The efficacy of Giftii biopesticide as a substitute fungicide for managing Septoria tritici blotch and enhancing wheat yield was evaluated through comprehensive field trials conducted at multiple locations. The study employed Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to assess differences among treatments in terms of yield and Area under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC). The results indicated significant differences (P < 0.05) among the treatments. The trials revealed notable variations in AUDPC across different application rates of Giftii biopesticide. Control plots, which received no treatment, exhibited the highest disease severity with an AUDPC of 1499.17% in days. In contrast, plots treated with Giftii at a rate of 0.75 liters per hectare showed the lowest disease severity, with an AUDPC of 1361.83% in days. These findings demonstrate a substantial reduction in disease spread when Giftii biopesticide was applied, compared to the untreated control plots. In terms of yield, the data showed significant differences among the treatments. The highest mean yield was recorded for the 0.75 liters per hectare application rate of Giftii, producing 4.3 tons per hectare. This was a marked improvement compared to the control treatment, which yielded only 2.7 tons per hectare. Statistical analysis further confirmed a significant difference between the control plots and those treated with 0.5 liters per hectare of Giftii biopesticide. These findings underscore the potential of Giftii biopesticide as an effective fungicide for managing Septoria tritici blotch and improving wheat yields. The significant reduction in disease severity and the corresponding increase in yield with Giftii application suggest it could be a viable alternative to conventional fungicides. The study highlights Giftii's efficacy and supports its consideration for broader use in wheat production to enhance crop health and productivity.
Published in | Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (Volume 9, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.bmb.20240903.11 |
Page(s) | 48-52 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Wheat Leaf Blotch Disease, Giftii Biopesticides, Hydrolysis Phenolic Compounds, Pre-Verification, Efficacy, Fungal Pathogens, Zymoseptoria Tritici
Treatments | GBP | Final Disease Severity | AUDPC | HLW | TKW | YLD (t/ha) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 0.75 l/ha | 79.7a | 1412.06a | 64.9b | 28.4b | 3.11c |
T2 | 1.5 l/ha | 79.2a | 1379.39a | 66b | 28.9b | 3.44bc |
T3 | 2.25 l/ha | 78.1ab | 1370.06a | 74.7a | 31.6ab | 4.06ab |
T4 | 0.5lt/ha of Tilt | 72.4b | 1361.83a | 77.8a | 35.1a | 4.3a |
T5 | Unsprayed on | 83a | 1499.17a | 62.8b | 28.9b | 2.78c |
Mean | 78.48 | 1410.5 | 69.25 | 30.6 | 3.53 | |
CV % | 8.2 | 10.84 | 11.6 | 13.3 | 20.67 |
[1] | Agrios, G. N. (2005). Plant Pathology (5th ed.). Academic Press. |
[2] | Fones, H., Davis, C. A., & Rico, A. (2021). Wheat disease resistance in the age of climate change: Is genomics enough? Frontiers in Plant Science, 12, 1233. |
[3] | Sharma, S., & Kaur, R. (2019). Glucosinolates: A natural source for plant disease management. In Plant, Soil and Microbes (pp. 53-70). |
[4] | Thakur, A., & Shrivastava, N. (2020). Biopesticides: An Eco-friendly Approach for Sustainable Agriculture. In Microbial Inoculants in Sustainable Agricultural Productivity (pp. 333-353). |
[5] | Alavanja, M. C. R. (2009). Pesticides Use and Exposure Extensive Worldwide. Environmental Health Perspectives, 117(7), A302–A303. |
[6] | Agrios, G. N. (2005). Plant Pathology. Elsevier Academic Press. |
[7] | Bailey, K. L., Boyetchko, S. M., & Längle, T. (2010). Social and economic drivers shaping the future of biological control: A Canadian perspective on the factors affecting the adoption and use of microbial biopesticides. Biological Control, 52(3), 221-229. |
[8] | Bais, H. P., Vepachedu, R., Gilroy, S., Callaway, R. M., & Vivanco, J. M. (2006). Allelopathy and exotic plant invasion: From molecules and genes to species interactions. Science, 301(5638), 1377-1380. |
[9] | Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2012). The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health. Trends in Plant Science, 17(8), 478-486. |
[10] | Brimner, T. A., & Boland, G. J. (2003). A review of the non-target effects of fungi used to biologically control plant diseases. Mycological Research, 107(11), 1409-1417. |
[11] | Chandler, D., Bailey, A. S., Tatchell, G. M., Davidson, G., Greaves, J., & Grant, W. P. (2011). The development, regulation and use of biopesticides for integrated pest management. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1573), 1987-1998. |
[12] | Copping, L. G., & Menn, J. J. (2000). Biopesticides: A review of their action, applications and efficacy. Pesticide Science, 54(3), 227-264. |
[13] | Damalas, C. A., & Eleftherohorinos, I. G. (2011). Pesticide Exposure, Safety Issues, and Risk Assessment Indicators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(5), 1402-1419. |
[14] | Deacon, J. W. (2006). Fungal Biology. Blackwell Publishing. |
[15] | Fahey, J. W., Zalcmann, A. T., & Talalay, P. (2001). The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry, 56(1), 5-51. |
[16] | Fones, H. N., Eyles, C. J., Kay, W., Cowper, J., & Gurr, S. J. (2021). A role for random, humidity-dependent epiphytic growth prior to invasion of wheat by Zymoseptoria tritici. Fungal Genetics and Biology, 144, 103475. |
[17] | Ghini, R., Bettiol, W., & Hamada, E. (2008). Diseases in tropical and plantation crops as affected by climate changes: Current knowledge and perspectives. Plant Pathology, 57(1), 122-133. |
[18] | Glare, T., Caradus, J., Gelernter, W., Jackson, T., Keyhani, N., Kohl, J., Marrone, P., Morin, L., & Stewart, A. (2012). Have biopesticides come of age? Trends in Biotechnology, 30(5), 250-258. |
[19] | Grennan, A. K. (2006). The Role of Zymoseptoria tritici in Wheat Pathogenesis. Plant Physiology, 141(2), 563-564. |
[20] | Halkier, B. A., & Gershenzon, J. (2006). Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 57, 303-333. |
[21] | Harborne, J. B., & Williams, C. A. (2000). Advances in flavonoid research since 1992. Phytochemistry, 55(6), 481-504. |
[22] | Holb, I. J. (2009). Fungal disease management in environmentally friendly apple production – a review. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, 3, 219-292. |
[23] | Kumar, S., Kaushik, N., & Walia, S. (2021). Recent trends in the development of bio-pesticides. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 10(1), 330-336. |
[24] | Lacey, L. A., & Shapiro-Ilan, D. I. (2008). Microbial control of insect pests in temperate orchard systems: Potential for incorporation into IPM. Annual Review of Entomology, 53, 121-144. |
[25] | Miller, J. D., Mackenzie, S., Fotoohi, F., & Czembor, J. H. (2013). Agronomic practices influence susceptibility to disease by Fusarium graminearum and reduce deoxynivalenol contamination in oats. Agricultural Sciences, 4(3), 151-157. |
[26] | Neeraj, S., Singh, M., & Sharma, S. (2014). Biological control of wheat leaf blotch through antagonistic microorganisms. Indian Phytopathology, 67(4), 356-360. |
[27] | Pascual-Villalobos, M. J., Robledo, A., Marín, M. I., & Morán-Peña, L. (2020). Development of Biopesticides in Mediterranean Horticultural Crops: Case Studies in Spain. Sustainability, 12(3), 725. |
[28] | Ponomarenko, A., Goodwin, S. B., & Kema, G. H. J. (2011). Septoria tritici blotch (STB) of wheat. Plant Health Instructor, |
[29] | Ravensberg, W. J. (2011). A roadmap to the successful development and commercialization of microbial pest control products for control of arthropods. Springer Science & Business Media. |
APA Style
Mamo, T. Y. (2024). Evaluating Giftii Biopesticides Containing Glucosinolates and Hydrolysis Phenolic Compounds for Wheat Leaf Blotch Disease Management. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 9(3), 48-52. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bmb.20240903.11
ACS Style
Mamo, T. Y. Evaluating Giftii Biopesticides Containing Glucosinolates and Hydrolysis Phenolic Compounds for Wheat Leaf Blotch Disease Management. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2024, 9(3), 48-52. doi: 10.11648/j.bmb.20240903.11
AMA Style
Mamo TY. Evaluating Giftii Biopesticides Containing Glucosinolates and Hydrolysis Phenolic Compounds for Wheat Leaf Blotch Disease Management. Biochem Mol Biol. 2024;9(3):48-52. doi: 10.11648/j.bmb.20240903.11
@article{10.11648/j.bmb.20240903.11, author = {Tsigehana Yewste Mamo}, title = {Evaluating Giftii Biopesticides Containing Glucosinolates and Hydrolysis Phenolic Compounds for Wheat Leaf Blotch Disease Management }, journal = {Biochemistry and Molecular Biology}, volume = {9}, number = {3}, pages = {48-52}, doi = {10.11648/j.bmb.20240903.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bmb.20240903.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.bmb.20240903.11}, abstract = {The efficacy of Giftii biopesticide as a substitute fungicide for managing Septoria tritici blotch and enhancing wheat yield was evaluated through comprehensive field trials conducted at multiple locations. The study employed Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to assess differences among treatments in terms of yield and Area under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC). The results indicated significant differences (P < 0.05) among the treatments. The trials revealed notable variations in AUDPC across different application rates of Giftii biopesticide. Control plots, which received no treatment, exhibited the highest disease severity with an AUDPC of 1499.17% in days. In contrast, plots treated with Giftii at a rate of 0.75 liters per hectare showed the lowest disease severity, with an AUDPC of 1361.83% in days. These findings demonstrate a substantial reduction in disease spread when Giftii biopesticide was applied, compared to the untreated control plots. In terms of yield, the data showed significant differences among the treatments. The highest mean yield was recorded for the 0.75 liters per hectare application rate of Giftii, producing 4.3 tons per hectare. This was a marked improvement compared to the control treatment, which yielded only 2.7 tons per hectare. Statistical analysis further confirmed a significant difference between the control plots and those treated with 0.5 liters per hectare of Giftii biopesticide. These findings underscore the potential of Giftii biopesticide as an effective fungicide for managing Septoria tritici blotch and improving wheat yields. The significant reduction in disease severity and the corresponding increase in yield with Giftii application suggest it could be a viable alternative to conventional fungicides. The study highlights Giftii's efficacy and supports its consideration for broader use in wheat production to enhance crop health and productivity. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluating Giftii Biopesticides Containing Glucosinolates and Hydrolysis Phenolic Compounds for Wheat Leaf Blotch Disease Management AU - Tsigehana Yewste Mamo Y1 - 2024/08/15 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bmb.20240903.11 DO - 10.11648/j.bmb.20240903.11 T2 - Biochemistry and Molecular Biology JF - Biochemistry and Molecular Biology JO - Biochemistry and Molecular Biology SP - 48 EP - 52 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-5048 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.bmb.20240903.11 AB - The efficacy of Giftii biopesticide as a substitute fungicide for managing Septoria tritici blotch and enhancing wheat yield was evaluated through comprehensive field trials conducted at multiple locations. The study employed Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to assess differences among treatments in terms of yield and Area under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC). The results indicated significant differences (P < 0.05) among the treatments. The trials revealed notable variations in AUDPC across different application rates of Giftii biopesticide. Control plots, which received no treatment, exhibited the highest disease severity with an AUDPC of 1499.17% in days. In contrast, plots treated with Giftii at a rate of 0.75 liters per hectare showed the lowest disease severity, with an AUDPC of 1361.83% in days. These findings demonstrate a substantial reduction in disease spread when Giftii biopesticide was applied, compared to the untreated control plots. In terms of yield, the data showed significant differences among the treatments. The highest mean yield was recorded for the 0.75 liters per hectare application rate of Giftii, producing 4.3 tons per hectare. This was a marked improvement compared to the control treatment, which yielded only 2.7 tons per hectare. Statistical analysis further confirmed a significant difference between the control plots and those treated with 0.5 liters per hectare of Giftii biopesticide. These findings underscore the potential of Giftii biopesticide as an effective fungicide for managing Septoria tritici blotch and improving wheat yields. The significant reduction in disease severity and the corresponding increase in yield with Giftii application suggest it could be a viable alternative to conventional fungicides. The study highlights Giftii's efficacy and supports its consideration for broader use in wheat production to enhance crop health and productivity. VL - 9 IS - 3 ER -