Spatial and Temporal Properties of Gaze Return Fixations While Viewing Affective Images

Lubov Podladchikova; Dmitry Shaposhnikov; Tatiana Koltunova; Dmitry Lazurenko; Valery Kiroy

doi:doi:10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16

| Peer-Reviewed

Spatial and Temporal Properties of Gaze Return Fixations While Viewing Affective Images

Lubov Podladchikova, Dmitry Shaposhnikov, Tatiana Koltunova, Dmitry Lazurenko, Valery Kiroy

Published in Advances in Applied Physiology (Volume 5, Issue 2)

Received: 23 October 2020 Accepted: 7 November 2020 Published: 24 November 2020

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Spatial and temporal properties of gaze return fixations on recently viewed regions during free viewing of affective images from The International Affective System (IAPS) image database are considered. In each test, 10 positive, 10 negative, and 10 neutral images were presented for each Subject (n=20). It was revealed that the probability of the return fixations varied from 0,04 up to 0,42 for different Subjects and images (the average probability for negative, neutral and positive images was equal to 0,090±0,009, 0,079±0,012 and 0,076±0,009). It was shown that the distributions of return fixations duration and preceding (returning) saccades amplitude had a bimodal character. Besides, a tendency to increase the return fixation duration with a decrease in amplitude of the preceding saccades was revealed. Return fixations which located inside the areas of interest determined by analysis of the spatial distribution of all fixations (both regular and return ones) had maximal density and duration as compared with the other image regions. Finally, the volunteers with dominant focal viewing scan-paths had a higher probability of return fixations than those with scanning trajectories (0,09±0,003 and 0,05±0,006). On the base of the obtained results, the opportunity to estimate the dominant component of visual attention during the current stage of the dynamic process of image viewing and prospective studies of return fixations have been discussed.

Published in	Advances in Applied Physiology (Volume 5, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16
Page(s)	42-47
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

IAPS Image Databases, Eye Movements, Return Gaze Fixations, Areas of Interest, Duration and Density of Fixations, Saccade Amplitude, Focal and Scanning Viewing Scan-Paths

References

[1]	Borji, A., & Itti, L. (2014). Defending Yarbus: Eye movements reveal observers' task. Journal of vision, 14 (3), 29-29.
[2]	DeAngelus, M., & Pelz, J. B. (2009). Top-down control of eye movements: Yarbus revisited. Visual Cognition, 17 (6-7), 790-811.
[3]	Podladchikova, L. N., Shaposhnikov, D. G., Tikidgji-Hamburyan, A. V., Koltunova, T. I., Tikidgji-Hamburyan, R. A., Gusakova, V. I., & Golovan, A. V. (2009). Model-based approach to study of mechanisms of complex image viewing. Optical Memory and Neural Networks, 18 (2), 114-121.
[4]	Privitera, C. M., & Stark, L. W. (2005). Scanpath theory, attention, and image processing algorithms for predicting human eye fixations. In Neurobiology of Attention (pp. 296-299). Academic Press.
[5]	Samarin, A., Koltunova, T., Osinov, V., Shaposhnikov, D., & Podladchikova, L. (2015). Scanpaths of complex image viewing: insights from experimental and modeling studies. Perception, 44 (8-9), 1064-1076.
[6]	Yarbus, A. L. (2013). Eye Movements and Vision. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-5379-7
[7]	Lupiáñez, J., Klein, R. M., & Bartolomeo, P. (2006). Inhibition of return: Twenty years after. Cognitive neuropsychology, 23 (7), 1003-1014.
[8]	Podladchikova, L. N., Shaposhnikov, D. G., Koltunova, T. I., Dyachenko, A. V., & Gusakova, V. I. (2009). Temporal dynamics of fixation duration, saccade amplitude, and viewing trajectory. Journal of integrative neuroscience, 8 (4), 487-501.
[9]	Dodd, M. D., Van der Stigchel, S., & Hollingworth, A. (2009). Novelty is not always the best policy: Inhibition of return and facilitation of return as a function of visual task. Psychological Science, 20 (3), 333-339.
[10]	Hooge, I. T. C., & Frens, M. A. (2000). Inhibition of saccade return (ISR): Spatio-temporal properties of saccade programming. Vision research, 40 (24), 3415-3426.
[11]	Hooge, I. T. C., Over, E. A., van Wezel, R. J., & Frens, M. A. (2005). Inhibition of return is not a foraging facilitator in saccadic search and free viewing. Vision research, 45 (14), 1901-1908.
[12]	Luke, S. G., Schmidt, J., & Henderson, J. M. (2013). Temporal oculomotor inhibition of return and spatial facilitation of return in a visual encoding task. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 400.
[13]	Martín-Arévalo, E., Chica, A. B., & Lupiáñez, J. (2016). No single electrophysiological marker for facilitation and inhibition of return: A review. Behavioural brain research, 300, 1-10.
[14]	Mills, M., Dalmaijer, E. S., Van der Stigchel, S., & Dodd, M. D. (2015). Effects of task and task-switching on temporal inhibition of return, facilitation of return, and saccadic momentum during scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41 (5), 1300.
[15]	Pratt, J., & Castel, A. D. (2001). Responding to feature or location: A re-examination of inhibition of return and facilitation of return. Vision Research, 41 (28), 3903-3908.
[16]	Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return: Neural basis and function. Cognitive neuropsychology, 2 (3), 211-228.
[17]	Fabius, J. H., Schut, M. J., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2016). Spatial inhibition of return as a function of fixation history, task, and spatial references. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78 (6), 1633-1641.
[18]	Hunt, A. R., & Kingstone, A. (2003). Inhibition of return: Dissociating attentional and oculomotor components. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29 (5), 1068.
[19]	Wang, Z., Satel, J., & Klein, R. M. (2012). Sensory and motor mechanisms of oculomotor inhibition of return. Experimental Brain Research, 218 (3), 441-453.
[20]	Weger, U. W., Abrams, R. A., Law, M. B., & Pratt, J. (2008). Attending to objects: Endogenous cues can produce inhibition of return. Visual Cognition, 16 (5), 659-674.
[21]	Bays, P. M., & Husain, M. (2012). Active inhibition and memory promote exploration and search of natural scenes. Journal of vision, 12 (8), 8-8.
[22]	Wang, Z., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Dissociable spatial and temporal effects of inhibition of return. PLoS One, 7 (8), e44290.
[23]	Barke, A., Stahl, J., & Kröner-Herwig, B. (2012). Identifying a subset of fear-evoking pictures from the IAPS on the basis of dimensional and categorical ratings for a German sample. Journal of behavior therapy and experimental psychiatry, 43 (1), 565-572.
[24]	Bradley, M. M., Houbova, P., Miccoli, L., Costa, V. D., & Lang, P. J. (2011). Scan patterns when viewing natural scenes: Emotion, complexity, and repetition. Psychophysiology, 48 (11), 1544-1553.
[25]	Christianson, S. Å., Loftus, E. F., Hoffman, H., & Loftus, G. R. (1991). Eye fixations and memory for emotional events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, 17 (4), 693.
[26]	Ni, J., Jiang, H., Jin, Y., Chen, N., Wang, J., Wang, Z.,... & Hu, X. (2011). Dissociable modulation of overt visual attention in valence and arousal revealed by topology of scan path. PLoS One, 6 (4), e18262.
[27]	Niu, Y., Todd, R., & Anderson, A. K. (2012). Affective salience can reverse the effects of stimulus-driven salience on eye movements in complex scenes. Frontiers in psychology, 3, 336.
[28]	Pilarczyk, J., & Kuniecki, M. (2014). Emotional content of an image attracts attention more than visually salient features in various signal-to-noise ratio conditions. Journal of vision, 14 (12), 4-4.
[29]	Sabatinelli, D., Lang, P. J., Keil, A., & Bradley, M. M. (2007). Emotional perception: correlation of functional MRI and event-related potentials. Cerebral cortex, 17 (5), 1085-1091.
[30]	Lang, P., & Bradley, M. M. (2007). The International Affective Picture System (IAPS) in the study of emotion and attention. Handbook of emotion elicitation and assessment, 29, 70-73.
[31]	Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. University of Florida, Gainesville. Tech Rep A-8.
[32]	Soares, A. P., Pinheiro, A. P., Costa, A., Frade, C. S., Comesaña, M., & Pureza, R. (2015). Adaptation of the international affective picture system (IAPS) for European Portuguese. Behavior Research Methods, 47 (4), 1159-1177.
[33]	Podladchikova, L. N., Koltunova, T. I., Shaposhnikov, D. G., & Lomakina, O. V. (2017). Individual features of viewing emotionally significant images. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 47 (8), 941-947.
[34]	Koltunova, T. I., Podladchikova, L. N., Shaposhnikov, D. G., Vladimirskii, B. M., Syrkin, L. D., Kryuchkov, B. I., & Usov, V. M. (2017). Dynamics of the duration of gaze fixation and event-related potentials on presentation of fading-in images and distractors. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 47 (3), 321-327.
[35]	Koltunova, T. I., & Podladchikova, L. N. (2013). Distractor effect at initial stages of recognition depends on visual image properties. Journal of integrative neuroscience, 12 (01), 91-101.
[36]	Pannasch, S., Schulz, J., & Velichkovsky, B. M. (2011). On the control of visual fixation durations in free viewing of complex images. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73 (4), 1120-1132.
[37]	Unema, P. J., Pannasch, S., Joos, M., & Velichkovsky, B. M. (2005). Time course of information processing during scene perception: The relationship between saccade amplitude and fixation duration. Visual cognition, 12 (3), 473-494.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Lubov Podladchikova, Dmitry Shaposhnikov, Tatiana Koltunova, Dmitry Lazurenko, Valery Kiroy. (2020). Spatial and Temporal Properties of Gaze Return Fixations While Viewing Affective Images. Advances in Applied Physiology, 5(2), 42-47. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Lubov Podladchikova; Dmitry Shaposhnikov; Tatiana Koltunova; Dmitry Lazurenko; Valery Kiroy. Spatial and Temporal Properties of Gaze Return Fixations While Viewing Affective Images. Adv. Appl. Physiol. 2020, 5(2), 42-47. doi: 10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Lubov Podladchikova, Dmitry Shaposhnikov, Tatiana Koltunova, Dmitry Lazurenko, Valery Kiroy. Spatial and Temporal Properties of Gaze Return Fixations While Viewing Affective Images. Adv Appl Physiol. 2020;5(2):42-47. doi: 10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16,
  author = {Lubov Podladchikova and Dmitry Shaposhnikov and Tatiana Koltunova and Dmitry Lazurenko and Valery Kiroy},
  title = {Spatial and Temporal Properties of Gaze Return Fixations While Viewing Affective Images},
  journal = {Advances in Applied Physiology},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {42-47},
  doi = {10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aap.20200502.16},
  abstract = {Spatial and temporal properties of gaze return fixations on recently viewed regions during free viewing of affective images from The International Affective System (IAPS) image database are considered. In each test, 10 positive, 10 negative, and 10 neutral images were presented for each Subject (n=20). It was revealed that the probability of the return fixations varied from 0,04 up to 0,42 for different Subjects and images (the average probability for negative, neutral and positive images was equal to 0,090±0,009, 0,079±0,012 and 0,076±0,009). It was shown that the distributions of return fixations duration and preceding (returning) saccades amplitude had a bimodal character. Besides, a tendency to increase the return fixation duration with a decrease in amplitude of the preceding saccades was revealed. Return fixations which located inside the areas of interest determined by analysis of the spatial distribution of all fixations (both regular and return ones) had maximal density and duration as compared with the other image regions. Finally, the volunteers with dominant focal viewing scan-paths had a higher probability of return fixations than those with scanning trajectories (0,09±0,003 and 0,05±0,006). On the base of the obtained results, the opportunity to estimate the dominant component of visual attention during the current stage of the dynamic process of image viewing and prospective studies of return fixations have been discussed.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Spatial and Temporal Properties of Gaze Return Fixations While Viewing Affective Images
AU  - Lubov Podladchikova
AU  - Dmitry Shaposhnikov
AU  - Tatiana Koltunova
AU  - Dmitry Lazurenko
AU  - Valery Kiroy
Y1  - 2020/11/24
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16
T2  - Advances in Applied Physiology
JF  - Advances in Applied Physiology
JO  - Advances in Applied Physiology
SP  - 42
EP  - 47
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2471-9714
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16
AB  - Spatial and temporal properties of gaze return fixations on recently viewed regions during free viewing of affective images from The International Affective System (IAPS) image database are considered. In each test, 10 positive, 10 negative, and 10 neutral images were presented for each Subject (n=20). It was revealed that the probability of the return fixations varied from 0,04 up to 0,42 for different Subjects and images (the average probability for negative, neutral and positive images was equal to 0,090±0,009, 0,079±0,012 and 0,076±0,009). It was shown that the distributions of return fixations duration and preceding (returning) saccades amplitude had a bimodal character. Besides, a tendency to increase the return fixation duration with a decrease in amplitude of the preceding saccades was revealed. Return fixations which located inside the areas of interest determined by analysis of the spatial distribution of all fixations (both regular and return ones) had maximal density and duration as compared with the other image regions. Finally, the volunteers with dominant focal viewing scan-paths had a higher probability of return fixations than those with scanning trajectories (0,09±0,003 and 0,05±0,006). On the base of the obtained results, the opportunity to estimate the dominant component of visual attention during the current stage of the dynamic process of image viewing and prospective studies of return fixations have been discussed.
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Lubov Podladchikova

Centre of Neurotechnology, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia
Dmitry Shaposhnikov

Centre of Neurotechnology, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia
Tatiana Koltunova

Centre of Neurotechnology, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia
Dmitry Lazurenko

Centre of Neurotechnology, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia
Valery Kiroy

Centre of Neurotechnology, Southern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Lubov Podladchikova, Dmitry Shaposhnikov, Tatiana Koltunova, Dmitry Lazurenko, Valery Kiroy. (2020). Spatial and Temporal Properties of Gaze Return Fixations While Viewing Affective Images. Advances in Applied Physiology, 5(2), 42-47. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Lubov Podladchikova; Dmitry Shaposhnikov; Tatiana Koltunova; Dmitry Lazurenko; Valery Kiroy. Spatial and Temporal Properties of Gaze Return Fixations While Viewing Affective Images. Adv. Appl. Physiol. 2020, 5(2), 42-47. doi: 10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Lubov Podladchikova, Dmitry Shaposhnikov, Tatiana Koltunova, Dmitry Lazurenko, Valery Kiroy. Spatial and Temporal Properties of Gaze Return Fixations While Viewing Affective Images. Adv Appl Physiol. 2020;5(2):42-47. doi: 10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16,
  author = {Lubov Podladchikova and Dmitry Shaposhnikov and Tatiana Koltunova and Dmitry Lazurenko and Valery Kiroy},
  title = {Spatial and Temporal Properties of Gaze Return Fixations While Viewing Affective Images},
  journal = {Advances in Applied Physiology},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {42-47},
  doi = {10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aap.20200502.16},
  abstract = {Spatial and temporal properties of gaze return fixations on recently viewed regions during free viewing of affective images from The International Affective System (IAPS) image database are considered. In each test, 10 positive, 10 negative, and 10 neutral images were presented for each Subject (n=20). It was revealed that the probability of the return fixations varied from 0,04 up to 0,42 for different Subjects and images (the average probability for negative, neutral and positive images was equal to 0,090±0,009, 0,079±0,012 and 0,076±0,009). It was shown that the distributions of return fixations duration and preceding (returning) saccades amplitude had a bimodal character. Besides, a tendency to increase the return fixation duration with a decrease in amplitude of the preceding saccades was revealed. Return fixations which located inside the areas of interest determined by analysis of the spatial distribution of all fixations (both regular and return ones) had maximal density and duration as compared with the other image regions. Finally, the volunteers with dominant focal viewing scan-paths had a higher probability of return fixations than those with scanning trajectories (0,09±0,003 and 0,05±0,006). On the base of the obtained results, the opportunity to estimate the dominant component of visual attention during the current stage of the dynamic process of image viewing and prospective studies of return fixations have been discussed.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Spatial and Temporal Properties of Gaze Return Fixations While Viewing Affective Images
AU  - Lubov Podladchikova
AU  - Dmitry Shaposhnikov
AU  - Tatiana Koltunova
AU  - Dmitry Lazurenko
AU  - Valery Kiroy
Y1  - 2020/11/24
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16
T2  - Advances in Applied Physiology
JF  - Advances in Applied Physiology
JO  - Advances in Applied Physiology
SP  - 42
EP  - 47
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2471-9714
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aap.20200502.16
AB  - Spatial and temporal properties of gaze return fixations on recently viewed regions during free viewing of affective images from The International Affective System (IAPS) image database are considered. In each test, 10 positive, 10 negative, and 10 neutral images were presented for each Subject (n=20). It was revealed that the probability of the return fixations varied from 0,04 up to 0,42 for different Subjects and images (the average probability for negative, neutral and positive images was equal to 0,090±0,009, 0,079±0,012 and 0,076±0,009). It was shown that the distributions of return fixations duration and preceding (returning) saccades amplitude had a bimodal character. Besides, a tendency to increase the return fixation duration with a decrease in amplitude of the preceding saccades was revealed. Return fixations which located inside the areas of interest determined by analysis of the spatial distribution of all fixations (both regular and return ones) had maximal density and duration as compared with the other image regions. Finally, the volunteers with dominant focal viewing scan-paths had a higher probability of return fixations than those with scanning trajectories (0,09±0,003 and 0,05±0,006). On the base of the obtained results, the opportunity to estimate the dominant component of visual attention during the current stage of the dynamic process of image viewing and prospective studies of return fixations have been discussed.
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download