Nowadays, a paradoxical situation arises: scientific and technological progress is an undoubted good, but at the same time it creates a threat to the continued existence of wildlife and the human race. To overcome this contradiction, it is necessary to develop a fundamentally new and more concrete understanding of the phenomenon of life. All existing approaches to the study of life are one-sided, since they do not pay due attention to the phenomenon of death. Science connects death with an increase in entropy. Philosophy focuses on ascending evolution and puts the problem of death on the back burner. As a result, death is seen as something completely opposite to life. Such an approach naturally creates a passive attitude to death in all spheres of culture, including medicine. To overcome this situation, it is necessary to realize the fact that the existence of living organisms involves a combination of opposite processes. This is synthesis and decay, renewal and degradation, complication and simplification. Life and death form an indissoluble unity. This leads to a number of general conclusions. Death is a condition of life. The main property of living beings is the ability to die. A person is a unique being who is able to die in a special way, namely, for an extremely long time, in the process of aging. In modern medicine, this circumstance is not taken into account. Therefore, all technologies for extending a person's life are applied only to the late, final stages of the life process. A new medical doctrine is needed. Medicine should delay death at earlier stages of the life of a human individual. This means that modern diseases of civilization (cardiovascular diseases and oncology) should not be treated, but prevented by shifting them to a later date. Such an approach opens up the prospect of unlimited prolongation of the life of both an individual and the whole of humanity already beyond the limits of natural nature, that is, at the super-natural level of human culture.
Published in | Advances in Sciences and Humanities (Volume 7, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ash.20210703.15 |
Page(s) | 74-78 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Evolution, Nature, Culture, Life, Death, Human Race, Aging, Person
[1] | Chakrabarty Dipesh. Ob antropocene [About the Anthropocene]. Moscow: V-A-C Press, Artguide Editions, 2020. 160 p. (In Russ.). |
[2] | Gasparyan D. E., Styrin E. Pricladnie problem wnedrenja etiki iskusstvennogo intellect v Rossii [M. Applied problems of implementing the ethics of artificial intelligence in Russia]. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics, 2020. 112 p. (In Russ.). |
[3] | Kutyrev V. A. Sova Minervi viletaet v polnoch [Minerva's Owl flies out into the twilight (Selected philosophical texts of the XXI century)]. St. Petersburg: Aleteia, 2018. 526 p. (In Russ.). |
[4] | Arthur Lovejoy. Velikaja cep bitija [The Great Chain of Being]. Moscow: Dom intellectualnoi knigi Publ., 2001. 376 p. (In Russ.). |
[5] | Alekseev V. P. Chelovek. Evolutia I taxonomia [Man. Evolution and taxonomy]. Alekseev V. P. Isbrannoe: v 5 t. T. 1. [Favorites: in 5 vol. Vol. 1]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2007. 687 p. (In Russ.). |
[6] | Biologia starenia. Rukovodstvo po fisiologii [Biology of aging. Manual of Physiology]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1982. 616 p. (In Russ.). |
[7] | Dilman V. M. Chetyre modeli meditsyny {Four models of medicine]. Moscow: Meditsina Publ., 1987. 288 p. (In Russ.). |
[8] | Lamb M. Biologia starenia [Biology of aging]. Moscow: Mir Publ., 1980. 208 p. (In Russ.). |
[9] | Filosofskij slovar. Pod red. I. T. Frolova. 6-e izdanie [Philosophical dictionary. Edited by I. T. Frolov. 6th edition]. Moscow: Politisdat Publ., 1991. 560 p. (In Russ.). |
[10] | Rybin V. A. Transhumanism kak problema ekologicheskogo crisisa [Transhumanism as a problem of ecological crisis] // Bulletin of the Chelyabinsk State University. Philosophical sciences. No. 13 (409). 2017. p. 12. (In Russ.). |
[11] | Filosofskij enciklopedicheskij slovar. 2-e izdanie [Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary. 2nd edition]. Moscow: Sov. enciklopedia Publ., 1989. 815 p. (In Russ.). |
[12] | Spencer Herbert. Sinteticheskay filosofia [Herbert Spencer. Synthetic Philosophy]. Kiev: Nika Publ., 1997. 512 p. (In Russ.). |
[13] | Bergson Anri. Tvorcheskay evolutia [Creative evolution]. Moscow: Kanon Publ., 1998. 384 p. (In Russ.). |
[14] | Vernadskij V. I. Chimicheskoe stroenie biosferi Zemli i ee okrushenia [Chemical structure of the Earth's biosphere and its environment]. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 2007. 376 p. (In Russ.). |
[15] | Lewontin Richard C. Biology as Ideology. Concord, Ontario: Anansi Press Limited Publishing House, 1991. 100 p. (In Engl.). |
[16] | Skulachev V. P. Shisn bes starosti [Life without old age]. Moscow: Eksmo Publ., 2013. 256 p. (In Russ.). |
[17] | Polina Loseva. Protiv chasovoi strelki: Chto takoe; starenie I kak s nim borotsja [Counterclockwise: What is aging and how to deal with it]. Moscow: Alpina non-fiction Publ., 2020. 470 p. (In Russ.). |
APA Style
Vladimir Alexandrovich Rybin. (2021). Death as a Condition of Life: On the Question of Individual Immortality of Man. Advances in Sciences and Humanities, 7(3), 74-78. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20210703.15
ACS Style
Vladimir Alexandrovich Rybin. Death as a Condition of Life: On the Question of Individual Immortality of Man. Adv. Sci. Humanit. 2021, 7(3), 74-78. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20210703.15
AMA Style
Vladimir Alexandrovich Rybin. Death as a Condition of Life: On the Question of Individual Immortality of Man. Adv Sci Humanit. 2021;7(3):74-78. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20210703.15
@article{10.11648/j.ash.20210703.15, author = {Vladimir Alexandrovich Rybin}, title = {Death as a Condition of Life: On the Question of Individual Immortality of Man}, journal = {Advances in Sciences and Humanities}, volume = {7}, number = {3}, pages = {74-78}, doi = {10.11648/j.ash.20210703.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20210703.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ash.20210703.15}, abstract = {Nowadays, a paradoxical situation arises: scientific and technological progress is an undoubted good, but at the same time it creates a threat to the continued existence of wildlife and the human race. To overcome this contradiction, it is necessary to develop a fundamentally new and more concrete understanding of the phenomenon of life. All existing approaches to the study of life are one-sided, since they do not pay due attention to the phenomenon of death. Science connects death with an increase in entropy. Philosophy focuses on ascending evolution and puts the problem of death on the back burner. As a result, death is seen as something completely opposite to life. Such an approach naturally creates a passive attitude to death in all spheres of culture, including medicine. To overcome this situation, it is necessary to realize the fact that the existence of living organisms involves a combination of opposite processes. This is synthesis and decay, renewal and degradation, complication and simplification. Life and death form an indissoluble unity. This leads to a number of general conclusions. Death is a condition of life. The main property of living beings is the ability to die. A person is a unique being who is able to die in a special way, namely, for an extremely long time, in the process of aging. In modern medicine, this circumstance is not taken into account. Therefore, all technologies for extending a person's life are applied only to the late, final stages of the life process. A new medical doctrine is needed. Medicine should delay death at earlier stages of the life of a human individual. This means that modern diseases of civilization (cardiovascular diseases and oncology) should not be treated, but prevented by shifting them to a later date. Such an approach opens up the prospect of unlimited prolongation of the life of both an individual and the whole of humanity already beyond the limits of natural nature, that is, at the super-natural level of human culture.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Death as a Condition of Life: On the Question of Individual Immortality of Man AU - Vladimir Alexandrovich Rybin Y1 - 2021/09/08 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20210703.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ash.20210703.15 T2 - Advances in Sciences and Humanities JF - Advances in Sciences and Humanities JO - Advances in Sciences and Humanities SP - 74 EP - 78 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-0984 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20210703.15 AB - Nowadays, a paradoxical situation arises: scientific and technological progress is an undoubted good, but at the same time it creates a threat to the continued existence of wildlife and the human race. To overcome this contradiction, it is necessary to develop a fundamentally new and more concrete understanding of the phenomenon of life. All existing approaches to the study of life are one-sided, since they do not pay due attention to the phenomenon of death. Science connects death with an increase in entropy. Philosophy focuses on ascending evolution and puts the problem of death on the back burner. As a result, death is seen as something completely opposite to life. Such an approach naturally creates a passive attitude to death in all spheres of culture, including medicine. To overcome this situation, it is necessary to realize the fact that the existence of living organisms involves a combination of opposite processes. This is synthesis and decay, renewal and degradation, complication and simplification. Life and death form an indissoluble unity. This leads to a number of general conclusions. Death is a condition of life. The main property of living beings is the ability to die. A person is a unique being who is able to die in a special way, namely, for an extremely long time, in the process of aging. In modern medicine, this circumstance is not taken into account. Therefore, all technologies for extending a person's life are applied only to the late, final stages of the life process. A new medical doctrine is needed. Medicine should delay death at earlier stages of the life of a human individual. This means that modern diseases of civilization (cardiovascular diseases and oncology) should not be treated, but prevented by shifting them to a later date. Such an approach opens up the prospect of unlimited prolongation of the life of both an individual and the whole of humanity already beyond the limits of natural nature, that is, at the super-natural level of human culture. VL - 7 IS - 3 ER -