Background: A synthetic oxazolidinone antimicrobial medication called Linezolid is used to treat patients who are resistant to multiple drugs. Few studies have been done regarding the effectiveness of Linezolid-containing regimens in both developing and developed nations. This study aimed to determine the Efficacy and determinant factors of linezolid-containing regimens in the treatment of DR - TB Patients. Methods: An institution-based cross-sectional study design was conducted using SPSS version 26, and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was used. Result: out of 345 patients that visited the outpatient clinic, 205 (59.4%) were males, and 126(36.5%) were between 30-39 years. MDR TB Patients' linezolid-containing regimen treatment efficacy success rate is 280(81.2%). MDR TB Patient Previously Treated TB by First Line Drug [AOR= 5.823(3.761-7.341)]. MDR TB Patient Previously Treated TB by First Line and treatment completed [AOR=2.351(1.34-3.214))], the adverse effect [AOR 0.842(0.674-2.431], tolerability of linezolid [AOR =2.543(2.41-4.532)] was significantly associated with linezolid containing regimen treatment efficacy rate. Conclusion: Linezolid-containing regimens have good efficacy and good treatment outcomes for DR-TB patients. The findings showed that Linezolid is a good choice for treating DR-TB, although patients ought to be monitored closely for the incidence of adverse effects.
Published in | American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine (Volume 12, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajcem.20241205.12 |
Page(s) | 74-86 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Multidrug Resistance, TB, linezolid, Efficacy, Tolerability Safety, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Variables | Variables categories | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
SEX | Male | 205 | 59.4 |
female | 140 | 40.6 | |
AGE | 20-29 | 94 | 27.2 |
30-39 | 126 | 36.5 | |
40-49 | 99 | 28.7 | |
50-65 | 26 | 7.5 | |
BODY MASS INDEX | <18.5 | 223 | 64.6 |
18.5-24.9 | 86 | 24.9 | |
>25 | 36 | 10.4 | |
Education | diploma | 124 | 35.9 |
degree | 49 | 14.2 | |
MSC | 49 | 14.2 | |
Other | 123 | 35.7 | |
Marital Status | single | 65 | 18.8 |
married | 167 | 48.4 | |
widowed | 33 | 9.6 | |
divorced | 80 | 23.2 |
Variables | Variables categories | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
HIV status of the patient | non-reactive | 248 | 71.9 |
reactive | 97 | 28.1 | |
Treatment regimen | long | 207 | 60.0 |
short | 138 | 40.0 | |
Previously treated by TB first-line drug | Yes | 268 | 77.7% |
No | 77 | 22.3 | |
IF YES (n=268) | Treatment | 210 | 60.9% |
Completed | 58 | 16.8% | |
Interrupted | |||
Directly Acquired MDR | YES | 241 | 69.9% |
NO | 104 | 30.1 | |
Patient resistance to drug profiles | Rifampicin Resistance | 186 | 53.9 |
MDR | 111 | 32.2 | |
HR | 21 | 6.1 | |
Pre XDR and XDR Patient | 27 | 7.8 | |
Time to culture conversion in months | <5 MONTH | 276 | 80.0 |
5-7 MONTH | 69 | 20.0 | |
Adverse effect (AE) | YES | 102 | 29.6 |
NO | 243 | 70.4 | |
IF YES(n=102) | Minor side effect | 84 | 24.3% |
Major side effect | 18 | 5.2 | |
Linezolid due to AE | DISCONTINUED | 12 | 3.5 |
CONTINUED | 70 | 20.3 | |
REINITIATED | 20 | 5.8% | |
If Linezolid Discontinued(N=12) | Permanently | 2 | 0.6% |
Temporarily | 10 | 2.9% | |
IF YES, Nausea and vomiting(n=102) | Yes | 72 | 20.9% |
no | 30 | 8.7 | |
IF YES, thrombocytopenia SE(n=102) If Yes, Polyneuropathy SE(n=102) IF YES, anemia(n=102) nutritional status | Yes | 30 | 8.7% |
No | 72 | 20.9 | |
Yes | 31 | 9.0% | |
No | 71 | 20.6% | |
Yes | 92 | 26.7% | |
No | 10 | 2.9% | |
SAM | 122 | 35.4% | |
MAM | 163 | 47.2 | |
NORMAL | 60 | 17.4 |
Variables | Variables categories | Frequency | Percentage (%) |
---|---|---|---|
After starting MDR treatment including linezolid treatment interruption | Yes | 48 | 13.9 |
no | 297 | 86.1 | |
comorbid disease | Yes | 150 | 43.5% |
no | 195 | 56.5 | |
If yes | DM | 39 | 11.3% |
HTN | 28 | 8.1% | |
HIV | 66 | 19.1% | |
CARDIA DISEASE | 17 | 4.9% | |
Taking the additional drug for linezolid AE Treatment | Yes | 90 | 26.1 |
no | 60 | 17.4 | |
Treatment outcome with linezolid AND OTHER MDR DRUGS | CURED | 195 | 56.5% |
COMPLETED | 84 | 24.3% | |
FAILED | 26 | 7.5%% | |
DEATH2 | 18 | 5.2%% | |
lost follow up | 22 | 6.4%% | |
Linezolid related death | no | 345 | 100 |
linezolid efficacy | success rate (cured and completed) | 280 | 81.2 |
poor treatment outcome (failed, death, and lost follow-up) | 65 | 18.8 | |
Tolerability of linezolid | well, tolerated | 291 | 84.3 |
not welltolerated | 54 | 15.7 | |
dosing and Duration of linezolid treatment | Short regimen | 192 | 55.7 |
Individualized MDR TB treatment | 139 | 40.3 | |
Long MDR TB treatment | 14 | 4.1 |
Variables | Variables categories | Linezolid Efficacy Success Rate | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|
RT success rate (cured and completed) | poor treatment outcome (failed, death, and lost follow-up) | |||
SEX | Male | 182 | 23 | 205 |
female | 98 | 42 | 140 | |
AGE | 20-29 | 70 | 24 | 94 |
30-39 | 109 | 17 | 126 | |
40-49 | 82 | 17 | 99 | |
50-65 | 19 | 7 | 26 | |
BODY MASS INDEX | <18.5 | 182 | 41 | 223 |
18.5-24.9 | 69 | 17 | 86 | |
>25 | 29 | 7 | 36 | |
Education | diploma | 101 | 23 | 124 |
degree | 40 | 9 | 49 | |
MSC | 39 | 10 | 49 | |
Other | 100 | 23 | 123 | |
Marital Status | single | 52 | 13 | 65 |
married | 137 | 30 | 167 | |
widowed | 27 | 6 | 33 | |
divorced | 64 | 16 | 80 |
Variables | Variables categories | Linezolid Efficacy Success Rate | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|
RT success rate (cured and completed) | poor treatment outcome (failed, death, and lost follow-up) | |||
HIV status of the patient E | Male | 182 | 23 | 205 |
female | 98 | 42 | 140 | |
Treatment Regimen | <18.5 | 182 | 41 | 223 |
18.5-24.9 | 69 | 17 | 86 | |
>25 | 29 | 7 | 36 | |
Previously Treated TB By First Line Drug | diploma | 101 | 23 | 124 |
degree | 40 | 9 | 49 | |
MSC | 39 | 10 | 49 | |
Other | 100 | 23 | 123 | |
IF YES(N=268) | single | 52 | 13 | 65 |
married | 137 | 30 | 167 | |
widowed | 27 | 6 | 33 | |
divorced | 64 | 16 | 80 | |
Directly Acquired MDR | YES | 195 | 46 | 241 |
NO | 85 | 19 | 104 | |
Patient Resistance To Drugs Profiles | Rifampicin Resistance | 148 | 38 | 186 |
MDR | 92 | 19 | 111 | |
HR | 17 | 4 | 21 | |
Pre XDR and XDR Patient | 23 | 4 | 27 | |
Time To Culture Conversion In Months | <5 Month | 222 | 54 | 27 |
5-7 Month | 58 | 11 | 69 | |
Adverse Effect(AE) | Yes | 71 | 31 | 10 |
no | 209 | 34 | 24 | |
If Yes | Minor sideefect | 70 | 14 | 84 |
Majorside effect | 14 | 4 | 18 | |
IF YES, Nausea and vomiting | Yes | 60 | 12 | 72 |
No | 24 | 6 | 30 | |
IF YES, thrombocytopenia SE | Yes | 25 | 5 | 30 |
No | 59 | 13 | 72 | |
If yes, Polyneuropathy SE | Yes | 25 | 6 | 31 |
No | 59 | 12 | 71 | |
IF YES, anemia | Yes | 75 | 17 | 92 |
No | 9 | 1 | 10 | |
Linezolid Due To AE | Discontinued | 10 | 2 | 12 |
Continued | 58 | 12 | 70 | |
Reinitiated | 16 | 14 | 20 | |
If Linezolid Discontinued(N=12) | Permanently | 2 | 0 | 2 |
temporarly | 8 | 2 | 10 | |
Nutritional Status | Sam | 98 | 24 | 122 |
Mam | 133 | 30 | 163 | |
Normal | 49 | 11 | 60 |
Variables | Variables categories | Linezolid Efficacy Success Rate | Total | |
---|---|---|---|---|
RT success rate (cured and completed) | poor treatment outcome (failed, death, and lost follow-up) | |||
Side effect (SE) | Yes | 71 | 31 | 102 |
No | 209 | 34 | 243 | |
After starting MDR treatment including linezolid treatment interruption | Yes | 38 | 10 | 48 |
No | 242 | 55 | 297 | |
COMORBID DISEASE | Yes | 121 | 29 | 150 |
No | 159 | 36 | 195 | |
If yes | DM | 32 | 7 | 39 |
HTN | 23 | 5 | 28 | |
HIV | 55 | 11 | 66 | |
CARDIAC DISEASE | 13 | 4 | 17 | |
Taking the additional drug for linezolid AE treatment | Yes | 74 | 16 | 90 |
no | 49 | 11 | 60 | |
Treatment outcome with linezolid and other MDR drugs | cured | 160 | 35 | 195 |
completed | 67 | 17 | 84 | |
failed | 21 | 5 | 26 | |
death | 15 | 3 | 18 | |
lost follow up | 17 | 5 | 22 | |
linezolid related death | no | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Tolerability of linezolid | well tolerated | 252 | 39 | 291 |
not well tolerated | 28 | 26 | 54 | |
dosing and Duration of linezolid treatment | Short regimen | 170 | 22 | 192 |
Individualized MDR TB treatment | 97 | 42 | 139 | |
Long MDR TB treatment | 13 | 1 | 14 |
Variables | Variable Categories | Linezolid Efficacy | COR (95%CI) | AOR(95%CI) | p-value | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Success Rate | Poor Treatment Outcome | |||||
Previously Treated TB By First Line | Yes | 168 | 39 | 3.268(1.829-5.840) * | 5.823(3.761-7.341) ** | 0.000 |
No | 112 | 26 | ||||
If yes | treatment completed | 230 | 38 | 1.000(.576-1.735) * | 2.351(1.34-3.214) ** | 0.000 |
Interrupted | 50 | 27 | ||||
Adverse Effect | Yes | 71 | 31 | 0.373(0.214-0.650) * | 0.842(0.674-2.431) ** | 0.000 |
No | 209 | 34 | ||||
Tolerability of linezolid | Well tolerated | 252 | 39 | 1.670(1.287-2.168) * | 2.543(2.41-4.532) ** | 0.000 |
Not well tolerated | 28 | 26 |
AAHB | Addis Ababa Health Bureau. |
ACCR | Addis Ababa Cancer Registry |
CCM | Critical Care Medicine |
DM | Diabetes Mellitus |
EMR | Electronic Medical Record |
GDP | Gross Domestic Products |
HAIs | hospital-acquired Infections |
ICU | Intensive Care Unit (ICU) |
MDR | Multiple Drug Resistance |
MOH | Ministry of Health |
OPD | Out Patient Department |
PI | Principal Investigator |
SPSS | Statically Package for Social Science |
TB | Tuberculosis |
U.S.A | United States of America |
WHO | World Health Organization |
[1] | Organization, W. H., Contributions of WHO to South Africa’s health agenda: evaluation of the Country Cooperation Strategy 2016-2020. 2022. |
[2] | Organization, W. H., WHO country stories: delivering for all. 2023: World Health Organization. |
[3] | Bagcchi, S., WHO's global tuberculosis report 2022. The Lancet Microbe, 2023. 4(1): p. e20. |
[4] | Eshetie, S., et al., Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Ethiopian settings and its association with previous history of anti-tuberculosis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infectious Diseases, 2017. 17: p. 1-12. |
[5] | Migliori, G. B., et al., Review of multidrug‐resistant and extensively drug‐resistant TB: global perspectives with a focus on sub‐Saharan Africa. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 2010. 15(9): p. 1052-1066. |
[6] | Seid, M. A., et al., Drug-susceptible tuberculosis treatment success and associated factors in Ethiopia from 2005 to 2017: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 2018. 8(9): p. e022111. |
[7] | Perry, C. M., and B. Jarvis, Linezolid: a review of its use in the management of serious gram-positive infections. Drugs, 2001. 61: p. 525-551. |
[8] | Azzouz, A. and C. V. Preuss, Linezolid, in StatPearls [Internet]. 2024, StatPearls Publishing. |
[9] | Babcock, H. M. and V. Fraser, Clinical experience with linezolid: a case series of 53 patients. Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice, 2002. 11(4): p. 198-204. |
[10] | Bloom, B. R., A half-century of research on tuberculosis: Successes and challenges. Journal of Experimental Medicine, 2023. 220(9): p. e20230859. |
[11] | Bloom, B. R. and J. D. McKinney, The death and resurrection of tuberculosis. Nature medicine, 1999. 5(8): p. 872-874. |
[12] | Vinh, D. C. and J. M. Embil, Device-related infections: a review. Journal of long-term effects of medical implants, 2005. 15(5). |
[13] | Vinh, D. C. and E. Rubinstein, Linezolid: a review of safety and tolerability. Journal of Infection, 2009. 59: p. S59-S74. |
[14] | Clemett, D. and A. Markham, Linezolid. Drugs, 2000. 59: p. 815-827. |
[15] | Mala, G., et al., Why tuberculosis service providers do not follow treatment guideline in E Ethiopia: a qualitative study. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2014. 20(1): p. 88-93. |
[16] | Hamel, E., Perivascular nerves and the regulation of cerebrovascular tone. Journal of Applied Physiology, 2006. 100(3): p. 1059-1064. |
[17] | Ma, A., et al., Clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid in intensive care unit patients. Journal of Intensive Medicine, 2023. 3(1): p. 65-72. |
[18] | Agyeman, A. A. and R. Ofori-Asenso, Efficacy and safety profile of linezolid in the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials, 2016. 15: p. 1-17. |
[19] | Wasserman, S., et al., Linezolid toxicity in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2022. 77(4): p. 1146-1154. |
[20] | Kizito, E., et al., Risk factors for mortality among patients diagnosed with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis in Uganda-a case-control study. BMC Infectious Diseases, 2021. 21: p. 1-7. |
[21] | Zegeye, A., et al., Prevalence and determinants of anti-tuberculosis treatment non-adherence in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one, 2019. 14(1): p. e0210422. |
[22] | Abseno, M., THE PREVALENCE OF TUBERCULOSIS AMONG ADDIS ABABA CITY BUS DRIVERS AND CASH COLLECTORS. 2004. |
APA Style
Mohammed, A. S., Yesuf, M. H., Menbere, C. S., Diress, G. M. (2024). Efficacy and Determinant Factors of Linezolid Containing Regimens in the Treatment of DR - TB Patients at Saint Peter Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2023 A Retrospective Study. American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 12(5), 74-86. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcem.20241205.12
ACS Style
Mohammed, A. S.; Yesuf, M. H.; Menbere, C. S.; Diress, G. M. Efficacy and Determinant Factors of Linezolid Containing Regimens in the Treatment of DR - TB Patients at Saint Peter Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2023 A Retrospective Study. Am. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2024, 12(5), 74-86. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcem.20241205.12
AMA Style
Mohammed AS, Yesuf MH, Menbere CS, Diress GM. Efficacy and Determinant Factors of Linezolid Containing Regimens in the Treatment of DR - TB Patients at Saint Peter Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2023 A Retrospective Study. Am J Clin Exp Med. 2024;12(5):74-86. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcem.20241205.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajcem.20241205.12, author = {Abdurehman Seid Mohammed and Mustofa Hassen Yesuf and Chekole Sileshi Menbere and Getachew Mekete Diress}, title = {Efficacy and Determinant Factors of Linezolid Containing Regimens in the Treatment of DR - TB Patients at Saint Peter Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2023 A Retrospective Study }, journal = {American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine}, volume = {12}, number = {5}, pages = {74-86}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajcem.20241205.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcem.20241205.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajcem.20241205.12}, abstract = {Background: A synthetic oxazolidinone antimicrobial medication called Linezolid is used to treat patients who are resistant to multiple drugs. Few studies have been done regarding the effectiveness of Linezolid-containing regimens in both developing and developed nations. This study aimed to determine the Efficacy and determinant factors of linezolid-containing regimens in the treatment of DR - TB Patients. Methods: An institution-based cross-sectional study design was conducted using SPSS version 26, and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was used. Result: out of 345 patients that visited the outpatient clinic, 205 (59.4%) were males, and 126(36.5%) were between 30-39 years. MDR TB Patients' linezolid-containing regimen treatment efficacy success rate is 280(81.2%). MDR TB Patient Previously Treated TB by First Line Drug [AOR= 5.823(3.761-7.341)]. MDR TB Patient Previously Treated TB by First Line and treatment completed [AOR=2.351(1.34-3.214))], the adverse effect [AOR 0.842(0.674-2.431], tolerability of linezolid [AOR =2.543(2.41-4.532)] was significantly associated with linezolid containing regimen treatment efficacy rate. Conclusion: Linezolid-containing regimens have good efficacy and good treatment outcomes for DR-TB patients. The findings showed that Linezolid is a good choice for treating DR-TB, although patients ought to be monitored closely for the incidence of adverse effects. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Efficacy and Determinant Factors of Linezolid Containing Regimens in the Treatment of DR - TB Patients at Saint Peter Specialized Hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2023 A Retrospective Study AU - Abdurehman Seid Mohammed AU - Mustofa Hassen Yesuf AU - Chekole Sileshi Menbere AU - Getachew Mekete Diress Y1 - 2024/12/12 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcem.20241205.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajcem.20241205.12 T2 - American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine JF - American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine JO - American Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine SP - 74 EP - 86 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8133 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcem.20241205.12 AB - Background: A synthetic oxazolidinone antimicrobial medication called Linezolid is used to treat patients who are resistant to multiple drugs. Few studies have been done regarding the effectiveness of Linezolid-containing regimens in both developing and developed nations. This study aimed to determine the Efficacy and determinant factors of linezolid-containing regimens in the treatment of DR - TB Patients. Methods: An institution-based cross-sectional study design was conducted using SPSS version 26, and multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was used. Result: out of 345 patients that visited the outpatient clinic, 205 (59.4%) were males, and 126(36.5%) were between 30-39 years. MDR TB Patients' linezolid-containing regimen treatment efficacy success rate is 280(81.2%). MDR TB Patient Previously Treated TB by First Line Drug [AOR= 5.823(3.761-7.341)]. MDR TB Patient Previously Treated TB by First Line and treatment completed [AOR=2.351(1.34-3.214))], the adverse effect [AOR 0.842(0.674-2.431], tolerability of linezolid [AOR =2.543(2.41-4.532)] was significantly associated with linezolid containing regimen treatment efficacy rate. Conclusion: Linezolid-containing regimens have good efficacy and good treatment outcomes for DR-TB patients. The findings showed that Linezolid is a good choice for treating DR-TB, although patients ought to be monitored closely for the incidence of adverse effects. VL - 12 IS - 5 ER -