This research focuses on optimizing the comparative advantage of agricultural products across Kaduna State's three senatorial zones to enhance food security in response to climate change. A descriptive survey research design was employed to guide the study, with stratified sampling comprises of 18 (6 local government areas from each zone) randomly selected from the 23 local government areas in the state. A sample size of approximately 2,556 farmers was selected using the Yaro Yamane formula for determining the sample size. Through a combination of quantitative and qualitative methodologies, including Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping, econometric modeling, stakeholder interviews, and field observations, the study comprehensively analyzed the agricultural landscapes, products endowments, and climate patterns of the selected local government areas and access the current agricultural practices, productivity and challenges faced by farmers in each senatorial zone to achieve its goals. Four research questions and a hypothesis were used in the study. A 100-item, five-point likert scale questionnaire, validated with a reliability index of 0.865, was adjudged as reliable instrument and usable for the study. Mean and standard deviation were used to answer the research questions while multi-regression analysis was applied to test the null hypotheses at 0.05 significance level. The result showed significance difference in crop yield between comparative advantage crops and other cultural agricultural practices yield with a calculated value of 4.26 was greater than the regression valued of 1.74. Based on the findings the North Senatorial Zone should focus on Millet, Sorghum, Groundnuts, Cowpea, and Sesame; the Central Senatorial Zone on Maize, Soybeans, Rice, Tomatoes, and Cotton; while the South Senatorial Zone on ginger, Yam, Cassava, Plantain/Bananas. The study also recommended strategies for improving agricultural productivity by ways of improving access to irrigation systems, modern farming techniques, storage and marketing which could further enhance productivity, partnership, stimulating economic growth, job creation, poverty reduction, reduce product wastage and dumping and infrastructural development. It also emphasized the need for targeted policies, infrastructure developments, research and technology transfer, community engagement, and stakeholder collaboration to maximize the agricultural potentials.
Published in | American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics (Volume 11, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.18 |
Page(s) | 142-150 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Optimization, Comparative Advantage, Agricultural Products, Food Security, Climate Change
S/N | Statement Item | Mean | S.D | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Climatic conditions in Kaduna North favourable for the cultivation of drought-resistant crops (millet, sorghum, groundnuts and cowpea). | 3.05 | 2.60 | Accept |
2 | Kaduna Central's moderate climate suits crops like maize, rice, groundnuts and soya beans | 3.13 | 2.80 | Accept |
3 | Higher rainfall in Kaduna South IS suitable for ginger, yam, cassava, and sugar cane | 3.12 | 2.76 | Accept |
4 | Temperature variation across the zones affect crop productivity. | 3.07 | 2.55 | Accept |
5 | Kaduna North’s sandy and loamy soil are ideal for legumes. | 3.11 | 2.65 | Accept |
6 | Kaduna Central’s clay soils suits rice farming with proper nutrient management | 3.14 | 2.89 | Accept |
7 | Fertile soils in Kaduna South offer advantage for root crops like cassava and sweet potatoes. | 3.09 | 2.62 | Accept |
8 | Soil degradation and erosion in parts of Kaduna North negatively impact the suitability of certain crops. | 2.43 | 2.19 | Reject |
9 | The availability of water resources in Kaduna Central provides significant opportunities for irrigation-based farming. | 3.07 | 2.55 | Accept |
10 | The relative scarcity of water sources in Kaduna North poses a challenge for growing water-intensive crops like rice and sugarcane. | 3.14 | 2.89 | Accept |
Average Total | 2.75 | 2.36 |
S/N | Statement/Item | Mean | S.D | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Promoting crop specialization based on the comparative advantages of different zones (e.g., millet in Kaduna North, rice in Kaduna Central, and yams in Kaduna South) will enhance overall productivity. | 3.41 | 2.95 | Accept |
2 | Enhancing transportation and logistics between zones will optimize the comparative advantage and improve food distribution | 3.38 | 2.87 | Accept |
3 | Providing access to improved seeds and inputs tailored to the zone’s crops will boost productivity | 3.48 | 2.99 | Accept |
4 | Strengthening irrigation systems in water scarce areas like Kaduna North, will maximize drought-resistant crops potential. | 3.47 | 2.97 | Accept |
5 | Encouraging inter-zone trade among producers will optimize the distribution and contribute to food security. | 3.48 | 2.99 | Accept |
6 | Supporting cooperative farming models will maximize the comparative advantage of each zone. | 3.58 | 2.86 | Accept |
7 | Developing value-added processing industries in each zone will reduce post-harvest losses. | 3.41 | 2.94 | Accept |
8 | Investment in research and development to improve crop varieties will enhance productivity. | 3.48 | 2.98 | Accept |
9 | Strengthening agricultural extension will improve farmers’ capacity to maximize their products comparative advantage. | 3.64 | 3.00 | Accept |
10 | Government policies focusing on zone-based agricultural development will improve resource utilization and food security. | 3.47 | 2.97 | Accept |
Average Total | 3.78 | 2.86 |
S/N | Statement/ Items | Mean | S.D | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Promoting drought-resistant crops such as grains in Kaduna North is an effective strategy to mitigate the effects of climate change. | 3.47 | 2.97 | Accept |
2 | Adopting climate-smart agricultural practices, such as crop rotation and conservation agriculture, can improve food security across all three senatorial zones. | 2.44 | 2.23 | Reject |
3 | The use of improved seed varieties adapted to changing climate conditions is essential for sustaining food production in Kaduna Central. | 3.32 | 2.82 | Accept |
4 | Investing in irrigation systems in areas prone to drought in Kaduna North will help mitigate climate change impacts on agricultural productivity. | 3.21 | 2.62 | Accept |
5 | Diversifying crop production in Kaduna South, especially with crops that are more resilient to extreme weather conditions, will enhance food security. | 3.09 | 2.58 | Accept |
6 | Agroforestry practices in Kaduna Central can reduce the negative effects of climate change while promoting sustainable food production. | 2.99 | 2.56 | Accept |
7 | Training farmers in the three zones on climate-resilient farming techniques will help mitigate the impact of climate change and maintain productivity. | 2.99 | 2.57 | Accept |
8 | Enhancing soil conservation efforts in Kaduna South, where rainfall patterns are shifting, is key to ensuring long-term agricultural sustainability. | 2.44 | 2.25 | Reject |
9 | The adoption of early warning systems for climate-related risks in Kaduna State can help farmers make informed decisions to protect their crops. | 2.98 | 2.59 | Accept |
10 | Government policies that promote the cultivation of climate-resilient crops in all three zones will be crucial for ensuring food security in the face of global climate change. | 3.18 | 2.60 | Accept |
Average Total | 2.79 | 2.13 |
S/N | Statement/ Items | Mean | S.D | Remark |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Promoting drought-resistant crops such as millet and sorghum in Kaduna North is an effective strategy to increase annual yield. | 3.47 | 2.97 | Accept |
2 | Adopting climate-smart agricultural practices, such as crop rotation and conservation agriculture, can improve food security across all three senatorial zones. | 2.94 | 2.63 | Reject |
3 | The use of improved seed varieties adapted to changing climate conditions is essential for sustaining high yield production in Kaduna Central. | 3.32 | 2.82 | Accept |
4 | Investing in irrigation systems in areas prone to drought in Kaduna North will help mitigate climate change impacts on agricultural yield productivity. | 3.21 | 2.62 | Accept |
5 | Diversifying crop production in Kaduna South, especially with crops that are more resilient to extreme weather conditions, will enhance high yield. | 3.09 | 2.58 | Accept |
6 | Agroforestry practices in Kaduna Central can reduce the negative effects of climate change while promoting sustainable high yield production. | 2.99 | 2.56 | Accept |
7 | Training farmers in the three zones on climate-resilient farming techniques will help mitigate the impact of climate change and maintain high yield productivity. | 2.99 | 2.57 | Accept |
8 | Enhancing soil conservation efforts in Kaduna South, where rainfall patterns are shifting, is key to ensuring long-term agricultural sustainability. | 2.75 | 2.35 | Accept |
9 | The adoption of early warning systems for climate-related risks in Kaduna State can help farmers make informed decisions to protect their crops yield. | 2.98 | 2.59 | Accept |
10 | Government policies that promote the cultivation of climate-resilient crops in all three zones will be crucial for ensuring high yield in the face of global climate change. | 3.18 | 2.60 | Accept |
Average Total | 2.97 | 2.41 |
Variable | Coefficient | Std. Error | t-Statistic | Prob. |
---|---|---|---|---|
X201 | 4.357538 | 2.304664 | 2.807008 | 0.0208 |
X2 | 3.300043 | 1.887612 | 2.464652 | 0.0193 |
X3 | 1.830407 | 1.294937 | 1.103096 | 0.0212 |
C | 15.56272 | 5.025650 | 3.096659 | 0.0112 |
R-squared | 0.906868 | Mean dependent var | 3.192000 | |
Adjusted R-squared | 0.560303 | S.D. dependent var | 3.330985 | |
S.E. of regression | 0.284666 | Akaike info criterion | 0.614173 | |
Sum squared resid | 0.486208 | Schwarz criterion | 0.735207 | |
Log likelihood | 0.929134 | Hannan-Quinn criter. | 0.481399 | |
F-statistic | 1.005713 | Durbin-Watson stat | 1.741634 | |
Prob (F-statistic) | 0.001667 |
CSAF | Climate-smart Agricultural Framework |
FAO | Food and Agricultural Organization |
GIS | Geographic Information System |
KADP | Kaduna State Agricultural Development Programme |
[1] | Adler, F. H., & Tompkins, R. E. (1997). The equitable distribution of the gains from trade and investment: exploring the issues In Globalization and the Poor (pp. 91-107). Palgrave Macmillan, London. |
[2] | Aloysius, E. U. (2011), Practical guide to writing research project reports in tertiary institution Chesion ltd. Uwani. Enugu, (pp 54 - 122). |
[3] | Amen Nomdjiye (2012), Northern Nigeria in the age of globalization: money, mobilization, and the birth of a new nation: the case of Kaduna, Nigeria: unpublished M. Sc project. |
[4] | Anyanwuocha R. A. I (2008). Fundamental of Economics for Senior Secondary Schools. African First Publishers Limited, Onitsha, Nigeria. |
[5] | Costinot, A., & Donaldson, D. (2012). Ricardo's theory of comparative advantage: old idea, new evidence. American Economic Review, 102(3), 453-58. |
[6] | Ewa Udo & Agu G. A (2004), New System Economics: A Senior Secondary Course. African First Publishers Limited, Onitsha, Nigeria, (213-219). |
[7] | Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO, 2024), Post-Harvest Management |
[8] | Grossman, G. M., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2008). Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring. American Economic Review, 98(5), 1978-1997. |
[9] | Jhingan M. L (2012), Principles of Economics. Vrinda Publication (P) Limited. B-5, Ashish Complex: Mayur Virhar, Phase-1, Delhi. |
[10] | Kaduna State Agricultural Development Project (KADP 2020), Reports on agricultural activities, crop yields, and extension services in Kaduna State. |
[11] | Nigerian Institute of Social and Economic Research (NISER, 2024) Publications on the socio-economic impacts of agriculture and related sectors in Nigeria. [NISER Website] |
[12] | Paul Krugman (2004), International Economics: Theory and Policy. African First Publishers Limited, Onitsha, Nigeria. 234-37. |
[13] | Victor Messiah (2015), Transforming Our World: Abuja: Society for peace studies and practice. In Collaboration with John Archers Publishers Ltd., Ibadan. |
[14] | Yusufu Bala Usman (2012), The Transformation of Katsina, 1400-1883: the historical tradition of an African Town. Arewa House, Kaduna. |
APA Style
Jori, V. N. (2025). Optimizing the Comparative Advantage of Agricultural Products in Kaduna State to Enhance Food Security in Response to Climate Changes. American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics, 11(3), 142-150. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.18
ACS Style
Jori, V. N. Optimizing the Comparative Advantage of Agricultural Products in Kaduna State to Enhance Food Security in Response to Climate Changes. Am. J. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2025, 11(3), 142-150. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.18
@article{10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.18, author = {Vayin Nuhu Jori}, title = {Optimizing the Comparative Advantage of Agricultural Products in Kaduna State to Enhance Food Security in Response to Climate Changes }, journal = {American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics}, volume = {11}, number = {3}, pages = {142-150}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.18}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.18}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbes.20251103.18}, abstract = {This research focuses on optimizing the comparative advantage of agricultural products across Kaduna State's three senatorial zones to enhance food security in response to climate change. A descriptive survey research design was employed to guide the study, with stratified sampling comprises of 18 (6 local government areas from each zone) randomly selected from the 23 local government areas in the state. A sample size of approximately 2,556 farmers was selected using the Yaro Yamane formula for determining the sample size. Through a combination of quantitative and qualitative methodologies, including Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping, econometric modeling, stakeholder interviews, and field observations, the study comprehensively analyzed the agricultural landscapes, products endowments, and climate patterns of the selected local government areas and access the current agricultural practices, productivity and challenges faced by farmers in each senatorial zone to achieve its goals. Four research questions and a hypothesis were used in the study. A 100-item, five-point likert scale questionnaire, validated with a reliability index of 0.865, was adjudged as reliable instrument and usable for the study. Mean and standard deviation were used to answer the research questions while multi-regression analysis was applied to test the null hypotheses at 0.05 significance level. The result showed significance difference in crop yield between comparative advantage crops and other cultural agricultural practices yield with a calculated value of 4.26 was greater than the regression valued of 1.74. Based on the findings the North Senatorial Zone should focus on Millet, Sorghum, Groundnuts, Cowpea, and Sesame; the Central Senatorial Zone on Maize, Soybeans, Rice, Tomatoes, and Cotton; while the South Senatorial Zone on ginger, Yam, Cassava, Plantain/Bananas. The study also recommended strategies for improving agricultural productivity by ways of improving access to irrigation systems, modern farming techniques, storage and marketing which could further enhance productivity, partnership, stimulating economic growth, job creation, poverty reduction, reduce product wastage and dumping and infrastructural development. It also emphasized the need for targeted policies, infrastructure developments, research and technology transfer, community engagement, and stakeholder collaboration to maximize the agricultural potentials. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Optimizing the Comparative Advantage of Agricultural Products in Kaduna State to Enhance Food Security in Response to Climate Changes AU - Vayin Nuhu Jori Y1 - 2025/09/23 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.18 DO - 10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.18 T2 - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics JF - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics JO - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics SP - 142 EP - 150 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2471-979X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20251103.18 AB - This research focuses on optimizing the comparative advantage of agricultural products across Kaduna State's three senatorial zones to enhance food security in response to climate change. A descriptive survey research design was employed to guide the study, with stratified sampling comprises of 18 (6 local government areas from each zone) randomly selected from the 23 local government areas in the state. A sample size of approximately 2,556 farmers was selected using the Yaro Yamane formula for determining the sample size. Through a combination of quantitative and qualitative methodologies, including Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping, econometric modeling, stakeholder interviews, and field observations, the study comprehensively analyzed the agricultural landscapes, products endowments, and climate patterns of the selected local government areas and access the current agricultural practices, productivity and challenges faced by farmers in each senatorial zone to achieve its goals. Four research questions and a hypothesis were used in the study. A 100-item, five-point likert scale questionnaire, validated with a reliability index of 0.865, was adjudged as reliable instrument and usable for the study. Mean and standard deviation were used to answer the research questions while multi-regression analysis was applied to test the null hypotheses at 0.05 significance level. The result showed significance difference in crop yield between comparative advantage crops and other cultural agricultural practices yield with a calculated value of 4.26 was greater than the regression valued of 1.74. Based on the findings the North Senatorial Zone should focus on Millet, Sorghum, Groundnuts, Cowpea, and Sesame; the Central Senatorial Zone on Maize, Soybeans, Rice, Tomatoes, and Cotton; while the South Senatorial Zone on ginger, Yam, Cassava, Plantain/Bananas. The study also recommended strategies for improving agricultural productivity by ways of improving access to irrigation systems, modern farming techniques, storage and marketing which could further enhance productivity, partnership, stimulating economic growth, job creation, poverty reduction, reduce product wastage and dumping and infrastructural development. It also emphasized the need for targeted policies, infrastructure developments, research and technology transfer, community engagement, and stakeholder collaboration to maximize the agricultural potentials. VL - 11 IS - 3 ER -