Nepal is a country with many mountains, situated in Hindukush Himalayas. Stone quarrying is currently accompanying the rapid expansion of physical infrastructure in the Roshi River and its tributaries. This study aims to establish the discharge and suspended sediment rating curve of the Roshi River. It also includes the impact of the stone quarries in the Roshi River during operation and non-operation at the upper Roshi watershed, Nepal. The data includes stage data, measurement of discharge, and suspended sediment in the years 2022 and 2023. The regression analysis was conducted with the development of a discharge rating curve having a coefficient of determination R2 = 0.83. The suspended sediment rating curve of the annual and monsoon, of the year 2022 was developed with a coefficient of determination of 0.23 and 0.39 respectively. The average suspended sediment concentration at tributary Roshi is 203.04 percent higher than at upstream. The increase in average suspended sediment concentration at main Roshi concerning tributary Roshi is 14.25 percent. Further, the decrease in average suspended sediment concentration due to the non-operation of the stone quarry in January 2023 concerning December 2022 is 52.13 percent in tributary Roshi and 12.59 percent in the main Roshi River. Furthermore, the increase in SSC during the operation of stone quarry including monsoon contribution is 682.97 percent higher than during non-operation. The increase in SSC during the operation of stone quarry excluding monsoon contribution is 64.34 percent higher than during non-operation. The study will facilitate Panauti hydropower and the concerned authorities of Panauti to adopt various measures to control sediment discharge from stone quarries at Roshi for sustainable development of the Roshi watershed.
Published in | American Journal of Water Science and Engineering (Volume 9, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajwse.20230904.11 |
Page(s) | 86-96 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Discharge, Stage, Stone Quarry, Suspended Sediment Rating Curve
[1] | M. R. Peart, M. E. Ruse, and L. Fok, “Sediment delivery from a landslide to a stream in a drainage basin in Hong Kong,” IAHS-AISH Publ., no. 299, pp. 46–55, 2005. |
[2] | R. M. Bajracharya, S. Sharma, and R. Clemente, “Discharge and sediment loads of two streams in the mid-hills of central Nepal,” Himal. J. Sci., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 51–54, 1970, doi: 10.3126/hjs.v2i3.233. |
[3] | A. Chhetri, R. B. Kayastha, and A. Shrestha, “Assessment of Sediment Load of Langtang River in Rasuwa District, Nepal,” J. Water Resour. Prot., vol. 08, no. 01, pp. 84–92, 2016, doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2016.81007. |
[4] | A. Sitorus and E. Susanto, “A Sediment Rating-curve Method to Determine Sediment Discharge for Rainy Season in Micro-scale Watersheds,” Indones. J. Agric. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2019, doi: 10.32734/injar.v2i1.857. |
[5] | S. Ghimire, U. Singh, and P. Kumar, “Generation of a Suspended Sediment Rating Curve of a Himalayan River based on a Long-term Data: A case study of Kabeli River,” Proc. 10th IOE Grad. Conf., vol. 8914, pp. 1110–1118, 2021. |
[6] | M. Raj Kafle, “Sediment Transport Measurement in the Koshi River: Comparison Between Historic and Recent Measurement Results,” Am. J. Water Sci. Eng., vol. 5, no. 3, p. 111, 2019, doi: 10.11648/j.ajwse.20190503.12. |
[7] | R. Sinha et al., “Basin-scale hydrology and sediment dynamics of the Kosi river in the Himalayan foreland,” J. Hydrol., vol. 570, no. February 2018, pp. 156–166, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.12.051. |
[8] | Y. Hassanzadeh, “Evaluation of sediment load in a natural river,” Water Int., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 145–154, 2007, doi: 10.1080/02508060708691971. |
[9] | P. M. Ndomba, F. W. Mtalo, and Å. Killingtveit, “Developing an excellent sediment rating curve from one hydrological year sampling programme data: Approach,” J. Urban Environ. Eng., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2008, doi: 10.4090/juee.2008.v2n1.021027. |
[10] | N. Sharma, M. Zakaullah, H. Tiwari, and D. Kumar, “Runoff and sediment yield modeling using ANN and support vector machines: a case study from Nepal watershed,” Model. Earth Syst. Environ., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–8, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s40808-015-0027-0. |
[11] | N. Q. Qazi and S. P. Rai, “Spatio-temporal dynamics of sediment transport in lesser Himalayan catchments, India,” Hydrol. Sci. J., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 50–62, 2018, doi: 10.1080/02626667.2017.1410280. |
[12] | D. Khatri, K. R. Neupane, and K. Devkota, “Dhulikhel’s Journey towards Water Security: INSIGHTS FOR POLICY AND PRACTICE,” no. February. pp. 1–178, 2021. |
[13] | D. P. Sangroula, “Hydropower Development and Its Sustainability With Respect to Sedimentation in Nepal,” J. Inst. Eng., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 56–64, 1970, doi: 10.3126/jie.v7i1.2063. |
[14] | N. B. Tamang, N. K. Tamrakar, M. Magar, and M. Raut, “Fluvial morphology and sediment transport of the Malekhu Khola, Central Nepal Lesser Himalaya,” Bull. Dep. Geol., vol. 18, no. July, pp. 35–48, 2017, doi: 10.3126/bdg.v18i0.16455. |
[15] | M. B. Baniya, T. Asaeda, K. C. Shivaram, and S. M. D. H. Jayashanka, “Hydraulic parameters for sediment transport and prediction of suspended sediment for Kali Gandaki River basin, Himalaya, Nepal,” Water (Switzerland), vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 1–18, 2019, doi: 10.3390/w11061229. |
[16] | L. P. Poudel, B. Thapa, B. P. Shrestha, and N. K. Shrestha, “Impact of Sand on Hydraulic Turbine Material: A Case Study of Roshi Khola, Nepal,” Hydro Nepal J. Water, Energy Environ., vol. 10, no. January 2016, pp. 60–65, 2012, doi: 10.3126/hn.v10i0.7116. |
[17] | C. Andermann, S. Bonnet, A. Crave, P. Davy, L. Longuevergne, and R. Gloaguen, “Sediment transfer and the hydrological cycle of Himalayan rivers in Nepal,” Comptes Rendus - Geosci., vol. 344, no. 11–12, pp. 627–635, 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.crte.2012.10.009. |
[18] | F. Jaramillo, M. Baccard, P. Narinesingh, S. Gaskin, and V. Cooper, “Assessing the Role of a Limestone Quarry as Sediment Source in a Developing Tropical Catchment,” L. Degrad. Dev., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1064–1074, 2016, doi: 10.1002/ldr.2347. |
[19] | J. Hu, G. Zhao, X. Mu, P. Tian, P. Gao, and W. Sun, “Quantifying the impacts of human activities on runoff and sediment load changes in a Loess Plateau catchment, China,” J. Soils Sediments, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 3866–3880, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11368-019-02353-z. |
[20] | E. Ansari, M. N. Akhtar, E. A. Bakar, A. F. Hawary, and S. S. N. Alhady, “Investigation of Suspended Sediment Samplers: A Review,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1874, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1874/1/012018. |
[21] | R. Talchabhadel et al., “Insights on the Impacts of Hydroclimatic Extremes and Anthropogenic Activities on Sediment Yield of a River Basin,” Earth (Switzerland), vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 32–50, 2021, doi: 10.3390/earth2010003. |
[22] | C. G. Crawford, “Estimation of suspended-sediment rating curves and mean suspended-sediment loads,” J. Hydrol., vol. 129, no. 1–4, pp. 331–348, 1991, doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(91)90057-O. |
[23] | A. M. De Girolamo, G. Pappagallo, and A. Lo Porto, “Temporal variability of suspended sediment transport and rating curves in a Mediterranean river basin: The Celone (SE Italy),” Catena, vol. 128, pp. 135–143, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2014.09.020. |
[24] | A. M. Messina and T. W. Biggs, “Contributions of human activities to suspended sediment yield during storm events from a small, steep, tropical watershed,” J. Hydrol., vol. 538, pp. 726–742, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.03.053. |
[25] | S. T. Harrington and J. R. Harrington, “An assessment of the suspended sediment rating curve approach for load estimation on the Rivers Bandon and Owenabue, Ireland,” Geomorphology, vol. 185, pp. 27–38, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.12.002. |
[26] | E. Olyaie, H. Banejad, K. W. Chau, and A. M. Melesse, “A comparison of various artificial intelligence approaches performance for estimating suspended sediment load of river systems: a case study in United States,” Environ. Monit. Assess., vol. 187, no. 4, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-4381-1. |
[27] | J. A. Warrick, “Trend analyses with river sediment rating curves,” Hydrol. Process., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 936–949, 2015, doi: 10.1002/hyp.10198. |
[28] | S. Zhang, D. Chen, F. Li, L. He, M. Yan, and Y. Yan, “Evaluating spatial variation of suspended sediment rating curves in the middle Yellow River basin, China,” Hydrol. Process., vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1616–1624, 2018, doi: 10.1002/hyp.11514. |
APA Style
Suman Shrestha, Prachand Man Pradhan, Hari Krishna Shrestha. (2023). Stone Quarries and Hydrological Regime of Roshi with Emphasis on Sedimentation. American Journal of Water Science and Engineering, 9(4), 86-96. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230904.11
ACS Style
Suman Shrestha; Prachand Man Pradhan; Hari Krishna Shrestha. Stone Quarries and Hydrological Regime of Roshi with Emphasis on Sedimentation. Am. J. Water Sci. Eng. 2023, 9(4), 86-96. doi: 10.11648/j.ajwse.20230904.11
AMA Style
Suman Shrestha, Prachand Man Pradhan, Hari Krishna Shrestha. Stone Quarries and Hydrological Regime of Roshi with Emphasis on Sedimentation. Am J Water Sci Eng. 2023;9(4):86-96. doi: 10.11648/j.ajwse.20230904.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajwse.20230904.11, author = {Suman Shrestha and Prachand Man Pradhan and Hari Krishna Shrestha}, title = {Stone Quarries and Hydrological Regime of Roshi with Emphasis on Sedimentation}, journal = {American Journal of Water Science and Engineering}, volume = {9}, number = {4}, pages = {86-96}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajwse.20230904.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230904.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajwse.20230904.11}, abstract = {Nepal is a country with many mountains, situated in Hindukush Himalayas. Stone quarrying is currently accompanying the rapid expansion of physical infrastructure in the Roshi River and its tributaries. This study aims to establish the discharge and suspended sediment rating curve of the Roshi River. It also includes the impact of the stone quarries in the Roshi River during operation and non-operation at the upper Roshi watershed, Nepal. The data includes stage data, measurement of discharge, and suspended sediment in the years 2022 and 2023. The regression analysis was conducted with the development of a discharge rating curve having a coefficient of determination R2 = 0.83. The suspended sediment rating curve of the annual and monsoon, of the year 2022 was developed with a coefficient of determination of 0.23 and 0.39 respectively. The average suspended sediment concentration at tributary Roshi is 203.04 percent higher than at upstream. The increase in average suspended sediment concentration at main Roshi concerning tributary Roshi is 14.25 percent. Further, the decrease in average suspended sediment concentration due to the non-operation of the stone quarry in January 2023 concerning December 2022 is 52.13 percent in tributary Roshi and 12.59 percent in the main Roshi River. Furthermore, the increase in SSC during the operation of stone quarry including monsoon contribution is 682.97 percent higher than during non-operation. The increase in SSC during the operation of stone quarry excluding monsoon contribution is 64.34 percent higher than during non-operation. The study will facilitate Panauti hydropower and the concerned authorities of Panauti to adopt various measures to control sediment discharge from stone quarries at Roshi for sustainable development of the Roshi watershed. }, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Stone Quarries and Hydrological Regime of Roshi with Emphasis on Sedimentation AU - Suman Shrestha AU - Prachand Man Pradhan AU - Hari Krishna Shrestha Y1 - 2023/10/28 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230904.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajwse.20230904.11 T2 - American Journal of Water Science and Engineering JF - American Journal of Water Science and Engineering JO - American Journal of Water Science and Engineering SP - 86 EP - 96 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1875 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajwse.20230904.11 AB - Nepal is a country with many mountains, situated in Hindukush Himalayas. Stone quarrying is currently accompanying the rapid expansion of physical infrastructure in the Roshi River and its tributaries. This study aims to establish the discharge and suspended sediment rating curve of the Roshi River. It also includes the impact of the stone quarries in the Roshi River during operation and non-operation at the upper Roshi watershed, Nepal. The data includes stage data, measurement of discharge, and suspended sediment in the years 2022 and 2023. The regression analysis was conducted with the development of a discharge rating curve having a coefficient of determination R2 = 0.83. The suspended sediment rating curve of the annual and monsoon, of the year 2022 was developed with a coefficient of determination of 0.23 and 0.39 respectively. The average suspended sediment concentration at tributary Roshi is 203.04 percent higher than at upstream. The increase in average suspended sediment concentration at main Roshi concerning tributary Roshi is 14.25 percent. Further, the decrease in average suspended sediment concentration due to the non-operation of the stone quarry in January 2023 concerning December 2022 is 52.13 percent in tributary Roshi and 12.59 percent in the main Roshi River. Furthermore, the increase in SSC during the operation of stone quarry including monsoon contribution is 682.97 percent higher than during non-operation. The increase in SSC during the operation of stone quarry excluding monsoon contribution is 64.34 percent higher than during non-operation. The study will facilitate Panauti hydropower and the concerned authorities of Panauti to adopt various measures to control sediment discharge from stone quarries at Roshi for sustainable development of the Roshi watershed. VL - 9 IS - 4 ER -