-value with urine osmolality and USG were significantly greater than the correlations with the 8-point subjective urine color scale. This suggests that a quantitative measurement of urine color via spectrophotometry is a better measure for assessing hydration status vs. subjective determination of urine color. The results of the current study raise the possibility of spectrophotometry as an additional non-invasive method of determining hydration status.
Published in | Advances in Applied Physiology (Volume 5, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.aap.20200502.12 |
Page(s) | 19-23 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Urine Color, Urine Osmolality, CIE L*a*b* Color Space, Dehydration
[1] | Armstrong, L. E., et al. (1994). Urinary indices of hydration status. International Journal of Sport Nutrition, vol. 4, no. 3, 1994, pp. 265-279., doi: 10.1123/ijsn.4.3.265. |
[2] | Armstrong, L. E., Johnson, E. C., Munoz, C. X., Swokla, B., Bellego, L. L., Jimenez, L., Casa, D. J., & Maresh, C. M. (2012). Hydration biomarkers and dietary fluid consumption of women. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 112 (7), 1056-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.03.036. |
[3] | Hahn, R. G., & Waldréus, N. (2013). An aggregate urine analysis tool to detect acute dehydration. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 23 (4), 303-311. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.23.4.303. |
[4] | Kavouras, S. A., Johnson, E. C., Bougatsas, D., Arnaoutis, G., Panagiotakos, D. B., Perrier, E., & Klein, A. (2015). Validation of a urine color scale for assessment of urine osmolality in healthy children. European Journal of Nutrition, 55 (3), 907-915. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-0905-2. |
[5] | Armstrong, L. E., Pumerantz, A. C., Fiala, K. A., Roti, M. W., Kavouras, S. A., Casa, D. J., & Maresh, C. M. (2010). Human hydration indices: acute and longitudinal reference values. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 20 (2), 145-153. doi: 10.1123/ijsnem.20.2.145. |
[6] | Mckenzie, A. L., & Armstrong, L. E. (2017). Monitoring body water balance in pregnant and nursing women: the validity of urine color. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, 70 (1), 18-22. doi: 10.1159/000462999. |
[7] | Mentes, J. C., Wakefield, B., & Culp, K. (2006). Use of a urine color chart to monitor hydration status in nursing home residents. Biological Research For Nursing, 7 (3), 197-203. doi: 10.1177/1099800405281607. |
[8] | Hasibuan, D., Ramayani, O., Sembiring, T., & Lubis, M. (2019). Relationship between urine color scale and urine specific gravity to hydration status in elementary school students. Global Journal For Research Analysis (GJRA), 8 (9). doi: 10.36106/gjra. |
[9] | Mckenzie, A. L., Muñoz, C. X., Ellis, L. A., Perrier, E. T., Guelinckx, I., Klein, A.,... Armstrong, L. E. (2015). Urine color as an indicator of urine concentration in pregnant and lactating women. European Journal of Nutrition, 56 (1), 355-362. Doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-1085-9. |
[10] | Fortes, M. B., Owen, J. A., Raymond-Barker, P., Bishop, C., Elghenzai, S., Oliver, S. J., & Walsh, N. P. (2015). Is this elderly patient dehydrated? Diagnostic accuracy of hydration assessment using physical signs, urine, and saliva markers. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 16 (3), 221-228. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.09.012. |
[11] | Kovacs E. M., Senden J. M., & Brouns F. (1999). Urine color, osmolality and specific electrical conductance are not accurate measures of hydration status during postexercise rehydration. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 39: 47-53. |
[12] | Cheuvront, S. N., Ely, B. R., Kenefick, R. W., & Sawka, M. N. (2010). Biological variation and diagnostic accuracy of dehydration assessment markers. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 92 (3), 565-573. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29490. |
[13] | Adams, W. M., Hevel, D. J., Maher, J. P., & Mcguirt, J. T. (2020). Racial and sex differences in 24 hour urinary hydration markers among male and female emerging adults: a pilot study. Nutrients, 12 (4), 1068. doi: 10.3390/nu12041068. |
[14] | Zhang, N., Du, S., Zheng, M., Tang, Z., Yan, R., Zhu, Y., & Ma, G. (2017). Urine color for assessment of dehydration among college men students in Hebei, China-a cross-sectional study. Asia Pacific Journal Clinical Nutrition, 788-793. |
[15] | Eid, M., Gollwitzer, M., & Schmitt, M. (2011). Statistik und forschungsmethoden lehrbuch. Weinheim: Beltz. p. 548. |
APA Style
Tory Edwards, Rebekah Belasco, Alfonso Joaquin Munoz, Vernon Rayo, Michael Buono. (2020). Subjective vs. Objective Urine Color: Effect of Hydration Status. Advances in Applied Physiology, 5(2), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20200502.12
ACS Style
Tory Edwards; Rebekah Belasco; Alfonso Joaquin Munoz; Vernon Rayo; Michael Buono. Subjective vs. Objective Urine Color: Effect of Hydration Status. Adv. Appl. Physiol. 2020, 5(2), 19-23. doi: 10.11648/j.aap.20200502.12
AMA Style
Tory Edwards, Rebekah Belasco, Alfonso Joaquin Munoz, Vernon Rayo, Michael Buono. Subjective vs. Objective Urine Color: Effect of Hydration Status. Adv Appl Physiol. 2020;5(2):19-23. doi: 10.11648/j.aap.20200502.12
@article{10.11648/j.aap.20200502.12, author = {Tory Edwards and Rebekah Belasco and Alfonso Joaquin Munoz and Vernon Rayo and Michael Buono}, title = {Subjective vs. Objective Urine Color: Effect of Hydration Status}, journal = {Advances in Applied Physiology}, volume = {5}, number = {2}, pages = {19-23}, doi = {10.11648/j.aap.20200502.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20200502.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aap.20200502.12}, abstract = {Purpose: To investigate the validity of urine color as a metric of hydration status using CIE L*a*b* color space, as compared to the commonly used subjective 8-point scale. Methods: A total of 151 urine samples were collected from subjects (N=28) in various states of hydration. Urine osmolality and urine specific gravity (USG) were measured in each sample. Urine color was assessed by the subjective 8-point urine color scale and quantified using CIE L*a*b* color space. RESULTS: The correlation between the CIE b*-value and urine osmolality (rs=0.89) was determined to be significantly (p=0.004) greater than the correlation between the subjective 8-point urine color scale and urine osmolality (rs=0.85). The correlation between the CIE b*-value and USG (rs=0.90) was also determined to be significantly (p s=0.84). Lastly, the correlation between urine color as determined by the 8-point subjective urine color chart and the CIE b*-value had a strong relationship (rs=0.92). Conclusions: The correlations of the quantitative CIE b*-value with urine osmolality and USG were significantly greater than the correlations with the 8-point subjective urine color scale. This suggests that a quantitative measurement of urine color via spectrophotometry is a better measure for assessing hydration status vs. subjective determination of urine color. The results of the current study raise the possibility of spectrophotometry as an additional non-invasive method of determining hydration status.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Subjective vs. Objective Urine Color: Effect of Hydration Status AU - Tory Edwards AU - Rebekah Belasco AU - Alfonso Joaquin Munoz AU - Vernon Rayo AU - Michael Buono Y1 - 2020/09/03 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20200502.12 DO - 10.11648/j.aap.20200502.12 T2 - Advances in Applied Physiology JF - Advances in Applied Physiology JO - Advances in Applied Physiology SP - 19 EP - 23 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2471-9714 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20200502.12 AB - Purpose: To investigate the validity of urine color as a metric of hydration status using CIE L*a*b* color space, as compared to the commonly used subjective 8-point scale. Methods: A total of 151 urine samples were collected from subjects (N=28) in various states of hydration. Urine osmolality and urine specific gravity (USG) were measured in each sample. Urine color was assessed by the subjective 8-point urine color scale and quantified using CIE L*a*b* color space. RESULTS: The correlation between the CIE b*-value and urine osmolality (rs=0.89) was determined to be significantly (p=0.004) greater than the correlation between the subjective 8-point urine color scale and urine osmolality (rs=0.85). The correlation between the CIE b*-value and USG (rs=0.90) was also determined to be significantly (p s=0.84). Lastly, the correlation between urine color as determined by the 8-point subjective urine color chart and the CIE b*-value had a strong relationship (rs=0.92). Conclusions: The correlations of the quantitative CIE b*-value with urine osmolality and USG were significantly greater than the correlations with the 8-point subjective urine color scale. This suggests that a quantitative measurement of urine color via spectrophotometry is a better measure for assessing hydration status vs. subjective determination of urine color. The results of the current study raise the possibility of spectrophotometry as an additional non-invasive method of determining hydration status. VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -