Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Carbon-Computing Coupling Optimization and Green Scheduling System for Intelligent Computing Centers

Received: 15 March 2026     Accepted: 27 March 2026     Published: 29 April 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Under China’s “Dual-Carbon” strategic goal, reducing carbon emissions in computing centers has become a critical challenge. The increasing scale of data centers, particularly in the context of initiatives such as “East Data, West Computing,” necessitates new approaches that jointly optimize computing efficiency and carbon footprint. This paper aims to address this challenge by proposing a novel carbon-computing coupling optimization framework and a green scheduling system designed to minimize the carbon emissions associated with computational tasks while maintaining system robustness. We first establish a carbon efficiency dynamic equilibrium equation and introduce the concept of virtual carbon flow to model the carbon footprint of computing tasks. Based on this modeling, we develop a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) based scheduler that dynamically migrates tasks to low-carbon nodes. In addition, we integrate a digital twin platform that preemptively simulates failure scenarios to enhance system robustness and resilience. Experimental results in simulated “East Data, West Computing” scenarios demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The system reduces carbon emissions per unit of computing power by 18%, improves the energy efficiency ratio in western nodes by 35%, and decreases the Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR) from 2 hours to 15 minutes. These findings validate the potential of carbon-computing coupling optimization in achieving both sustainability and reliability goals for large-scale computing centers.

Published in American Journal of Computer Science and Technology (Volume 9, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajcst.20260902.11
Page(s) 49-57
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Carbon Efficiency Optimization, Virtual Carbon Flow, Green Scheduling, Deep Reinforcement Learning, Digital Twin

1. Introduction
The rapid expansion of intelligent computing centers has led to dramatically increasing energy consumption and carbon emissions. According to the International Energy Agency (IEA), data centers currently account for approximately 1-1.5% of global electricity consumption, with this proportion expected to rise to 3-5% by 2030 without effective intervention. China's "East Data, West Computing" project presents both challenges and opportunities for optimizing computing resource allocation while minimizing carbon footprint .
Traditional scheduling approaches predominantly focus on performance metrics such as throughput, latency, and resource utilization, often neglecting environmental impact. Recent research has begun addressing energy efficiency, but few studies have comprehensively modeled the carbon-computing coupling effect or developed practical systems for carbon-aware scheduling across geographically distributed data centers with heterogeneous energy sources .
This paper makes three key contributions:
1. Proposes a carbon efficiency dynamic equilibrium equation and virtual carbon flow theory to quantify and model carbon emissions in computing centers.
2. Develops a DRL-based scheduler that dynamically migrates tasks to nodes with lower carbon intensity while maintaining performance constraints .
3. Implements a digital twin platform that simulates failure scenarios and scheduling strategies in virtual environment before deployment .
2. Key Algorithms
2.1. Carbon Efficiency Dynamic Equilibrium Equation
We define the carbon efficiency metric η to quantify the computational output per unit carbon emission:
(1)
Where:
: Computational output measured in FLOP (Floating Point Operations)
: Electrical energy consumption (kWh)
: Cooling energy consumption (kWh)
: Weighting coefficients adjusted based on regional carbon intensity factors
The coefficients and are dynamically adjusted based on real-time carbon intensity of electricity:
(2)
(3)
Where:
: Real-time carbon intensity of local electricity grid (gCO2/kWh)
: Average carbon intensity across all available regions
: Power Usage Effectiveness of the local data center
Algorithm 1: Carbon Efficiency Aware Scheduling
Input: Task queue , Node list with carbon intensity
Output: Task-node assignment mapping
1. Initialize priority queue for tasks sorted by carbon sensitivity
2. for each task in :
3. for each node in :
4. Calculate potential carbon efficiency using current
5. Estimate performance impact
6. // Weighted scoring
7. end for
8. Push ( , ) to
9. end for
10. while not empty:
11. Pop task with highest score
12. Assign to node that achieved for
13. Update based on new workload
14. Recalculate scores for remaining tasks affected by this assignment
15. end while
2.2. Virtual Carbon Flow Model
We model carbon flow as a diffusion process using partial differential equations :
(4)
Where:
: Carbon concentration at location and time
: Diffusion coefficient representing carbon dispersion characteristics
: Velocity field of carbon flow influenced by energy transmission
: Source term representing carbon emission from computing activities
The source term is calculated as:
(5)
Where:
: Power consumption of computing node
: Carbon intensity of electricity for node
: Dirac delta function
: Position of node
We solve this equation using finite difference method with alternating direction implicit (ADI) scheme for numerical stability.
2.3. Deep Reinforcement Learning Scheduler
We formulate the carbon-aware scheduling as a Markov Decision Process (MDP):
State space: {Workload distribution, Carbon intensity across regions, Node utilization, Temperature metrics}
Action space: {Task-node assignment, Migration decisions, Resource allocation}
Reward function:
(6)
We implement a Deep Q-Network (DQN) with double Q-learning and prioritized experience replay:
Algorithm 2: DRL-Based Carbon-Aware Scheduler
Input: Environment env, Empty replay buffer D, Q-network Q with random weights
Output: Trained Q-network
1. for = τ = 1 to M:
2. Initialize state s0
3. for t = 1 to T:
4. With probability ε select random action at
5. Otherwise Select
6. Execute at, observe reward rt and next state s (t 1)
7. Store experience in D
8. Sample random mini batch from D
9. Calculate target
10. Update Q-network by minimizing
11. Every c steps update target network
12. end for
13. end for
2.4. Digital Twin for Failure Prediction and Recovery
We implement a digital twin platform that creates virtual replicas of physical systems:
Algorithm 3: Digital Twin Failure Preemption
Input: Physical system metrics, Historical failure data
Output: Failure predictions and recovery plans
1. Continuously synchronize physical system state to digital twin
2. for each component in digital twin:
3. Train LSTM-based failure prediction model on historical data
4. Simulate various failure scenarios and recovery strategies
5. Calculate risk scores for different components
6. if :
7. Generate early warning and propose preventive actions
8. Test recovery strategies in virtual environment
9. Deploy optimal strategy to physical system
10. end for
3. System Architecture and Workflow
Figure 1 illustrates the comprehensive architecture of our carbon-computing coupling optimization system:
Figure 1. System Architecture of Carbon-Aware Green Scheduling System.
The workflow of our system operates as follows:
Data Collection: Real-time carbon intensity data, power consumption metrics, and computational demands are continuously collected from both eastern and western computing nodes.
Carbon Efficiency Calculation: The system calculates carbon efficiency metrics for potential task-node assignments using our dynamic equilibrium equation.
DRL Decision Making: The reinforcement learning scheduler evaluates possible actions based on current state and learned policies.
Digital Twin Simulation: Before implementation, critical decisions are tested in the digital twin environment to validate effectiveness and identify potential issues.
Execution & Monitoring: Approved scheduling decisions are deployed to the physical system, with continuous monitoring of actual outcomes.
Learning & Adaptation: Results from deployed actions are fed back to the DRL model to improve future decision-making.
4. Experimental Evaluation
4.1. Simulation Environment
We developed a comprehensive simulation platform to evaluate our carbon-aware scheduling system under various scenarios:
Table 1. Simulation Environment Configuration.

Component

Eastern Nodes Specification

Western Nodes Specification

Compute Nodes

4x NVIDIA DGX A100 (320 GPUs)

8x Supermicro AS-4124GS-TNR (256 CPUs)

Energy Source

Grid electricity (0.78 kgCO2/kWh)

Renewable mix (0.21 kgCO2/kWh)

PUE

1.67

1.22

Network Latency

5-7ms (within region)

32-38ms (cross-region)

Storage

4PB All-Flash Array

8PB HDD Array with NVMe cache

Cooling System

Chilled water cooling

Direct free cooling

Software Environment:
Container Platform: Kubernetes 1.24 with custom scheduler
Monitoring Stack: Prometheus 2.36 + Grafana 9.0 + Carbon Tracker Exporter
DRL Framework: PyTorch 1.13 with RLlib 2.0
Digital Twin: NVIDIA Omniverse for simulation and modeling
4.2. Dataset and Workloads
We evaluated our system using diverse workloads representing realistic computing scenarios:
Table 2. Workload Characteristics.

Workload Type

Proportion

Compute Intensity

Data Locality

QoS (Quality of Service) Requirements

AI Training

35%

GPU-intensive

Low

Medium priority

AI Inference

25%

Mixed CPU/GPU

High

High priority

Big Data Analytic

20%

CPU-intensive

Medium

Low priority

Scientific Computing

15%

CPU/GPU hybrid

Low

Variable priority

Web Services

5%

CPU-intensive

High

High priority

We collected carbon intensity data from multiple sources:
Chinese Regional Grids: Historical data from 2022-2023 with 5-minute resolution
Renewable Generation: Solar and wind generation forecasts with uncertainty modeling
Electricity Market: Real-time pricing data where available
4.3. Results and Analysis
A representative snapshot of what the simulator output displayed is as follow.
Table 3. Simulator Snapshot – Carbon-Aware Green Scheduling System Dashboard Overview (Real-time).

Metric

Eastern Nodes

Western Nodes

Current Carbon Intensity

0.78 kgCO2/kWh

0.21 kgCO2/kWh

Current Load

68%

82%

PUE

1.67

1.22

Renewable Energy Mix

5%

78%

Active Tasks

142

187

Queue Length

23

8

Figure 2. Carbon Efficiency Map (Virtual Carbon Flow Field).
Table 4. DRL Scheduler – Decision Log (Recent Actions).

Timestamp

Action

Task ID

Source Node

Target Node

Carbon Saved

Performance Impact

14: 32: 05

Migrate

T-2301

Eastern-03

Western-07

0.52 kgCO2

+2.3% latency

14: 31: 22

Assign

T-2287

Western-12

0.38 kgCO2

14: 30: 18

Hold

T-2265

Eastern-01

0.00 kgCO2

14: 29: 45

Migrate

T-2243

Eastern-08

Western-04

0.61 kgCO2

+1.8% latency

14: 28: 50

Assign

T-2221

Western-15

0.44 kgCO2

Figure 3. Performance Metrics (Last 60 Minutes).
Table 5. Digital Twin – Failure Prediction & Recovery.

Component

Risk Score

Predicted Failure

Recommended Action

Status

Eastern-03 Cooling

87%

12 min

Migrate tasks to Western

✓ Executed

Western-08 PSU

42%

45 min

Standby unit ready

Monitoring

Eastern-07 Network

23%

No action

Healthy

Western-12 Temp

91%

8 min

Throttle + migrate

✓ Executed

Last Recovery Action: Eastern-03 tasks migrated to Western-07 in 14 seconds (MTTR reduced from 2 hours to 15 min)
Table 6. Summary Output (Experimental Results).

Metric

Value

Carbon Emissions Reduction

18.1% (vs. SCAS)

Western Node Utilization

82.7% (↑20.7% vs. SCAS)

Energy Efficiency

15.83 MFLOP/kWh (↑19.4% vs. SCAS)

Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR)

15 min (from 120 min baseline)

Migration Overhead

0.8% (↓61.9% vs. SCAS)

QoS Violation Rate

1.9% (↓32.1% vs. SCAS)

We compared our Carbon-Computing Coupling Optimization (C3O) system against three baseline approaches:
Performance-First Scheduler (PFS): Traditional approach maximizing throughput
Energy-Efficient Scheduler (EES): Minimizes energy consumption without carbon awareness
Static Carbon-Aware Scheduler (SCAS): Uses fixed carbon intensity values
Table 7. Comprehensive Performance Comparison.

Metric

PFS

EES

SCAS

C3O (Ours)

Improvement

Carbon Emissions (kgCO2/MFLOP)

0.417

0.352

0.298

0.244

18.1% reduction

Energy Efficiency (MFLOP/kWh)

8.72

11.35

13.26

15.83

19.4% improvement

Western Node Utilization

42.3%

57.8%

68.5%

82.7%

20.7% improvement

QoS Violation Rate

2.8%

4.3%

3.7%

1.9%

32.1% reduction

Migration Overhead

0.4%

1.2%

2.1%

0.8%

61.9% reduction

Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR)

120 min

95 min

73 min

15 min

79.5% reduction

Our experimental results demonstrate significant advantages of the C3O system:
Carbon Reduction Analysis: Table 8 shows the carbon emission reduction achieved by our approach across different workload types. AI training workloads showed the highest reduction potential (22.7%) due to their flexibility in scheduling and significant energy demands.
Table 8. Carbon Emission Reduction by Workload Type.

Workload Type

PFS

EES

SCAS

C3O

AI Training

0.581

0.492

0.413

0.319

AI Inference

0.382

0.327

0.286

0.241

Big Data Analytic

0.415

0.352

0.312

0.263

Scientific Computing

0.437

0.371

0.324

0.268

Web Services

0.289

0.257

0.231

0.205

Geographical Distribution Optimization
The CCO system achieves significant geographical distribution optimization through effective migration of computational loads to low-carbon nodes in western regions. The utilization rate of western nodes increases to 82.7%, while time-shifted scheduling strategies fully leverage the potential of renewable energy sources.
Fault Recovery Capability
The application of the digital twin platform reduces the mean time to recovery (MTTR) from 2 hours to 15 minutes, substantially enhancing system operational reliability.
5. Conclusion and Future Work [10, 12, 14]
This study addresses the challenge of high carbon emissions in intelligent computing centers by proposing a carbon-computing coupling optimization theory and a green scheduling system. Through the synergistic integration of a dynamic carbon efficiency equation, a virtual carbon flow model, a deep reinforcement learning scheduler, and a digital twin platform, significant reduction in carbon emissions and improvement in energy efficiency have been achieved. Experimental results validate the effectiveness and practicality of the proposed system in the "East Data, West Computing" scenario.
Future research will focus on the following directions: (1) modeling and solving multi-timescale coupled optimization problems; (2) in-depth exploration of deep interaction mechanisms with electricity markets; (3) extension of carbon-aware scheduling methods to edge computing scenarios; and (4) investigation of cross-chain carbon footprint tracking and verification technologies.
Abbreviations

DRL

Deep Reinforcement Learning

MTTR

Mean Time to Recovery

IEA

International Energy Agency

FLOP

Floating Point Operations

CI

Carbon Intensity

PUE

Power Usage Effectiveness

PQ

Priority Queue

ADI

Alternating Direction Implicit

MDP

Markov Decision Process

DQN

Deep Q-Network

LSTM

Long Short-Term Memory

QoS

Quality of Service

PFS

Performance-First Scheduler

EES

Energy-Efficient Scheduler

SCAS

Static Carbon-Aware Scheduler

C3O

Carbon-Computing Coupling Optimization System

Author Contributions
Guiyuan Xie: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing
Wenguo Wei: Conceptualization, Resources
Funding
This work is supported by the Key-Area Special Development Project of Guangdong Provincial Department of Education under Grant No. 2025ZDZX1012.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] China Academy of Information and Communications Technology (CAICT). Data Center White Paper (2023). Beijing: CAICT, 2023.
[2] National Development and Reform Commission. *Implementation Plan for Green and High-Quality Development of Data Centers and 5G New Infrastructure under the Dual-Carbon Goals*. Beijing: NDRC, 2022.
[3] Li, H., et al. “Carbon-aware scheduling for sustainable computing: A survey and future directions.” IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Computing, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 45–62, 2023.
[4] Wang, J., et al. “Research on cloud computing task scheduling algorithm based on deep reinforcement learning.” Chinese Journal of Computers, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1023–1040, 2022.
[5] Zhang, Y., et al. “Digital twin for smart manufacturing: The state of the art and research perspectives.” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 68, pp. 240–256, 2023.
[6] Liu, B., et al. “Research on green and low-carbon development path of data centers under the background of ‘East Data, West Computing’.” Strategic Study of CAE, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 78–87, 2023.
[7] Wang, C., et al. “Carbon-efficient virtual machine placement in cloud data centers.” IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1452–1465, 2022.
[8] Research Group on China’s Power System Transition Path under Carbon Neutrality. “Optimization of China’s power system carbon neutrality path.” Scientia Sinica Technologica, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 589–602, 2023.
[9] Radovanović, A., et al. “Carbon-aware computing: A survey.” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 55, no. 8, Article 162, pp. 1–38, 2023.
[10] Islam, M. T., et al. “Deep reinforcement learning for task scheduling in edge computing: A survey.” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 436–468, 2024.
[11] Chen, X., et al. “Digital twin-enabled intelligent energy management for data centers: A review.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 189, Article 114002, 2024.
[12] Wu, H., et al. “Carbon-aware workload migration in geo-distributed data centers: A reinforcement learning approach.” IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1768–1782, 2023.
[13] Li, Y., et al. “Virtual power flow: A new concept for carbon emission flow tracing in power systems.” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 3812–3825, 2023.
[14] Zhou, Z., et al. “Energy-efficient and carbon-aware scheduling in cloud data centers: A comprehensive survey.” Journal of Network and Computer Applications, vol. 215, Article 103639, 2023.
[15] Liu, J., et al. “East Data West Computing: A new paradigm for sustainable computing in China.” IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 52–60, 2023.
[16] Gupta, S., et al. “Digital twin-driven predictive maintenance for data center cooling systems.” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 456–467, 2024.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Xie, G., Wei, W. (2026). Carbon-Computing Coupling Optimization and Green Scheduling System for Intelligent Computing Centers. American Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 9(2), 49-57. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20260902.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Xie, G.; Wei, W. Carbon-Computing Coupling Optimization and Green Scheduling System for Intelligent Computing Centers. Am. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 2026, 9(2), 49-57. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcst.20260902.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Xie G, Wei W. Carbon-Computing Coupling Optimization and Green Scheduling System for Intelligent Computing Centers. Am J Comput Sci Technol. 2026;9(2):49-57. doi: 10.11648/j.ajcst.20260902.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajcst.20260902.11,
      author = {Guiyuan Xie and Wenguo Wei},
      title = {Carbon-Computing Coupling Optimization and Green Scheduling System for Intelligent Computing Centers},
      journal = {American Journal of Computer Science and Technology},
      volume = {9},
      number = {2},
      pages = {49-57},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajcst.20260902.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20260902.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajcst.20260902.11},
      abstract = {Under China’s “Dual-Carbon” strategic goal, reducing carbon emissions in computing centers has become a critical challenge. The increasing scale of data centers, particularly in the context of initiatives such as “East Data, West Computing,” necessitates new approaches that jointly optimize computing efficiency and carbon footprint. This paper aims to address this challenge by proposing a novel carbon-computing coupling optimization framework and a green scheduling system designed to minimize the carbon emissions associated with computational tasks while maintaining system robustness. We first establish a carbon efficiency dynamic equilibrium equation and introduce the concept of virtual carbon flow to model the carbon footprint of computing tasks. Based on this modeling, we develop a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) based scheduler that dynamically migrates tasks to low-carbon nodes. In addition, we integrate a digital twin platform that preemptively simulates failure scenarios to enhance system robustness and resilience. Experimental results in simulated “East Data, West Computing” scenarios demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The system reduces carbon emissions per unit of computing power by 18%, improves the energy efficiency ratio in western nodes by 35%, and decreases the Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR) from 2 hours to 15 minutes. These findings validate the potential of carbon-computing coupling optimization in achieving both sustainability and reliability goals for large-scale computing centers.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Carbon-Computing Coupling Optimization and Green Scheduling System for Intelligent Computing Centers
    AU  - Guiyuan Xie
    AU  - Wenguo Wei
    Y1  - 2026/04/29
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20260902.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajcst.20260902.11
    T2  - American Journal of Computer Science and Technology
    JF  - American Journal of Computer Science and Technology
    JO  - American Journal of Computer Science and Technology
    SP  - 49
    EP  - 57
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-012X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajcst.20260902.11
    AB  - Under China’s “Dual-Carbon” strategic goal, reducing carbon emissions in computing centers has become a critical challenge. The increasing scale of data centers, particularly in the context of initiatives such as “East Data, West Computing,” necessitates new approaches that jointly optimize computing efficiency and carbon footprint. This paper aims to address this challenge by proposing a novel carbon-computing coupling optimization framework and a green scheduling system designed to minimize the carbon emissions associated with computational tasks while maintaining system robustness. We first establish a carbon efficiency dynamic equilibrium equation and introduce the concept of virtual carbon flow to model the carbon footprint of computing tasks. Based on this modeling, we develop a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) based scheduler that dynamically migrates tasks to low-carbon nodes. In addition, we integrate a digital twin platform that preemptively simulates failure scenarios to enhance system robustness and resilience. Experimental results in simulated “East Data, West Computing” scenarios demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. The system reduces carbon emissions per unit of computing power by 18%, improves the energy efficiency ratio in western nodes by 35%, and decreases the Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR) from 2 hours to 15 minutes. These findings validate the potential of carbon-computing coupling optimization in achieving both sustainability and reliability goals for large-scale computing centers.
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Collage of Computer and Science, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, China

    Biography: Guiyuan Xie is an Associate Professor at the School of Computer Science, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University. She completed her Master of Engineering in Software Engineering from Sun Yat-sen University in 2005, and her Bachelor of Science in Computer Science and Technology from Hunan Normal University in 2000. Recognized for her extensive judging and evaluation expertise, Prof. Xie has been appointed as a Judge and Supervisor for the Guangdong Vocational College Professional Skills Competition, a Judge for the Guangdong Big Data Technology and Application Competition, and an Evaluation Expert for both the Guangdong Provincial Department of Science and Technology and Guangdong Government Procurement. She has served as Principal Investigator (PI) for multiple provincial and municipal-level research projects, including recent work on data desensitization systems and VR interactive platforms.

    Research Fields: High Performance Computing, High Performance Storage, and Artificial Intelligence.

  • Collage of Computer and Science, Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, Guangzhou, China

    Biography: Wenguo Wei is a Professor and Doctoral Supervisor at Guangdong Polytechnic Normal University, where he serves as the Director of the Network and Information Center. He completed his Ph.D. in Computer Application from South China University of Technology in 2005. Recognized for his academic leadership, Prof. Wei serves as the Director of the Guangdong University Mobile Information Engineering Research Center, leads the Guangdong Provincial Core Curriculum Teaching Team for Computer Courses in Electronic Information Majors, and is a Senior Member of the China Computer Federation (CCF). He has been honored with the Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Award (First Class) in 2021.

    Research Fields: High Performance Computing, High Performance Storage.