The sustainable use and management of freshwater resources is on the center of developmental debate and becoming a global challenge. The overall aim of this study is to document published literature in the field of water privatization, critically review them and to draw a conclusion about how private sector participation can contribute in the initiative of sustainability for freshwater. To accomplish the specific goal of this paper, review articles, research papers, mini-articles, book and reports of authorized organizations published from last 25 years were reviewed. Comparative advantages, problems, challenges and opportunities of private and public sector management in water resources were thoroughly analyzed. Based on those reviews, this study found that there is a mixed legacy in water privatization throughout the world which needs to be strongly regulated to fulfill the basic requirements of consumers in one side and for sustainable management of scarce freshwater resources in another side. Meanwhile, after careful analysis of various water delivery systems and case-studies managed by different agencies around the world, this paper postulates the pubic-private-partnership as an appropriate form of privatization in water which not only helps to increase the project efficiency but also improves the service delivery to end-users.
Published in | American Journal of Water Science and Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajwse.20230902.13 |
Page(s) | 41-49 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Private Sector Participation, Public-Private-Partnership, Remunicipalization, Water Economics, Water Privatization, Water Supply
[1] | Biswas, A. K. & Tortajada, C. (2009). ‘Changing global water management landscape’, in AK Biswas, C Tortajada & R Izquierdo (eds). Water resources development and management, Springer, Berlin, pp. 1-34. |
[2] | Koumpli, A. & Kanakoudis, V. (2022). Privatization and Remunicipalization of Water Supply: A Global Research. Environmental Sciences Proceedings 21, 1-9. |
[3] | Savenije, H. & Van Der Zaag, P. (2002). Water as an Economic Good and Demand Management Paradigms with Pitfalls. Water International 27, 98–104. |
[4] | Arango, J. H., Frutos, J. A. S. & Molina, E. H. (2022). Murky waters: the impact of privatizing water use on environmental degradation and the exclusion of local communities in the Caribbean. International Journal of Water Resources Development 38 (1), 152-172, DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2021.1931052. |
[5] | Riazi, F., Fidelis, T., Matos, M. V., Sousa, M. C., Teles, F. & Roebeling, P. (2023). Institutional arrangements for water reuse: assessing challenges for the transition to water circularity. Water Policy, 1-20. |
[6] | NASA (2023). Freshwater Availability Toolkit. https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/toolkits/freshwater-availability-toolkit (accessed 1 March 2023). |
[7] | International Water Association, (2023). The Impact of Privatization on the Sustainability of Water Resources, Available at: https://www.iwapublishing.com/news/impact-privatisation-sustainability-water-resources (accessed 5 March 2023). |
[8] | Albdaiwi, R. N., Al-Hawadi, J. S., Al-Rawashdeh, Z. B., Al-Habahbeh, K. A., Ayad, J. Y. & Al-Sayaydeh, R. S. (2022). Effect of Treated Wastewater Irrigation on the Accumulation and Transfer of Heavy Metals in Lemon Trees Cultivated in Arid Environment. Horticulturae 8, 514-527. |
[9] | Cosgrove, W. J., Loucks, D. P. (2015). Water management: current and future challenges and research directions. Water Resources Research 51, 4823-4839. |
[10] | Cymes, I., Draga ́nska, E. & Rodzi ́nski, Z. (2022). Potential Possibilities of Using Groundwater for Crop Irrigation in the Context of Climate Change. Agriculture 12, 739-752. |
[11] | Mobie, T. R. & Masango, M. (2009). Privatization of water systems: crime against humanity, Hervormde Teologies Studies 65 (1), 1-6. |
[12] | Chang, Z. & Huang, T. (2023). Analysis of Water-Lifting Aerator Performance Based on the Volume of Fluid Method. Water 15, 1-18. |
[13] | Owen, D. L. (2005). ‘The private sector and service extension’, in J Chenowith & J Bird (eds), The business of water and sustainable development, Greenleaf Publishing, UK, pp. 64-81. |
[14] | Cooper, R. (2020). Water security beyond Covid-19. K4D Helpdesk report 803. Institute of Development Studies. |
[15] | Berge, J. V. D., Vos, J. & Boelens, R. (2021). Water justice and Europe’s Right2Water movement. International Journal of Water Resources Development 38 (1), 173-191, DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2021.1898347. |
[16] | Chand, J. B., Hewa, G., Hassanli, A. & Myers, B. (2023). Basic economics on deficit irrigation and water quality dynamics for horticulture production in a greenhouse environment. Australian Journal of Crop Science 17 (1), 52-60. |
[17] | India Water Portal, (2022). Privatization, viewed on 6 January 2023. https://www.indiawaterportal.org/topics/privatisation (accessed 2 March 2023). |
[18] | Prasad, N. (2014). PRIVATISATION OF WATER: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE. Law, Environment and Development Journal 3, 1-21. |
[19] | O’Brien, H. (2018). Is privatizing water supply really the best solution? China Dialogue. https://chinadialogue.net/en/business/10797-is-privatising-water-supply-really-the-best-solution/ (accessed 5 March 2023). |
[20] | Chenoweth, J. & Bird, H. (2005). The business of water and sustainable development, Greenleaf Publication Limited, Sheffield, UK. |
[21] | Root, R. L. (2020). Exclusive: Inside the battle over a UN report on water privatization. Devex publication. https://www.devex.com/news/exclusive-inside-the-battle-over-a-un-report-on-water-privatization-98385 (accessed 2 March 2023). |
[22] | Davis, J. (2005). Private-sector participation in water and sanitation sector. Environment and Resource 30 (2), 145-184. |
[23] | McDonald, D. A. & Ruiters, G. (2005). The age of commodity: water privatization in Southern Africa, Earthscan, London, 1-13. |
[24] | Salzman, J. (2006). Thirst: A Short History of Drinking Water. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities 94, 1-33. |
[25] | Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Dispossessing H2O: The Contested Terrain of Water Privatization. Capitalism Nature Socialism 16, 1-18. |
[26] | Walker, C. (2010). Water privatization. Chain Reaction 29 (108), pp. 41-51. |
[27] | Bel, G. & Warner, M. (2008). Does privatization of solid waste and water services reduce costs? A review of empirical studies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52 (12), 1337–1348. |
[28] | Hefetz, A. & Warner, M. E. (2012). Contracting or public delivery? The importance of service, market, and management characteristics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (2). 289–317. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur006. |
[29] | Chong, E., Saussier, S. & Silverman, B. S. (2015). Water under the bridge: Determinants of franchise renewal in water provision. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 31 (1). https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewv010. |
[30] | Bel, G. (2020). Public versus private water delivery, remunicipalization and water tariffs. Utilities Policy 62, 100982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2019.100982. |
[31] | Robinson, C. (2004). Water privatization: too much regulation. Economic Affairs 24 (3), 24-31. |
[32] | Rothenberger, D. & Truffer, B. (2005). ‘Private sector participation in water and sanitation’, in J Chenowith & J Bird (eds), The business of water and sustainable development, Greenleaf Publishing, UK, 82-98. |
[33] | Alcazar, L., Abdala, M. A. & Shirley, M. M. (2002). Thirsting for efficiency: the economics and politics of urban water system reform, Oxford Publication, UK, pp. 65-102. |
[34] | Haugton, G 2002, Market making: internationalization and global water markets, Environment and Planning, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 791-807. |
[35] | Megginson, W. L. & Netter, J. (2001). From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatisation. Journal of Economic Literature 39, 321-329. |
[36] | Achterhuis, H., Boelens, R., & Zwarteveen, M. (2012). Water property relations and modern policy regimes: Neoliberal Utopia and the Disempowerment of collective action. In R. Boelens, D. Getches, & A. Guevara-Gil (Eds.), Out of the mainstream: Water rights, politics and identity (pp. 27–55). |
[37] | Vos, J., & Boelens, R. (2018). Neoliberal water governmentalities, virtual water trade, and contestations. In R. Boelens, T. Perrault, & J. Vos (Eds.), Water Justice (283–301). Cambridge University Press. |
[38] | Harris, L., & Roa-García, M. C. (2013). Recent waves of water governance: Constitutional reform and resistance to neoliberalization in Latin America (1990–2012). Geoforum 50, 20–30. |
[39] | Greg, B. & Margaret, W. (2011). An institutional economics perspective: the impact of water privatization on water conservation in England and Australia. Water Resources Management 25 (5), 1325-13. |
[40] | AQUA 2023. Water and wastewater case studies. https://www.waterbyaqua.com/privatization-resources/case-studies/ (accessed 7 March 2023). |
[41] | Hardoy, A. & Schusterman, R. (2009). New models for the privatization of water and sanitation for urban poor. Environment and Urbanization, 12 (2), 63-75. |
[42] | Zaki, S. & Amin, N. (2009). Does basic services privatization benefit the urban poor? Urban Studies 46 (11), 2301-2327. |
[43] | Rapid Transition Alliance. (2019). Turning the tide of water privatization – the rise of the new municipal movement. https://www.rapidtransition.org/stories/turning-the-tide-of-water-privatization-the-rise-of-the-new-municipal-movement/ (accessed 10 February 2023). |
[44] | Beveridge, R., Hüesker, F., & Naumann, M. (2013). From post-politics to a politics of possibility? Unravelling the privatization of the Berlin Water Company. Geoforum 51, 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.09.021. |
[45] | Dean, J 2022. Privatization, poverty threaten water affordability. Cornell University. https://news.cornell.edu/stories/2022/04/privatization-poverty-threaten-water-affordability (accessed 3 March 2023). |
[46] | Zhang, X., Rivas, M. G., Grant, M. & Warner, M. E. (2022). Water pricing and affordability in the US: public vs. private ownership. Water Policy 24, 500-516. |
[47] | Barbosa, A. & Brusca, I. (2015). Governance structures and their impact on tariff levels of Brazilian water and sanitation corporations. Utilities Policy 34, 94-105. |
[48] | Romano, G., Masserini, L. & Guerrini, A. (2015). Does water utilities’ ownership matter in water pricing policy? An analysis of endogenous and environmental determinants of water tariffs in Italy. Water Policy 17, 918-931. |
[49] | Ruester, S. & Zschille, M. (2010). The impact of governance structure on firm performance: An application to the German water distribution sector. Utilities Policy 18, 154-162. |
[50] | Saal, D. S. & Parker, D. (2001). Productivity and price performance in the privatized water and sewerage companies of England and Wales. Journal of Regulatory Economics 20, 61-90. |
[51] | Hall, D. (2014). Why public–private partnerships don’t work, the many advantages of the public alternative. PSIRU. |
[52] | Kanakoudis, V., Tsitsifli, S. (2012). Urban water services public infrastructure projects: Turning the high level of the NRW into an attractive financing opportunity using the PBSC tool. Desalination and Water Treatment 39, 323–335. |
[53] | Marvin, S. & Laurie, N. (2000). An emerging logic of urban water management: Cochabambia, Bolivia. Urban Studies 36 (2), 341-357. |
[54] | Burnes, B., Katsouros, M. & Jones, T. (2004). Privatization and the European Union. International Journal of Public Sector Management 17 (1), pp. 65-80. |
[55] | Bekkada, Z. (2007). Lyonnais puts its case as French water corruption crisis deepens. Water Services 99 (1), 309-319. |
[56] | Schott, K., Wilson, S. & Walkom, S. (2010). Policy forum: urban water pricing and supply urban water reform: an industry perspective, The Australian Economic Review 41 (4), 413–419. |
APA Style
Jeet Chand, Farjana Akhter, Shiva Kumar Jha. (2023). A Review on Challenges, Opportunities and Outlook of Water Sector Privatization for Sustainability and Water Scarcity Management. American Journal of Water Science and Engineering, 9(2), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230902.13
ACS Style
Jeet Chand; Farjana Akhter; Shiva Kumar Jha. A Review on Challenges, Opportunities and Outlook of Water Sector Privatization for Sustainability and Water Scarcity Management. Am. J. Water Sci. Eng. 2023, 9(2), 41-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ajwse.20230902.13
AMA Style
Jeet Chand, Farjana Akhter, Shiva Kumar Jha. A Review on Challenges, Opportunities and Outlook of Water Sector Privatization for Sustainability and Water Scarcity Management. Am J Water Sci Eng. 2023;9(2):41-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ajwse.20230902.13
@article{10.11648/j.ajwse.20230902.13, author = {Jeet Chand and Farjana Akhter and Shiva Kumar Jha}, title = {A Review on Challenges, Opportunities and Outlook of Water Sector Privatization for Sustainability and Water Scarcity Management}, journal = {American Journal of Water Science and Engineering}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {41-49}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajwse.20230902.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230902.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajwse.20230902.13}, abstract = {The sustainable use and management of freshwater resources is on the center of developmental debate and becoming a global challenge. The overall aim of this study is to document published literature in the field of water privatization, critically review them and to draw a conclusion about how private sector participation can contribute in the initiative of sustainability for freshwater. To accomplish the specific goal of this paper, review articles, research papers, mini-articles, book and reports of authorized organizations published from last 25 years were reviewed. Comparative advantages, problems, challenges and opportunities of private and public sector management in water resources were thoroughly analyzed. Based on those reviews, this study found that there is a mixed legacy in water privatization throughout the world which needs to be strongly regulated to fulfill the basic requirements of consumers in one side and for sustainable management of scarce freshwater resources in another side. Meanwhile, after careful analysis of various water delivery systems and case-studies managed by different agencies around the world, this paper postulates the pubic-private-partnership as an appropriate form of privatization in water which not only helps to increase the project efficiency but also improves the service delivery to end-users.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A Review on Challenges, Opportunities and Outlook of Water Sector Privatization for Sustainability and Water Scarcity Management AU - Jeet Chand AU - Farjana Akhter AU - Shiva Kumar Jha Y1 - 2023/05/10 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230902.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajwse.20230902.13 T2 - American Journal of Water Science and Engineering JF - American Journal of Water Science and Engineering JO - American Journal of Water Science and Engineering SP - 41 EP - 49 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1875 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230902.13 AB - The sustainable use and management of freshwater resources is on the center of developmental debate and becoming a global challenge. The overall aim of this study is to document published literature in the field of water privatization, critically review them and to draw a conclusion about how private sector participation can contribute in the initiative of sustainability for freshwater. To accomplish the specific goal of this paper, review articles, research papers, mini-articles, book and reports of authorized organizations published from last 25 years were reviewed. Comparative advantages, problems, challenges and opportunities of private and public sector management in water resources were thoroughly analyzed. Based on those reviews, this study found that there is a mixed legacy in water privatization throughout the world which needs to be strongly regulated to fulfill the basic requirements of consumers in one side and for sustainable management of scarce freshwater resources in another side. Meanwhile, after careful analysis of various water delivery systems and case-studies managed by different agencies around the world, this paper postulates the pubic-private-partnership as an appropriate form of privatization in water which not only helps to increase the project efficiency but also improves the service delivery to end-users. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -