Control of Aflatoxins in Poultry Feed by Using Yeast

Nosheen Afzal; Syeda Mona Hassan; Shahzad Sharif Mughal; Alejandro Pando; Alvina Rafiq

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Control of Aflatoxins in Poultry Feed by Using Yeast

Nosheen Afzal, Syeda Mona Hassan, Shahzad Sharif Mughal, Alejandro Pando, Alvina Rafiq

Published in American Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 1)

Received: 27 December 2021 Accepted: 16 May 2022 Published: 24 May 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The present study aimed to determine the detoxification potential of the food industry by-products such as yeast sludge against the harmful effects of aflatoxins on broilers. The objective of this study was to compare the binding capacity of yeast sludge fractions i.e. yeast sludge cell wall (YSCW) and yeast sludge cell solubles (YSCS) against different levels of AFB1 and AFG1. Yeast sludge was sonicated into yeast sludge cell walls and yeast sludge cell soluble. A total of 300 one-day-old chicks were randomly divided into 10 treatments with three replicates per treatment and ten chicks per replicate. The 10 treatments included negative control, three positive control with different levels of AFB1 and AFG1, and three different adsorbents with different levels of combinations of AFB1 and AFG1. AFB1 and AFG1 treatments were offered with different levels of AFs (50, 100, and 150 µg/kg) without toxin binder in the feed while the remaining treatments included 0.5% YSCW and 0.5% YSCS as toxin binders at different levels of AFB1 and AFG1 in a factorial arrangement. Feed and water were provided timely with great accuracy. The Aflatoxins showed a significant effect on production, slaughtering, and serum chemistry parameters. The yeast sludge cell wall exhibited significant effects on the production and slaughtering parameters of chicks. Yeast sludge cell wall also showed a significant effect on the biochemical and mineral profile of chicks. The results confirmed that natural binders are economically effective in commercial poultry production.

Published in	American Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13
Page(s)	21-26
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Aflatoxin, Yeast Sludge, Adsorption, Glucomannan

References

[1]	Adjou, E. S., Kouton, S., Dahouenon-Ahoussi, E., Soumanou, M. M., & Sohounhloue, D. C. (2013). Effect of essential oil from fresh leaves of Ocimum gratissimum L. on mycoflora during storage of peanuts in Benin. Mycotoxin research, 29 (1), 29-38.
[2]	Bennett JW and Klich M. 2003. Mycotoxins. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 16: 497-516.
[3]	Ditta, Y. A., Pasha, T. N., Akram, M., Iqbal, Z. M., & Naseem, S. (2016). BINDING EFFICACY OF YEAST SLUDGE FRACTIONS AND COMMERCIAL GLUCOMANNAN AGAINST AFLATOXINS IN BROILERS. JAPS: Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 26 (5).
[4]	FAO. Data, (2020): F. A. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
[5]	Gowda, N., Suganthi, R., Malathi, V., & Raghavendra, A. (2007). Efficacy of heat treatment and sun drying of aflatoxin-contaminated feed for reducing the harmful biological effects in sheep. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 133 (1-2), 167-175.
[6]	HaseenabiShaik. (2019). Comparative Studies of the Protein Content of Probiotic and Nonprobiotic Treated Chicken Meat. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research, 9 (12), 169-173.
[7]	Huma. Mujahid, (2019). Protective Effect of Yeast Sludge and Whey Powder against Ochratoxicosis in Broiler Chicks. Pakistan Veterinary Journal. 39. 588-592.
[8]	Khan, B., Abdukadir, A., Qureshi, R., & Mustafa, G. (2011). Medicinal uses of plants by the inhabitants of Khunjerab National Park, Gilgit, Pakistan. Pak J Bot, 43 (5), 2301-2310.
[9]	Marke’s et al; (2011). Aflatoxins: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Ch-14, Pg 285-293.
[10]	Maurice OM. 2002. Risk assessment for afatoxins in foodstuffs. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 50: 137-142.
[11]	Méndez-Albores, A., Del Río-García, J. C., & Moreno-Martinez, E. (2007). Decontamination of aflatoxin duckling feed with aqueous citric acid treatment. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 135 (3-4), 249-262.
[12]	Monson, M. S., R. A. Coulombe and K. M. Reed (2015). Aflatoxicosis: Lessons from toxicity and responses to aflatoxin B1 in poultry. Agric 5 (3): 742-777.
[13]	Morgan, N. K., & Choct, M. (2016). Cassava: Nutrient composition and nutritive value in poultry diets. Animal Nutrition, 2 (4), 253-261.
[14]	Moricz, A. M., Ott, P. G., Billes, F., Otta, K. H., & Tyihák, E. (2007). The influence of l-ascorbic acid on the antibacterial-toxic activity of aflatoxins on adsorbent layer. Journal of applied microbiology, 103 (6), 2525-2532.
[15]	Nam, I. S., Garnsworthy, P. C., & Ahn, J. H. (2009). Effects of freeze-dried citrus peel on feed preservation, aflatoxin contamination and in vitro ruminal fermentation. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 22 (5), 674-680.
[16]	Oguz, Halis & Parlat, SS. (2004). Effects of dietary mannanoligosaccharide on performance of Japanese quail affected by aflatoxicosis. South African Journal of Animal Science. 34.
[17]	Pereyra De La Iglesia, M. T., Domenech, J., & Gutiérrez Mañero, F. J. (2008). Systemic disease protection elicited by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria strains: relationship between metabolic responses, systemic disease protection, and biotic elicitors. Phytopathology, 98 (4), 451-457.
[18]	Quezada, T., Cuellar, H., Jaramillo-Juarez, F., Valdivia, A., & Reyes, J. (2000). Effects of aflatoxin B1 on the liver and kidney of broiler chickens during development. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Pharmacology, Toxicology and Endocrinology, 125 (3), 265-272.
[19]	Rashid, N., Bajwa, M. A., Rafeeq, M., Tariq, M. M., Abbas, F., Awan, M. A., & Ahmad, Z. (2013). Prevalence of aflatoxicosis in broiler chickens in Quetta, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Zoology, 45 (4).
[20]	Safameher, A. (2008). Effects of clinoptilolite on performance, biochemical parameters and hepatic lesions in broiler chickens during aflatoxosis. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 7 (4), 381-388.
[21]	Salgado, J., Cabral, H. N., & Costa, M. J. (2011). Food web structure and habitat connectivity in fish estuarine nurseries—impact of river flow. Estuaries and Coasts, 34 (4), 663-674.
[22]	Santin, E., Paulillo, A., Nakagui, L., Alessi, A., & Maiorka, A. (2006). Evaluation of yeast cell wall on the performance of broiles fed diets with or without mycotoxins. Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science, 8 (4), 221-225.
[23]	Sawant, S., & Gawai, D. (2011). Biochemical changes in banana fruits due to postharvest fungal pathogens. Current Botany, 2 (1).
[24]	Sohail, Muhammad Umar & Ahmad, Ijaz & Younus, Muhammad & Shabbir, Muhammad Zubair & Kamran, Zahid & Ahmad, DrShakeel & Anwar, Haseeb & Yousaf, Muhammad Shahbaz & Ashraf, Kamran & Shahzad, Abid&Rehman, Habib. (2013). Effect of supplementation of mannan oligosaccharide and probiotic on growth performance, relative weights of viscera, and population of selected intestinal bacteria in cyclic heat-stressed broilers. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 22. 485-491.
[25]	Suksombat W, Suksombat P and Mirttanaphari R. 2011. Effect of commercial or bovine yeasts on the performance and blood variables of broiler chickens intoxicated with aflatoxins. World.
[26]	Valchev, I., Kanakov, D., Hristov, T., Lazarov, L., Binev, R., Grozeva, N., & Nikolov, Y. (2014). Investigations on the liver function of broiler chickens with experimental aflatoxicosis. Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 17 (4).
[27]	Yunus, A. W., Razzazi-Fazeli, E., & Bohm, J. (2011). Aflatoxin B1 in affecting broiler’s performance, immunity, and gastrointestinal tract: A review of history and contemporary issues. Toxins, 3 (6), 566-590.
[28]	Zafar, M., Khan, M. A., Ahmad, M., Jan, G., Sultana, S., Ullah, K., & Ullah, Z. (2010). Elemental analysis of some medicinal plants used in traditional medicine by atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS). Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, 4 (19), 1987-1990.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Nosheen Afzal, Syeda Mona Hassan, Shahzad Sharif Mughal, Alejandro Pando, Alvina Rafiq. (2022). Control of Aflatoxins in Poultry Feed by Using Yeast. American Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, 6(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Nosheen Afzal; Syeda Mona Hassan; Shahzad Sharif Mughal; Alejandro Pando; Alvina Rafiq. Control of Aflatoxins in Poultry Feed by Using Yeast. Am. J. Chem. Biochem. Eng. 2022, 6(1), 21-26. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Nosheen Afzal, Syeda Mona Hassan, Shahzad Sharif Mughal, Alejandro Pando, Alvina Rafiq. Control of Aflatoxins in Poultry Feed by Using Yeast. Am J Chem Biochem Eng. 2022;6(1):21-26. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13,
  author = {Nosheen Afzal and Syeda Mona Hassan and Shahzad Sharif Mughal and Alejandro Pando and Alvina Rafiq},
  title = {Control of Aflatoxins in Poultry Feed by Using Yeast},
  journal = {American Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {21-26},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajcbe.20220601.13},
  abstract = {The present study aimed to determine the detoxification potential of the food industry by-products such as yeast sludge against the harmful effects of aflatoxins on broilers. The objective of this study was to compare the binding capacity of yeast sludge fractions i.e. yeast sludge cell wall (YSCW) and yeast sludge cell solubles (YSCS) against different levels of AFB1 and AFG1. Yeast sludge was sonicated into yeast sludge cell walls and yeast sludge cell soluble. A total of 300 one-day-old chicks were randomly divided into 10 treatments with three replicates per treatment and ten chicks per replicate. The 10 treatments included negative control, three positive control with different levels of AFB1 and AFG1, and three different adsorbents with different levels of combinations of AFB1 and AFG1. AFB1 and AFG1 treatments were offered with different levels of AFs (50, 100, and 150 µg/kg) without toxin binder in the feed while the remaining treatments included 0.5% YSCW and 0.5% YSCS as toxin binders at different levels of AFB1 and AFG1 in a factorial arrangement. Feed and water were provided timely with great accuracy. The Aflatoxins showed a significant effect on production, slaughtering, and serum chemistry parameters. The yeast sludge cell wall exhibited significant effects on the production and slaughtering parameters of chicks. Yeast sludge cell wall also showed a significant effect on the biochemical and mineral profile of chicks. The results confirmed that natural binders are economically effective in commercial poultry production.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY - JOUR
T1 - Control of Aflatoxins in Poultry Feed by Using Yeast
AU - Nosheen Afzal
AU - Syeda Mona Hassan
AU - Shahzad Sharif Mughal
AU - Alejandro Pando
AU - Alvina Rafiq
Y1 - 2022/05/24
PY - 2022
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13
DO - 10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13
T2 - American Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering
JF - American Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering
JO - American Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering
SP - 21
EP - 26
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2639-9989
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13
AB - The present study aimed to determine the detoxification potential of the food industry by-products such as yeast sludge against the harmful effects of aflatoxins on broilers. The objective of this study was to compare the binding capacity of yeast sludge fractions i.e. yeast sludge cell wall (YSCW) and yeast sludge cell solubles (YSCS) against different levels of AFB1 and AFG1. Yeast sludge was sonicated into yeast sludge cell walls and yeast sludge cell soluble. A total of 300 one-day-old chicks were randomly divided into 10 treatments with three replicates per treatment and ten chicks per replicate. The 10 treatments included negative control, three positive control with different levels of AFB1 and AFG1, and three different adsorbents with different levels of combinations of AFB1 and AFG1. AFB1 and AFG1 treatments were offered with different levels of AFs (50, 100, and 150 µg/kg) without toxin binder in the feed while the remaining treatments included 0.5% YSCW and 0.5% YSCS as toxin binders at different levels of AFB1 and AFG1 in a factorial arrangement. Feed and water were provided timely with great accuracy. The Aflatoxins showed a significant effect on production, slaughtering, and serum chemistry parameters. The yeast sludge cell wall exhibited significant effects on the production and slaughtering parameters of chicks. Yeast sludge cell wall also showed a significant effect on the biochemical and mineral profile of chicks. The results confirmed that natural binders are economically effective in commercial poultry production.
VL - 6
IS - 1
ER -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Nosheen Afzal

Department of Chemistry, Lahore Garrison University, Lahore, Pakistan
Syeda Mona Hassan

Department of Chemistry, Lahore Garrison University, Lahore, Pakistan
Shahzad Sharif Mughal

Department of Chemistry, Lahore Garrison University, Lahore, Pakistan
Alejandro Pando

Center for Biomedical Engineering, Brown University, Providence, USA
Alvina Rafiq

Department of Chemistry, Lahore Garrison University, Lahore, Pakistan

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Nosheen Afzal, Syeda Mona Hassan, Shahzad Sharif Mughal, Alejandro Pando, Alvina Rafiq. (2022). Control of Aflatoxins in Poultry Feed by Using Yeast. American Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, 6(1), 21-26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Nosheen Afzal; Syeda Mona Hassan; Shahzad Sharif Mughal; Alejandro Pando; Alvina Rafiq. Control of Aflatoxins in Poultry Feed by Using Yeast. Am. J. Chem. Biochem. Eng. 2022, 6(1), 21-26. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Nosheen Afzal, Syeda Mona Hassan, Shahzad Sharif Mughal, Alejandro Pando, Alvina Rafiq. Control of Aflatoxins in Poultry Feed by Using Yeast. Am J Chem Biochem Eng. 2022;6(1):21-26. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13,
  author = {Nosheen Afzal and Syeda Mona Hassan and Shahzad Sharif Mughal and Alejandro Pando and Alvina Rafiq},
  title = {Control of Aflatoxins in Poultry Feed by Using Yeast},
  journal = {American Journal of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering},
  volume = {6},
  number = {1},
  pages = {21-26},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcbe.20220601.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajcbe.20220601.13},
  abstract = {The present study aimed to determine the detoxification potential of the food industry by-products such as yeast sludge against the harmful effects of aflatoxins on broilers. The objective of this study was to compare the binding capacity of yeast sludge fractions i.e. yeast sludge cell wall (YSCW) and yeast sludge cell solubles (YSCS) against different levels of AFB1 and AFG1. Yeast sludge was sonicated into yeast sludge cell walls and yeast sludge cell soluble. A total of 300 one-day-old chicks were randomly divided into 10 treatments with three replicates per treatment and ten chicks per replicate. The 10 treatments included negative control, three positive control with different levels of AFB1 and AFG1, and three different adsorbents with different levels of combinations of AFB1 and AFG1. AFB1 and AFG1 treatments were offered with different levels of AFs (50, 100, and 150 µg/kg) without toxin binder in the feed while the remaining treatments included 0.5% YSCW and 0.5% YSCS as toxin binders at different levels of AFB1 and AFG1 in a factorial arrangement. Feed and water were provided timely with great accuracy. The Aflatoxins showed a significant effect on production, slaughtering, and serum chemistry parameters. The yeast sludge cell wall exhibited significant effects on the production and slaughtering parameters of chicks. Yeast sludge cell wall also showed a significant effect on the biochemical and mineral profile of chicks. The results confirmed that natural binders are economically effective in commercial poultry production.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download