| Peer-Reviewed

Seismic Analysis (Non-linear Static Analysis (Pushover) and Nonlinear Dynamic) on Cable - Stayed Bridge

Received: 12 August 2015     Accepted: 25 August 2015     Published: 5 September 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Pushover analysis application development is greatly increased in recent years and numerous advanced methods to evaluate the seismic pushover are provided. Because these methods have been proposed mainly for building structures and given the fundamental differences between the behavior of bridge structures and buildings using pushover methods on the bridge structure with the uncertainties faced. 1. First, the effect of non-linear pushover results (time history) 2. Choose a target displacement due to the finite element model should be examined in order to understand the prediction of the seismic capacity. Thus a pushover analysis is presented for evaluation of seismic bridge pylons and deck where the effects of displacement and deformation of the plastic joints, structural changes in the modal characteristics of change used plastic forms and effects of higher modes can be seen clearly. The method is able to accurately approximate the dynamic response of the nonlinear analysis. Ultimately this method compared with analysis time history.

Published in American Journal of Civil Engineering (Volume 3, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.11
Page(s) 129-139
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Seismic Analysis, Non-linear Static Analysis, Non-linear Dynamic Analysis, Cable Stayed Bridge

References
[1] S. A. Freeman, J. P. Nicoletti, and J. V. Tyrell, 1975, “Evaluations of Existing Buildings for Seismic Risk – A Case Study of Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, Bremerton, Washington,” Proc. of the First U.S. Nat. Conf. on Earthq. Engng, Oakland,California, pp. 113-122
[2] P. Fajfar, M. Fischinger, N2 - A method for non-linear seismic analysis of regular buildings. Proc. of the 9th WCEE, August 2-9 Tokyo-Kyoto, Japan, 1988.
[3] T. J. Sullivan. (2012). Formulation of a Direct Displacement-Based Design Procedure for Steel Eccentrically Braced Frame structures.
[4] Priestly M. J. N, Kowalsky M. J, Calvi G. M. (2007). Displacment – Based Design Seismic Design of Structures. IUSS. Press:Pavia
[5] Priestly M. J. N, Kowalsky M. J, Calvi G. M. (2007). Displacment – Based Design Seismic Design Of Structures. IUSS. Press:Pavia
[6] Goel RK Chopra AK (1998). Period formulas for concrete shear wall building. Journal of Structural Engineering ASCE 124(ST4), 426-433.
[7] http://peer.berkeley.edu/
[8] Aprile A, Benedetti A, Grassucci F. Assessment of cracking and collapse for old brick masonry columns. J Struct Eng 2001; 127(12):1427–35.
[9] Hernلndez-Montes E, Kwon OS, Aschheim M. An energy-based formulation for first and multiple-mode nonlinear static (pushover) analyses. J Earthq Eng 2004; 8(1):69–88.
[10] Fajfar P. A. nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design. Earthq Spectra 2000.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Mohammad Taghipour, Hesamoldin Yazdi. (2015). Seismic Analysis (Non-linear Static Analysis (Pushover) and Nonlinear Dynamic) on Cable - Stayed Bridge. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 3(5), 129-139. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Mohammad Taghipour; Hesamoldin Yazdi. Seismic Analysis (Non-linear Static Analysis (Pushover) and Nonlinear Dynamic) on Cable - Stayed Bridge. Am. J. Civ. Eng. 2015, 3(5), 129-139. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Mohammad Taghipour, Hesamoldin Yazdi. Seismic Analysis (Non-linear Static Analysis (Pushover) and Nonlinear Dynamic) on Cable - Stayed Bridge. Am J Civ Eng. 2015;3(5):129-139. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.11,
      author = {Mohammad Taghipour and Hesamoldin Yazdi},
      title = {Seismic Analysis (Non-linear Static Analysis (Pushover) and Nonlinear Dynamic) on Cable - Stayed Bridge},
      journal = {American Journal of Civil Engineering},
      volume = {3},
      number = {5},
      pages = {129-139},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajce.20150305.11},
      abstract = {Pushover analysis application development is greatly increased in recent years and numerous advanced methods to evaluate the seismic pushover are provided. Because these methods have been proposed mainly for building structures and given the fundamental differences between the behavior of bridge structures and buildings using pushover methods on the bridge structure with the uncertainties faced. 1. First, the effect of non-linear pushover results (time history) 2. Choose a target displacement due to the finite element model should be examined in order to understand the prediction of the seismic capacity. Thus a pushover analysis is presented for evaluation of seismic bridge pylons and deck where the effects of displacement and deformation of the plastic joints, structural changes in the modal characteristics of change used plastic forms and effects of higher modes can be seen clearly. The method is able to accurately approximate the dynamic response of the nonlinear analysis. Ultimately this method compared with analysis time history.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Seismic Analysis (Non-linear Static Analysis (Pushover) and Nonlinear Dynamic) on Cable - Stayed Bridge
    AU  - Mohammad Taghipour
    AU  - Hesamoldin Yazdi
    Y1  - 2015/09/05
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.11
    T2  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    JF  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    JO  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    SP  - 129
    EP  - 139
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8737
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.11
    AB  - Pushover analysis application development is greatly increased in recent years and numerous advanced methods to evaluate the seismic pushover are provided. Because these methods have been proposed mainly for building structures and given the fundamental differences between the behavior of bridge structures and buildings using pushover methods on the bridge structure with the uncertainties faced. 1. First, the effect of non-linear pushover results (time history) 2. Choose a target displacement due to the finite element model should be examined in order to understand the prediction of the seismic capacity. Thus a pushover analysis is presented for evaluation of seismic bridge pylons and deck where the effects of displacement and deformation of the plastic joints, structural changes in the modal characteristics of change used plastic forms and effects of higher modes can be seen clearly. The method is able to accurately approximate the dynamic response of the nonlinear analysis. Ultimately this method compared with analysis time history.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Industrial Engineering, Science & Research Branch of Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

  • Civil engineering, non-profit institution of higher education, Aba - Abyek, Qazvin, Iran

  • Sections