Modeling Household Cooking Fuel Energy Choice in Rwanda

Mushinzimana Isaac; Niyonshuti Emmanuel

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Modeling Household Cooking Fuel Energy Choice in Rwanda

Mushinzimana Isaac, Niyonshuti Emmanuel

Published in American Journal of Modern Energy (Volume 7, Issue 4)

Received: 30 March 2021 Accepted: 29 April 2021 Published: 23 August 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This investigation applies a multinomial logit procedure to demonstrate decisions of fuel for cooking in Rwanda. The decisions considered are five fundamental cooking fuels: wood, charcoal, gas, lamp oil and generator; Using the Integrated Household Living Condition Surveys from 2010 up to 2017 (EICVs 2010-2017) data, the study identifies the driving forces that underpin and support the household's decision of fuel for cooking and investigates the fundamental factors that decide decision of essential cooking fuel choices in Rwanda. The descriptive results showed the higher dependency on biomass cooking fuel among Rwandan households with 84.55 percent for firewood usage and 12 percent for charcoal usage for cooking and the result multinomial logit revealed that location of living arrangement, home possession, household size, type of marriage, household income level, and type of habitant play significant role in explaining the probability of cooking fuel choices within households. Further the results show that clean energy is bound to be utilized in urban families, where household with high income more often use LPG compare to others. The study also showed that main stream of household in Rwanda depend on more on non-clean energy while cooking, and this is more pronounced in rural households.

Published in	American Journal of Modern Energy (Volume 7, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13
Page(s)	61-68
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Cooking Fuel, Household Energy Choice, Multinomial Logit

References

[1]	Arowosoge, O. G. E & Faleyimu, “Assessment of Household Energy Utilized for Cooking in Ado-Ekiti Metropolitan Area of Ekiti State, Nigeria,” International Journal of Academic Research, pp. 3(151-155, 2011.
[2]	United Nations, “policy brief in support of the high level political forum 2020: Accelerating SDG7 achievement in time of Covid19,” Uinited Nations, 2020.
[3]	WHO, “Interventions to reduce indoor air pollution avialble: http://www.who.int/indoorair/interventions/en/. accessed 23 Dec 2020,” WHO, 2017.
[4]	Rehfuess EA, Puzzolo E, Stanistreet D, Pope D, Bruce NG, “Enablers and barriers to large scale uptake of improved solid fuel stoves:a systematic review.,” Environ Health Perspect 122, pp. 120-130, 2014.
[5]	H. Ladislas, “The transition from cooking with charcoal to LPG gas in Rwanda(2018-2024),” intergovermental research and policy journal, 2019.
[6]	B. Malinski, “"Impact Assessment of Chitetezo Mbaula, Improved Household Firewood Stove in Rural Malawi",,” GTZ. Probec., 2008.
[7]	EICV5, NISR, “Rwanda Poverty Profile Report,” EICV5, NISR, Kigali, 2016-2017.
[8]	X. Zhang and S. Hassen, “Household fuel choice in urban China: A random effect generalized probit analysis,” Journal of Business and Social Sciences Research, 2014.
[9]	Alem, Y., Beyene, A. D., Köhlin, G., & Mekonnen, A., “Household Fuel Choice in Urban Ethiopia: A Random Effects Multinomial Logit Analysis.,” Environment for Development, 2013.
[10]	Reddy, B. S., “‘A multilogit model for fuel shifts in the domestic sector’,” Energy 20, p. 929–936., 2015.
[11]	R. Heltberg, “‘Factors determining household fuel choice in Guatemala’,” Environment and Development Economics 10, p. 337–361, 2015.
[12]	Alam, M., J. Sathaye, and D. Barnes, “Urban household energy use in India:efficiency and policy implications’,” Energy Policy 26, p. 885–891, 2008.
[13]	Chambwera, M., Folmer, H.,, ““Fuel switching in Harare: An almost ideal demand system approach”,” Energy Policy, 35,, pp. 2538-2548, 2007..
[14]	Saad. S, Bugaje, “Biomass consumption in Nigeri a: Trends and policy issues.,” Journal of Agriculture and Sustainability. 9 (2):, pp. 127- 157, 2016.
[15]	Farsi, M., Filippini, M., Pachauri, S., “"Fuel choices in urban India households",” Environment and Development Economics, 12, pp. 757-774, 2008.
[16]	Gangopadhyay, S., B. Ramaswami, and W. Wadhwa, “‘Access of the poor to modern household fuels in India’,” SERFA Report for the World Bank, washington DC, 2003.
[17]	B. Ouedraogo, “"Household energy preferences for cooking in urban Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso",” Energy Policy, Vol. 34 No. 18, p. 3787–3795, 2006.
[18]	Koswari, R., & Zerriffi, H., “Three-dimensional energy profile: A conceptual framework for assessing household energy use.,” Energy Policy, 39 (12), p. 7505–7517, 2011.
[19]	van der Kroon B, Brouwer R and van Beukering PJH, “The energy ladder: theoretical myth or empirical truth? Results from a meta-analysis.,” Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2013; 20, p. 504–513., 2013.
[20]	Rahut, D. B., Behera, B., & Ali, A., “Determinants of household energy use in Bhutan.,” Energy, 69 (May), p. 661–672., 2014.
[21]	A. Wickramasinghe, “"Energy access and transition to cleaner cooking fuels and technologies in SriLanka: Issues and policy limitations",” Energy Policy, Vol. 39 No. 12, p. 7567–7574., 2011.
[22]	Ezzati, M. and D. M. Kammen, “‘Evaluating the health benefits of transitions in household energy technologies in Kenya’,” Energy Policy 30, p. 815–826., 2010.
[23]	Jumbe, C. B.; Angelsen, A., “Modeling choice of fuelwood source among rural households in Malawi: A multinomial probit analysis.,” Energy Econ. 2011,, pp. 33, 732–738., 2011.
[24]	Bourguignon, F., Fournier, M., Gurgand, M.,, “ “Selection Bias Corrections Based on the Multinomial Logit Model: Monte-Carlo Comparisons”,” Journal of Economic Surveys, 21(1), pp. 174-205., 2007.
[25]	D. McFadden, “"Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour", in P. Zarembka (Ed.),” Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York,, p. 105–142, 2008.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Mushinzimana Isaac, Niyonshuti Emmanuel. (2021). Modeling Household Cooking Fuel Energy Choice in Rwanda. American Journal of Modern Energy, 7(4), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Mushinzimana Isaac; Niyonshuti Emmanuel. Modeling Household Cooking Fuel Energy Choice in Rwanda. Am. J. Mod. Energy 2021, 7(4), 61-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Mushinzimana Isaac, Niyonshuti Emmanuel. Modeling Household Cooking Fuel Energy Choice in Rwanda. Am J Mod Energy. 2021;7(4):61-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13,
  author = {Mushinzimana Isaac and Niyonshuti Emmanuel},
  title = {Modeling Household Cooking Fuel Energy Choice in Rwanda},
  journal = {American Journal of Modern Energy},
  volume = {7},
  number = {4},
  pages = {61-68},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajme.20210704.13},
  abstract = {This investigation applies a multinomial logit procedure to demonstrate decisions of fuel for cooking in Rwanda. The decisions considered are five fundamental cooking fuels: wood, charcoal, gas, lamp oil and generator; Using the Integrated Household Living Condition Surveys from 2010 up to 2017 (EICVs 2010-2017) data, the study identifies the driving forces that underpin and support the household's decision of fuel for cooking and investigates the fundamental factors that decide decision of essential cooking fuel choices in Rwanda. The descriptive results showed the higher dependency on biomass cooking fuel among Rwandan households with 84.55 percent for firewood usage and 12 percent for charcoal usage for cooking and the result multinomial logit revealed that location of living arrangement, home possession, household size, type of marriage, household income level, and type of habitant play significant role in explaining the probability of cooking fuel choices within households. Further the results show that clean energy is bound to be utilized in urban families, where household with high income more often use LPG compare to others. The study also showed that main stream of household in Rwanda depend on more on non-clean energy while cooking, and this is more pronounced in rural households.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Modeling Household Cooking Fuel Energy Choice in Rwanda
AU  - Mushinzimana Isaac
AU  - Niyonshuti Emmanuel
Y1  - 2021/08/23
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13
T2  - American Journal of Modern Energy
JF  - American Journal of Modern Energy
JO  - American Journal of Modern Energy
SP  - 61
EP  - 68
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3797
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13
AB  - This investigation applies a multinomial logit procedure to demonstrate decisions of fuel for cooking in Rwanda. The decisions considered are five fundamental cooking fuels: wood, charcoal, gas, lamp oil and generator; Using the Integrated Household Living Condition Surveys from 2010 up to 2017 (EICVs 2010-2017) data, the study identifies the driving forces that underpin and support the household's decision of fuel for cooking and investigates the fundamental factors that decide decision of essential cooking fuel choices in Rwanda. The descriptive results showed the higher dependency on biomass cooking fuel among Rwandan households with 84.55 percent for firewood usage and 12 percent for charcoal usage for cooking and the result multinomial logit revealed that location of living arrangement, home possession, household size, type of marriage, household income level, and type of habitant play significant role in explaining the probability of cooking fuel choices within households. Further the results show that clean energy is bound to be utilized in urban families, where household with high income more often use LPG compare to others. The study also showed that main stream of household in Rwanda depend on more on non-clean energy while cooking, and this is more pronounced in rural households.
VL  - 7
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Mushinzimana Isaac

Department of Energy Economics, African Centre of Excellence in Energy for Sustainable Development University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda
Niyonshuti Emmanuel

Department of Energy Economics, African Centre of Excellence in Energy for Sustainable Development University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Mushinzimana Isaac, Niyonshuti Emmanuel. (2021). Modeling Household Cooking Fuel Energy Choice in Rwanda. American Journal of Modern Energy, 7(4), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Mushinzimana Isaac; Niyonshuti Emmanuel. Modeling Household Cooking Fuel Energy Choice in Rwanda. Am. J. Mod. Energy 2021, 7(4), 61-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Mushinzimana Isaac, Niyonshuti Emmanuel. Modeling Household Cooking Fuel Energy Choice in Rwanda. Am J Mod Energy. 2021;7(4):61-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13,
  author = {Mushinzimana Isaac and Niyonshuti Emmanuel},
  title = {Modeling Household Cooking Fuel Energy Choice in Rwanda},
  journal = {American Journal of Modern Energy},
  volume = {7},
  number = {4},
  pages = {61-68},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajme.20210704.13},
  abstract = {This investigation applies a multinomial logit procedure to demonstrate decisions of fuel for cooking in Rwanda. The decisions considered are five fundamental cooking fuels: wood, charcoal, gas, lamp oil and generator; Using the Integrated Household Living Condition Surveys from 2010 up to 2017 (EICVs 2010-2017) data, the study identifies the driving forces that underpin and support the household's decision of fuel for cooking and investigates the fundamental factors that decide decision of essential cooking fuel choices in Rwanda. The descriptive results showed the higher dependency on biomass cooking fuel among Rwandan households with 84.55 percent for firewood usage and 12 percent for charcoal usage for cooking and the result multinomial logit revealed that location of living arrangement, home possession, household size, type of marriage, household income level, and type of habitant play significant role in explaining the probability of cooking fuel choices within households. Further the results show that clean energy is bound to be utilized in urban families, where household with high income more often use LPG compare to others. The study also showed that main stream of household in Rwanda depend on more on non-clean energy while cooking, and this is more pronounced in rural households.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Modeling Household Cooking Fuel Energy Choice in Rwanda
AU  - Mushinzimana Isaac
AU  - Niyonshuti Emmanuel
Y1  - 2021/08/23
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13
T2  - American Journal of Modern Energy
JF  - American Journal of Modern Energy
JO  - American Journal of Modern Energy
SP  - 61
EP  - 68
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3797
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajme.20210704.13
AB  - This investigation applies a multinomial logit procedure to demonstrate decisions of fuel for cooking in Rwanda. The decisions considered are five fundamental cooking fuels: wood, charcoal, gas, lamp oil and generator; Using the Integrated Household Living Condition Surveys from 2010 up to 2017 (EICVs 2010-2017) data, the study identifies the driving forces that underpin and support the household's decision of fuel for cooking and investigates the fundamental factors that decide decision of essential cooking fuel choices in Rwanda. The descriptive results showed the higher dependency on biomass cooking fuel among Rwandan households with 84.55 percent for firewood usage and 12 percent for charcoal usage for cooking and the result multinomial logit revealed that location of living arrangement, home possession, household size, type of marriage, household income level, and type of habitant play significant role in explaining the probability of cooking fuel choices within households. Further the results show that clean energy is bound to be utilized in urban families, where household with high income more often use LPG compare to others. The study also showed that main stream of household in Rwanda depend on more on non-clean energy while cooking, and this is more pronounced in rural households.
VL  - 7
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download