Human-wildlife conflicts are common phenomenon throughout the world which have become significant problems. Human-wildlife conflicts bring many socio-economic and ecological consequences in buffer zone area of the protected area. This study is based on mixed research design combination of both quantitative and qualitative research methods. Household survey, focus group discussions are used for primary data collection. After collecting data, the data are tabulated with coding and tables are constructed with percentage figures and qualitative data are analyzed inductively using descriptions through words and phrases. There are different major sources of conflicts in the people of buffer zone and the Chitwan National Park. The major conflicts are illegal extraction of park resources such as collection of firewood, fodder and timber, livestock grazing, crop raids by wild animals and loss of human life and property. The Mitigative measures used in the study areas for wildlife damage control are repellents, physical constructions and guarding. Different community development programs have influenced buffer zone people’s attitude towards the park. Conservation education and with adequate compensation against damages and regular monitoring of wild animals help to reduce human-wildlife conflicts.
| Published in | American Journal of Zoology (Volume 3, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajz.20200304.11 |
| Page(s) | 65-71 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
National Park, Human Casualties, Depredation, Livelihood, Buffer Zone, Crop Raiding
| [1] | Studsrod, J. E. & Wegge, P. (1995). Park-People Relationship: The case of damage caused by park animals around the Royal Bardia National Park, Nepal. Environment Conservation, 22 (2): 133-142. |
| [2] | Mishra, H. R. (1991). Regional review: South and South East Asia. A Review developed from a regional meeting on national parks and protected areas held in Bangkok from 1-4 Dec. Under the co-sponsorship of IUCN, AIT and the World Bank. |
| [3] | Shrestha, B. (1996). Park people conflict around the Chitwan National Park. Journal of National History Museum, 15, Kathmandu: National History Museum. |
| [4] | Wang, S. & Macdonald, D. W. (2005). Livestock predation by carnivores in Jigme Singye Wangchuck National Park. Bhutan: Biological Conservation. |
| [5] | Ogra, M. & Badola, R. (2008). Compensating Human- wildlife conflict in protected area communities: Ground level perspectives from Uttarakhand. India: Human Ecology. |
| [6] | Inskip, C. & Zimmermann, A. (2009). Human-felid conflict: A review of patterns and priorities worldwide. Oryx, 43 (1). |
| [7] | Schwerdtner, K. & Gruber, B. (2007). A conceptual framework for damage compensations schemes. Biological Conservation. |
| [8] | GON (1973). The National Parks and Wildlife Conservation Act 1973 (4th amendment in 1993). Government of Nepal (GON), Kathmandu, Nepal. |
| [9] | GON (1996). Buffer zone management rule 2052 (1996). Government of Nepal (GON), Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, Kathmandu, Nepal. |
| [10] | DNPWC (1999) Buffer zone management guideline. Department of National Park and Wildlife Conservation (DNPWC), Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, Nepal. |
| [11] | Lamichhane, B. R., Persoon, G. A., Leirs, H., Poudel, S., Subedi, N., et al (2019). Contribution of buffer zone programs to reduce human-wildlife impacts: the case of the Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Human Ecology, 47: 95-110. |
| [12] | Silwal, T., Subedi, R., Poudel, B. S. & Lakhey, S. P. (2013). Wildlife damages and adaptation strategies: a case study in Chitwan National Park, Nepal. A research report submitted to Institute of Forestry/ ComForM Project, Pokhara, Nepal. |
| [13] | Hill, C. M. (1997). Crop-raiding by wild vertebrates: the farmer’s perspective in an agricultural community in western Uganda. International Journal of Pest Management, 43 (1): 77-84. |
| [14] | Naughton-Treves, L. (1998). Predicting patterns of crop damage by wildlife around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Conservation Biology, 12 (1): 156-168. |
| [15] | Hill, C., Osborn, F. & Plumptre, A. J. (2002). Human-wildlife conflict: Identifying the problem and possible solutions. Albertine Rift Technical Report Series Vol. 1. Wildlife Conservation Society, 23-35. |
| [16] | Lewis, C. (1996). Managing conflicts in protected areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland, and Cambridge, UK. |
| [17] | Nepal, S. K. & Weber, K. E. (1993). Struggle for existence: Park-people conflict in Chitwan National Park, Thailand: Asian Institute of Technology. |
| [18] | Smith, J. L. D., Ahern, S. C. & McDougal, C. (1998). Landscape analysis of tiger distribution and habitat quality in Nepal. Conservation Biology, 12 (6): 1338-1346. |
| [19] | Wagle, R. (2009). Effects of management and disturbance gradients on a bird fauna in Chitwan National Park and its buffer zone. M. Sc. Thesis (unpublished). Swedish Agricultural University, Uppsala, Sweden. |
| [20] | CNP (2015). Management plan for Chitwan National Park and buffer zone (2013-2017). Chitwan National Park, Kasara, Chitwan. |
| [21] | Thapa, R. (2013). The burning issues of Conflict: A case study of Chitwan National Park, Nepal, International Journal of Science and Research, ISSN (Online): 2319-7064. https://pdfs. Semanticscholar.org/48c6/d483ac2f6b0778163721a7595dbd9760fe5.pdf. |
| [22] | Lamichhane, B. R., Persoon, G. A., Leirs, H., Poudel, S., Subedi, N., et al (2018). Spatio-temporal patterns of attacks on human and economic losses from wildlife in Chitwan national park. Nepal. PLoS ONE. 13 (4): e0195373. |
| [23] | Sharma, U. R. (1990). An overview of park-people interactions in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Landscape and urban planning, 19: 133–144. doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(90)90049-8. |
| [24] | Rodgers, W. A. (1989) Policy issues in wildlife conservation. Indian Journal of Public Administration, 35: 461–468. |
| [25] | Bailey, R. (2011). A study of relationship between crop damages inflicted by the one- horned Rhinoceros and the defensive responses to these damages by the farmers in Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Canada. |
| [26] | Uprety, H. K. (1995). An assessment of agricultural and livestock depredation by wild animals at Patihani and Jagatpur areas near Royal Chitwan National Park. World Wildlife Fund Nepal Program. |
| [27] | CNP (2012). Chitwan National Park: annual report- fiscal year 2068/69 (2011/2012). Department of National Parks and Wildlife Conservation, Chitwan National Park, Nepal. |
| [28] | Goodrich, J. M. (2010). Human-tiger conflict: A review and call for comprehensive plans. Integr. Zool, 5 (4): 300-312. |
| [29] | Karranath, K. U. & Madhusudhan, M. D. (2002). Mitigating human-wildlife conflicts in southern Asia. In J. Terborg, C. Van Schaik, L. Davenport, M. Rao (Eds.) Making Parks Work: Strategies for preserving Tropical Nature. Island Press, Washington, DC, 250-264. |
| [30] | Treeves, A., Wallace, R. B., Naughton-Treeves, L., & Morales, A. (2006). Co-managing human-wildlife conflicts: A review. Hum. Dimens. Wildi, 11 (6): 383-396. |
| [31] | Osborn, F. V. & Parker, G. E. (2003). Towards an integrated approach for reducing the conflict between elephants and people: a review of current research. Oryx, 37 (1): 80-84. |
| [32] | Banikoi, H., Thapa, S., Bhattarai, N., Kandel R. C., Chaudhary, S. et al (2017). Mitigating Human-Wildlife Conflict in Nepal: A Case Study of Fences around Chitwan National Park. ICIMOD working paper. Available from: [accessed Sep 05 2020]. |
| [33] | Lehmkuhl, J., Upreti, R., & Sharma, U. (1988). National Parks and Local Development: Grasses and People in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Environmental Conservation, 15 (2), 143-148. doi: 10.1017/S0376892900028952. |
APA Style
Keshav Raj Dhakal. (2020). Human-Wildlife Conflicts: The Case of Chitwan National Park and Buffer Zone People in Nepal. American Journal of Zoology, 3(4), 65-71. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20200304.11
ACS Style
Keshav Raj Dhakal. Human-Wildlife Conflicts: The Case of Chitwan National Park and Buffer Zone People in Nepal. Am. J. Zool. 2020, 3(4), 65-71. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20200304.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajz.20200304.11,
author = {Keshav Raj Dhakal},
title = {Human-Wildlife Conflicts: The Case of Chitwan National Park and Buffer Zone People in Nepal},
journal = {American Journal of Zoology},
volume = {3},
number = {4},
pages = {65-71},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajz.20200304.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20200304.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajz.20200304.11},
abstract = {Human-wildlife conflicts are common phenomenon throughout the world which have become significant problems. Human-wildlife conflicts bring many socio-economic and ecological consequences in buffer zone area of the protected area. This study is based on mixed research design combination of both quantitative and qualitative research methods. Household survey, focus group discussions are used for primary data collection. After collecting data, the data are tabulated with coding and tables are constructed with percentage figures and qualitative data are analyzed inductively using descriptions through words and phrases. There are different major sources of conflicts in the people of buffer zone and the Chitwan National Park. The major conflicts are illegal extraction of park resources such as collection of firewood, fodder and timber, livestock grazing, crop raids by wild animals and loss of human life and property. The Mitigative measures used in the study areas for wildlife damage control are repellents, physical constructions and guarding. Different community development programs have influenced buffer zone people’s attitude towards the park. Conservation education and with adequate compensation against damages and regular monitoring of wild animals help to reduce human-wildlife conflicts.},
year = {2020}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Human-Wildlife Conflicts: The Case of Chitwan National Park and Buffer Zone People in Nepal AU - Keshav Raj Dhakal Y1 - 2020/12/11 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20200304.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajz.20200304.11 T2 - American Journal of Zoology JF - American Journal of Zoology JO - American Journal of Zoology SP - 65 EP - 71 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7413 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20200304.11 AB - Human-wildlife conflicts are common phenomenon throughout the world which have become significant problems. Human-wildlife conflicts bring many socio-economic and ecological consequences in buffer zone area of the protected area. This study is based on mixed research design combination of both quantitative and qualitative research methods. Household survey, focus group discussions are used for primary data collection. After collecting data, the data are tabulated with coding and tables are constructed with percentage figures and qualitative data are analyzed inductively using descriptions through words and phrases. There are different major sources of conflicts in the people of buffer zone and the Chitwan National Park. The major conflicts are illegal extraction of park resources such as collection of firewood, fodder and timber, livestock grazing, crop raids by wild animals and loss of human life and property. The Mitigative measures used in the study areas for wildlife damage control are repellents, physical constructions and guarding. Different community development programs have influenced buffer zone people’s attitude towards the park. Conservation education and with adequate compensation against damages and regular monitoring of wild animals help to reduce human-wildlife conflicts. VL - 3 IS - 4 ER -
Information
Email: