The bonded joints in composite structures is a challenging point in both research study and industry application. Compared with homogeneous and isotropic material, there is higher chance of stress concentration and intrinsic weak for this anisotropic structures. It is most common source of failure in structural laminates. So it is important to model and analyze the composite bonded joint to get the mechanical response and estimate the damage evolution. In this review paper, composite bonded joint are categorized based on bonded methods, materials, loading methods and failure modes. Multiple widely used adhesive bonded joint models including cohesive zone element model (CZM), interface element model, multiple point constraint model, kinking crack model, and repeating RVE model are introduced and discussed. To estimate the damage evolution in the bonded joint, a series of damage criteria have been developed including displacement based, stress based, energy based and modulus based damage criteria. Those damage criteria of bonded joint are also discussed and compared. This review work is important for the development of modeling of composite bonded joint in future.
Published in | American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (Volume 2, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajmie.20170201.11 |
Page(s) | 1-7 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Modeling, Composite Bonded Joint, Adhesive, Damage Criterion
[1] | F. Bianchi, X. Zhang, A cohesive zone model for predicting delamination suppression in z-pinned laminates, Composites Science and Technique, 71 (2011) 1898–1907. |
[2] | J. Zhang, B. Koo, N. Subramanian, Y. Liu and A. Chattopadhyay. An optimized cross-linked network model to simulate the linear elastic material response of a smart polymer. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures (2015): 1045389X15595292. |
[3] | J. Zhang, B. Koo, Y. Liu, J. Zou, A. Chattopadhyay, L. Dai. A novel statistical spring-bead based network model for self-sensing smart polymer materials. Smart Materials and Structures. 24.8 (2015): 085022. |
[4] | P. Kerfriden, O. Allix, P. Gosselet, A three-scale domain decomposition method for the 3D analysis of debonding in laminates, Comput Mech, (2009) 44:343–362. |
[5] | P. Camanho, Carlos G. Dávila, Mixed-Mode Decohesion Finite Elements for the Simulation of Delamination in Composite Materials, NASA/TM-2002-211737. |
[6] | J. Ye, T. Kobayashi, M. Murakawa, T. Higuchi. Kernel discriminant analysis for environmental sound recognition based on acoustic subspace. 2013 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing 2013 May 26 (pp. 808-812). IEEE. |
[7] | L. Gornet, H. Ijaz, A high-cyclic elastic fatigue damage model for carbon fibre epoxy matrix laminates with different mode mixtures, Composites: Part B, 42 (2011) 1173–1180. |
[8] | J. Zhang, K. Liu, C. Luo and A. Chattopadhyay. (2013). Crack initiation and fatigue life prediction on aluminum lug joints using statistical volume element–based multiscale modeling. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, 24(17), 2097-2109. |
[9] | J. Zhang, J. Johnston and A. Chattopadhyay. (2014). Physics‐based multiscale damage criterion for fatigue crack prediction in aluminium alloy. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 37 (2), 119-131. |
[10] | L. J. Hart-Smith, Adhesive bonded double-lap joints, Technical report for NASA, January 1973, NASA CR 112235. |
[11] | L. J. Hart-Smith, Adhesive bonded single-lap joints, Technical report for NASA, January 1973, NASA CR 112236. |
[12] | M. K. Kim, D. J. Elder, C. H. Wang, S. Feih, Interaction of laminate damage and adhesive disbonding in composite scarf joints subjected to combined in-plane loading and impact, Composite Structures, 94 (2012) 945–953. |
[13] | J. Zhang, K. Liu, A. Chattopadhyay, (2012, November). Fatigue Life Prediction under Biaxial FALSTAFF Loading using Statistical Volume Element Based Multiscale Modeling. In ASME 2012 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (pp. 625-634). American Society of Mechanical Engineers. |
[14] | Jiansheng, G, Bingchen, W, Lei, L, Jinjun, Z, & Zhiwei, S. (2008). Effect of Structural Relaxation on Hardness and Shear Band Features of Zr_ (64.13) Cu_ (15.75) Ni_ (10.12) Al_ (10) Bulk Metallic Glass During Indentation. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, S4. |
[15] | J. J. C. Remmers, R. de Borst, Delamination buckling of fibre–metal laminates, Composites Science and Technology, 61 (2001) 2207–2213. |
[16] | J. Zhang, J. Gu, L. Li, Y. Huan and B. Wei. (2009). Bonding of alumina and metal using bulk metallic glass forming alloy. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 23(06n07), 1306-1312. |
[17] | T. S. Plagianakos, D. A. Saravanos, Higher-order layerwise laminate theory for the prediction of interlaminar shear stresses in thick composite and sandwich composite plates, Composite Structures, 87 (2009) 23–35. |
[18] | O. Rabinovitch, Impact of thermal loads on interfacial debonding in FRP strengthened beams, International Journal of Solids and Structures, 47 (2010) 3234–3244. |
[19] | O. Rabinovitch and Y. Frostig, Delamination failure of RC beams strengthened with FRP strips-A closed form high order and fracture mechanics approach, J. Eng. Mech. 2001.127:852-861. |
[20] | C. Orifici, R. S. Thomson, R. Degenhardt, C. Bisagni, and J. Bayandor, Development of a finite element analysis methodology for the propagation of delamination in composite structures, Mechanics of Composite Materials, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2007. |
[21] | J. Li, S. Meng, X. Tian, F. Song, C. Jiang, Composites: Part B, 43 (2012) 961–971. |
[22] | A. Plumtree, M. Melo, J. Dahl, Damage evolution in a [±45]2S CFRP laminate under block loading conditions, International Journal of Fatigue 32 (2010) 139–145. |
[23] | P. Maimı´, P. P. Camanho, J. A. Mayugo, C. G. Da´vila, A continuum damage model for composite laminates: Part II –Computational implementation and validation, Mechanics of Materials, 39 (2007) 909–919. |
[24] | P. Maimı´, P. P. Camanho, J. A. Mayugo, C. G. Da´vila, A continuum damage model for composite laminates: Part I – Constitutive model, Mechanics of Materials, 39 (2007) 897–908. |
[25] | D. S. Dugdale, yielding of steel sheets containing slits. J. Appl. Mech, 1960, 8: 100-104. |
[26] | J. N. Reddy, An evaluation of equivalent single layer and laywise theories of composite laminates, Composite Structures, 25 (1993) 21-35. |
[27] | T. Kobayashi, J. Ye. Acoustic feature extraction by statistics based local binary pattern for environmental sound classification. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2014 May 4 (pp. 3052-3056). IEEE. |
[28] | J. Ye, M. Iwata, K. Takumi, M. Murakawa, H. Tetsuya, Y. Kubota, T. Yui, K. Mori. Statistical Impact-Echo Analysis Based on Grassmann Manifold Learning: Its Preliminary Results for Concrete Condition Assessment. InEWSHM-7th European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring 2014 Jul 8. |
[29] | P. Ladeveze, Loiseau and D. Dureisseix, A micro–macro and parallel computational strategy for highly heterogeneous structures, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng, 2001; 52:121–138. |
[30] | A. Strong, Brent: high performance and engineering thermoplastic composites. Technomic Pub, 1993. |
[31] | M. Schwartz, Jointing of composite materials, ASM Int (1994), 35-88. |
[32] | S. Todd, Joining thermoplastic composites. Proceedings of the 22nd International SAMPE Technical Conference, vol. 22, 1990 383–92. |
[33] | J. Zhang, W. Xu and X. F. Yao, ‘Load Detection of Functionally Graded Material Based on Coherent Gradient Sensing Method’, Journal of Mechanics, pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1017/jmech.2016.114. |
[34] | J. Mackerle, Model Simulat Mater Sci Eng, 10 (6) (2002), p. 637. |
[35] | A. Baldan, J Mater Sci, 39 (1) (2004), p. 1. |
[36] | A. Baldan, J Mater Sci, 39 (15) (2004), p. 4729. |
[37] | M. D. Banea, L. F. M. da Silvam, P I Mech Eng L-J Mater, 223 (1) (2009), p. 1. |
[38] | G. Jiansheng, W. Bingchen, L. Lei, Z. Jinjun, amd S. Zhiwei. (2008). Effect of Structural Relaxation on Hardness and Shear Band Features of Zr_ (64.13) Cu_ (15.75) Ni_ (10.12) Al_ (10) Bulk Metallic Glass During Indentation. Rare Metal Materials and Engineering, S4. |
APA Style
Miller Park, Kelly Frey, Lion Simon. (2016). Modeling and Analysis of Composite Bonded Joints. American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 2(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmie.20170201.11
ACS Style
Miller Park; Kelly Frey; Lion Simon. Modeling and Analysis of Composite Bonded Joints. Am. J. Mech. Ind. Eng. 2016, 2(1), 1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmie.20170201.11
AMA Style
Miller Park, Kelly Frey, Lion Simon. Modeling and Analysis of Composite Bonded Joints. Am J Mech Ind Eng. 2016;2(1):1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmie.20170201.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajmie.20170201.11, author = {Miller Park and Kelly Frey and Lion Simon}, title = {Modeling and Analysis of Composite Bonded Joints}, journal = {American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering}, volume = {2}, number = {1}, pages = {1-7}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajmie.20170201.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmie.20170201.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmie.20170201.11}, abstract = {The bonded joints in composite structures is a challenging point in both research study and industry application. Compared with homogeneous and isotropic material, there is higher chance of stress concentration and intrinsic weak for this anisotropic structures. It is most common source of failure in structural laminates. So it is important to model and analyze the composite bonded joint to get the mechanical response and estimate the damage evolution. In this review paper, composite bonded joint are categorized based on bonded methods, materials, loading methods and failure modes. Multiple widely used adhesive bonded joint models including cohesive zone element model (CZM), interface element model, multiple point constraint model, kinking crack model, and repeating RVE model are introduced and discussed. To estimate the damage evolution in the bonded joint, a series of damage criteria have been developed including displacement based, stress based, energy based and modulus based damage criteria. Those damage criteria of bonded joint are also discussed and compared. This review work is important for the development of modeling of composite bonded joint in future.}, year = {2016} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Modeling and Analysis of Composite Bonded Joints AU - Miller Park AU - Kelly Frey AU - Lion Simon Y1 - 2016/12/16 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmie.20170201.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajmie.20170201.11 T2 - American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering JF - American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering JO - American Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering SP - 1 EP - 7 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-6060 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmie.20170201.11 AB - The bonded joints in composite structures is a challenging point in both research study and industry application. Compared with homogeneous and isotropic material, there is higher chance of stress concentration and intrinsic weak for this anisotropic structures. It is most common source of failure in structural laminates. So it is important to model and analyze the composite bonded joint to get the mechanical response and estimate the damage evolution. In this review paper, composite bonded joint are categorized based on bonded methods, materials, loading methods and failure modes. Multiple widely used adhesive bonded joint models including cohesive zone element model (CZM), interface element model, multiple point constraint model, kinking crack model, and repeating RVE model are introduced and discussed. To estimate the damage evolution in the bonded joint, a series of damage criteria have been developed including displacement based, stress based, energy based and modulus based damage criteria. Those damage criteria of bonded joint are also discussed and compared. This review work is important for the development of modeling of composite bonded joint in future. VL - 2 IS - 1 ER -