Optimization of Hydropower Generation Potential of Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam

Chimdesa Regasa Kishe

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Optimization of Hydropower Generation Potential of Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam

Chimdesa Regasa Kishe

Published in American Journal of Water Science and Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 3)

Received: 22 June 2023 Accepted: 18 July 2023 Published: 27 July 2023

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Hydropower has been developed to have a positive impact on the quality of life for rural residents in many ways. It offers a wide range of facilities, such as improved lighting, energy for small industries, schools, computer and communication service centers, and clinics. Ethiopia has constructed numerous dams for irrigation and water supply, yet these structures may have untapped potential for other purposes. One example of such a dam is the Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam located in western Ethiopia. Advanced optimization models have been developed to maximize the annual energy generation from the Arjo Dedessa Dam, while taking into account restrictions on water release for irrigation and ecological purposes, as well as the need to maintain maximum reservoir yield and storage capacity. The model was analyzed using LINGO software for different probabilities of mean annual inflow exceedance. Two scenarios for hydropower retrofitting were evaluated. The scenario of independent hydropower release with reservoir inflows at 50%, 75%, and 90% probabilities of exceedance results in a total annual hydropower output of 4.8 MW, 4.34 MW, and 0.99 MW, respectively. The matching values for the scenario of complementary hydropower release were 5.27 MW, 4.55 MW, and 1 MW, respectively. The study also measured the potential increase in the reservoir's live storage capacity to 1945.01 Mm³ by utilizing flood storage, which would allow for a maximum draft increase to 285.74 Mm³. With an upper limit on storage and draft, and reservoir inflows with probabilities of exceedance at 50%, 75%, and 90%, the hydropower production increased correspondingly to 6.51 MW, 4.54 MW, and 1.935 MW for the scenario of independent hydropower release arrangement. For the scenario of complimentary hydropower release, the hydropower production improved to 6.75 MW, 4.58 MW, and 1.94 MW respectively. The outcomes specify that the Arjo Dedessa Dam is appropriate for the production of hydroelectric power and that its generation potential is between 6.51 and 6.75 MW.

Published in	American Journal of Water Science and Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12
Page(s)	58-68
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Irrigation Dam, Energy, Optimization, Linear Programming, LINGO

References

[1]	Anagnostopoulos, John S., and Dimitris E. Papantonis. 2007. ‘Optimal Sizing of a Run-of-River Small Hydropower Plant’. Energy Conversion and Management 48 (10): 2663–70.
[2]	Arunkumar, R., and V. Jothiprakash. 2012. ‘Optimal Reservoir Operation for Hydropower Generation Using Non-Linear Programming Model’. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A 93 (2): 111–20.
[3]	Bhandari, Ramchandra, Lena Ganda Saptalena, and Wolfgang Kusch. 2018. ‘Sustainability Assessment of a Micro Hydropower Plant in Nepal’. Energy, Sustainability and Society 8 (3): 1–15. https://energsustainsoc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13705-018-0147-2 (December 14, 2021).
[4]	Bilgen, Selçuk, Kamil Kaygusuz, and Ahmet Sari. 2004. ‘Renewable Energy for a Clean and Sustainable Future’. Energy Sources 26 (12): 1119–29.
[5]	Ellabban, Omar, Haitham Abu-Rub, and Frede Blaabjerg. 2014. ‘Renewable Energy Resources: Current Status, Future Prospects and Their Enabling Technology’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 39: 748–64.
[6]	Evans, Annette, Vladimir Strezov, and Tim J. Evans. 2009. ‘Assessment of Sustainability Indicators for Renewable Energy Technologies’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 13 (5): 1082–88.
[7]	Field, Randi, and Jay R. Lund. 2006. ‘Multi-Objective Optimization of Folsom Reservoir Operation’. Operating Reservoirs in Changing Conditions: 205–14. http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/40875%28212%2921 (December 14, 2021).
[8]	Frey, Gary W., and Deborah M. Linke. 2002. ‘Hydropower as a Renewable and Sustainable Energy Resource Meeting Global Energy Challenges in a Reasonable Way’. Energy Policy 30 (14): 1261–65.
[9]	Girma, Zelalem. 2016. ‘Techno-Economic Feasibility of Small Scale Hydropower in Ethiopia: The Case of the Kulfo River, in Southern Ethiopia’. Journal of Renewable Energy 2016: 1–12.
[10]	Hadjerioua, Boualem, Yaxing Wei, and Shih-Chieh Kao. 2012. ‘An Assessment of Energy Potential at Non-Powered Dams in the United States’. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc833679/ (December 14, 2021).
[11]	Hailu, Ashebir Dingeto, and Desta Kalbessa Kumsa. 2020. ‘Ethiopia Renewable Energy Potentials and Current State’. AIMS Energy 9 (1): 1–14.
[12]	Hatamkhani, Amir, Mojtaba Shourian, and Ali Moridi. 2021. ‘Optimal Design and Operation of a Hydropower Reservoir Plant Using a WEAP-Based Simulation–Optimization Approach’. Water Resources Management 35 (5): 1637–52.
[13]	Johnson, William K. 1972. ‘Use of Systems Analysis in Water Resources Planning’. Journal of the Hydraulics Division 98 (9): 1543–56. https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/JYCEAJ.0003403 (December 14, 2021).
[14]	Kaunda, Chiyembekezo S., Cuthbert Z. Kimambo, and Torbjorn K. Nielsen. 2012. ‘Potential of Small-Scale Hydropower for Electricity Generation in Sub-Saharan Africa’. ISRN Renewable Energy 2012: 1–15.
[15]	Kaygusuz, Kamil. 2004. ‘Hydropower and the World’s Energy Future’. Energy Sources 26 (3): 215–24.
[16]	Kaygusuz, Kamil, and Ahmet Sarı. 2003. ‘Renewable Energy Potential and Utilization in Turkey’. Energy Conversion and Management 44 (3): 459–78.
[17]	Kichonge, Baraka. 2018. ‘The Status and Future Prospects of Hydropower for Sustainable Water and Energy Development in Tanzania’. Journal of Renewable Energy 2018: 1–12.
[18]	Kumar, Deepak, and S. S. Katoch. 2015. ‘Sustainability Suspense of Small Hydropower Projects: A Study from Western Himalayan Region of India’. Renewable Energy 76: 220–33.
[19]	Labadie, John W. 2004. ‘Optimal Operation of Multireservoir Systems: State-of-the-Art Review’. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management 130 (2): 93–111.
[20]	Loucks, Daniel P., and Eelco van Beek. 2017a. ‘Water Resources Planning and Management: An Overview’. Water Resource Systems Planning and Management: 1–49.
[21]	Martinot, Eric et al. 2002. ‘Renewable Energy Markets in Developing Countries’. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 27: 309–48.
[22]	Mukheibir, Pierre. 2013. ‘Potential Consequences of Projected Climate Change Impacts on Hydroelectricity Generation’. Climatic Change 121 (1): 67–78.
[23]	Nandalal, K D W, Sri Lanka, Slobodan P Simonovic, and Research Chair. 2002. ‘State-of-the-Art Report on Systems Analysis Methods for Resolution of Conflicts in Water Resources Management’.
[24]	Nautiyal, Himanshu, S. K. Singal, Varun, and Aashish Sharma. 2011. ‘Small Hydropower for Sustainable Energy Development in India’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (4): 2021–27.
[25]	Nkwonta, O. I., B. Dzwairo, F. A. O. Otieno, and J. A. Adeyemo. 2017. ‘A Review on Water Resources Yield Model’. South African Journal of Chemical Engineering 23: 107–15.
[26]	Omer, Abdeen Mustafa. 2008. ‘Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 12 (9): 2265–2300.
[27]	Paish, Oliver. 2002. ‘Small Hydro Power: Technology and Current Status’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 6 (6): 537–56.
[28]	Pegels, Anna. 2010. ‘Renewable Energy in South Africa: Potentials, Barriers and Options for Support’. Energy Policy 38 (9): 4945–54.
[29]	Purohit, Pallav. 2008. ‘Small Hydro Power Projects under Clean Development Mechanism in India: A Preliminary Assessment’. Energy Policy 36 (6): 2000–2015.
[30]	Salami, Adebayo Wahab et al. 2017. ‘Evaluation of the Hydropower Generation Potential of a Dam Using Optimization Techniques: Application to Doma Dam, Nassarawa, in North Central Nigeria’. Slovak Journal of Civil Engineering 25 (1): 1–9.
[31]	Sreenivasan, K R, and S Vedula. 1996. ‘Reservoir Operation for Hydropower Optimization: A Chance-Constrained Approach’. 21: 503–10.
[32]	Sternberg, R. 2010. ‘Hydropower’s Future, the Environment, and Global Electricity Systems’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14 (2): 713–23.
[33]	Temesgen Ayalew, Abebe. 2021a. ‘Assessment of Power Compeers Prospective of Gobecho Micro Hydropower Plant on Ganga River, Genale Dawa River Basin, Ethiopia’. American Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 10 (2): 25.
[34]	Wurbs, Ralph A. ‘Simulation Modeling of River/Reservoir System Water Allocation and Management’. http://twri.tamu.edu (December 14, 2021).
[35]	Yaseen, Zaher Mundher et al. 2018. ‘Optimization of Reservoir Operation Using New Hybrid Algorithm’. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 2018 22: 11 22 (11): 4668–80. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12205-018-2095-y (December 14, 2021).
[36]	Yeh, William W-G. 1985. ‘Reservoir Management and Operations Models: A State-of-the-Art Review’. Water Resources Research 21 (12): 1797–1818.
[37]	Zadeh, N. Afsharian, S. J. Mousavi, E. Jahani, and J. H. Kim. 2016. ‘Optimal Design and Operation of Hydraulically Coupled Hydropower Reservoirs System’. Procedia Engineering 154: 1393–1400.
[38]	Zarfl, Christiane et al. 2015. ‘A Global Boom in Hydropower Dam Construction’. Aquatic Sciences 77 (1): 161–70.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Chimdesa Regasa Kishe. (2023). Optimization of Hydropower Generation Potential of Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam. American Journal of Water Science and Engineering, 9(3), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Chimdesa Regasa Kishe. Optimization of Hydropower Generation Potential of Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam. Am. J. Water Sci. Eng. 2023, 9(3), 58-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Chimdesa Regasa Kishe. Optimization of Hydropower Generation Potential of Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam. Am J Water Sci Eng. 2023;9(3):58-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12,
  author = {Chimdesa Regasa Kishe},
  title = {Optimization of Hydropower Generation Potential of Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam},
  journal = {American Journal of Water Science and Engineering},
  volume = {9},
  number = {3},
  pages = {58-68},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajwse.20230903.12},
  abstract = {Hydropower has been developed to have a positive impact on the quality of life for rural residents in many ways. It offers a wide range of facilities, such as improved lighting, energy for small industries, schools, computer and communication service centers, and clinics. Ethiopia has constructed numerous dams for irrigation and water supply, yet these structures may have untapped potential for other purposes. One example of such a dam is the Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam located in western Ethiopia. Advanced optimization models have been developed to maximize the annual energy generation from the Arjo Dedessa Dam, while taking into account restrictions on water release for irrigation and ecological purposes, as well as the need to maintain maximum reservoir yield and storage capacity. The model was analyzed using LINGO software for different probabilities of mean annual inflow exceedance. Two scenarios for hydropower retrofitting were evaluated. The scenario of independent hydropower release with reservoir inflows at 50%, 75%, and 90% probabilities of exceedance results in a total annual hydropower output of 4.8 MW, 4.34 MW, and 0.99 MW, respectively. The matching values for the scenario of complementary hydropower release were 5.27 MW, 4.55 MW, and 1 MW, respectively. The study also measured the potential increase in the reservoir's live storage capacity to 1945.01 Mm3 by utilizing flood storage, which would allow for a maximum draft increase to 285.74 Mm3. With an upper limit on storage and draft, and reservoir inflows with probabilities of exceedance at 50%, 75%, and 90%, the hydropower production increased correspondingly to 6.51 MW, 4.54 MW, and 1.935 MW for the scenario of independent hydropower release arrangement. For the scenario of complimentary hydropower release, the hydropower production improved to 6.75 MW, 4.58 MW, and 1.94 MW respectively. The outcomes specify that the Arjo Dedessa Dam is appropriate for the production of hydroelectric power and that its generation potential is between 6.51 and 6.75 MW.},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Optimization of Hydropower Generation Potential of Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam
AU  - Chimdesa Regasa Kishe
Y1  - 2023/07/27
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12
T2  - American Journal of Water Science and Engineering
JF  - American Journal of Water Science and Engineering
JO  - American Journal of Water Science and Engineering
SP  - 58
EP  - 68
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-1875
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12
AB  - Hydropower has been developed to have a positive impact on the quality of life for rural residents in many ways. It offers a wide range of facilities, such as improved lighting, energy for small industries, schools, computer and communication service centers, and clinics. Ethiopia has constructed numerous dams for irrigation and water supply, yet these structures may have untapped potential for other purposes. One example of such a dam is the Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam located in western Ethiopia. Advanced optimization models have been developed to maximize the annual energy generation from the Arjo Dedessa Dam, while taking into account restrictions on water release for irrigation and ecological purposes, as well as the need to maintain maximum reservoir yield and storage capacity. The model was analyzed using LINGO software for different probabilities of mean annual inflow exceedance. Two scenarios for hydropower retrofitting were evaluated. The scenario of independent hydropower release with reservoir inflows at 50%, 75%, and 90% probabilities of exceedance results in a total annual hydropower output of 4.8 MW, 4.34 MW, and 0.99 MW, respectively. The matching values for the scenario of complementary hydropower release were 5.27 MW, 4.55 MW, and 1 MW, respectively. The study also measured the potential increase in the reservoir's live storage capacity to 1945.01 Mm3 by utilizing flood storage, which would allow for a maximum draft increase to 285.74 Mm3. With an upper limit on storage and draft, and reservoir inflows with probabilities of exceedance at 50%, 75%, and 90%, the hydropower production increased correspondingly to 6.51 MW, 4.54 MW, and 1.935 MW for the scenario of independent hydropower release arrangement. For the scenario of complimentary hydropower release, the hydropower production improved to 6.75 MW, 4.58 MW, and 1.94 MW respectively. The outcomes specify that the Arjo Dedessa Dam is appropriate for the production of hydroelectric power and that its generation potential is between 6.51 and 6.75 MW.
VL  - 9
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Chimdesa Regasa Kishe

College of Engineering and Technology, Wolkite University, Wolkite, Ethiopia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Chimdesa Regasa Kishe. (2023). Optimization of Hydropower Generation Potential of Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam. American Journal of Water Science and Engineering, 9(3), 58-68. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Chimdesa Regasa Kishe. Optimization of Hydropower Generation Potential of Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam. Am. J. Water Sci. Eng. 2023, 9(3), 58-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Chimdesa Regasa Kishe. Optimization of Hydropower Generation Potential of Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam. Am J Water Sci Eng. 2023;9(3):58-68. doi: 10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12,
  author = {Chimdesa Regasa Kishe},
  title = {Optimization of Hydropower Generation Potential of Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam},
  journal = {American Journal of Water Science and Engineering},
  volume = {9},
  number = {3},
  pages = {58-68},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajwse.20230903.12},
  abstract = {Hydropower has been developed to have a positive impact on the quality of life for rural residents in many ways. It offers a wide range of facilities, such as improved lighting, energy for small industries, schools, computer and communication service centers, and clinics. Ethiopia has constructed numerous dams for irrigation and water supply, yet these structures may have untapped potential for other purposes. One example of such a dam is the Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam located in western Ethiopia. Advanced optimization models have been developed to maximize the annual energy generation from the Arjo Dedessa Dam, while taking into account restrictions on water release for irrigation and ecological purposes, as well as the need to maintain maximum reservoir yield and storage capacity. The model was analyzed using LINGO software for different probabilities of mean annual inflow exceedance. Two scenarios for hydropower retrofitting were evaluated. The scenario of independent hydropower release with reservoir inflows at 50%, 75%, and 90% probabilities of exceedance results in a total annual hydropower output of 4.8 MW, 4.34 MW, and 0.99 MW, respectively. The matching values for the scenario of complementary hydropower release were 5.27 MW, 4.55 MW, and 1 MW, respectively. The study also measured the potential increase in the reservoir's live storage capacity to 1945.01 Mm3 by utilizing flood storage, which would allow for a maximum draft increase to 285.74 Mm3. With an upper limit on storage and draft, and reservoir inflows with probabilities of exceedance at 50%, 75%, and 90%, the hydropower production increased correspondingly to 6.51 MW, 4.54 MW, and 1.935 MW for the scenario of independent hydropower release arrangement. For the scenario of complimentary hydropower release, the hydropower production improved to 6.75 MW, 4.58 MW, and 1.94 MW respectively. The outcomes specify that the Arjo Dedessa Dam is appropriate for the production of hydroelectric power and that its generation potential is between 6.51 and 6.75 MW.},
 year = {2023}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Optimization of Hydropower Generation Potential of Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam
AU  - Chimdesa Regasa Kishe
Y1  - 2023/07/27
PY  - 2023
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12
T2  - American Journal of Water Science and Engineering
JF  - American Journal of Water Science and Engineering
JO  - American Journal of Water Science and Engineering
SP  - 58
EP  - 68
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-1875
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230903.12
AB  - Hydropower has been developed to have a positive impact on the quality of life for rural residents in many ways. It offers a wide range of facilities, such as improved lighting, energy for small industries, schools, computer and communication service centers, and clinics. Ethiopia has constructed numerous dams for irrigation and water supply, yet these structures may have untapped potential for other purposes. One example of such a dam is the Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Dam located in western Ethiopia. Advanced optimization models have been developed to maximize the annual energy generation from the Arjo Dedessa Dam, while taking into account restrictions on water release for irrigation and ecological purposes, as well as the need to maintain maximum reservoir yield and storage capacity. The model was analyzed using LINGO software for different probabilities of mean annual inflow exceedance. Two scenarios for hydropower retrofitting were evaluated. The scenario of independent hydropower release with reservoir inflows at 50%, 75%, and 90% probabilities of exceedance results in a total annual hydropower output of 4.8 MW, 4.34 MW, and 0.99 MW, respectively. The matching values for the scenario of complementary hydropower release were 5.27 MW, 4.55 MW, and 1 MW, respectively. The study also measured the potential increase in the reservoir's live storage capacity to 1945.01 Mm3 by utilizing flood storage, which would allow for a maximum draft increase to 285.74 Mm3. With an upper limit on storage and draft, and reservoir inflows with probabilities of exceedance at 50%, 75%, and 90%, the hydropower production increased correspondingly to 6.51 MW, 4.54 MW, and 1.935 MW for the scenario of independent hydropower release arrangement. For the scenario of complimentary hydropower release, the hydropower production improved to 6.75 MW, 4.58 MW, and 1.94 MW respectively. The outcomes specify that the Arjo Dedessa Dam is appropriate for the production of hydroelectric power and that its generation potential is between 6.51 and 6.75 MW.
VL  - 9
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download