Comparison of Various Bracing System for Self-Supporting Steel Lattice Structure Towers

Abdulaqder M. Tah; Kamiran M. Alsilevanai; Mustafa Özakça

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Comparison of Various Bracing System for Self-Supporting Steel Lattice Structure Towers

Abdulaqder M. Tah, Kamiran M. Alsilevanai, Mustafa Özakça

Published in American Journal of Civil Engineering (Volume 5, Issue 2)

Received: 27 December 2016 Accepted: 7 January 2017 Published: 4 February 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This paper deals with the effectiveness of various bracing systems used in lattice towers. Seven types of bracings used in 4-legged square based self-supporting power transmission and telecommunication towers and four types of bracings used in 3-leg triangular based self-supporting telecommunication towers are analyzed. The investigated bracing systems are K, KD, Y, YD, D, XB and X. This study has focused on identifying the economical bracing system for a given range of tower heights. Towers of height 40 to 60 m for telecommunication and 35 m for transmission towers have been analyzed under critical loads such as wind and earthquake loads. The load cases include diagonal wind has been found to be most critical cases for towers. The performance of various bracing system has been identified and reported.

Published in	American Journal of Civil Engineering (Volume 5, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11
Page(s)	60-68
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Transmission Tower, Telecommunication Tower, Bracing System, Lattice Tower, Nonlinear Analysis, Load Cases, Self-Supporting Tower

References

[1]	Oliveira, M., Silva, J., Vellasco, P., Andrade, S., & Lima, L. (2007). Structural analysis of guyed steel telecommunication towers for radio antennas. Journal Of The Brazilian Society Of Mechanical Sciences And Engineering, 29, 185-195.
[2]	Monopole Towers Manufacturer - Monopoles Tower Manufacturer from Delhi. 2016. Available: http://www.galvanisedstore.com/monopole-towers manufacturer.html. Accessed 28.12.2016.
[3]	Kroeker, D. (2000). Structural analysis of transmission towers with connection slip modeling. Ph.D. University of Manitoba.
[4]	Siddesha, H. (2010). Wind Analysis of Microwave Antenna Towers. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 1, p.574-584.
[5]	Kemp, A. R., & Behncke, R. H. (1998). Behavior of Cross-Bracing in Latticed Towers, Journal of Structural Engineering, 124, 360-367.
[6]	Albermani, F., Mahendran, M., & Kitipornchai, S. (2004). Upgrading of transmission towers using a diaphragm bracing system. Engineering Structures, 26, 735-744.
[7]	Albermani, F., S. Kitipornchai, and R. W. K. Chan. (2009). Failure analysis of transmission towers. Engineering Failure Analysis, 16, 1922-1928.
[8]	Alam, M. J., & Santhakumar, A. R. (1996). Reliability analysis and full-scale testing of transmission tower. Journal of Structural Engineering, 122 (3), 338-344.
[9]	Moon, B. W., Park, J. H., Lee, S. K., Kim, J., Kim, T., & Min, K. W. (2009). Performance evaluation of a transmission tower by substructure test. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 65, 1-11.
[10]	Albermani, F., Mahendran, M., & Kitipornchai, S. (2004). Upgrading of transmission towers using a diaphragm bracing system. Engineering Structures, 26 (6), 735-744.
[11]	Xie, Q., Yan, Q., & Li, J. (2006). Effects of Diaphragm on Wind Resistant Design of Power Transmission Towers [J]. High Voltage Engineering, 4, 000.
[12]	Qiang, X., Zhao-dong, D. I. N. G., Gui-feng, Z. H. A. O., & Jie, L. (2009). Wind resistant analysis of power transmission tower with different diaphragm arrangements. High Voltage Engineering, 35 (3), 683-687.
[13]	American tower. Collocation Considerations & Best Practices for Financial Services Organizations. A structural engineering perspective. Available at: http://www.americantower.com/Assets/uploads/files/PDFs/American_Tower_Financial_Services_Collocation_Best_Practices.pdf. Accessed 2016.
[14]	ASCE. Design of latticed steel transmission structures. Virginia: ASCE 10–97; 2000.
[15]	European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 3 design of steel structures part 3–1: towers, masts and chimneys—towers and masts; 2005. Brussels.
[16]	TIA/EIA-222-G, (Draft). Structural Standards for Antenna Supporting Structures and Antennas.
[17]	TOWER (2013). Power Line System, Inc ©.
[18]	Silva, J. D., Vellasco, P. D. S., Andrade, S. D., & Oliveira, M. D. (2002). An evaluation of structural steel design systems for transmission and telecommunication towers. In Proceedings of International IASS Symposium «Lightweight Structures in Civil E.
[19]	Da Silva, J. G. S., Vellasco, P. D. S., De Andrade, S. A. L., & De Oliveira, M. I. R. (2005). Structural assessment of current steel design models for transmission and telecommunication towers. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 61, 1108-1134.
[20]	Varma, C. & Lal, P. (1998). Transmission line manual. 1st edition. New Delhi: Central Board of Irrigation and Power.
[21]	Nefzger, P., Kaintzyk, U. and Nolasco, J. F. (2003). Overhead power lines: planning, design, construction. 1st edition. Berlin: Springer.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Abdulaqder M. Tah, Kamiran M. Alsilevanai, Mustafa Özakça. (2017). Comparison of Various Bracing System for Self-Supporting Steel Lattice Structure Towers. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 5(2), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Abdulaqder M. Tah; Kamiran M. Alsilevanai; Mustafa Özakça. Comparison of Various Bracing System for Self-Supporting Steel Lattice Structure Towers. Am. J. Civ. Eng. 2017, 5(2), 60-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Abdulaqder M. Tah, Kamiran M. Alsilevanai, Mustafa Özakça. Comparison of Various Bracing System for Self-Supporting Steel Lattice Structure Towers. Am J Civ Eng. 2017;5(2):60-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11,
  author = {Abdulaqder M. Tah and Kamiran M. Alsilevanai and Mustafa Özakça},
  title = {Comparison of Various Bracing System for Self-Supporting Steel Lattice Structure Towers},
  journal = {American Journal of Civil Engineering},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {60-68},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajce.20170502.11},
  abstract = {This paper deals with the effectiveness of various bracing systems used in lattice towers. Seven types of bracings used in 4-legged square based self-supporting power transmission and telecommunication towers and four types of bracings used in 3-leg triangular based self-supporting telecommunication towers are analyzed. The investigated bracing systems are K, KD, Y, YD, D, XB and X. This study has focused on identifying the economical bracing system for a given range of tower heights. Towers of height 40 to 60 m for telecommunication and 35 m for transmission towers have been analyzed under critical loads such as wind and earthquake loads. The load cases include diagonal wind has been found to be most critical cases for towers. The performance of various bracing system has been identified and reported.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparison of Various Bracing System for Self-Supporting Steel Lattice Structure Towers
AU  - Abdulaqder M. Tah
AU  - Kamiran M. Alsilevanai
AU  - Mustafa Özakça
Y1  - 2017/02/04
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11
T2  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
JF  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
JO  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
SP  - 60
EP  - 68
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8737
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11
AB  - This paper deals with the effectiveness of various bracing systems used in lattice towers. Seven types of bracings used in 4-legged square based self-supporting power transmission and telecommunication towers and four types of bracings used in 3-leg triangular based self-supporting telecommunication towers are analyzed. The investigated bracing systems are K, KD, Y, YD, D, XB and X. This study has focused on identifying the economical bracing system for a given range of tower heights. Towers of height 40 to 60 m for telecommunication and 35 m for transmission towers have been analyzed under critical loads such as wind and earthquake loads. The load cases include diagonal wind has been found to be most critical cases for towers. The performance of various bracing system has been identified and reported.
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Abdulaqder M. Tah

Department of Civil and Engineering, University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey
Kamiran M. Alsilevanai

Department of Civil and Engineering, University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey
Mustafa Özakça

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Abdulaqder M. Tah, Kamiran M. Alsilevanai, Mustafa Özakça. (2017). Comparison of Various Bracing System for Self-Supporting Steel Lattice Structure Towers. American Journal of Civil Engineering, 5(2), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Abdulaqder M. Tah; Kamiran M. Alsilevanai; Mustafa Özakça. Comparison of Various Bracing System for Self-Supporting Steel Lattice Structure Towers. Am. J. Civ. Eng. 2017, 5(2), 60-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Abdulaqder M. Tah, Kamiran M. Alsilevanai, Mustafa Özakça. Comparison of Various Bracing System for Self-Supporting Steel Lattice Structure Towers. Am J Civ Eng. 2017;5(2):60-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11,
  author = {Abdulaqder M. Tah and Kamiran M. Alsilevanai and Mustafa Özakça},
  title = {Comparison of Various Bracing System for Self-Supporting Steel Lattice Structure Towers},
  journal = {American Journal of Civil Engineering},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {60-68},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajce.20170502.11},
  abstract = {This paper deals with the effectiveness of various bracing systems used in lattice towers. Seven types of bracings used in 4-legged square based self-supporting power transmission and telecommunication towers and four types of bracings used in 3-leg triangular based self-supporting telecommunication towers are analyzed. The investigated bracing systems are K, KD, Y, YD, D, XB and X. This study has focused on identifying the economical bracing system for a given range of tower heights. Towers of height 40 to 60 m for telecommunication and 35 m for transmission towers have been analyzed under critical loads such as wind and earthquake loads. The load cases include diagonal wind has been found to be most critical cases for towers. The performance of various bracing system has been identified and reported.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Comparison of Various Bracing System for Self-Supporting Steel Lattice Structure Towers
AU  - Abdulaqder M. Tah
AU  - Kamiran M. Alsilevanai
AU  - Mustafa Özakça
Y1  - 2017/02/04
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11
T2  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
JF  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
JO  - American Journal of Civil Engineering
SP  - 60
EP  - 68
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8737
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajce.20170502.11
AB  - This paper deals with the effectiveness of various bracing systems used in lattice towers. Seven types of bracings used in 4-legged square based self-supporting power transmission and telecommunication towers and four types of bracings used in 3-leg triangular based self-supporting telecommunication towers are analyzed. The investigated bracing systems are K, KD, Y, YD, D, XB and X. This study has focused on identifying the economical bracing system for a given range of tower heights. Towers of height 40 to 60 m for telecommunication and 35 m for transmission towers have been analyzed under critical loads such as wind and earthquake loads. The load cases include diagonal wind has been found to be most critical cases for towers. The performance of various bracing system has been identified and reported.
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download