Fe Coefficient – Development and Application of a Key Figure for Assessing the Efficiency of Alternative Drive Concepts in Trucks

Klaus-Peter Franke

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Fe Coefficient – Development and Application of a Key Figure for Assessing the Efficiency of Alternative Drive Concepts in Trucks

Klaus-Peter Franke

Published in American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (Volume 4, Issue 2)

Received: 26 March 2019 Accepted: 28 April 2019 Published: 23 May 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Alternative drive concepts for trucks represent a highly promising way of reducing environmental pollution from road freight traffic. There are numerous proposals and pilot schemes pointing to the replacement of fossil fuel diesel by more sustainable energy sources. Along with drive chain electrification, it is a matter here of deploying alternative natural (gas) and synthetically generated fuels (eFuels) in combustion engines that might have to be modified. Given that a multitude of parameters on final energies, vehicle and travel route/ ambient conditions enter into the consumption calculation, it is usually difficult to compare the various drive concepts based on individually gauged consumptions/emissions. It is therefore proposed assessing the comparison on the basis of the same vehicle platform under practically the same deployment and route parameters. In other words, in order to examine an alternative energy as to its efficiency, only the vehicle drive chain is replaced - everything else remains as it is! The Fe coefficient in the heading is formulated to afford a simplified comparison of the various drive concepts under the above general conditions. Going into the Fe coefficient in each instance is solely the mean drive efficiency over the route ηE-N and the payload to total load ratio under full capacity utilisation ηkon (design efficiency). The calculated Fe coefficient provides information on consumption. The greater the Fe the higher the consumption. Under the same vehicle platform - and with consideration given to the above general conditions - the Fe coefficients of the various drive variants can be related one to the other and, in this way, the increase or decrease in consumption as against, for instance, the diesel benchmark can be established. In conclusion, the Fe coefficient is used in three case studies to assess the effectiveness as against the diesel benchmark of two electric battery (Fuso eCanter, Tesla Semi) trucks and one LNG-driven Iveco Stralis NP 400 truck.

Published in	American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (Volume 4, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12
Page(s)	48-55
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Transport Logistics, Road Freight Traffic, Transport Efficiency, Energy Demand Calculation, Fe Coefficient

References

[1]	N. N.: Klimaschutzplan 2050. Deutsches Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit (BMU), Arbeitsgruppe IK III 1, Berlin. November 2016. https://www.bmu.de/fileadmin/Daten_BMU/Download_PDF/Klimaschutz/klimaschutzplan_2050_bf.pdf.
[2]	Weiß, Martin; Welke, Mareike: Klimaschutz in Zahlen. Fakten, Trends und Impulse deutscher Klimapolitik. Deutsches Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz, Bau und Reaktorsicherheit (BMUB), Referat KI I 1, Berlin. April 2017. http://www.bmub.bund.de/fileadmin/Daten_BMU/Pools/Broschueren/klimaschutz_in_zahlen_2017_bf.pdf.
[3]	N. N.: Gerichts-Hammer: Städte dürfen Diesel-Fahrverbote erlassen. Onlineportal Merkur.de, München, 28.02.18. https://www.merkur.de/politik/hammer-urteil-bundesverwaltungsgerichts-in-leipzig-staedte-duerfen-diesel-fahrverbote-erlassen-zr-9649379.html.
[4]	N. N.: Trend guide – Alles was 2018 wichtig ist! ETM-Verlag, Stuttgart, 2018.
[5]	Crissey, Jeff: Mitsubishi Fuso delivers first all-electric eCanter trucks to customers. https://www.ccjdigital.com/mitsubishi-fuso-delivers-first-all-electric-ecanter-trucks-to-customers/. Commercial Carrier Journal. Posted on 14.09.2017.
[6]	Gross, L. J.: Analysis: The Tesla semi’s major selling points. https://www.joc.com/technology/analysis-telsa-semis-major-selling-points_20171228.html. joc.com. Posted on 28.12.2017.
[7]	Hoffmann, J.: Scania zieht nach – Schwedischer Lkw-Hersteller setzt zunehmend auf Erdgas. transaktuell 5. ETM-Verlag, Stuttgart, 15.2.2018.
[8]	Schmidt, B.: Iveco und Scania geben Gas. Onlineportal Frankfurter Allgemeine faz.net, Frankfurt, 03.12.2017. http://www.faz.net/aktuell/technik-motor/motor/lastwagen-mit-lng-iveco-und-scania-geben-gas-15311802-p2.html.
[9]	Bünger, U. et alt.: Vergleich von CNG und LNG zum Einsatz in Lkw im Fernverkehr. Abschlussbericht. Ludwig-Bölkow- Systemtechnik GmbH, Ottobrunn, Mai 2016. http://www.lbst.de/ressources/docs2016/1605_CNG_LNG_Endbericht_public.pdf.
[10]	Franke, K.-P.: Raising the efficiency of Long Distance Road Haulage by Introducing Extra Long Trucks. Proceedings of the VII International Scientific Conference “Logistic Systems in Global Economics”, S. 21 -29. Krasnoyarsk 2017. http://vseup.ru/static/files/2017.pdf.
[11]	Haag, M.; Künzel, T.: Plausibilisierung eines Rechenmodells für Fernverkehrs-Lkw. Master-Projektarbeit an der Hochschule Ulm. 03.2018 (not published).
[12]	N. N.: Fuso Ecanter. WIKIPEDIA. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fuso_Ecanter. (Download 8.3.2018).
[13]	Burgdorf, J.: Supertest Iveco Stralis NP 400: Spass mit dem Gas? Trucker.de –Test & Technik –Tests. Springer Fachmedien München GmbH, München, 10.01.2018. http://www.trucker.de/supertest-iveco-stralis-np-400-spass-mit-dem-gas-2036790.html.
[14]	N. N.: Sattelzugmaschine Scania LNG – Flüssiges ERDGAS für Langstreckenstars. Zukunft ERDGAS GmbH, Berlin. https://www.erdgas.info/erdgas-mobil/erdgas-fahrzeuge/scania/scania-pg-lng-340/. (Download 26.04.2019).
[15]	Linde: LNG (Erdgas flüssig). Produktdatenblatt, Stand 21.04.2008. https://produkte.linde-gase.de/db_neu/lng_erdgas_fluessig.pdf.
[16]	Wurster, R. et alt.: LNG als Alternativkraftstoff für den Antrieb von Schiffen und schweren Nutzfahrzeugen, S. 95. Kurzstudie im Auftrag des Deutschen Bundesverkehrsministeriums für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur (BMVI). Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR), Institut für Verkehrsforschung; ifeu – Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg GmbH; Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik GmbH (LBST); Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum gGmbH (DBFZ); München/Ottobrunn, Heidelberg, Leipzig, Berlin, 06.03.2014. http://biogasrat.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/mks-kurzstudie-lng.pdf.
[17]	Prenzler, Christian: Tesla Semi unveiled: 500+ range, Bugatti-beating aero, 2019 production. https://www.teslarati.com/tesla-semi-unveiled-coming-2019-500-mile-range/. Teslarati. Posted on 16.11.2017.
[18]	Rosenberger, T.: Keine Kompromisse. trans aktuell 24. ETM Verlag, Stuttgart.1.12.2017.
[19]	Lanzinger, R.: Eingebauter Umweltschutz. trans aktuell 12. ETM Verlag, Stuttgart. 8.6.2018.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Klaus-Peter Franke. (2019). Fe Coefficient – Development and Application of a Key Figure for Assessing the Efficiency of Alternative Drive Concepts in Trucks. American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 4(2), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Klaus-Peter Franke. Fe Coefficient – Development and Application of a Key Figure for Assessing the Efficiency of Alternative Drive Concepts in Trucks. Am. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2019, 4(2), 48-55. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Klaus-Peter Franke. Fe Coefficient – Development and Application of a Key Figure for Assessing the Efficiency of Alternative Drive Concepts in Trucks. Am J Traffic Transp Eng. 2019;4(2):48-55. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12,
  author = {Klaus-Peter Franke},
  title = {Fe Coefficient – Development and Application of a Key Figure for Assessing the Efficiency of Alternative Drive Concepts in Trucks},
  journal = {American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering},
  volume = {4},
  number = {2},
  pages = {48-55},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtte.20190402.12},
  abstract = {Alternative drive concepts for trucks represent a highly promising way of reducing environmental pollution from road freight traffic. There are numerous proposals and pilot schemes pointing to the replacement of fossil fuel diesel by more sustainable energy sources. Along with drive chain electrification, it is a matter here of deploying alternative natural (gas) and synthetically generated fuels (eFuels) in combustion engines that might have to be modified. Given that a multitude of parameters on final energies, vehicle and travel route/ ambient conditions enter into the consumption calculation, it is usually difficult to compare the various drive concepts based on individually gauged consumptions/emissions. It is therefore proposed assessing the comparison on the basis of the same vehicle platform under practically the same deployment and route parameters. In other words, in order to examine an alternative energy as to its efficiency, only the vehicle drive chain is replaced - everything else remains as it is! The Fe coefficient in the heading is formulated to afford a simplified comparison of the various drive concepts under the above general conditions. Going into the Fe coefficient in each instance is solely the mean drive efficiency over the route ηE-N and the payload to total load ratio under full capacity utilisation ηkon (design efficiency). The calculated Fe coefficient provides information on consumption. The greater the Fe the higher the consumption. Under the same vehicle platform - and with consideration given to the above general conditions - the Fe coefficients of the various drive variants can be related one to the other and, in this way, the increase or decrease in consumption as against, for instance, the diesel benchmark can be established. In conclusion, the Fe coefficient is used in three case studies to assess the effectiveness as against the diesel benchmark of two electric battery (Fuso eCanter, Tesla Semi) trucks and one LNG-driven Iveco Stralis NP 400 truck.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Fe Coefficient – Development and Application of a Key Figure for Assessing the Efficiency of Alternative Drive Concepts in Trucks
AU  - Klaus-Peter Franke
Y1  - 2019/05/23
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12
T2  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
JF  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
JO  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
SP  - 48
EP  - 55
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-8604
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12
AB  - Alternative drive concepts for trucks represent a highly promising way of reducing environmental pollution from road freight traffic. There are numerous proposals and pilot schemes pointing to the replacement of fossil fuel diesel by more sustainable energy sources. Along with drive chain electrification, it is a matter here of deploying alternative natural (gas) and synthetically generated fuels (eFuels) in combustion engines that might have to be modified. Given that a multitude of parameters on final energies, vehicle and travel route/ ambient conditions enter into the consumption calculation, it is usually difficult to compare the various drive concepts based on individually gauged consumptions/emissions. It is therefore proposed assessing the comparison on the basis of the same vehicle platform under practically the same deployment and route parameters. In other words, in order to examine an alternative energy as to its efficiency, only the vehicle drive chain is replaced - everything else remains as it is! The Fe coefficient in the heading is formulated to afford a simplified comparison of the various drive concepts under the above general conditions. Going into the Fe coefficient in each instance is solely the mean drive efficiency over the route ηE-N and the payload to total load ratio under full capacity utilisation ηkon (design efficiency). The calculated Fe coefficient provides information on consumption. The greater the Fe the higher the consumption. Under the same vehicle platform - and with consideration given to the above general conditions - the Fe coefficients of the various drive variants can be related one to the other and, in this way, the increase or decrease in consumption as against, for instance, the diesel benchmark can be established. In conclusion, the Fe coefficient is used in three case studies to assess the effectiveness as against the diesel benchmark of two electric battery (Fuso eCanter, Tesla Semi) trucks and one LNG-driven Iveco Stralis NP 400 truck.
VL  - 4
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Klaus-Peter Franke

Institute of Industrial Engineering and Supply Chain Management, Ulm University of Applied Sciences, Ulm, Germany

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Klaus-Peter Franke. (2019). Fe Coefficient – Development and Application of a Key Figure for Assessing the Efficiency of Alternative Drive Concepts in Trucks. American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 4(2), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Klaus-Peter Franke. Fe Coefficient – Development and Application of a Key Figure for Assessing the Efficiency of Alternative Drive Concepts in Trucks. Am. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2019, 4(2), 48-55. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Klaus-Peter Franke. Fe Coefficient – Development and Application of a Key Figure for Assessing the Efficiency of Alternative Drive Concepts in Trucks. Am J Traffic Transp Eng. 2019;4(2):48-55. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12,
  author = {Klaus-Peter Franke},
  title = {Fe Coefficient – Development and Application of a Key Figure for Assessing the Efficiency of Alternative Drive Concepts in Trucks},
  journal = {American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering},
  volume = {4},
  number = {2},
  pages = {48-55},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtte.20190402.12},
  abstract = {Alternative drive concepts for trucks represent a highly promising way of reducing environmental pollution from road freight traffic. There are numerous proposals and pilot schemes pointing to the replacement of fossil fuel diesel by more sustainable energy sources. Along with drive chain electrification, it is a matter here of deploying alternative natural (gas) and synthetically generated fuels (eFuels) in combustion engines that might have to be modified. Given that a multitude of parameters on final energies, vehicle and travel route/ ambient conditions enter into the consumption calculation, it is usually difficult to compare the various drive concepts based on individually gauged consumptions/emissions. It is therefore proposed assessing the comparison on the basis of the same vehicle platform under practically the same deployment and route parameters. In other words, in order to examine an alternative energy as to its efficiency, only the vehicle drive chain is replaced - everything else remains as it is! The Fe coefficient in the heading is formulated to afford a simplified comparison of the various drive concepts under the above general conditions. Going into the Fe coefficient in each instance is solely the mean drive efficiency over the route ηE-N and the payload to total load ratio under full capacity utilisation ηkon (design efficiency). The calculated Fe coefficient provides information on consumption. The greater the Fe the higher the consumption. Under the same vehicle platform - and with consideration given to the above general conditions - the Fe coefficients of the various drive variants can be related one to the other and, in this way, the increase or decrease in consumption as against, for instance, the diesel benchmark can be established. In conclusion, the Fe coefficient is used in three case studies to assess the effectiveness as against the diesel benchmark of two electric battery (Fuso eCanter, Tesla Semi) trucks and one LNG-driven Iveco Stralis NP 400 truck.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Fe Coefficient – Development and Application of a Key Figure for Assessing the Efficiency of Alternative Drive Concepts in Trucks
AU  - Klaus-Peter Franke
Y1  - 2019/05/23
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12
T2  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
JF  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
JO  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
SP  - 48
EP  - 55
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-8604
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20190402.12
AB  - Alternative drive concepts for trucks represent a highly promising way of reducing environmental pollution from road freight traffic. There are numerous proposals and pilot schemes pointing to the replacement of fossil fuel diesel by more sustainable energy sources. Along with drive chain electrification, it is a matter here of deploying alternative natural (gas) and synthetically generated fuels (eFuels) in combustion engines that might have to be modified. Given that a multitude of parameters on final energies, vehicle and travel route/ ambient conditions enter into the consumption calculation, it is usually difficult to compare the various drive concepts based on individually gauged consumptions/emissions. It is therefore proposed assessing the comparison on the basis of the same vehicle platform under practically the same deployment and route parameters. In other words, in order to examine an alternative energy as to its efficiency, only the vehicle drive chain is replaced - everything else remains as it is! The Fe coefficient in the heading is formulated to afford a simplified comparison of the various drive concepts under the above general conditions. Going into the Fe coefficient in each instance is solely the mean drive efficiency over the route ηE-N and the payload to total load ratio under full capacity utilisation ηkon (design efficiency). The calculated Fe coefficient provides information on consumption. The greater the Fe the higher the consumption. Under the same vehicle platform - and with consideration given to the above general conditions - the Fe coefficients of the various drive variants can be related one to the other and, in this way, the increase or decrease in consumption as against, for instance, the diesel benchmark can be established. In conclusion, the Fe coefficient is used in three case studies to assess the effectiveness as against the diesel benchmark of two electric battery (Fuso eCanter, Tesla Semi) trucks and one LNG-driven Iveco Stralis NP 400 truck.
VL  - 4
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download