Climate change has verified moveable effect in different part of the world, its effect is severe in the developing countries. The adaptation and production of the crops highly affected due to climate change i.e. the ambient weather factors are becoming beyond the suitability ranges. Here, it focuses on the effects of rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations, rising temperature, and changes in precipitation and their interaction on plant growth, development and yield. Therefore, this paper is aimed at reviewing the response of cereal crops to the changing of climate. The existing knowledge sources demonstrated climate change has negative impacts on cereal crops production and productivity. While in some cases these responses are variable within and between species and are dependent on developmental stage. Variability also exists between C3 and C4 species in response to elevated CO2, especially in terms of growth and seed yield stimulation. C3 plants will benefit more than C4 plants at elevated CO2. However, if global warming will take place, an increase in temperature may offset the benefits of increasing CO2 on crop yield. The difference in responses of different crops to elevated CO2 might be due to difference in water, soil, nutrient availability and temperature variation. It concludes that there is a need for further research regarding the weather and climate variability and change together within a specific region.
| Published in | Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering (Volume 8, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.abb.20200804.11 |
| Page(s) | 63-72 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Climate Change, Cereal Crops, Adaptation, Elevated [CO2], Crop Yield
| [1] | Ainsworth EA and Long SP, What have we learned from 15 years of free air CO2 enrichment. A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2. New Phytol 165: 2005, 351–371. |
| [2] | Albert KR, Ro-Poulsen H, Mikkelsen TN, Michelsen A, van der Linden L, Beier C. Interactive effects of elevated CO2, warming, and drought on photosynthesis of Deschampsia flexuosa in a temperate heath ecosystem. J Exp Bot 62: 2011, 4253–4266. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err133. |
| [3] | Alexandrov, V. A., & Hoogenboom, G., Vulnerability and Adaptation Assessments of Agricultural Crops under Climate Change in the South eastern USA; theor. Appl. Climatol. 67, 2000, 45-63. |
| [4] | Baldocchi D, Wong S., Accumulated winter chill is decreasing in the fruit growing regions of California. Clim Chang 87 (1): 2008, 153–166. |
| [5] | Barlow, K. M., Christy, B. P., O’ Leary, G. J., Riffkin, P. A., Nuttall, J. G., Simulating the impact of extreme heat and frost events on wheat crop production: a review. Field Crops Res. 171, 2015, 109–119. |
| [6] | Barnabas B, Jager K, Feher A., The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereal. Plant, Cell and Environment 31, 2008, pp 11–38. |
| [7] | Bill and Gates, Sustainable Agriculture, Food Security and Nutrition in the Post-2015 Framework, Bill and Gates Foundation. Discussion paper. 2014, pp 4-8. |
| [8] | Blum A., Crop responses to drought and the interpretation of adaptation. Plant Growth Regul 20: 1996, 135–148. |
| [9] | Bodner G, Nakhforoosh, Kaul HP, Management of crop water under drought: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 35: 2015, 401–442. |
| [10] | Cereals; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cereals [Accessed 20th December, 2014. |
| [11] | Crafts-Brandner SJ, Salvucci ME, Sensitivity of photosynthesis in a C4 plant, maize, to heat stress. Plant Physiol 129: 2002, pp 1773–1780. |
| [12] | Derner, J. D., Johnson, H. B., Kimball, B. A., Pinter Jr, P. J., Polley, H. W., Tischler, C. R., Bouttons, T. W., LaMorte, R. L., Wall, G. W., Adam, N. R., Leavitt, S. W., Ottman, M. J., Matthias, A. D., Brooks, T. J., Above-and below-ground responses of C3-C4 species mixtures to elevated CO2 and soil water availability. Global Change Biology 9, 2003, pp 452–460. |
| [13] | Drake, B. G., Gonzalez-Meler, M. A., & Long, S. P. More efficient plants: A consequence of rising atmospheric CO2? Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 48, 1997, pp 609–639. |
| [14] | Erbs M, Manderscheid R, Jansen G, Seddig S, Pacholski A., Effects of free-air CO2 enrichment and nitrogen supply on grain quality parameters and elemental composition of wheat and barley grown in crop rotation. Agric Ecosyst Environ 136: 2010. 59–68. |
| [15] | Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), Production year book Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations, Rome, Italy 51: 2005, p 209. |
| [16] | FAO, IFAD and WFP, The State of Food Insecurity in the World; The multiple dimensions of food security. Rome, FAO, 2013. |
| [17] | Ferris, R., Ellis, R. H., Wheeler, T. R., Hadley, P., Effect of high temperature stress at anthesis on grain yield and biomass of field grown crops of wheat. Ann. Bot. 82, 1998, pp 631–639. |
| [18] | Flexas J, Bota J, Galme´ s J, Medrano H, Ribas-Carbo´ M., Keeping a positive carbon balance under adverse conditions: responses of photosynthesis and respiration to water stress. Physiologia Plantarum 127, 2006a, pp 343–352. |
| [19] | Francesco N. Tubiello, Jean-Francois Soussana, and S. Mark Howden, Crop and pasture response to climate change. The National Academy of Sciences of the USA. vol. 104, no 50, 2007, pp 19686–19690. |
| [20] | Ghannoum, O.; Evans, J. R. & von Caemmerer, S., Nitrogen and water use efficiency of C4 plants. In: Raghavendra, A. S. & Sage, R. S. (Eds.) C4 Photosynthesis and Related CO2 Concentrating Mechanisms, Springer Science Business Media B. V., Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011, pp. 129-146. |
| [21] | Glover J, Johnson H, Lizzio J, Wesley V, Hattersley P, Knight C., Australia’s crops and pastures in a changing climate can biotechnology help? Australian Government Bureau of Rural Sciences, Canberra, 2008. |
| [22] | Gray, S. B., Siebers, M., Locke, A. M., Rosenthal, D. R., Strellner, R. S., Paul, R. E., Klein, S. P., Bernacchi, C. J., A. D. B., Intensifying drought eliminates the expected benefits of elevated CO2 for soybean. Nat. Plants. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NPLANTS.2016.132, 2016. |
| [23] | Griffin JG, Thomas GR, Mason-Pharr D., Heat and drought influence photosynthesis, water relations, and soluble carbohydrates of two ecotypes of redbud (Cercis Canadensis). J Am Soc Hort Sci 129 (4): 2004), pp 497–502. |
| [24] | Hamayun M, Sohn EY, Khan SA, Shinwari ZK, Khan AL, Lee IJ., Silicon alleviates the adverse effects of salinity and drought stress on growth and endogenous plant growth hormones of soybean (Glycine max L.). Pak J Bot 42: 2010, pp 1713–1722. |
| [25] | Hamilton, E. W.; Heckathorn, S. A.; Joshi, P.; Wang, D. & Barua, D., Interactive Effects of Elevated CO2 and Growth Temperature on the Tolerance of Photosynthesis to Acute Heat Stress in C3 and C4 Species. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology Vol. 50 (11): 2008, pp 1375–1387. |
| [26] | IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) Climate Change: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Contribution of WG II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK), 2007. |
| [27] | IPCC, Climate Change: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability, Contribution of WG II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, UK), 2012. |
| [28] | IPCC, Climate Change: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R. K. Pachauri and L. A. Meyer (Eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 2014, p 151. |
| [29] | Jerry L. Hatfield, John H. Prueger, Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather and Climate Extremes 10, 2015, pp 4–10. |
| [30] | Khodarahmpour Z., Effect of drought stress induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG) on germination indices in corn (Zea mays L.) hybrids. Afr J Biotechnol 10: 2011, pp 18222–18227. |
| [31] | Kimball, B. A., Kobayashi, K., Bindi, M., Responses of agricultural crops to free-air CO2 enrichment. Advances in Agronomy 77, 2002, pp 293–368. |
| [32] | Long SP, Ainsworth EA, Leakey ADB, Nösberger J, Ort DR, Food for thought: lower-than-expected crop yield stimulation with rising CO2 concentrations. Science 312: 2006, 1918–1921. |
| [33] | Luigi G, Colin K, Cary F., Food security and Climate Change in Dry Area. Conference Preceding. https://icardablog.files.wordpress.com/2011/04/foodsecurityandclimat echange1.pdf, 2010. |
| [34] | Matsui, T., Omasa, K., Horie, T., The difference in sterility due to high temperatures during the flowering period among Japonica rice varieties. Plant Prod. Sci. 4, 2001, pp 90–93. |
| [35] | Meena A, Leishman MR, Downey PO., Exotic C4 grasses have increased tolerance to glyphosate under elevated carbon dioxide. Weed Sci 59: 2015, pp 28–36. |
| [36] | Mohammed, A. and Tarpley, L., High nighttime temperatures affect rice productivity through altered pollen germination and spikelet fertility. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 149 (6): 2009, pp 999-1008. |
| [37] | Myers, S. S., Zanobetti, A., Kloog, I., Huybers, P., Leakey, A. D. B., Bloom, A. J., Carlisle, E., Dietterich, L. H., Fitzgerald, G., Increasing CO2 threatens human nutrition. Nature 510, 2014, pp 139–142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature13179. |
| [38] | Nowak RS, Ellsworth DS, Smith SD., Elevated CO2 effects on plant carbon, nitrogen and water relations: six important lessons from FACE. Journal of Experimental Botany Vol. 60: 2859–2876. Losers and functional groups. New Phytologist Vol. 157: 2004, pp 175–198. |
| [39] | Olesen, J. E., Bindi, M., Consequences of climate change for European agricultural productivity, land use and policy. Eur. J. Agron. 16, 2002, pp 239–262. |
| [40] | Pace PF, Crale HT, El-Halawany SHM, Cothren JT, Senseman SA., Drought induced changes in shoot and root growth of young cotton plants. J Cotton Sci 3: 1999, pp 183–187. |
| [41] | Hatfield JL, Prueger JH ExtremesTemperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather and Climate Extremes 10: 2015, pp 4-10. |
| [42] | Peng, S.; Huang, J.; Sheehy, J. E.; Laza, R. C.; Visperas, R. M.; Zhong, X.; Centenso, G. S.; Khush, G. S.; Cassman, K. G. Rice yields decline with higher night temperature from global warming. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, |
| [43] | Pooter, H. & Navas, M. L. Plant growth and competition at elevated CO2, 2003. |
| [44] | Qaderi, M. M., & Reid D. M., Crop Responses to Elevated Carbon dioxide and Temperature (chp1), In Singh S. N., (ed.), Climate Change and Crops, Environmental Science and Engineering, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-88246-61, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. 2009. |
| [45] | Rahman, M. T., Islam, M. T., Islam, M. O. Effect of waterstress at different growth stages on yield and yield contributing characters of transplanted Aman rice. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 5 (2): 2002, pp 169-172. |
| [46] | Stone P., The effects of heat stress on cereal yield and quality. In AS Basra, ed, Crop Responses and Adaptations to Temperature Stress. Food Products Press, Binghamton, NY, 2001, pp 243–291. |
| [47] | Taub DR, Miller B, Allen H., Effects of elevated CO2 on the protein concentration of food crops: a meta-analysis. Glob Change Biol 14: 2008, 565–575. |
| [48] | Thomas, A., Agricultural irrigation demand under present and future climate scenarios in China. Global and Planetary Change 60, 2008, pp 306–326. |
| [49] | Trenberth KE, Jones PD, Ambenje P, Bojariu R, Easterling D, Klein TankA, Parker D, Rahimzadeh F, Renwick JA, Rusticucci M, Soden B, Zhai P., Observations: surface and atmospheric climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2007. |
| [50] | Tubiello, F. N., Ewert, F., Simulating the effects of elevated CO2 on crops: approaches and applications for climate change. European Journal of Agronomy 18, 2002, pp 57–74. |
| [51] | Tuong TP, Bouman BAM., Rice production in water-scarce environments. In: Kijne JW, Barker R, Molden D (eds) Water productivity in agriculture: limits and opportunities for improvements. CABI Publishing: 2003, 53–67. |
| [52] | Ugarte C, Calderini DF, Slafer GA., Grain weight and grain number responsiveness to preanthesis temperature in wheat, barley and triticale. Field Crops Res 100: 2007, 240–248. |
| [53] | Uprety D. C., Sen S., & Dwivedi N., Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide on grain quality in crop plants: physiol Mol Biol Plants, 2010. |
| [54] | USDA (United States Department of Agriculture). (n.d.). Foreign Agricultural Service, Global Agricultural Service Network Reports. http://gain.fas.usda.gov. (accessed 11.9.2014). |
| [55] | Vahid Mollasadeghi and Samaneh Elyasi, A Study of Drought Stress effect on Physiological and Morphological traits of Wheat. Bull. Env. Pharmacol. Life Sci., Vol 3, 9: 2014, pp 137-140. |
| [56] | Waha, K., Müller, C., Bondeau, A., Dietrich, J. P., Kurukulasuriya, P., Heinke, J., Lotze- Campen, H., Adaptation to climate change through the choice of cropping system and sowing date in sub-Saharan Africa. Global Environmental Change 23, 2013, 130–143. |
| [57] | Wheeler, T. R., Craufurd, P. Q., Ellis, R. H., Porter, J. R., Vara Prasad, P. V., Temperature variability and the annual yield of crops. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 82, 2000, pp 159–167. |
| [58] | Wilkinson S, Mills G, Illidge R, Davies WJ., How is ozone pollution reducing our food supply? J Exp Bot 63: 2012, pp 527–536. |
| [59] | World Bank, Economics of Adaptation to Climate Change: Ethiopia. The World Bank, Washington, D. C. 2010. |
| [60] | Zargar M., Najafi H., Fakhri K., Mafakheri S., Sarajuoghi M., Agronomic evaluation of mechanical and chemical weed management for reducing use of herbicides in single vs. twin-row sugarbeet. Research on Crops 12: 2011, pp 173-178. |
| [61] | Zheng S, Nakamoto H, Yoshikawa K, Furuya T, Fukuyama M., Influences of high night temperature on flowering and pod setting in soybean. Plant Prod Sci 5 (3): 2002, 215–218. |
| [62] | Ziska LH, Blumenthal DM, Runion GB, Hunt ER, Diaz-Soltero H., Invasive species and climate change: an agronomic perspective. Climate Change 105: 2011, pp 13–42. |
APA Style
Arebu Hussen. (2020). Review on: Response of Cereal Crops to Climate Change. Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering, 8(4), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20200804.11
ACS Style
Arebu Hussen. Review on: Response of Cereal Crops to Climate Change. Adv. BioSci. Bioeng. 2020, 8(4), 63-72. doi: 10.11648/j.abb.20200804.11
AMA Style
Arebu Hussen. Review on: Response of Cereal Crops to Climate Change. Adv BioSci Bioeng. 2020;8(4):63-72. doi: 10.11648/j.abb.20200804.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.abb.20200804.11,
author = {Arebu Hussen},
title = {Review on: Response of Cereal Crops to Climate Change},
journal = {Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering},
volume = {8},
number = {4},
pages = {63-72},
doi = {10.11648/j.abb.20200804.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20200804.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.abb.20200804.11},
abstract = {Climate change has verified moveable effect in different part of the world, its effect is severe in the developing countries. The adaptation and production of the crops highly affected due to climate change i.e. the ambient weather factors are becoming beyond the suitability ranges. Here, it focuses on the effects of rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations, rising temperature, and changes in precipitation and their interaction on plant growth, development and yield. Therefore, this paper is aimed at reviewing the response of cereal crops to the changing of climate. The existing knowledge sources demonstrated climate change has negative impacts on cereal crops production and productivity. While in some cases these responses are variable within and between species and are dependent on developmental stage. Variability also exists between C3 and C4 species in response to elevated CO2, especially in terms of growth and seed yield stimulation. C3 plants will benefit more than C4 plants at elevated CO2. However, if global warming will take place, an increase in temperature may offset the benefits of increasing CO2 on crop yield. The difference in responses of different crops to elevated CO2 might be due to difference in water, soil, nutrient availability and temperature variation. It concludes that there is a need for further research regarding the weather and climate variability and change together within a specific region.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Review on: Response of Cereal Crops to Climate Change AU - Arebu Hussen Y1 - 2020/11/16 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20200804.11 DO - 10.11648/j.abb.20200804.11 T2 - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering JF - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering JO - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering SP - 63 EP - 72 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-4162 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20200804.11 AB - Climate change has verified moveable effect in different part of the world, its effect is severe in the developing countries. The adaptation and production of the crops highly affected due to climate change i.e. the ambient weather factors are becoming beyond the suitability ranges. Here, it focuses on the effects of rising atmospheric CO2 concentrations, rising temperature, and changes in precipitation and their interaction on plant growth, development and yield. Therefore, this paper is aimed at reviewing the response of cereal crops to the changing of climate. The existing knowledge sources demonstrated climate change has negative impacts on cereal crops production and productivity. While in some cases these responses are variable within and between species and are dependent on developmental stage. Variability also exists between C3 and C4 species in response to elevated CO2, especially in terms of growth and seed yield stimulation. C3 plants will benefit more than C4 plants at elevated CO2. However, if global warming will take place, an increase in temperature may offset the benefits of increasing CO2 on crop yield. The difference in responses of different crops to elevated CO2 might be due to difference in water, soil, nutrient availability and temperature variation. It concludes that there is a need for further research regarding the weather and climate variability and change together within a specific region. VL - 8 IS - 4 ER -
Information
Email: