| Peer-Reviewed

Comparative Analysis of Non-Destructive Strength of Water Cured and Air Cured Concrete

Received: 15 October 2015     Accepted: 23 October 2015     Published: 16 November 2015
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Non-destructive strength comparative analysis was carried out on water cured and air cured concrete cube samples. The investigation was for a period of 7, 14, 21 and 28 days. The concrete cube samples were designed using a mix ratio of 1:2:4 and water cement ratio of 0.55 with batching done in weight. The results reveal a substantial strength gain in the water cured samples to that of the air cured, having taking an average results of four cubes for each group of the samples tested for, using a Schmidt rebound hammer. The 28 day age concrete cube gave a strength difference of 5.1 N/mm2 between the water cured and air cured samples in favor of strength gain of the water cured cubes, thereby pointing to the significant of curing in terms of concrete strength development.

Published in American Journal of Civil Engineering (Volume 3, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.17
Page(s) 194-198
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Concrete, Curing, Hydration, Non-Destructive, Strength

References
[1] Jackson, N. (1976). Civil Engineering Materials. London: Macmillan Press Limited.
[2] Kulkarni, S.B. & Clinton, P. (2006).Significance of Curing of Concrete for Durability of Structures. Mumbai: Ultra-Tech Cement Limited.
[3] Mamlouk, M. S., & Zaniewski, J. P. (2011).Materials for Civil and Construction Engineers. New Jersey: Pearson Books.
[4] Stark, J. (2011). Recent advances in the field of cement hydration and microstructure analysis. Cement and Concrete Research. Vol, 41, pp 666-678.
[5] Taylor, G. D. (2000). Materials in Construction, an Introduction. United Kingdom: Pearson Education Limited.
[6] Spears, R. E. (1983).The 80 Percent Solution to Inadequate Curing Problems. Concrete International, Vol. 5, pp 15-18.
[7] Alamri, A. M. (1988). Influence of Curing on the Properties of Concrete and Mortars in Hot Climates. PhD Thesis; Leeds University, United Kingdom.
[8] Amir H. and Tyler L. M. (2015). Impact of Wet and Sealed Curing on Curling in Cement Paste Beams from Drying Shrinkage, Material Journal of America Concrete Institute, Vol. 112, Issue 1, Pp 79-84 https://www.concrete.org/publications/internationalconcreteabstractsportal.aspx?m=details&ID=5168
[9] Mark B., Kevern J. T., and Eric O. A.(2015). Effect of Curing Environment on the Strength Properties of Cement and Cement Extenders, Journal of Materials Sciences and Applications, 2015, 6, 33-39, Scientific Research Publishing Inc., Received 21 October 2014; revised 18 November 2014; accepted 6 December 2014, Published Online January 2015 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/msa, http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/msa.2015.61005
[10] Guneyisi, E., Ozturan T., &Gesoglu, M. (2005). A study on Reinforced Corrosion and Related Properties of Plain and Blended Cement Concrete under Different Curing Conditions. Cement and Concrete Composites, Vol. 27, pp 440-461.
[11] Alizadeh, R., Ghods P., Chini M., Ghalibafian, M., &Shekarchi, M. (2008). Effect of Curing Conditions on the Service Life Design of Structures in Persian Gulf Region. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, Vol.1.2.
[12] Kosmatka et al, (2002). Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures, 15th Edition, EB001, PCA Engineering Bulletin EB 001, Portland Cement Association, Skokie.
[13] Ali H. H. (2009). The effect of curing condition on compressive strength in high strength concrete, Journal of Engineering Sciences, Vol. 02, No. 01, June 2009 35 ISSN 1999 – 8716, Civil Department ,College Engineering , Diyala University Received: 25/10/2008 Accepted: 16/2/2009.
[14] BS EN 197-1. Cement-Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cement, British Standards Institution, 2000.
[15] Gideon O. B., Anthony N. E., Chioma E., Joshua J., Oluwaleke O. and Tajudeen O. (2015). Assessment of Compressive Strength of Concrete Produced from Different Brands of Portland Cement, Journal of Civil and Environmental Research, ISSN 2224-5790 (Paper) ISSN 2225-0514 (Online) Vol.7, No.8, 2015 http://www.iiste.org
[16] BS EN 12390-, Testing hardened concrete –Part 2: Making and curing specimens for strength tests, BSI, London, 2000.
[17] British Standard Institution. (1983). Methods for Determination of Slump; London. (BS 1881: Part 102).
[18] British Standard Institution (1983). Method for Making Test Cubes from Fresh Concrete, (BS 1881: Part 1). London: British Standard Institution.
[19] Emesiobi, F. C. (2000). Testing and Quality Control of Materials in Civil and Highway Engineering. Port Harcourt: Goodnews Press.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Onungwe Ishmael, Sarogoro Samuel, George Abednego, Akpan Paul. (2015). Comparative Analysis of Non-Destructive Strength of Water Cured and Air Cured Concrete. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 3(6), 194-198. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.17

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Onungwe Ishmael; Sarogoro Samuel; George Abednego; Akpan Paul. Comparative Analysis of Non-Destructive Strength of Water Cured and Air Cured Concrete. Am. J. Civ. Eng. 2015, 3(6), 194-198. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.17

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Onungwe Ishmael, Sarogoro Samuel, George Abednego, Akpan Paul. Comparative Analysis of Non-Destructive Strength of Water Cured and Air Cured Concrete. Am J Civ Eng. 2015;3(6):194-198. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.17

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.17,
      author = {Onungwe Ishmael and Sarogoro Samuel and George Abednego and Akpan Paul},
      title = {Comparative Analysis of Non-Destructive Strength of Water Cured and Air Cured Concrete},
      journal = {American Journal of Civil Engineering},
      volume = {3},
      number = {6},
      pages = {194-198},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.17},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.17},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajce.20150305.17},
      abstract = {Non-destructive strength comparative analysis was carried out on water cured and air cured concrete cube samples. The investigation was for a period of 7, 14, 21 and 28 days. The concrete cube samples were designed using a mix ratio of 1:2:4 and water cement ratio of 0.55 with batching done in weight. The results reveal a substantial strength gain in the water cured samples to that of the air cured, having taking an average results of four cubes for each group of the samples tested for, using a Schmidt rebound hammer. The 28 day age concrete cube gave a strength difference of 5.1 N/mm2 between the water cured and air cured samples in favor of strength gain of the water cured cubes, thereby pointing to the significant of curing in terms of concrete strength development.},
     year = {2015}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Comparative Analysis of Non-Destructive Strength of Water Cured and Air Cured Concrete
    AU  - Onungwe Ishmael
    AU  - Sarogoro Samuel
    AU  - George Abednego
    AU  - Akpan Paul
    Y1  - 2015/11/16
    PY  - 2015
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.17
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.17
    T2  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    JF  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    JO  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
    SP  - 194
    EP  - 198
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8737
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20150305.17
    AB  - Non-destructive strength comparative analysis was carried out on water cured and air cured concrete cube samples. The investigation was for a period of 7, 14, 21 and 28 days. The concrete cube samples were designed using a mix ratio of 1:2:4 and water cement ratio of 0.55 with batching done in weight. The results reveal a substantial strength gain in the water cured samples to that of the air cured, having taking an average results of four cubes for each group of the samples tested for, using a Schmidt rebound hammer. The 28 day age concrete cube gave a strength difference of 5.1 N/mm2 between the water cured and air cured samples in favor of strength gain of the water cured cubes, thereby pointing to the significant of curing in terms of concrete strength development.
    VL  - 3
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Civil Engineering, Rivers State Polytechnic, Bori-Ogoni, Rivers State, Nigeria, West Africa

  • Department of Civil Engineering, Rivers State Polytechnic, Bori-Ogoni, Rivers State, Nigeria, West Africa

  • Department of Civil Engineering, Rivers State Polytechnic, Bori-Ogoni, Rivers State, Nigeria, West Africa

  • Department of Civil Engineering, Rivers State Polytechnic, Bori-Ogoni, Rivers State, Nigeria, West Africa

  • Sections