Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Effect of NPS Rate and Rhizobium Inoculation on Yield and Yield Components of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgari L.) at Kellem Wollega Zone, Western Oromia, Ethiopia

Received: 11 November 2024     Accepted: 25 November 2024     Published: 23 December 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is one of the most important and widely cultivated pulse crops in most developing countries. However, its cultivation is constrained mainly by low soil fertility and lack of improved agronomic practices. The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of Rhizobium inoculation, NPS fertilizer rate, and their interaction effect on grain yield and yield components of common bean and to recommend the appropriate combination that can maximize the productivities of common bean in the study areas. Six levels of NPS rates (0, 50, 75, 100, 125 and 150 kg ha-1) and three levels of Rhizobium strains (un-inoculated, BH429 and BH-A-15) were laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications in factorial arrangement. The collected data were analyzed by SAS software. Main effect of rhizobium strain exerted significant effect on effective branch/plant, however, NPS levels significantly influenced days to 50% flowering, days to 90% maturity, nodule/plant, effective branch/plant, pod/plant and grain yield. The main effect of experimental location imposed significant effect on most of agronomic parameters including pod/plant and grain yield. Significantly higher mean grain yield was recorded at Haro Sabu Agricultural Research Center and Igu experimental locations compared to Sago, which had the lower mean value of grain yield. Application of NPS rate with rhizobium strain affected number of effective branch/planr, while the interaction of NPS rate with location influenced number of days to 90% maturity, effective branch/plant, pod/plant, seed/pod and grain yield. Significantly higher mean grain yield was obtained by applying 100, 125 and 150 Kg/ha of NPS at Haro Sabu Agricultural Research Center and Igu, by applying 125 and 150 Kg/ha of NPS at Sago. Based on partial budget analysis the highest net benefit (Birr 31792.34 ha-1) was obtained from combined application of 100 kg blended NPS ha-1 with un-inoculated strain which had 811% marginal rate of return. Hence, application of 100 kg NPS ha-1 without inoculation of the strain was recommended for common bean productivity enhancement in the study area.

Published in Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering (Volume 12, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.abb.20241204.12
Page(s) 81-92
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Grain Yield, NPS, Common Bean, Strain

1. Introduction
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is the third most important food legume, fodder and cover crops worldwide next to soybean and peanut . Nutritionally, common bean grains are rich in protein, carbohydrates, oil, fiber and sucrose . This crop also an important for economic and environmental benefit due to their association with nitrogen-fixing bacteria by contributing in sustainable agriculture . The ability of the fixing nitrogen (N) has raised the crop’s importance in terms of boosting soil fertility. The crops is suited for different cropping systems including crop rotation, intercropping, double cropping, relay cropping and mixed cropping with cereals . Farmers prefer the crop due to its fast maturing which allows households to earn additional cash income as a result of the possibility for double cropping .
Globally common beans production was 57,496,465 tons produced on 38,229,984 hectares . Recently, it is one of the most widely cultivated and most economically important food crops in Ethiopia . The majority of produced common beans were used for household consumption followed by sale, seed and feed and in-kind payment for wage. In Ethiopia, it was cultivated on about 281,083.49 hectares of land from white and red common bean, producing 4, 85,547.093 tons with the productivity of 1.73 tons ha−1 . The average yield of this crop is (1.48 tons) which is significantly less than the yield that most improved varieties can achieve under good management conditions (2.5–3.0 tons ha−1).
The lowering yield might due to poor agronomic techniques, such as insufficient soil fertility management lack of superior varieties for the different agro-ecological zones, and untimely and inappropriate field operations, could be the major contributing factors for low yield of the crop in Ethiopia particularly in Western and Kellem Wollega Zones Oromia . Among the limiting factors are edaphic and environmental factors that constrain bean production in most areas where the crop is grown include nitrogen and phosphorus deficiency, soil acidity that constraints bean production . Compared to the inorganic fertilizers, the use of bio-fertilizers is economical, eco-friendly, more efficient, productive and accessible to marginal and small holder farmers . In Ethiopia, however, bio-fertilizer is new technology and not widely used by the farmer but inoculants were selected and distributed to the farmers in few areas of the country. In comparison to other legume crops, common bean is widely recognized as a low N2 fixer . However, the response of common beans to inoculation can vary with legume genotypes and rhizobium strains environment and their interactions . Inoculations of legume crop with rhizobium strain certainly improve growth, nitrogen fixation, and enhance the yield potential in legumes.
Recently, some research conducted on inoculated common bean varieties under field conditions reported enhanced growth and yield . To present, no research has been undertaken on the response of common bean variety to NPS fertilizer rates and their combination with Rhizobium strains in western Oromia. Therefore, the study was initiated with the objectives to evaluate the effects of rhizobium inoculation and NPS fertilizer on yield and yield components of common bean and to recommend the appropriate rate of NPS fertilizer in combination with effective Rhizobium strains that can maximize the productivities of common bean in the study areas.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Description of the Study Area
The study was executed at HaroSabu, Igu (SadiChanka district), Sago (Lalo Kile district) of Kellem Wollega zone during 2020 and 2021 cropping season. Experimental locations were based on common bean potential for production. Description of the study area was presented in table 1. The soil type of the area is Nitisols which is characteristically reddish brown and soil textural class which is sandy loam with a pH that falls in the range of moderate acidic According to Horneck soil classification rating .
Table 1. Description of study area, initial soil physical and chemical characteristics (0–20 cm).

Soil parameters

Value

HSARC

Igu

Sago

Altitude

1558

1449

1629

Latitude

N-08052’40.904’’

N-08048’11.841’’

08055’28.797’’

Longitude

E-035013’56.039’’

E-035003’03.524’’

E-035018’30.689’’

pH (H20)

5.9

5.6

5.4

Total N

0.252

0.224

0.238

Available posphrus (ppm) or mg/kg of soil

1.12

1

0.7

Exchangeable acidity

0.32

0.32

1.44

Exchangeable Ca (meq/100 giram soil)

19.75

18.5

8.5

Exchangeable Mg (meq/100 giram soil)

3.25

3.0

9.5

Exchangeable Na (cmol/kg of soil)

0.217

0.196

0.13

Exchangeable K (cmol/kg of soil)

0.716

0.309

0.473

CEC (meq/100 giram soil)

16.9

22.7

17.7

Organic C

4.388

4.258

3.413

Soil texture

Clay loam

Clay

Clay

Source: Bedele Soil Research Center (BeARC), 2020
Figure 1. Map of the study area.
Similarly, the area has a warm humid climate with annual mean minimum and maximum temperatures of 14.860C and 29.6430C, respectively and it receives annual rainfall of (1996.72 mm) mainly from May to October with maximum precipitation in the month of July with rain fall mean (166.39 mm) (Figure 2).
The study area is located at mid to high land agro- ecological zone and encompassed by abundant natural vegetation. The agro climatic condition is known for its mixed crop- livestock farming system in which cultivation from cereals maize (Zea mays L), Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench), tef (Eragrostis tef Zucc), from pulse and oil crops, soybean (Glycine max (L.), common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), from spices and coffee, (Coffea arabica L), hot pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), from horticulture banana (Mussa spp), and the others crops are the major crops.
Figure 2. Annual men Rainfall and Temperature (Tmin and Tmax) of HSARC.
Y-axis =Rainfall, X axis = Months of the year. Source: Ethiopian Meteorology
2.2. Experimental Materials
Newly released common bean variety (Haro Sabu-1) was used. The variety was released by Haro Sabu Agricultural Research Center (HSARC) during 2020. Haro Sabu-1 variety has an indeterminate growth habit and red seed color. The yield potential of Haro Sabu-1 variety was 20.1-21.17 and 17.92-18.65 Q/ha on research and farmers field, respectively. NPS fertilizer was obtained from Haro Sabu Agricultural Research Center. Rhizobium strains namely, BH429 and BH-A-15 were obtained from Holeta Agricultural Research Center, Soil Microbiology Laboratory (HARC)
2.3. Treatments and Experimental Design
Treatments were comprised of two factors, namely; three levels of Rhizobium strains (un-inoculated, BH429 and BH-A-15) and six levels of NPS rates (0, 50, 75, 100, 125 and 150 kg ha-1). The treatment was arranged as 3 x 6 in factorial combinations in RCBD with three replications. Eighteen (18) treatment combinations were used. The gross plot comprised of six rows of 3 m length (6 × 0.4 m × 3 m = 7.2 m2) and the central four rows (4 × 0.4 m × 3 m = 4.8 m2) were used for data collection as net plot.
2.4. Experimental Procedures
The experimental land was cleared and ploughed by tractor, disked and leveled by hands. Lime was applied and thoroughly mixed a month before plantation based on composite soil sample results, and field layout was arranged. Carrier based inoculants of each strain was applied at the rate of 10 g inoculants per kg of seed . The inoculants were mixed by sugar with the addition of some water in order to facilitate the adhesion of the strain on the seed. To ensure that the applied inoculants stick to the seed, the required quantities of inoculants were suspended in 1:1 ratio in 10% sugar solution. The thick slurry of the inoculants was gently mixed with the dry seeds so that all the seeds received a thin coating of the inoculants.
To maintain the viability of the cells, inoculation was done under the shade and allowed to air dry for 30 minutes and sown at the recommended spacing. Seeds were immediately covered with soil after sowing to avoid death of cells due to the sun’s radiation. A plot with un-inoculated seeds was planted first to avoid contamination. The seeds were planted at spacing of 40 cm and 10 cm between rows and within rows, respectively. The spacing between blocks and plots were 1.5 m and 1 m, respectively. Two seeds were sown per hill and then thinned to one plant after seedling establishment. All other management practices were done as per the recommendations.
2.5. Data Collection
Major crop data collected during experimentation include; days to flowering, days to maturity, stand count at harvesting, plant height at harvesting, number of effective branch/pod, number of seed/pod, nodule number, hundred seed weight and harvesting index following procedures developed in common bean descriptor. Soil data were collected from at the depth of 20 cm from each experimental plot following the procedures developed for this purposes. The collected soil data were submitted to soil laboratory for further analysis of important soil physico-chemical characters analysis.
2.6. Data Analysis
The collected data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) which fit factorial experiment in randomized complete block design (RCBD) according to the General Linear Model (GLM) procedures of SAS version 9.0. Results were interpreted following the procedures developed by . Based on the significance detected from ANOVA, treatment means were compared by deploying Least Significant Difference (LSD) at 5% probability test.
2.7. Partial Budget Analysis
The economically acceptable treatment(s) were determined by partial budget analysis to estimate the gross value of the grain yield by using the adjusted yield at the market value of the grain and inputs during the cropping period. Only total variable costs that varied (TCV) were used to compute costs. Current prices of common bean, inoculants, NPS fertilizer and application cost of inoculants and NPS fertilizer were considered as variable with their cost.
To estimate economic parameters, common bean yield was valued at an average open market price of 30 Birr/kg. Cost of land preparation, field management, harvest, transportation and storage were not included in the analysis as they were not variable. To equate the common bean grain yield with what a farmer would get, the obtained yield was adjusted downward by 10%. Both the costs and benefits were converted to monetary values in Ethiopian Birr (ETB) and reported per hectare. Treatments net benefits (NB) and Total variable cost (TCV) were compared using dominance analysis following the two steps described below. The first step was calculation of the NB as shown in the formula below as suggested by CIMMYT ;
NB=(GYxP)–TCV
where GY x P = Gross Field Benefit (GFB), GY = Adjusted Grain yield per hectare and P = Field price per unit of the crop.
Secondly, treatments TCV were listed in increasing order in accordance with dominance analysis. All treatments which had NB less than or equal to treatment with lower TCV were marked with a letter “D” since they were dominated and eliminated from any further analysis. Un-dominated treatments were subjected to Marginal Rate of Return (MRR) analysis in stepwise manner, moving from lower TCV to the next as shown below:
MRR(%)=Change in NB (NBb - NBa)Change in TCV (TCVb - TCVa) ×100
Where NBa = NB with the immediate lower TCV, NBb = NB with the next higher TCV, TCVa = the immediate lower TCV and TCVb = the next highest TCV.
For investments that require change in the use of technology, minimum rate of return of ≥ 100% is acceptable to farmers (CIMMYT, 1988). Marginal Rate of Return, which refers to net income obtained by incurring a unit cost of inoculants and NPS fertilizer were calculated by dividing the net increase in yield of common bean due to application of each rate to the total cost of inoculants and NPS fertilizer applied at each rate. This enables to compare the economic feasibility of the treatments used.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Analysis of Variance
Analysis of variance showed significant main effect of NPS rate on all agronomic parameters except for days to 50% flowering, harvesting index and hundred seed weight. Rhizobium strain significantly affected days to 90% maturity only, while the experimental location significantly influenced all parameters excluding seed/pod and harvesting index (Table 2). Interaction of NPS*Location imposed significant effect on days to 90% maturity, effective branch/plant, pod/plant and seed/pod (Table 2). Location*Year exerted significant effect on days to 50% flowering, nodule/plant, plant height, harvesting index, hundred seed weight and grain yield (Table 2).
Table 2. Analysis of variance for grain yield and yield components of common bean.

Source of variation

DF

DFG

DM

NN

PH

EBPP

NPS

5.00

1.54

14.88**

1982.92*

2655.94**

16.46**

Strain

2.00

5.68

7.10*

987.61

474.64

5.26

Rep

2.00

17.69

5.33*

11504.25*

76.02

14.31

Location

2.00

117.44**

1221.82**

152211.55**

3098.01**

116.76**

Year

1.00

37.35**

11.48**

841.64

67964.49**

22.09*

NPS*Strain

10.00

1.75

1.41

735.48

298.68

10.14

NPS*location

4.00

1.35

15.03**

763.86

528.20

9.81*

NPS*Year

5.00

1.04

0.68

616.66

709.74

1.72

Strain*Location

4.00

0.97

3.00

431.74

318.31

4.17

Strain*Year

2.00

0.06

1.43

435.99

343.67

1.25

Location*Year

2.00

125.38**

4.28

19892.39**

3397.44*

4.77

NPS*Strain*Location*Year

64.00

0.65

1.26

651.01

392.20

3.46

Error

3.13

1.47

1617.09

433.35

4.04

Source of variation

DF

PPP

SPP

GY

HI

HSW

NPS

5.00

73.91**

1.27*

2341538.61**

2209.26**

1.79

Strain

2.00

3.00

0.95

40916.91

1574.60

1.23

Rep

2.00

29.59**

0.46

380819.80*

2209.57

4.48*

Location

2.00

138.41**

0.34

131762.44*

471.25

65.71**

Year

1.00

4266.27**

24.39**

28075515.20**

367.89

12.56*

NPS*Strain

10.00

2406.99

8.70

0.39

0.63

53357.82

NPS*Location

4.00

2213.34*

12.54*

0.25*

1.11

77527.93

NPS*Year

5.00

6.85

10.61*

0.37

2.92*

145996.73*

Strain*Location

4.00

1959.08

5.66

0.30

0.35

38378.06

Strain*Year

2.00

3.02

2.07

0.03

0.51

9243.28

Location*Year

2.00

1549.88

23.88*

10.95**

10.89**

797823.23**

NPS*Strain*Location*Year

64.00

671.47

5.05

0.55

0.92

31395.04

Error

1158.23

4.79

0.53

0.91

43167.79

DF-=degree of freedom, DFG= days to 50% flowering, DM= days to 90% phsilogical maturity, NN=number of nodule per plan, PH=plant height (cm), EBPP=effective branch perplant
3.2. Phenological Parameters
Days to 90% maturity (DM): Main effect of NPS rate and rhizobium strain exerted significant effect on days to 90% maturity (Table 2). Significantly higher mean (DM) was recorded by applying 150 and 125 Kg/ha. Inversely, utilization of NPS at the rate of 0 and 50 Kg/ha showed significantly lower days to 90% maturity (Table 3). Increasing NPS rate from 0 to 150 kg/ha prolonged the number of days required to reach 90% maturity. The result also manifested that decreasing the rate from 150-0 kg/ha significantly contributed to earlier maturity (Table 3). Application of BH-A-15 gave significantly longer (DM) compared to BH429 (Table 3). The possible reason for delayed maturity with BH-A-15 rhizobium inoculation might be due to inoculation enhanced nitrogen fixation and thereby increasing N uptake by plants which elongated the vegetative growth of common bean and delayed maturity. The finding of present study was in agreement with Deresa , who reported significant NPS fertilizer rate on phonological parameters of common bean. Additionally, earlier researchers reported the prolonged phonological traits with rhizobium inoculation in common bean.
Table 3. Main effect of rhizobium strains and NPS on days to flowering, days to maturity, nodule/plant, plant height, effective branch/plant.

Treatment

Days to flowering

Days to maturity

Nodule/plant

Plant height

Effective branch/plant

Inoculation

Un-inoculated

40.03a

88.06ab

72.39a

44.19a

4.67a

BH-A-15

39.69a

88.26a

78.22a

43.63a

5.02a

BH429

40.12a

87.75b

73.89a

47.51a

4.61a

LSD (0.05)

NS

*

NS

NS

NS

NPS rate (kg ha-1)

0

39.85a

87.48c

65.17b

33.42c

4.21c

50

40.09a

87.37c

73.76ab

42.24b

4.37bc

75

39.76a

88.11b

80.17ab

44.23b

4.63bc

100

40.15a

88.02b

82.27a

53.88a

5.75a

125

40.04a

88.43ab

75.12ab

49.14ab

4.64bc

150

39.78a

88.72a

72.56ab

47.76ab

5.01ab

LSD

NS

*

*

*

**

3.3. Grain Yield and Yield Components
Nodule number/plant (NNP): NPS rate significantly influenced number of nodule/plant (Table 2). Significantly higher and lower mean of (NNP) was recorded from 100 and 0 Kg/ha of NPS, respectively (Table 3). This result was in accordance with the study of Nuru et al. (2020), who reported significant NPS fertilizer effect on common bean nodulation.
Plant height (PH): Experimental location and NPS fertilizer rate imposed significant effect on plant height (Table 2). Application of 100 Kg/ha of NPS fertilizer rate resulted into the maximum PH, and conversely, unfertilized treatment (0 Kg/ha of NPS) showed lowest mean of PH (Table 3). Conversely, Non-significant main effect of NPS and interaction effect of NPS with variety on plant height of common bean was reported by Deressa , which was most probably in line with the present study.
Number of effective branch/plant (EBPP): EBPP was significantly affected by the main effect of NPS fertilizer rate and interaction of rhizobium*NPS fertilizer rate (Table 2). Hence, the application of 100 kg/ha of NPS resulted into the higher mean effective branch/plant, while unfertilized treatment revealed significantly lower mean of EBPP (Table 3). Significantly higher (EBPP) was recorded from combined effect of BH-A-15 strain with 100 kg/ha of NPS fertilizer, however, significantly lower (EBPP) was recorded from combined effect of BH-A-15 with 0 kg/ha (Table 4).
Table 4. Interaction effect of Rhizobium strain*NPS rate on number of effective branch/plant.

Rhizobium strain

NPS Rates (kg ha-1)

0

50

75

100

125

150

Un-inoculated

4.22bc

4.43bc

4.74bc

5.01b

4.48bc

5.03b

BH-A-15

3.72c

4.53bc

4.47bc

7.64a

4.67bc

5.09b

BH429

4.69bc

4.13bc

4.69bc

4.51bc

4.77bc

4.9bc

Harvesting Index (HI %): Main effect of NPS fertilizer rate exerted highly significant effect on harvesting index (Table 2). Harvest index is useful in measuring nutrient partitioning in crop plants, which provides an indication of how efficiently the plant utilized acquired nutrients for grain production . Presently, significantly higher mean of harvesting index (HI) was computed by applying 125 kg/ha of NPS, whereas the significantly lowest (HI) was recorded from Zero and 50 kg/ha of NPS fertilizer rate (Table 5).
Table 5. Main effect of rhizobium strains and NPS fertilizer rates on harvesting index, pod/plant, seed/pod, hundred seed weight and grain yield.

Treatment

Harvesting index

Pod/plant

Seed/pod

Grain yield

Inoculation

Un-inoculated

46.50a

9.69a

4.65a

978.99a

BH-A-15

53.19a

9.41a

4.63a

962.53a

BH429

46.65a

9.71a

4.47a

940.21a

LSD (0.05)

NS

NS

NS

NS

NPS rate (kg ha-1)

0

7.66d

7.66d

4.4b

585.78d

50

8.81c

8.81c

4.41b

901.64c

75

9.83b

9.83b

4.7a

959.39bc

100

10.18ab

10.18ab

4.64ab

1024.71b

125

10.87a

10.87a

4.78a

1146.71a

150

10.28ab

10.28ab

4.56ab

1145.24a

LSD (0.05)

**

**

*

**

CV (%)

19.77

22.77

15.94

21.63

Number of pod/plant (PPP): Main effect of NPS fertlizer rate, experimental location, and the interaction effect of NPS fertilizer rate *Location significantly (p<0.01) influenced pod/plant (Table 2). Significantly highest and lowest mean (PPP) was observed from applying 125 and 0 Kg/ha of NPS fertilizer, respectively. Maximum pod/ plant were recorded from 100, 125 and 150 Kg/ha of NPS fertilizer (Table 5). Regarding experimental location, significantly higher mean pod/plant was obtained at Haro Sabu Research Center followed by Igu location, while Sago location had the least pod/plant (Table 6). Earlier scientists; reported significant effect of P application on number of pod loading relative to unfertilized plot of common bean which was in line with present study. As interaction effect is concerned; significantly higher mean pod/plant was obtained due to 125 kg/ha of NPS fertilizer rate at HSARC, due to 100 and 125 kg/ha of NPS fertilizer at Igu and due to 75 kg/ha NPS at Sago (Table 7).
Table 6. Main effect of location on pod/plant and grain yield of Common bean.

Location

Pod/plant

Grain yield

HaroSabu

10.45a

986.78a

Igu

10.05a

974.03ab

Sago

8.32b

920.92b

LSD

0.59

55.73

Conversely, significantly lower mean PPP was recorded by applying 0 kg/ha of NPS fertilizer across the three locations, indicating some differential response of pod loading due to NPS fertilizer levels across experimental location (Table 7).
Number of seed/plant (SPP): Analysis of variance showed significant difference between NPS fertilizer rate for number of seed per pod (Table 2). Significantly highest mean (SPP) was obtained by applying 75 and 125 Kg/ha of NPS fertilizer rate, whereas applying 0 and 50 Kg/ha of NPS fertilizer resulted into significantly lower mean SPP (Table 5). This finding disagree with Nuru et al. (2020), who reported significantly higher mean (SPP) with application of 100 Kg/ha of NPS fertilizer, while the result supported the finding of who reported that number of seeds per pod was significantly (P<0.05) influenced by the interaction of common bean variety and P fertilizer rate.
Grain Yield (GY): The main effect of NPS fertilizer, experimental location, and the interaction of NPS*Location significantly (p<0.01 or p<0.05) influenced grain yield (Table 2). Significantly lower mean grain yield was obtained from 0 and 50 Kg/ha of NPS. Conversely, significantly higher mean grain yield was recorded by applying 125 and 150 Kg/ha of NPS (Table 5).
The variability of experimental location is most probably attributed either by soil fertility or potential difference for optimum bean production. With this, HSARC followed by Igu location showed significantly higher mean grain yield compared to Sago location which had poor grain yield (Table 6). This further indicates the higher yield potential of HSARC and Igu experimental locations. For interaction effect, significantly higher grain yield was found by applying 125 and 150 Kg/ha of NPS at HSARC and Igu locations consistently, and by applying 150 Kg/ha of NPS fertilizer at Sago.
On the contrary, significantly lower mean grain yield was recorded due to 0 and 50 Kg/ha of NPS at HSARC and Igu locations, and due to 0, 50 and 75 Kg/ha of NPS fertilizer at Sago location (Table 7). The final recommendation of NPS fertilizer rate of this finding depends on partial budget analysis. In accordance with this study, reported significant effect of P application on grain yield of common bean compared to unfertilized plots in their study.
Table 7. Interaction effect of NPS rate*Location on number of pod/plant and grain yield.

NPS (Kg/ha)

Pod/plant

Grain yield (Kg/ha

HSARC

IGU

Sago

HSARC

Igu

Sago

0

7.70c

5.07a

6.66b

572.13d

678.22c

506.98e

50

8.6c

5.4a

8.5a

841.92c

951.29b

911.7cd

75

10.4b

5.36a

9.14a

1027.99b

976.95b

873.23d

100

11.32ab

5.57a

8.47a

1026.08b

1035.98ab

1012.07bc

125

12.88a

5.52a

8.59a

1260.3a

1101.89a

1077.93ab

150

11.79ab

5.31a

8.56a

1192.24a

1099.87a

1143.63a

LSD

1.58

0.6

1.56

161.47

117.08

118.46

3.4. Partial Budget Analysis
Partial budget analysis of the net benefits, total costs that vary and marginal rate of returns are presented in (Table 8). Information on costs and benefits of treatments is a prerequisite for adoption of technical innovation for farmers. As indicated in (Table 8), the partial budget analysis showed that the highest net benefit (Birr 31792.34 ha-1) was recorded at the rate of application of 100 kg blended NPS ha-1 with un-inoculated strain followed by 75 kg blended NPS ha-1 with un-inoculated strain (Birr 29183.01 ha-1), whereas the lowest net benefit (Birr 18975.6 ha-1) was recorded from zero fertilizer application and un-inoculated strain. According to CIMMYT (28) suggestion, the minimum acceptable marginal rate of return should be more than 100%. Thus, application of 100 kg ha-1 of blended fertilizer with un-inoculated strain gave the maximum economic benefit (Birr 31792.34 ha-1) with marginal rate of return (811%) as presented in (Table 8). Therefore, on economic grounds, application of 100 kg NPS ha-1 without inoculation of the strain would be best and economical for production of common bean in the study area and other areas with similar agro-ecological conditions.
Table 8. Partial budget and marginal rate of return analysis.

Treatment

Yield

Income

cost

NB (ETB/ha)

MRR (%)

NPS rates

R Strain

UGY kg/ha

AGY

GFB (ETB/ha)

NPS cost

app cost

TVC (ETB/ha)

0

0

702.8

632.52

18975.6

0

0

0

18975.6

0

BH429

784.26

705.83

21175.02

0

0

0

21175.02

0

BH15

727.33

654.59

19637.91

0

0

0

19637.91

50

0

1116.83

1005.15

30154.41

1250

900

2150

28004.41

389.14

50

BH429

1121.87

1009.68

30290.49

1250

900

2150

28140.49

50

BH15

1136.78

1023.10

30693.06

1250

900

2150

28543.06

75

0

1183.63

1065.27

31958.01

1875

900

2775

29183.01

102.392

75

BH429

1248.48

1123.63

33708.96

1875

900

2775

30933.96

75

BH15

1092.54

983.29

29498.58

1875

900

2775

26723.58

100

0

1303.42

1173.08

35192.34

2500

900

3400

31792.34

811.00

100

BH429

1153.46

1038.11

31143.42

2500

900

3400

27743.42

100

BH15

1300.43

1170.39

35111.61

2500

900

3400

31711.61

125

0

1137.36

1023.62

30708.72

3125

900

4025

26683.72

D

125

BH429

1274.82

1147.34

34420.14

3125

900

4025

30395.14

125

BH15

1329.92

1196.93

35907.84

3125

900

4025

31882.84

150

0

1281.85

1153.67

34609.95

3750

900

4650

29959.95

D

150

BH429

1164.62

1048.16

31444.74

3750

900

4650

26794.74

150

BH15

1227.95

1105.16

33154.65

3750

900

4650

28504.65

Where, UGY = Unadjusted grain yield; AGY = adjusted grain yield; GFB = gross field benefit; TVC = total variable costs; NB = net benefit, MRR = marginal rate of return; ETB ha-1 = Ethiopian Birr per hectare; D = dominated treatments. Cost of NPS fertilizer = Birr 25 kg-1, The labour cost for application of NPS (12 persons ha-1, each 75 ETB day-1), Market price of common bean grain = 30 Birr kg-1
4. Conclusions and Recommendations
Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production has been practiced at Kellem Wollega Zone, Western Oromia, and Ethiopia. However, the average yield is below the potential yield of the crop. The major yield limitation are decline soil fertility and lack of improved agronomic practices is concern for most parts of Ethiopia. It is yield potential exploitation depends on different edaphic factors including inorganic fertilizer and Bioferilizer application. The study was conducted at Haro Sabu Agricultural Research Center, Sago and Igu during (2020 and 2021) the main cropping season in western Oromia, Ethiopia.
However, the response of the crop to these fertilizers may vary in different soil types. In present study, grain yield and most of yield related parameters were significantly affected by the main effect of NPS fertilizer rate and experimental locations. Increasing the rate of NPS fertilizer rate from zero to 150 kg/ha resulted into the prolonged phonological parameters including days to maturity. On the other hands, significantly higher mean value was recorded by applying 125 and 150 kg/ha of NPS fertilizer for grain yield, 125 kg/ha of NPS fertilizer for pod/plant, and 125 and 150 Kg/ha of NPS fertilizer for seed/pod. This study found poor effect of rhizobium strain on most of agronomic parameters which might be resulted from either low adaptability of the strain or low soil acidity of the experimental locations. Significantly higher mean value of pod/plant, seed/pod and grain yield/ha was obtained at HSARC and Igu experimental locations compared to Sago location which had the least mean value for these parameters. This further illustrates the common bean production potential difference of the experimental locations.
With the interaction effect; significantly higher mean value of effective branch/plant was recorded from combined effect of BH-A-15 strain with 100 kg/ha of NPS fertilizer. Besides, significantly higher mean value of grain yield was recorded at HSARC and Igu locations with application of 125 and 150 Kg/ha of NPS fertilizer consistently. Partial budget analysis showed highest net benefit (Birr 31792.34 ha-1) from combined application of 100 kg blended NPS ha-1 fertilizer with un-inoculated strain which had 811% marginal rate of return. Therefore, application of 100 kg NPS ha-1 without inoculation of the strain was recommended for common bean production and productivity improvement in the experimental locations and in similar agroecolgy.
Abbreviations

HSARC

Haro Sabu Agricultural Research Center

Acknowledgments
Oromia Agricultural Research Institute funded this research work at Haro-sabu Agricultural Research Center. Our acknowledgment extends to pulse and oil crops technology generation team members for their dedication during trial management and data collection.
Author Contributions
Lemesa Emisha: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Dereje Abera: Resources, Supervision, Formal Analysis, Validation, Writing – review & editing
Hambisa Fayisa: Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Kebede, E., 2020. Grain legumes production and productivity in Ethiopian smallholder agricultural system, contribution to livelihoods and the way forward. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 6(1): 1722353.
[2] Baligar, V. C. and Fageria, N. K., 2007. Agronomy and physiology of tropical cover crops. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 30(8): 1287-1339.
[3] Dalton, T. J., Cardwell, K., Katsvairo, T. and Park, I., 2012. External Evaluation Report on the Peanut Collaborative Research Support Program: A Report Submitted to the Bureau of Food Security, USAID.
[4] Hayat, I., Ahmad, A., Masud, T., Ahmed, A. and Bashir, S., 2014. Nutritional and health perspectives of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): an overview. Critical reviews in food science and nutrition, 54(5): 580-592.
[5] Fallahi, S. and Sharifi, P., 2020. Effect of nitrogen fixing bacteria and nitrogen rate on yield and growth of common bean. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 68(3): 491-496.
[6] Das, A., Thoithoi Devi, M., Babu, S., Ansari, M., Layek, J., Bhowmick, S. N., Yadav, G. S. and Singh, R., 2018. Cereal-legume cropping system in indian himalayan region for food and environmental sustainability. Legumes for soil health and sustainable management: 33-76.
[7] Berhanu Amsalu, KassayeNegash, TigistShiferaw, KidaneTumsa, Dagmawit Tsegaye, Rubyogo Jean Claude and Clare Mugisha Mukankusi. (2018). Progress of Common Bean Breeding and Genetics Research in Ethiopia. Ethiop. J. Crop Sci. Special Issue Vol. 6 No. 3.
[8] FAO. (2008). Food and agricultural organization: fertilizer and plant nutrition. Rome, Italy: Bulletin. FAO.
[9] Habtamu, A. K. (2017). genotype x environment x management interaction of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris l.) On acidic soils of Western Ethiopia. Msc. Thesis. Haramaya University.
[10] CSA (Central Statistical Agency), Agricultural Sample Survey, Area and Production of Major Crops, Private Holdings for the 2018/19, and (E. C.). Meher season, Addis Ababa Ethiopia, 2019.
[11] Amsal Tarekegne and Tanner, D., (2001). Effects of Fertilizer application on N and P uptake, recovery and use efficiency of bread wheat grown on two soil types in central Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Natural Resources.
[12] Martey, E., Wiredu, A. N., Etwire, P. M. and Kuwornu, J. K., 2019. The impact of credit on the technical efficiency of maize-producing households in Northern Ghana. Agricultural Finance Review, 79(3): 304-322.
[13] Alemitu, M., (2011). Factors affecting adoption of improved haricot bean varieties and associated agronomic practices in Dale Woreda, SNNPRS (Doctoral dissertation).
[14] Dibabe, A., (2000). Effect of fertiliser on the yield and nodulation pattern of Faba Bean on a Nitisols of Adet Northwestern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Natural Resources.
[15] Singh, R. J., Chung, G. H. and Nelson, R. L., (2007). Landmark research in legumes. Genome, 50(6): 525-537.
[16] Chekanai, V., Chikowo, R. and Vanlauwe, B., 2018. Response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to nitrogen, phosphorus and rhizobia inoculation across variable soils in Zimbabwe. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 266: 167-173.
[17] Beshir, B. and Nishikawa, Y., 2012. An assessment of farm household diverse common bean seed sources and the seed quality in Central Ethiopia. Tropical agriculture and Development, 56(3): 104-112.
[18] Giller, K. E., Franke, A. C., Abaidoo, R., Baijukya, F., Bala, A., Boahen, S., Dashiell, K., Kantengwa, S., Sanginga, J. M., Sanginga, N. and Simmons, A., (2013). N2Africa: putting nitrogen fixation to work for smallholder farmers in Africa. In Agro-ecological intensification of agricultural systems in the African highlands: 156-174. Routledge.
[19] Argaw, A., Mekonnen, E. and Muleta, D., (2015). Agronomic efficiency of N of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in some representative soils of Eastern Ethiopia. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 1(1), p. 1074790.
[20] Dabessa, A., Abebe, Z. and Bekele, S., (2018). Limitations and strategies to enhance biological nitrogen fixation in sub-humid tropics of Western Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology and Sustainable Development, 10(7), 122-131.
[21] Gunnabo, A. H., Geurts, R., Wolde-meskel, E., Degefu, T., Giller, K. E. and Van Heerwaarden, J., (2019). Genetic interaction studies reveal superior performance of Rhizobium tropici CIAT899 on a range of diverse East African common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) genotypes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 85(24): e01763-19.
[22] Samago, T. Y., Anniye, E. W. and Dakora, F. D., (2018). Grain yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties is markedly increased by rhizobia inoculation and phosphorus application in Ethiopia. Symbiosis, 75: 245-255.
[23] Rurangwa, E., Vanlauwe, B. and Giller, K. E., 2018. Benefits of inoculation, P fertilizer and manure on yields of common bean and soybean also increase yield of subsequent maize. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 261: 219-229.
[24] BARROS, R. L. N., De Oliveira, L. B., De Magalhaes, W. B. and Pimentel, C., (2018). Growth and yield of common bean as affected by seed inoculation with rhizobium and nitrogen fertilization. Experimental Agriculture, 54(1): 16-30.
[25] Horneck, D. A., Sullivan, D. M., Owen, J. S. and Hart, J. M., 2011. Soil test interpretation guide.
[26] Rice, W. A., Clayton, G. W., Lupwayi, N. Z. and Olsen, P. E., (2001). Evaluation of coated seeds as a Rhizobium delivery system for field pea. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 81(2): 247-253.
[27] Gomez, K. A., (1984). Statistical procedures for agricultural research. John New York: Wiley and Sons.
[28] Cimmyt, M. and Cimmyt, M., (1988). From agronomic data to farmer recommendations: An economics training manual. CIMMYT.
[29] Deresa, S., (2018). Response of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties to rates of blended NPS fertilizer in Adola district, Southern Ethiopia. African Journal of Plant Science, 12(8): 164-179.
[30] Verma, Jay Prakash, Janardan Yadav, Kavindra Nath Tiwari, and Ashok Kumar. "Effect of indigenous Mesorhizobium spp. and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on yields and nutrients uptake of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under sustainable agriculture." Ecological engineering 51(2013): 282-286.
[31] Nuru, S. T., 2020. Effect of blended NPS fertilizer and Rhizobium inoculation on yield components and yield of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties at mekdela district, south Wollo, Ethiopia. Acad. J. Res. Sci. Publishing, 2: 115-140.
[32] Yayis Rezene, Y. R., Fitsum Alemayehu, F. A., Fikadu Gurmu, F. G., Fisseha Negash, F. N., Bahilu Banteyirgu, B. B. and Yasin Goa, Y. G., 2015. Registration of'Ambericho'a newly released field pea (Pisum sativum L) variety for the southern highlands of Ethiopia.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Emisha, L., Abera, D., Fayisa, H. (2024). Effect of NPS Rate and Rhizobium Inoculation on Yield and Yield Components of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgari L.) at Kellem Wollega Zone, Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering, 12(4), 81-92. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20241204.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Emisha, L.; Abera, D.; Fayisa, H. Effect of NPS Rate and Rhizobium Inoculation on Yield and Yield Components of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgari L.) at Kellem Wollega Zone, Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Adv. BioSci. Bioeng. 2024, 12(4), 81-92. doi: 10.11648/j.abb.20241204.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Emisha L, Abera D, Fayisa H. Effect of NPS Rate and Rhizobium Inoculation on Yield and Yield Components of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgari L.) at Kellem Wollega Zone, Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Adv BioSci Bioeng. 2024;12(4):81-92. doi: 10.11648/j.abb.20241204.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.abb.20241204.12,
      author = {Lemesa Emisha and Dereje Abera and Hambisa Fayisa},
      title = {Effect of NPS Rate and Rhizobium Inoculation on Yield and Yield Components of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgari L.) at Kellem Wollega Zone, Western Oromia, Ethiopia
    },
      journal = {Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering},
      volume = {12},
      number = {4},
      pages = {81-92},
      doi = {10.11648/j.abb.20241204.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20241204.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.abb.20241204.12},
      abstract = {Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is one of the most important and widely cultivated pulse crops in most developing countries. However, its cultivation is constrained mainly by low soil fertility and lack of improved agronomic practices. The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of Rhizobium inoculation, NPS fertilizer rate, and their interaction effect on grain yield and yield components of common bean and to recommend the appropriate combination that can maximize the productivities of common bean in the study areas. Six levels of NPS rates (0, 50, 75, 100, 125 and 150 kg ha-1) and three levels of Rhizobium strains (un-inoculated, BH429 and BH-A-15) were laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications in factorial arrangement. The collected data were analyzed by SAS software. Main effect of rhizobium strain exerted significant effect on effective branch/plant, however, NPS levels significantly influenced days to 50% flowering, days to 90% maturity, nodule/plant, effective branch/plant, pod/plant and grain yield. The main effect of experimental location imposed significant effect on most of agronomic parameters including pod/plant and grain yield. Significantly higher mean grain yield was recorded at Haro Sabu Agricultural Research Center and Igu experimental locations compared to Sago, which had the lower mean value of grain yield. Application of NPS rate with rhizobium strain affected number of effective branch/planr, while the interaction of NPS rate with location influenced number of days to 90% maturity, effective branch/plant, pod/plant, seed/pod and grain yield. Significantly higher mean grain yield was obtained by applying 100, 125 and 150 Kg/ha of NPS at Haro Sabu Agricultural Research Center and Igu, by applying 125 and 150 Kg/ha of NPS at Sago. Based on partial budget analysis the highest net benefit (Birr 31792.34 ha-1) was obtained from combined application of 100 kg blended NPS ha-1 with un-inoculated strain which had 811% marginal rate of return. Hence, application of 100 kg NPS ha-1 without inoculation of the strain was recommended for common bean productivity enhancement in the study area.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effect of NPS Rate and Rhizobium Inoculation on Yield and Yield Components of Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgari L.) at Kellem Wollega Zone, Western Oromia, Ethiopia
    
    AU  - Lemesa Emisha
    AU  - Dereje Abera
    AU  - Hambisa Fayisa
    Y1  - 2024/12/23
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20241204.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.abb.20241204.12
    T2  - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering
    JF  - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering
    JO  - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering
    SP  - 81
    EP  - 92
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-4162
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20241204.12
    AB  - Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) is one of the most important and widely cultivated pulse crops in most developing countries. However, its cultivation is constrained mainly by low soil fertility and lack of improved agronomic practices. The experiment was conducted to evaluate the effects of Rhizobium inoculation, NPS fertilizer rate, and their interaction effect on grain yield and yield components of common bean and to recommend the appropriate combination that can maximize the productivities of common bean in the study areas. Six levels of NPS rates (0, 50, 75, 100, 125 and 150 kg ha-1) and three levels of Rhizobium strains (un-inoculated, BH429 and BH-A-15) were laid out in Randomized Complete Block Design with three replications in factorial arrangement. The collected data were analyzed by SAS software. Main effect of rhizobium strain exerted significant effect on effective branch/plant, however, NPS levels significantly influenced days to 50% flowering, days to 90% maturity, nodule/plant, effective branch/plant, pod/plant and grain yield. The main effect of experimental location imposed significant effect on most of agronomic parameters including pod/plant and grain yield. Significantly higher mean grain yield was recorded at Haro Sabu Agricultural Research Center and Igu experimental locations compared to Sago, which had the lower mean value of grain yield. Application of NPS rate with rhizobium strain affected number of effective branch/planr, while the interaction of NPS rate with location influenced number of days to 90% maturity, effective branch/plant, pod/plant, seed/pod and grain yield. Significantly higher mean grain yield was obtained by applying 100, 125 and 150 Kg/ha of NPS at Haro Sabu Agricultural Research Center and Igu, by applying 125 and 150 Kg/ha of NPS at Sago. Based on partial budget analysis the highest net benefit (Birr 31792.34 ha-1) was obtained from combined application of 100 kg blended NPS ha-1 with un-inoculated strain which had 811% marginal rate of return. Hence, application of 100 kg NPS ha-1 without inoculation of the strain was recommended for common bean productivity enhancement in the study area.
    
    VL  - 12
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Materials and Methods
    3. 3. Results and Discussion
    4. 4. Conclusions and Recommendations
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgments
  • Author Contributions
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information