Compatibility Study of Pantographs with Head Length 1600mm and 1950mm

Song Wei

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Compatibility Study of Pantographs with Head Length 1600mm and 1950mm

Song Wei

Published in American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (Volume 7, Issue 2)

Received: 19 April 2022 Accepted: 4 May 2022 Published: 12 May 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

A study of European railroad systems revealed that a large number of pantographs of different lengths are used in Europe, and even in the same country, multiple types of pantographs are allowed depending on the type of line. For example, France is using the type of pantographs of 1600 mm, Norway is using the type of pantographs of 1800 mm, Austria is using the type of pantographs of 1950 mm, Estonia is using the type of pantographs of 2000 mm or 2200mm. Different lengths of pantographs have certain influence on railroad design, and various factors such as pull-out value, locator length and turnout arrangement need to be considered during contact network plan design. At the same time, different countries have their own independent requirements for pantograph types in addition to the European standards that must be met. In this paper, the use of pantograph type is analyzed through the investigation and study of a section of railroad in Serbia, and the possibility of using 1950 mm pantograph in Serbian railroad is explored. Ultimately, through practical investigation and theoretical analysis, we concluded that there was no problem in using a 1950mm pantograph in Serbia. In addition to the influence factors mentioned in the paper, the actual design also needs to consider the problem of connecting with the existing line.

Published in	American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (Volume 7, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12
Page(s)	45-50
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Pantographs, Lengths, Contact Network, European Standards

References

[1]	Lee, Jin, Hee, et al. Analysis of dynamic interaction between catenary and pantograph with experimental verification and performance evaluation in new high-speed line [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics International Journal of Vehicle Mechanics & Mobility, 2015.
[2]	Bayanov I, Badretdinov T, Muminov S, et al. The electric field of the sliding contact during the interaction of the pantograph and the contact wire [J]. E3S Web of Conferences, 2021, 264 (3): 04029.
[3]	Drugge L. Modelling and simulation of pantograph-catenary dynamics [J]. Lule Tekniska Universitet, 2016, 44 (8): 615-630.
[4]	Liang, Zhang, Jiye, et al. Influence of pantograph fixing position on aerodynamic characteristics of high-speed trains [J]. Journal of Modern Transportation, 2017, 25 (1): 34–39.
[5]	Mukha Andrii Ustymenko Dmytro Diab Al Said Ahmad Mohammad Kuznetsov Valeriy Skrzyniarz Marek Szulc Waldemar Dnipro National University of Railway Transport named after Academician V. LazaryanRailway Research Institute. The Use of Innovative Contact Strip for Pantographs of Electric Rolling Stock. Experience in Operational and Bench Tests [J]. Journal of KONBiN, 2021, 51 (4): 35-48.
[6]	Chu W, Song Y, Duan F, et al. Development of steady arm damper for electrified railway overhead contact line with double pantographs based on numerical and experimental analysis [J]. IET Electrical Systems in Transportation, 2021 (10).
[7]	Liu X, Zhang J, Thompson D, et al. Aerodynamic noise of high-speed train pantographs: Comparisons between field measurements and an updated component-based prediction model [J]. Applied Acoustics, 2021, 175 (1187): 107791.
[8]	Roy S, Dasgupta A, Chakraborty G. Dynamic interaction between multiple pantographs sliding on an overhead conductor wire: a multibody and wave-based approach [J]. Archive of Applied Mechanics, 2021, 92 (1): 45-72.
[9]	Rusu-Anghel S, Mezinescu S S, Lihaciu I C. Experimental stand and researches on pantograph-catenary contact force control using chaos theory [J]. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1781 (1): 012029 (11pp).
[10]	Li Y H, Zhao F Y, Gao Y H, et al. Importance analysis of underframe connection system for the pantograph lower arm rod. 2022.
[11]	Jan L. DETECTION OF MAINTENANCE STATUS FOR A PANTOGRAPH AND/OR A CONTACT WIRE:, EP3724022A4 [P]. 2021.
[12]	Dai Z, Li T, Deng J, et al. Effect of the strip spacing on the aerodynamic performance of a high-speed double-strip pantograph [J]. Vehicle System Dynamics, 2021.
[13]	Song Y, Duan F, Wu F, et al. Assessment of the Current Collection Quality of Pantograph-Catenary with Contact Line Height Variability in Electric Railways [J]. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 2021, PP (99): 1-1.
[14]	Benet J, Cuartero F, Rojo T, et al. A Dynamic Model for the Study and Simulation of the Pantograph–Rigid Catenary Interaction with an Overlapping Span [J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11 (16): 7445.
[15]	Liu S, Wei Y, Yin Y, et al. Structural Health Monitoring Method of Pantograph–Catenary System Based on Strain Response Inversion [J]. Frontiers in Physics, 2021, 9: 691510.
[16]	Shen Y, Pan X, Chang L. Online Intelligent Perception of Pantograph and Catenary System Status Based on Parameter Adaptation [J]. Applied Sciences, 2021, 11 (4): 1948.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Song Wei. (2022). Compatibility Study of Pantographs with Head Length 1600mm and 1950mm. American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 7(2), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Song Wei. Compatibility Study of Pantographs with Head Length 1600mm and 1950mm. Am. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2022, 7(2), 45-50. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Song Wei. Compatibility Study of Pantographs with Head Length 1600mm and 1950mm. Am J Traffic Transp Eng. 2022;7(2):45-50. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12,
  author = {Song Wei},
  title = {Compatibility Study of Pantographs with Head Length 1600mm and 1950mm},
  journal = {American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering},
  volume = {7},
  number = {2},
  pages = {45-50},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtte.20220702.12},
  abstract = {A study of European railroad systems revealed that a large number of pantographs of different lengths are used in Europe, and even in the same country, multiple types of pantographs are allowed depending on the type of line. For example, France is using the type of pantographs of 1600 mm, Norway is using the type of pantographs of 1800 mm, Austria is using the type of pantographs of 1950 mm, Estonia is using the type of pantographs of 2000 mm or 2200mm. Different lengths of pantographs have certain influence on railroad design, and various factors such as pull-out value, locator length and turnout arrangement need to be considered during contact network plan design. At the same time, different countries have their own independent requirements for pantograph types in addition to the European standards that must be met. In this paper, the use of pantograph type is analyzed through the investigation and study of a section of railroad in Serbia, and the possibility of using 1950 mm pantograph in Serbian railroad is explored. Ultimately, through practical investigation and theoretical analysis, we concluded that there was no problem in using a 1950mm pantograph in Serbia. In addition to the influence factors mentioned in the paper, the actual design also needs to consider the problem of connecting with the existing line.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Compatibility Study of Pantographs with Head Length 1600mm and 1950mm
AU  - Song Wei
Y1  - 2022/05/12
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12
T2  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
JF  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
JO  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
SP  - 45
EP  - 50
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-8604
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12
AB  - A study of European railroad systems revealed that a large number of pantographs of different lengths are used in Europe, and even in the same country, multiple types of pantographs are allowed depending on the type of line. For example, France is using the type of pantographs of 1600 mm, Norway is using the type of pantographs of 1800 mm, Austria is using the type of pantographs of 1950 mm, Estonia is using the type of pantographs of 2000 mm or 2200mm. Different lengths of pantographs have certain influence on railroad design, and various factors such as pull-out value, locator length and turnout arrangement need to be considered during contact network plan design. At the same time, different countries have their own independent requirements for pantograph types in addition to the European standards that must be met. In this paper, the use of pantograph type is analyzed through the investigation and study of a section of railroad in Serbia, and the possibility of using 1950 mm pantograph in Serbian railroad is explored. Ultimately, through practical investigation and theoretical analysis, we concluded that there was no problem in using a 1950mm pantograph in Serbia. In addition to the influence factors mentioned in the paper, the actual design also needs to consider the problem of connecting with the existing line.
VL  - 7
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Song Wei

China Ralway International Co. LTD., Beijing, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Song Wei. (2022). Compatibility Study of Pantographs with Head Length 1600mm and 1950mm. American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 7(2), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Song Wei. Compatibility Study of Pantographs with Head Length 1600mm and 1950mm. Am. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2022, 7(2), 45-50. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Song Wei. Compatibility Study of Pantographs with Head Length 1600mm and 1950mm. Am J Traffic Transp Eng. 2022;7(2):45-50. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12,
  author = {Song Wei},
  title = {Compatibility Study of Pantographs with Head Length 1600mm and 1950mm},
  journal = {American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering},
  volume = {7},
  number = {2},
  pages = {45-50},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtte.20220702.12},
  abstract = {A study of European railroad systems revealed that a large number of pantographs of different lengths are used in Europe, and even in the same country, multiple types of pantographs are allowed depending on the type of line. For example, France is using the type of pantographs of 1600 mm, Norway is using the type of pantographs of 1800 mm, Austria is using the type of pantographs of 1950 mm, Estonia is using the type of pantographs of 2000 mm or 2200mm. Different lengths of pantographs have certain influence on railroad design, and various factors such as pull-out value, locator length and turnout arrangement need to be considered during contact network plan design. At the same time, different countries have their own independent requirements for pantograph types in addition to the European standards that must be met. In this paper, the use of pantograph type is analyzed through the investigation and study of a section of railroad in Serbia, and the possibility of using 1950 mm pantograph in Serbian railroad is explored. Ultimately, through practical investigation and theoretical analysis, we concluded that there was no problem in using a 1950mm pantograph in Serbia. In addition to the influence factors mentioned in the paper, the actual design also needs to consider the problem of connecting with the existing line.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Compatibility Study of Pantographs with Head Length 1600mm and 1950mm
AU  - Song Wei
Y1  - 2022/05/12
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12
T2  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
JF  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
JO  - American Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering
SP  - 45
EP  - 50
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-8604
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtte.20220702.12
AB  - A study of European railroad systems revealed that a large number of pantographs of different lengths are used in Europe, and even in the same country, multiple types of pantographs are allowed depending on the type of line. For example, France is using the type of pantographs of 1600 mm, Norway is using the type of pantographs of 1800 mm, Austria is using the type of pantographs of 1950 mm, Estonia is using the type of pantographs of 2000 mm or 2200mm. Different lengths of pantographs have certain influence on railroad design, and various factors such as pull-out value, locator length and turnout arrangement need to be considered during contact network plan design. At the same time, different countries have their own independent requirements for pantograph types in addition to the European standards that must be met. In this paper, the use of pantograph type is analyzed through the investigation and study of a section of railroad in Serbia, and the possibility of using 1950 mm pantograph in Serbian railroad is explored. Ultimately, through practical investigation and theoretical analysis, we concluded that there was no problem in using a 1950mm pantograph in Serbia. In addition to the influence factors mentioned in the paper, the actual design also needs to consider the problem of connecting with the existing line.
VL  - 7
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download