A laboratory scale anaerobic digester unit was setup and applied for biogas production from cow dung. Anaerobic digestion was conducted at 35°C and observed for a retention period of fifty days. The ambient and slurry temperatures, pH of slurry and amount of biogas produced were measured on a four-day interval basis. The experimental data obtained were used for kinetic studies by fitting the data to known kinetic models such as Linear, Exponential, Gaussian, Logistics and Modified Gompertz. The constants in these models were determined by linear regression using the Matlab curve fitting tool box. A reactor model for the bioreactor was also developed. The experimental results showed biogas production occurred within the mesophilic temperature range (28°C – 29°C - 36°C), measured pH values were 6.9 – 7 – 6.1 for fifty days’ production (retention) period. The volume of biogas produced was 27.7 ml/g, maximum production rate of biogas is 5.1 ml/g/day and the minimum time required for biogas production (the lag phase) was three days. The kinetic evaluation of the production data showed that the coefficient of determination (R2) were as follows, linear model: 0.9673 and 0.7808, exponential model: 0.9742 and 0.779 for the ascending and descending climbs respectively, Gaussian model: 0.9132, Logistic Growth model: 0.9979 and Modified Gompertz model: 0.999 with the logistic model gave the kinetic constant of 2.564. Thus, the Modified Gompertz model yielded high accuracy result. In addition, the reactor model developed solved with the Modified Gompertz kinetic model predicted the biogas production process accurately with cumulative biogas production of 28.13 ml/g compared to the experimental cumulative production of 27.7 ml/g with a deviation of 1.53%.
Published in | Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.cbe.20210603.12 |
Page(s) | 49-58 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Anaerobic Digester, Cow Dung, Biogas, Cumulative Biogas, Kinetic Models
[1] | Baki, A. S. (2004). Isolation and Identification of Microbe Associated with Biogas Production at Different Retention Time using Cow Dung, Master of Science Dissertation, Usman Dan Fodio University, Sokoto, Nigeria. |
[2] | Sunarso, O., Widiasa, S. J. & Budiyono, I. N. (2012). The Effect of Feed to Inoculum Ratio on Biogas Production Rate from Cattle Manure Using Rumen Fluid Inoculum. Journal of Waste Resources. |
[3] | Meena, K. & Vijay, V. K. (2010). Biogas for Overcoming Energy Scarcity and Climate Change in India, Proceedings of the First International Conference on New Frontiers in Biofuels, DTU Jan. 18-19, 2010, New Delhi, India. |
[4] | Yusuf, M. O. L., Debora, A. & Ogheneruona, D. E. (2011). Ambient Temperature Kinetic Assessment of Biogas Production from Co-Digestion of Horse and Cow Dung. Research in Agricultural Engineering, 57, 97-104. |
[5] | Shete, B. S. & Shinkar, N. P. (2017). Anaerobic Digestion of Diary Industry Waste Water-Biogas Evolution-A Review. International Journal of Applied Environmental Sciences, 12, 6, 1117-1130. |
[6] | Rabah, A. B., Baki, A. S., Hassan, L. G., Musa, M. & Ibrahim, A. D. (2010). Production of Biogas Using Abattoir Waste at Different Retention Time. Science World Journal, 5, 4, 23-26. |
[7] | Alfa, M. I., Adie, D. B., Iorhemen, O. T., Okafor, C. C., Ajayi, S. A., Dahunsi, S. O. & Akali, D. M. (2013). Assessment of Mesophilic Co-Digestion of Cow Dung with Lemon Grass for Biogas Production. Nigerian Journal of Technology, 32, 3, 478-484. |
[8] | Rabiu, A., Yaakub, H., Liang, J. B. & Samsudin, A. A. (2014). Increasing Biogas Production of Rumen Fluid using Cattle Manure Collected at Different Time as a Substrate. IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (IOSR-JAVS), 7, 4, 44 - 47. |
[9] | Vikrant, D. & Shekhar, P. (2013). Generation of Biogas from Kitchen Waste –Experimental Analysis, International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 2, 10, 15-19. |
[10] | Pratima, K. C. & Bhakta, B. A. (2015). Production of Biogas from Slaughterhouse Waste in Lalitpur Sub-Metropolitan City, Proceedings of IOE Graduate Conference, 143–149. |
[11] | Clescerl, L. S., Greenberg, A. E. & Eaton, A. D. (1985). Stand¬ard Method for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 16th Ed. Washington D.C., APHA. |
[12] | American Public Health Association (1998). Standard Method for the Examination of Water and Waste Water 15th Ed., APHA, Washington DC, USA. |
[13] | Ahmad, J. & Ansari, T. A. (2012). Biogas from Slaughter House Water: Towards an Energy Self-Sufficient Industry with Economical Analysis in India. Microbial & Biochemical Technology Journal, available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/1984-5948.S12-001 |
[14] | Kumar, S., Mondal, A. N., Gaikward, S. A., Derotta, S. & Singh, R. N. (2004). Qualitative Assessment of Methane Emission Inventory from Muicipal Solid Waste Disposal Sites: A Case Study. Amos Ennion. 38, 4921 – 4929. |
[15] | Lo., H. M., Kurniawan, T. A., Sillanpaa, M. E. T., Pai, T. Y. & Chiang, C. F. (2010). Modelling Biogas Production from Organic Function of MSW Co-Digested with MSWI Ashes in Anaerobc Bioreactors. Bio Resources Technology, 101, 6329-6335. |
[16] | De Gioannis, G., Mantoni, A., Cappai, G. & Milia, S. (2009). Landfull Gas Generation after Mechanical Biological Treatment of Manicipal Solid Waste: Estimation of Gas Generation Rate Constants. Waste Manage, 29, 1026-1034. |
[17] | Hills, D. J. & Roberts, D. W. (1981) Anaerobic Digestion of Dairy Manure and Field Crop Residues. Agricultural Wastes, 3, 179-189. |
[18] | Budiyono, I. N., Widiasa, S. J. & Sunarso, O. (2010). The Kinetic of Biogas Production Rate from Cattle Manure in Batch Mode. International Journal of Chemical and Biological Engineering, 10, 1, 68-75. |
[19] | Mahanta, P., Dewan, A., Saha, U. K. & Kalita, P. (2004). Effect of temperature and total solid concentration on the gas production rate of biogas digester. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 15, 4, 112-117. |
[20] | Lazcano, C., Gomez, M. B. & Dominguez, J. (2008). Comparison of the Effectiveness of Composting and Vermi-Composting for the Biological Stabilization of Cattle Manure. Chemosphere., T72: 1013-1019. |
[21] | Kiyasudeen, K. S., Ibrahim, M. H. & Ismail, S. A. (2015). Characterization of Fresh Cattle Wastes Using Proximate, Microbial and Spectroscopic Principles. American-Eurasian J. Agric. & Environ. Sci., 15, 8, 1700-1709. |
[22] | Shehu, B., Abubakar, U. I. & Ismail, N. (2012). Anaerobic Digestion of Cow Dung for Biogas Production, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 7, 2, 169 – 172. |
[23] | Hashimoto, G, & Varriel, H. (1978). Factors Affecting Methane Yield and Production Rate. American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE). St Joseph, ML: 49085. http: //www.usaid.gov/stores/Srilanka-biogas.Htm, 68. |
[24] | Angelika, I. & Ellegaard, L. (2003). Co-Digestion of Manure and Organic Wastes in Centralized Biogas Plant: Status and Future Trend. Environmental and Resources, Technical University of Denmark. |
[25] | Latinwo, G. K. & Agarry, S. E. (2015). Modelling the Kinetics of Biogas Generation from Mesophilic Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Sewage Sludge with Municipal Organic Waste. Chemical and Process Engineering Research, 13, 43 - 53. |
APA Style
Akpa Jackson Gunorubon, Igbagara Princewill Woyinbrakemi, Adeloye Olalekan Michael. (2021). Kinetics and Reactor Model of Biogas Production from Abattoir Waste (Cow Dung). Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 6(3), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20210603.12
ACS Style
Akpa Jackson Gunorubon; Igbagara Princewill Woyinbrakemi; Adeloye Olalekan Michael. Kinetics and Reactor Model of Biogas Production from Abattoir Waste (Cow Dung). Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2021, 6(3), 49-58. doi: 10.11648/j.cbe.20210603.12
AMA Style
Akpa Jackson Gunorubon, Igbagara Princewill Woyinbrakemi, Adeloye Olalekan Michael. Kinetics and Reactor Model of Biogas Production from Abattoir Waste (Cow Dung). Chem Biomol Eng. 2021;6(3):49-58. doi: 10.11648/j.cbe.20210603.12
@article{10.11648/j.cbe.20210603.12, author = {Akpa Jackson Gunorubon and Igbagara Princewill Woyinbrakemi and Adeloye Olalekan Michael}, title = {Kinetics and Reactor Model of Biogas Production from Abattoir Waste (Cow Dung)}, journal = {Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering}, volume = {6}, number = {3}, pages = {49-58}, doi = {10.11648/j.cbe.20210603.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20210603.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cbe.20210603.12}, abstract = {A laboratory scale anaerobic digester unit was setup and applied for biogas production from cow dung. Anaerobic digestion was conducted at 35°C and observed for a retention period of fifty days. The ambient and slurry temperatures, pH of slurry and amount of biogas produced were measured on a four-day interval basis. The experimental data obtained were used for kinetic studies by fitting the data to known kinetic models such as Linear, Exponential, Gaussian, Logistics and Modified Gompertz. The constants in these models were determined by linear regression using the Matlab curve fitting tool box. A reactor model for the bioreactor was also developed. The experimental results showed biogas production occurred within the mesophilic temperature range (28°C – 29°C - 36°C), measured pH values were 6.9 – 7 – 6.1 for fifty days’ production (retention) period. The volume of biogas produced was 27.7 ml/g, maximum production rate of biogas is 5.1 ml/g/day and the minimum time required for biogas production (the lag phase) was three days. The kinetic evaluation of the production data showed that the coefficient of determination (R2) were as follows, linear model: 0.9673 and 0.7808, exponential model: 0.9742 and 0.779 for the ascending and descending climbs respectively, Gaussian model: 0.9132, Logistic Growth model: 0.9979 and Modified Gompertz model: 0.999 with the logistic model gave the kinetic constant of 2.564. Thus, the Modified Gompertz model yielded high accuracy result. In addition, the reactor model developed solved with the Modified Gompertz kinetic model predicted the biogas production process accurately with cumulative biogas production of 28.13 ml/g compared to the experimental cumulative production of 27.7 ml/g with a deviation of 1.53%.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Kinetics and Reactor Model of Biogas Production from Abattoir Waste (Cow Dung) AU - Akpa Jackson Gunorubon AU - Igbagara Princewill Woyinbrakemi AU - Adeloye Olalekan Michael Y1 - 2021/09/06 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20210603.12 DO - 10.11648/j.cbe.20210603.12 T2 - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering JF - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering JO - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering SP - 49 EP - 58 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-8884 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20210603.12 AB - A laboratory scale anaerobic digester unit was setup and applied for biogas production from cow dung. Anaerobic digestion was conducted at 35°C and observed for a retention period of fifty days. The ambient and slurry temperatures, pH of slurry and amount of biogas produced were measured on a four-day interval basis. The experimental data obtained were used for kinetic studies by fitting the data to known kinetic models such as Linear, Exponential, Gaussian, Logistics and Modified Gompertz. The constants in these models were determined by linear regression using the Matlab curve fitting tool box. A reactor model for the bioreactor was also developed. The experimental results showed biogas production occurred within the mesophilic temperature range (28°C – 29°C - 36°C), measured pH values were 6.9 – 7 – 6.1 for fifty days’ production (retention) period. The volume of biogas produced was 27.7 ml/g, maximum production rate of biogas is 5.1 ml/g/day and the minimum time required for biogas production (the lag phase) was three days. The kinetic evaluation of the production data showed that the coefficient of determination (R2) were as follows, linear model: 0.9673 and 0.7808, exponential model: 0.9742 and 0.779 for the ascending and descending climbs respectively, Gaussian model: 0.9132, Logistic Growth model: 0.9979 and Modified Gompertz model: 0.999 with the logistic model gave the kinetic constant of 2.564. Thus, the Modified Gompertz model yielded high accuracy result. In addition, the reactor model developed solved with the Modified Gompertz kinetic model predicted the biogas production process accurately with cumulative biogas production of 28.13 ml/g compared to the experimental cumulative production of 27.7 ml/g with a deviation of 1.53%. VL - 6 IS - 3 ER -