The study was done at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center (ATARC) to investigate the effect of different dietary ration on growth performance of crossbred male calves and to identify the most economical feeding dietary ration. Three dietary treatments rations (treatment one=65% wheat bran+ 35% Cotton seed cake, treatment two=50% wheat bran + 49% Noug cake and treatment three=20% Maize grain + 45% wheat bran + 35% Noug seed cakes) were evaluated. Complete Randomized Block Design was used to assign eighteen cross bred male calves randomly to three dietary rations. All experimental calves were supplemented dietary rations based on their body weight at the rate of 2.5% of their live body weight throughout the experimental period. The results indicated that there were significant difference in average daily weight gain and total weight gain between crossbred male calves fed with dietary T1 and T3. Calves fed with dietary ration T1 and T2 numerically difference in final body weight, even though not statistically significant. Partial budget analysis indicated that there was no significant difference among calves fed with three dietary feed rations. But cross bred male calves fed with dietary treatment T2 was numerically higher in gross margin as compared to T1 and T3 rations. Further evaluation of different dietary rations on growth performance of yearling age (1-1.5 years old) cross bred bull calves were warranted to attain export market live weight at early age.
Published in | American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics (Volume 6, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.12 |
Page(s) | 11-15 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Crossbred Calves, Growth Performance, Dietary Ration
[1] | Ayeneshet B, Abera M, Wondifraw Z. (2018). Reproductive and Productive Performance of Indigenous Dairy Cows under Smallholder Farmers Management System in North. Journal of Fisheries & Livestock Production. 6 (1): 1-5. |
[2] | Gebretnsae Mezgebe, Solomon Gizaw, Mengistu Urge, Arvind Chavhan (2017). Begait cattle production systems and production performances in northern Ethiopia. Int. J. of Life Sciences. 5 (4): 506-516. |
[3] | Negassa, A., Shahidur, R., Gebremedhin, B. (2011). Livestock Production and Marketing in Ethiopia. Ethiopia Strategy Support Program II, ESSP II Working Paper, pp: 26-35. |
[4] | Yesihak Y. M., Webb E. C. (2015). Causes of Beef Carcass and Organ Condemnations in Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10 (4), 147-160. |
[5] | Zekarias Bassa, Shewan Gizawu Wolde, Tesfaye Alemu, Melese Yilma, Asrat Terra, Berekt Zeleke, Deibe Gemiyu (2016). Evaluation of Locally Available Energy Source Feeds on Fattening Performance of Local Oxen and Carcass Analysis in Wolaita, Southern Ethiopia. Hydrol Current Res 7: 255. doi: 10.4172/2157-7587.1000255. |
[6] | Tsigereda Fekadu, Mengistu Urge, Emebet Moreda (2016). Assessment of Traditional Cattle Fattening Practices in Hararghe Highland Parts of Ethiopia. World journal of agricultural science, 2016, 12 (2): 149-160. ISSN 1817-3047. |
[7] | Tsegay Teklebrhan, Mengistu Urge (2013). Assessment of commercial feedlot finishing practices at eastern Shoa, Ethiopia. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, Vol. 3, No. 4, 273-280. |
[8] | Aman Gudeto, Tesfaye Alemu T. Ashebir Worku, Frehiwot Mesele, Genet Dadi, Mieso Guru (2020). On-farm evaluation and demonstration of different feeding Agricultural Science. Volume 2 issue 1. |
[9] | Mekuria, W., Mekonnen, K., Thorne, P. et al. Competition for land resources: driving forces and consequences in crop-livestock production systems of the Ethiopian highlands. Ecol Process 7, 30 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-018-0143-7. |
[10] | Gadzma, I. U., Yashim, S. M., Abdu, S. B., Makun, H. J., Barje, P. P., Achi, N. P. (2018). Feed, Intake, growth performance and Nutrient Utilization in Friesian xBunaji calves Fed Soya milk based Milk replacer. J. Animal Prod. Res. (2017) 29 (2): 96-111. |
[11] | Iftikhar Ali1, Umar Farooq, Sajid Hameed', Faisal Shehzad", Falik Sher Khan, Muhammad Asim Tausif (2008). Performance of Cholistani Male Cattle Calves Fed Fattening Ration Under Local Climatic Conditions. Pak. J. Agri. Sci., Vol. 45 (2). |
[12] | Khan M. R. (2003). Royal of agro based industry for national economic development. P. 18 Proc. Semin. Role. Agro. Based. Indust. Nat. Econ. Dev. Dhaka, Bangladesh. |
[13] | Haque F. M., Paul D. C., Mahabbatullah M. (2005). Farming systems research activities on livestock component at Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute. Pp. 182-194 in Proc. Livest. Dev. Bangladesh. Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh. |
[14] | Aydin, R., Yanar, M., Kocyigit, R., Diler, A., Ozkilicci, T. Z., 2009. Effect of direct-fed microbials plus enzyme supplementation on the fattening performance of Holstein young bulls at two different initial body weights. African Journal of Agricultural Research., Vol. 4. P. 548-552. |
[15] | Malope P, Tsopito. CM, Aganga AA, Madibela OR, (2007). Profitablity of dry season beef –lotting in rain deficit countries: the cae of Botswana. Livestock Res. Rular Dev., 19 (6). |
[16] | Mlote, SN, Mdoe, NSY, Isinika, A. C, Mtenga, L. A (2012). Value addition of beef cattle fattening in the Lake Zone in Tanzania: Challenges and opportunities. Livestock Res. Rural Dev., 24 (95). |
[17] | Girma D, Mieso G, Tesfaye A, Arse G, Frehowit M, Ashebir W and Aman G. (2015). Effect of different feeds option on growth response and carcass characteristic of two years aged Borana bulls for export market weight gain at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center. Basic Research Journal of Agricultural Science Vol. 4 (5) pp. 139-145. |
APA Style
Genet Dadi, Ashebir Worku, Aman Gudeto, Tesfye Alemu Tucho, Mieso Guru, et al. (2021). Growth Performance Evaluation of Crossbred Male Calves of Holstein Friesian with Arsi Cattle Fed on Different Dietary Ration. American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics, 6(1), 11-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.12
ACS Style
Genet Dadi; Ashebir Worku; Aman Gudeto; Tesfye Alemu Tucho; Mieso Guru, et al. Growth Performance Evaluation of Crossbred Male Calves of Holstein Friesian with Arsi Cattle Fed on Different Dietary Ration. Am. J. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2021, 6(1), 11-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.12
AMA Style
Genet Dadi, Ashebir Worku, Aman Gudeto, Tesfye Alemu Tucho, Mieso Guru, et al. Growth Performance Evaluation of Crossbred Male Calves of Holstein Friesian with Arsi Cattle Fed on Different Dietary Ration. Am J Environ Resour Econ. 2021;6(1):11-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.12, author = {Genet Dadi and Ashebir Worku and Aman Gudeto and Tesfye Alemu Tucho and Mieso Guru and Frehiwot Mesele and Girma Debele}, title = {Growth Performance Evaluation of Crossbred Male Calves of Holstein Friesian with Arsi Cattle Fed on Different Dietary Ration}, journal = {American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics}, volume = {6}, number = {1}, pages = {11-15}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajere.20210601.12}, abstract = {The study was done at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center (ATARC) to investigate the effect of different dietary ration on growth performance of crossbred male calves and to identify the most economical feeding dietary ration. Three dietary treatments rations (treatment one=65% wheat bran+ 35% Cotton seed cake, treatment two=50% wheat bran + 49% Noug cake and treatment three=20% Maize grain + 45% wheat bran + 35% Noug seed cakes) were evaluated. Complete Randomized Block Design was used to assign eighteen cross bred male calves randomly to three dietary rations. All experimental calves were supplemented dietary rations based on their body weight at the rate of 2.5% of their live body weight throughout the experimental period. The results indicated that there were significant difference in average daily weight gain and total weight gain between crossbred male calves fed with dietary T1 and T3. Calves fed with dietary ration T1 and T2 numerically difference in final body weight, even though not statistically significant. Partial budget analysis indicated that there was no significant difference among calves fed with three dietary feed rations. But cross bred male calves fed with dietary treatment T2 was numerically higher in gross margin as compared to T1 and T3 rations. Further evaluation of different dietary rations on growth performance of yearling age (1-1.5 years old) cross bred bull calves were warranted to attain export market live weight at early age.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Growth Performance Evaluation of Crossbred Male Calves of Holstein Friesian with Arsi Cattle Fed on Different Dietary Ration AU - Genet Dadi AU - Ashebir Worku AU - Aman Gudeto AU - Tesfye Alemu Tucho AU - Mieso Guru AU - Frehiwot Mesele AU - Girma Debele Y1 - 2021/03/10 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.12 T2 - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics JF - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics JO - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics SP - 11 EP - 15 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-787X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.12 AB - The study was done at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center (ATARC) to investigate the effect of different dietary ration on growth performance of crossbred male calves and to identify the most economical feeding dietary ration. Three dietary treatments rations (treatment one=65% wheat bran+ 35% Cotton seed cake, treatment two=50% wheat bran + 49% Noug cake and treatment three=20% Maize grain + 45% wheat bran + 35% Noug seed cakes) were evaluated. Complete Randomized Block Design was used to assign eighteen cross bred male calves randomly to three dietary rations. All experimental calves were supplemented dietary rations based on their body weight at the rate of 2.5% of their live body weight throughout the experimental period. The results indicated that there were significant difference in average daily weight gain and total weight gain between crossbred male calves fed with dietary T1 and T3. Calves fed with dietary ration T1 and T2 numerically difference in final body weight, even though not statistically significant. Partial budget analysis indicated that there was no significant difference among calves fed with three dietary feed rations. But cross bred male calves fed with dietary treatment T2 was numerically higher in gross margin as compared to T1 and T3 rations. Further evaluation of different dietary rations on growth performance of yearling age (1-1.5 years old) cross bred bull calves were warranted to attain export market live weight at early age. VL - 6 IS - 1 ER -