Influence of Unlike Proportions of Preliminary and Activated Sludge on Methane Generation During Anaerobic Co-digestion

Md. Nurul Islam Siddique; Mohd Zamri Bin Ibrahim; Mohd Mokhlesur Rahman

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Influence of Unlike Proportions of Preliminary and Activated Sludge on Methane Generation During Anaerobic Co-digestion

Md. Nurul Islam Siddique, Mohd Zamri Bin Ibrahim, Mohd Mokhlesur Rahman

Published in American Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Spectroscopy (Volume 5, Issue 1)

Received: 20 April 2021 Accepted: 7 May 2021 Published: 27 May 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The aim of this study was to look into methane generation using different amounts of initial sludge (IS) and activated sludge (AS) for anaerobic transformation. To compare the best combination in analysis with a benchmark combination, C0, three experimental ratios (IS: AS) (v/v) were used: C1 (60: 40), C2 (80: 20), and C3 (100: 00). (40: 60). Anaerobic digestion was carried out at 37°C in mesophilic conditions with a 12 day HRT and a loading rate of 1.63 0.06 kg TVS/m3 day. In comparison to C0, biogas generation for ratios C1 and C2 increased from 25% to 38%. The maximum amount generated by combination C3, which was 52.44 percent more than that of C0, showed a clear improvement in specific methane generation. C1, which involves using less initial sludge and increasing activated sludge condensing, is the most realistic combination to use on a large scale. IS has a C/N proportion that is 2 times more than AS because of the higher organic compounds in IS. The obtained proportion of IS that ought to be added to AS to achieve the greatest methane production were 60 and 80% (combination C1 and C2), separately than the reference conditions, C0. Nevertheless, the influent ought to be deliberately arranged with a gradual increment to the ideal influent proportion to acclimatization of the microorganisms and avoid over-loading. 3.72 years are found to be the time needed to recover expenses.

Published in	American Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Spectroscopy (Volume 5, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12
Page(s)	10-15
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Methane, Anaerobic Co-digestion, IS: AS Ratio, Sludge

References

[1]	APHA (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and AStewater, 20th ed. Am Public Health Association, Maryland, USA.
[2]	AR Syukor, A. Z., MIM Said, MNI Siddique, 2015. Bio-sorption of Chromium using aquatic plant, Lepironia articulata. Adv. Environ. Biol 1, 13.
[3]	Cabbai, V., De Bortoli, N., Goi, D., 2016. Pilot plant experience on anaerobic codigestion of source selected OFMSW and sewage sludge. Waste Management 49, 47-54.
[4]	Chen, C., Guo, W. S., Ngo, H. H., Chang, S. W., Nguyen, D. D., Zhang, J., Liang, S., Guo, J. B., Zhang, X. B., 2018. Effects of C/N ratio on the performance of a hybrid sponge-assisted aerobic moving bed-anaerobic granular membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Bioresource Technology 247, 340-346.
[5]	Dai, X., Li, X., Zhang, D., Chen, Y., Dai, L., 2016. Simultaneous enhancement of methane production and methane content in biogas from waste activated sludge and perennial ryegrass anaerobic co-digestion: The effects of pH and C/N ratio. Bioresource Technology 216, 323-330.
[6]	Harb, M., Lou, E., Smith, A. L., Stadler, L. B., 2019. Perspectives on the fate of micropollutants in mainstream anaerobic wastewater treatment. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 57, 94-100.
[7]	Islam Siddique, M. N., Khalid, Z. B., Ibrahim, M. Z. B., 2020. Effect of additional nutrients on bio-methane production from anaerobic digestion of farming waste: Feasibility & Fertilizer recovery. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 8 (1), 103569.
[8]	Khalid, Z. B., Siddique, M. N. I., Nasrullah, M., Singh, L., Wahid, Z. B. A., Ahmad, M. F., 2019. Application of solar assisted bioreactor for biogas production from palm oil mill effluent co-digested with cattle manure. Environmental Technology & Innovation 16, 100446.
[9]	Krishnan, S., Singh, L., Mishra, P., Nasrullah, M., Sakinah, M., Thakur, S., Siddique, N. I., Wahid, Z. A., 2017. Comparison of process stability in methane generation from palm oil mill effluent using dairy manure as inoculum. Environmental Technology & Innovation 8, 360-365.
[10]	Leite, L. d. S., Hoffmann, M. T., Daniel, L. A., 2019. Microalgae cultivation for municipal and piggery wastewater treatment in Brazil. Journal of Water Process Engineering 31, 100821.
[11]	Li, Y., Chen, Y., Wu, J., 2019. Enhancement of methane production in anaerobic digestion process: A review. Applied Energy 240, 120-137.
[12]	Li, Y., Li, L., Sun, Y., Yuan, Z., 2018. Bioaugmentation strategy for enhancing anaerobic digestion of high C/N ratio feedstock with methanogenic enrichment culture. Bioresource Technology 261, 188-195.
[13]	M Nasrullah, M. S., AW Zularisam, 2014. Effect of high current density in electrocoagulation process for sewage treatment. Asian Journal of Chemistry 26 (14), 4281.
[14]	M. N. I. Siddique, M. F. I. a. A. W. Z., 2016. Enriched Renewable Methane from the Anaerobic Digestion of Petrochemical Wastewater: A Bio-Remediation Structure. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCES 7, 1-8.
[15]	Md Nurul Islam Siddique, Z. B. K., Muhammad Nomani Kabir, 2019. Progressive Two-Stage Efficient Co-Digestion of Food Waste and Petrochemical Wastewater for Higher Methane and Hydrogen Production. Asian Journal of Chemistry 31 (11), 2575-2578.
[16]	Md Siddique, N. I., Zularisam Bin Abdul Wahid, 2018. Enhanced Methane Yield by Codigestion of Sewage Sludge with Microalgae and Catering Waste Leachate. Water Environment Research 90 (9), 835-839.
[17]	Md. Nurul Islam Siddique, A., M. Sakinah, 2014a. Biomethane generation potential of petrochemical wastewater by anaerobic digestion using CSTR. 4th Johor Biotechnology Conference and Exhibition, malaysia.
[18]	Md. Nurul Islam Siddique, A., M. Sakinah, 2014b. Intensified CSTR for bio-methane generation from petrochemical wastewater. International conference on chemical, environmental and biological sciences, IICBE-2014, Malaysia.
[19]	Md. Nurul Islam Siddique, M. S., A. W. Zularisam, 2014. Sustainable bio-methane generation from petrochemical wastewater using CSTR. International Journal of Engineering Technology and Science. 1 (1), 1-4.
[20]	Md. Nurul Islam Siddique, Z., 2012. Temperature and organic loading rate influence on biomethanation of Petrochemical wastewater using CSTR. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Geo-Environment. 2, 59-64.
[21]	Md. Nurul Islam Siddique, Z. A., 2012. Continuous stirred tank reactor application for renewable methane from anaerobic biodegradation of Petrochemical wastewater. Engineering E-Transaction 7, 23-27.
[22]	Mimi Sakinah Lakhveer Singh, M. N. I. S., Zularisam A. W., Mohd. Hasbi Ab. Rahim, 2012. Optimization of sustained hydrogen production from palm oil mill effluent using immobilized mixed culture. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Geo-Environment. 1 (1), 5-9.
[23]	MNI Siddique, A. Z., 2013. Role of ammonium bicarbonates in methenogenesis while co-digesting petrochemical wastewater with activated manure sludge. Ener. Edu. Sci. Technol 31 (1), 80-90.
[24]	MNI Siddique, A. Z., 2018. Application of natural seaweed modified mortar for sustainable concrete production. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 342, 012008.
[25]	MNI Siddique, M. M., AW Zularisam, 2013a. Bioenergy production from codigestion of chemically-treated petrochemical wastewater and activated manure sludge. Ener. Edu. Sci. Technol 31, 59-70.
[26]	MNI Siddique, M. M., AW Zularisam, 2013b. Cycle time minimization during renewable methane production from H2O2 enhanced anaerobic Co-digestion of Petrochemical wastewater in CSTR. Asian. J. Chem 25, 80-90.
[27]	MNI Siddique, M. M., AW Zularisam, 2013. Role of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) enhanced anaerobic co-digestion of petrochemical wastewater on cycle time minimization during biomethanation. Sci. Resear. and Essays: Acad. J 8 (22), 996-1009.
[28]	MNI SIddique, M. M., AW Zularisam, 2014. Role of Bio-filtration in Petrochemical Wastewater treatment using CSTR. Int. J. Eng. Tech. Sci 2, 9-12.
[29]	NI Siddique, A. Z., 2012. Renewable Methane from Ammonium Bicarbonate Supplemented Petrochemical Wastewater Treatment During Anaerobic Co-Digestion in CSTR. Procedia Engineering 50, 134-141.
[30]	NI Siddique, Z. A. W., 2012. Application of chemical and biological coupled treatment technology in POME and petroleum waste water as biodegradation alternative. Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 5 (3), 155-167.
[31]	Otieno, B., Apollo, S., Kabuba, J., Naidoo, B., Simate, G., Ochieng, A., 2019. Ozonolysis pre-treatment of waste activated sludge for solubilization and biodegradability enhancement. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 7 (2), 102945.
[32]	Roman, B., Brennan, R. A., 2019. A beneficial by-product of ecological wastewater treatment: An evaluation of wastewater-grown duckweed as a protein supplement for sustainable agriculture. Ecological Engineering: X 1, 100004.
[33]	Siddique, M. N. I., Abdul Munaim, M. S., Zularisam, A. W., 2015a. Feasibility analysis of anaerobic co-digestion of activated manure and petrochemical wastewater in Kuantan (Malaysia). Journal of Cleaner Production 106, 380-388.
[34]	Siddique, M. N. I., Munaim, M. S. A., Ab. Wahid, Z., 2016a. Role of hydraulic retention time in enhancing bioenergy generation from petrochemical wastewater. Journal of Cleaner Production 133, 504-510.
[35]	Siddique, M. N. I., Munaim, M. S. A., Wahid, Z. B. A., 2017. The combined effect of ultrasonic and microwave pre-treatment on bio-methane generation from co-digestion of petrochemical wastewater. Journal of Cleaner Production 145, 303-309.
[36]	Siddique, M. N. I., Munaim, M. S. A., Zularisam, A. W., 2016b. Effect of food to microbe ratio variation on anaerobic co-digestion of petrochemical wastewater with manure. Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers 58, 451-457.
[37]	Siddique, M. N. I., Sakinah Abd Munaim, M., Zularisam, A. W., 2014. Mesophilic and thermophilic biomethane production by co-digesting pretreated petrochemical wastewater with beef and dairy cattle manure. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 20 (1), 331-337.
[38]	Siddique, M. N. I., Sakinah, M., Zularisam, A. W., 2015b. Influence of flow rate variation on bio-energy generation during anaerobic co-digestion. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 27, 44-49.
[39]	Siddique, M. N. I., Wahid, Z. A., 2018. Achievements and perspectives of anaerobic co-digestion: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production 194, 359-371.
[40]	Siddique, N. I., Munaim, M. S. A., Wahid, Z. A., 2015. Role of biogas recirculation in enhancing petrochemical wastewater treatment efficiency of continuous stirred tank reactor. Journal of Cleaner Production 91, 229-234.
[41]	Siddique, Z. N. I., 2019. Effect of Water-Cement Ratio On Performance of Seaweed-Modified Mortars. European Proceedings of Social & Behavioural Sciences EpSBS 12, 212-221.
[42]	Solé-Bundó, M., Garfí, M., Matamoros, V., Ferrer, I., 2019. Co-digestion of microalgae and primary sludge: Effect on biogas production and microcontaminants removal. Science of The Total Environment 660, 974-981.
[43]	Wang, S., Cui, Y., Li, A., Wang, D., Zhang, W., Chen, Z., 2019. Seasonal dynamics of bacterial communities associated with antibiotic removal and sludge stabilization in three different sludge treatment wetlands. Journal of Environmental Management 240, 231-237.
[44]	Xu, R., Xu, S., Florentino, A. P., Zhang, L., Yang, Z., Liu, Y., 2019. Enhancing blackwater methane production by enriching hydrogenotrophic methanogens through hydrogen supplementation. Bioresource Technology 278, 481-485.
[45]	Yu, L., Bian, C., Zhu, N., Shen, Y., Yuan, H., 2019. Enhancement of methane production from anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge with choline supplement. Energy 173, 1021-1029.
[46]	Zaied bin khalid, M. N. I. S., Zularisam Abd Wahid, Younis Mohammed Salih, 2019. Biomethane Production from Anaerobic Co-digestion of Palm Oil Mill Effluent with Cattle Manure: A Review. Asian Journal of Chemistry 31 (31), 2413-2424.
[47]	Zaied, B. K., Nasrullah, M., Islam Siddique, M. N., Zularisam, A. W., Singh, L., Krishnan, S., 2019. Enhanced bioenergy production from palm oil mill effluent by co-digestion in solar assisted bioreactor: Effects of hydrogen peroxide pretreatment. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 103551.
[48]	Zan, F., Zeng, Q., Hao, T., Ekama, G. A., Hao, X., Chen, G., 2019. Achieving methane production enhancement from waste activated sludge with sulfite pretreatment: Feasibility, kinetics and mechanism study. Water Research 158, 438-448.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Md. Nurul Islam Siddique, Mohd Zamri Bin Ibrahim, Mohd Mokhlesur Rahman. (2021). Influence of Unlike Proportions of Preliminary and Activated Sludge on Methane Generation During Anaerobic Co-digestion. American Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Spectroscopy, 5(1), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Md. Nurul Islam Siddique; Mohd Zamri Bin Ibrahim; Mohd Mokhlesur Rahman. Influence of Unlike Proportions of Preliminary and Activated Sludge on Methane Generation During Anaerobic Co-digestion. Am. J. Quantum Chem. Mol. Spectrosc. 2021, 5(1), 10-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Md. Nurul Islam Siddique, Mohd Zamri Bin Ibrahim, Mohd Mokhlesur Rahman. Influence of Unlike Proportions of Preliminary and Activated Sludge on Methane Generation During Anaerobic Co-digestion. Am J Quantum Chem Mol Spectrosc. 2021;5(1):10-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12,
  author = {Md. Nurul Islam Siddique and Mohd Zamri Bin Ibrahim and Mohd Mokhlesur Rahman},
  title = {Influence of Unlike Proportions of Preliminary and Activated Sludge on Methane Generation During Anaerobic Co-digestion},
  journal = {American Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Spectroscopy},
  volume = {5},
  number = {1},
  pages = {10-15},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajqcms.20210501.12},
  abstract = {The aim of this study was to look into methane generation using different amounts of initial sludge (IS) and activated sludge (AS) for anaerobic transformation. To compare the best combination in analysis with a benchmark combination, C0, three experimental ratios (IS: AS) (v/v) were used: C1 (60: 40), C2 (80: 20), and C3 (100: 00). (40: 60). Anaerobic digestion was carried out at 37°C in mesophilic conditions with a 12 day HRT and a loading rate of 1.63 0.06 kg TVS/m3 day. In comparison to C0, biogas generation for ratios C1 and C2 increased from 25% to 38%. The maximum amount generated by combination C3, which was 52.44 percent more than that of C0, showed a clear improvement in specific methane generation. C1, which involves using less initial sludge and increasing activated sludge condensing, is the most realistic combination to use on a large scale. IS has a C/N proportion that is 2 times more than AS because of the higher organic compounds in IS. The obtained proportion of IS that ought to be added to AS to achieve the greatest methane production were 60 and 80% (combination C1 and C2), separately than the reference conditions, C0. Nevertheless, the influent ought to be deliberately arranged with a gradual increment to the ideal influent proportion to acclimatization of the microorganisms and avoid over-loading. 3.72 years are found to be the time needed to recover expenses.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of Unlike Proportions of Preliminary and Activated Sludge on Methane Generation During Anaerobic Co-digestion
AU - Md. Nurul Islam Siddique
AU - Mohd Zamri Bin Ibrahim
AU - Mohd Mokhlesur Rahman
Y1 - 2021/05/27
PY - 2021
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12
DO - 10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12
T2 - American Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Spectroscopy
JF - American Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Spectroscopy
JO - American Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Spectroscopy
SP - 10
EP - 15
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2994-7308
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12
AB - The aim of this study was to look into methane generation using different amounts of initial sludge (IS) and activated sludge (AS) for anaerobic transformation. To compare the best combination in analysis with a benchmark combination, C0, three experimental ratios (IS: AS) (v/v) were used: C1 (60: 40), C2 (80: 20), and C3 (100: 00). (40: 60). Anaerobic digestion was carried out at 37°C in mesophilic conditions with a 12 day HRT and a loading rate of 1.63 0.06 kg TVS/m3 day. In comparison to C0, biogas generation for ratios C1 and C2 increased from 25% to 38%. The maximum amount generated by combination C3, which was 52.44 percent more than that of C0, showed a clear improvement in specific methane generation. C1, which involves using less initial sludge and increasing activated sludge condensing, is the most realistic combination to use on a large scale. IS has a C/N proportion that is 2 times more than AS because of the higher organic compounds in IS. The obtained proportion of IS that ought to be added to AS to achieve the greatest methane production were 60 and 80% (combination C1 and C2), separately than the reference conditions, C0. Nevertheless, the influent ought to be deliberately arranged with a gradual increment to the ideal influent proportion to acclimatization of the microorganisms and avoid over-loading. 3.72 years are found to be the time needed to recover expenses.
VL - 5
IS - 1
ER -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Md. Nurul Islam Siddique

Faculty of Ocean Engineering Technology and Informatics, University Malaysia Terengganu (UMT), Terengganu, Malaysia
Mohd Zamri Bin Ibrahim

Faculty of Ocean Engineering Technology and Informatics, University Malaysia Terengganu (UMT), Terengganu, Malaysia
Mohd Mokhlesur Rahman

East Coast Environmental Research Institute, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin, Terengganu, Malaysia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Md. Nurul Islam Siddique, Mohd Zamri Bin Ibrahim, Mohd Mokhlesur Rahman. (2021). Influence of Unlike Proportions of Preliminary and Activated Sludge on Methane Generation During Anaerobic Co-digestion. American Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Spectroscopy, 5(1), 10-15. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Md. Nurul Islam Siddique; Mohd Zamri Bin Ibrahim; Mohd Mokhlesur Rahman. Influence of Unlike Proportions of Preliminary and Activated Sludge on Methane Generation During Anaerobic Co-digestion. Am. J. Quantum Chem. Mol. Spectrosc. 2021, 5(1), 10-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Md. Nurul Islam Siddique, Mohd Zamri Bin Ibrahim, Mohd Mokhlesur Rahman. Influence of Unlike Proportions of Preliminary and Activated Sludge on Methane Generation During Anaerobic Co-digestion. Am J Quantum Chem Mol Spectrosc. 2021;5(1):10-15. doi: 10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12,
  author = {Md. Nurul Islam Siddique and Mohd Zamri Bin Ibrahim and Mohd Mokhlesur Rahman},
  title = {Influence of Unlike Proportions of Preliminary and Activated Sludge on Methane Generation During Anaerobic Co-digestion},
  journal = {American Journal of Quantum Chemistry and Molecular Spectroscopy},
  volume = {5},
  number = {1},
  pages = {10-15},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajqcms.20210501.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajqcms.20210501.12},
  abstract = {The aim of this study was to look into methane generation using different amounts of initial sludge (IS) and activated sludge (AS) for anaerobic transformation. To compare the best combination in analysis with a benchmark combination, C0, three experimental ratios (IS: AS) (v/v) were used: C1 (60: 40), C2 (80: 20), and C3 (100: 00). (40: 60). Anaerobic digestion was carried out at 37°C in mesophilic conditions with a 12 day HRT and a loading rate of 1.63 0.06 kg TVS/m3 day. In comparison to C0, biogas generation for ratios C1 and C2 increased from 25% to 38%. The maximum amount generated by combination C3, which was 52.44 percent more than that of C0, showed a clear improvement in specific methane generation. C1, which involves using less initial sludge and increasing activated sludge condensing, is the most realistic combination to use on a large scale. IS has a C/N proportion that is 2 times more than AS because of the higher organic compounds in IS. The obtained proportion of IS that ought to be added to AS to achieve the greatest methane production were 60 and 80% (combination C1 and C2), separately than the reference conditions, C0. Nevertheless, the influent ought to be deliberately arranged with a gradual increment to the ideal influent proportion to acclimatization of the microorganisms and avoid over-loading. 3.72 years are found to be the time needed to recover expenses.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download