Effect of Drought on Various Agro-physical Parameters of Chickpea (<i>Cicer arietinum</i> L.) Genotypes in a Field Experiment

Khadraji Ahmed; Hind El Hari; Chafika Houasli; Ghoulam Cherki

doi:doi:10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Effect of Drought on Various Agro-physical Parameters of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes in a Field Experiment

Khadraji Ahmed, Hind El Hari, Chafika Houasli, Ghoulam Cherki

Published in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 4)

Received: 19 October 2021 Accepted: 4 November 2021 Published: 17 November 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Drought stress is one of the major factors limiting the growth and development of legumes. In order to improve water deficit tolerance of this crop, several techniques have been put into practice such as seed priming or the selection of tolerant genotypes to water stress. In 2020, field experiment was conducted to assess the drought tolerance of thirty-six chickpea genotypes (C. arietinum) by analyzing the behaviour of certain physiological and biochemical parameters of plants harvested in a randomized field experiment. The genotypes analysed presented a diversity of behavior concerning the accumulation of mineral elements under drought. The results showed an accumulation of inorganic ions, especially calcium and potassium (1.8 and 2 mg.g^-1, respectively) and increased proline and protein content (3.4 and 1.7 mg.g^-1, respectively) has been observed in drought tolerant chickpea genotypes. Also, the results obtained showed that the P contents in the aerial parts are generally higher for plants with a high biomass, such as the case of genotypes V36 and V32. This tends to prove the positive effect of P on plant growth. After analysis of the various parameters, the results obtained allowed us to classify the tolerant genotypes:, V36, V38 andV41, intermediates: V40 and V4 and sensitive: V17 and V28.

Published in	Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11
Page(s)	68-73
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Chickpea, Physiological and Biochemical Parameters, Tolerance

References

[1]	Badini, S. A. et al. 2015. Effect of phosphorus levels on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer aretinum L.) varieties. J. Nat. Sci. Res. 5: 3.
[2]	Chen, H., Ma HR, Gao YH, Zhang X, Habasi M, Hu R, Aisa HA. 2015. Isoflavones extracted from chickpea Cicer arietinum L. sprouts induce mitochondria-dependent apoptosis in human breast cancer cells. Phytother Res. 29 (2): 210-9. doi: 10.1002/ptr.5241.
[3]	Gupta N, Bisen PS, Bhagyawant SS. 2018. Chickpea Lectin Inhibits Human Breast Cancer Cell Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis Through Cell Cycle Arrest. Protein Pept Lett.; 25 (5): 492-499. doi: 10.2174/0929866525666180406142900.
[4]	Deppe, C. 2010. The Resilient Gardener. Chelsea Green, Pp. 241.
[5]	Wallace, T. C.; Murray, R.; Zelman, K. M. 2016. The nutritional value and health benefits of chickpeas and hummus. Nutrients. 8: 766.
[6]	Houasli C, Nasserlhaq N, Elbouhmadi K, Mahboub S & Sripada U, (2014). Effet du stress hydrique sur les critères physiologiques et biochimiques chez neuf génotypes de pois chiche (Cicer arietinum L.). NATEC, (11): 8- 16. Nature & Technologie. B- Sciences Agronomiques et Biologiques, n° 11. P 08-16.
[7]	Serraj R., Krishnamurthy L., Kashiwagi J., Kumar J., Chandra S., Crouch JH. 2004. Variation in root traits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) grown under terminal drought. Field Crops Research. 88: 115–127.
[8]	FAOSTAT (2017). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome. Available at: http://faostat.fao.org/; last accessed 15-10-2019.
[9]	Dita, M. A., Rispail N, Prats E, Rubiales D, Singh KB, (2006). Biotechnology approaches to overcome biotic and abiotic stress constraints in legumes. Euphytica 147: 1-24.
[10]	Borucki W, Sujkowska M (2008). The effects of sodium chloride salinity upon growth, nodulation, and root nodule structure of pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants. Acta Phys. Plant. 30: 293-301.
[11]	Cesar AI, Esther MG, Daniel M, Ruben L, Estibaliz L, Erena GQ, (2011). Physiological response of legume nodules to drought. Plant stress. 5: 24-31.
[12]	Galeano E, TS Vasconcelos, P Novais de Oliveira and H Carrer, (2019). Physiological and molecular responses to drought stress in teak (Tectona grandis L.f.). PLoS One, 14 (9): 1-26.
[13]	Khadraji A., Mouradi M., Houasli C., Qaddoury A., Ghoulam C., (2017). Growth and antioxidant responses during early growth of winter and spring chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under water deficit as affected by osmopriming. Seed Sci. Technol. 45 (1): 198-211.
[14]	Hu, Y., Z. Burucs, and U. Schmidhalter (2006). Shortterm effect of drought and salinity on growth and mineral elements in wheat seedlings. J. Plant Nutr. 29: 2227-2243.
[15]	Sanchez-Rodriguez et al., (2010). Study of the ionome and uptake fluxes in cherry tomato plants under moderate water stress conditions. Plant Soil, 335: 339-347.
[16]	Frossard, E., L. M. Condron, A. Oberson, S. Sinaj, and J. C. Fardeau. 2000. Processes governing phosphorus availability in temperate soils. J. Environ. Qual. 29: 15-23.
[17]	Bidai, Y., Beliali, N. H., Belkhodja, M. 2020. The Combined Effect of Drought Stress and Culture Substrate on Water Nutrition, Growth and Yield of Vicia faba L. Int J Agri Biosci 11-19.
[18]	Bradford, M. 1976. Anal Biochem 72: 248-256.
[19]	Singh, T. N., Aspinall D., Paleg et Bogges, F. 1973. Stress metabolism. II – Changes in proline concentration in excised plant tissues. Austr. J. bot. Sci., 26, 57-63.
[20]	Kettani, R. et Khalfi D. 2019. Criblage de sept variétés de pois chiche obtenues à l’INRA (cicer arietinum L.) face au stress hydrique en période de floraison. https://mag.inrameknes.info/?p=2017.
[21]	Ben Mbarek, K., Boujelben, A., Boubaker, M., Hannachi, C. 2009. Criblage et performances agronomiques de 45 génotypes de pois chiche (Cicer arienitum L.) soumis à un régime hydrique limité 13 (3): 381-393.
[22]	Mouradi M., Farissi M., Bouizgaren A., Makoudi B., Kabbadj A., Very A-A, Sentenac H., Qaddoury A., Ghoulam C. 2016. Effects of water deficit on growth, nodulation and physiological and biochemical processes in Medicago sativa-rhizobia symbiotic association. Arid Land Res Manag.; 30 (2): 193-208.
[23]	Kagambèga, F. W., Nana R., Bayen P., Thiombiano A., Boussim J. I. 2019. Tolérance au déficit hydrique de cinq espèces prioritaires pour le reboisement au Burkina Faso. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ. 23 (4), 245-256.
[24]	Bargaz A., Faghire M., Abdi N., Farissi M., Sifi B., Drevon J-J., Cherkaoui Ikbal M. & Ghoulam C., 2012. Low Phosphorus Availability Increases Acid Phosphatases Activites and Affects P Partitioning in Nodules, Seeds and Rhizosphere of Phaseolus vulgaris. Agriculture, 2: 139-153.
[25]	El fakhri, M., Mahboub S., Benchekroun M., Nsarellah N., 2010. Effet du stress hydrique sur la répartition ionique dans les feuilles et les racines du blé dur (Triticum Durum). «Nature & Technologie». 5: 66-71.
[26]	Khadraji, A.; Mouradi, M. and Ghoulam, C. 2017. Growth and Mineral Nutrition of the Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)-Rhizobia Symbiosis under Water Deficit. Braz. arch. biol. technol. 60: 17-25.
[27]	Farissi M., Bouizgaren A., Faghire M., Bargaz A. & Ghoulam C. 2013. Agrophysiological and biochemical properties associated with adaptation of Medicago sativa populations to water deficit. Turk J Bot, 37: 1166-1175.
[28]	Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants, 2nd edition. Academic Press, San Diego, 889 pp.
[29]	Toumi, M., Barris S. et Aid F. 2014. Effects of water and osmotic stress on the accumulation of proline and malondialdehyde (MDA) in two varieties of colza (Brassica napus L.). Bulletin de l’Institut Scientifique, Rabat, Section Sciences de la Vie, n° 36, 17-24.
[30]	Gunes A., Pilbeam D., Inal A., Coban S. 2008. Influence of silicon on sunflower cultivars under drought stress, I: Growth, antioxidant mechanisms and lipid peroxidation. Commun. Soil Science & Plant Nutrition, 39: 1885–1903.
[31]	Valentovic, P., Luxova M., Kolarovic L., Gasparikova O. 2006. Effect of osmotic stress on compatible solutes content, membrane stability and water relations in two maize cultivars. Plant Soil and Environment. 4, 186-191.
[32]	Sircelj, H., Tausz M., Grill D., Batic F. 2005. Biochemical responses in leaves of two apple tree cultivars subjected to progressing drought. J. Plant Physiol. 162. 1308-1318.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Khadraji Ahmed, Hind El Hari, Chafika Houasli, Ghoulam Cherki. (2021). Effect of Drought on Various Agro-physical Parameters of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes in a Field Experiment. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 6(4), 68-73. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Khadraji Ahmed; Hind El Hari; Chafika Houasli; Ghoulam Cherki. Effect of Drought on Various Agro-physical Parameters of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes in a Field Experiment. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2021, 6(4), 68-73. doi: 10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Khadraji Ahmed, Hind El Hari, Chafika Houasli, Ghoulam Cherki. Effect of Drought on Various Agro-physical Parameters of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes in a Field Experiment. Chem Biomol Eng. 2021;6(4):68-73. doi: 10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11,
  author = {Khadraji Ahmed and Hind El Hari and Chafika Houasli and Ghoulam Cherki},
  title = {Effect of Drought on Various Agro-physical Parameters of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes in a Field Experiment},
  journal = {Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering},
  volume = {6},
  number = {4},
  pages = {68-73},
  doi = {10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cbe.20210604.11},
  abstract = {Drought stress is one of the major factors limiting the growth and development of legumes. In order to improve water deficit tolerance of this crop, several techniques have been put into practice such as seed priming or the selection of tolerant genotypes to water stress. In 2020, field experiment was conducted to assess the drought tolerance of thirty-six chickpea genotypes (C. arietinum) by analyzing the behaviour of certain physiological and biochemical parameters of plants harvested in a randomized field experiment. The genotypes analysed presented a diversity of behavior concerning the accumulation of mineral elements under drought. The results showed an accumulation of inorganic ions, especially calcium and potassium (1.8 and 2 mg.g-1, respectively) and increased proline and protein content (3.4 and 1.7 mg.g-1, respectively) has been observed in drought tolerant chickpea genotypes. Also, the results obtained showed that the P contents in the aerial parts are generally higher for plants with a high biomass, such as the case of genotypes V36 and V32. This tends to prove the positive effect of P on plant growth. After analysis of the various parameters, the results obtained allowed us to classify the tolerant genotypes:, V36, V38 andV41, intermediates: V40 and V4 and sensitive: V17 and V28.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Effect of Drought on Various Agro-physical Parameters of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes in a Field Experiment
AU  - Khadraji Ahmed
AU  - Hind El Hari
AU  - Chafika Houasli
AU  - Ghoulam Cherki
Y1  - 2021/11/17
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11
T2  - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
JF  - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
JO  - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
SP  - 68
EP  - 73
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-8884
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11
AB  - Drought stress is one of the major factors limiting the growth and development of legumes. In order to improve water deficit tolerance of this crop, several techniques have been put into practice such as seed priming or the selection of tolerant genotypes to water stress. In 2020, field experiment was conducted to assess the drought tolerance of thirty-six chickpea genotypes (C. arietinum) by analyzing the behaviour of certain physiological and biochemical parameters of plants harvested in a randomized field experiment. The genotypes analysed presented a diversity of behavior concerning the accumulation of mineral elements under drought. The results showed an accumulation of inorganic ions, especially calcium and potassium (1.8 and 2 mg.g-1, respectively) and increased proline and protein content (3.4 and 1.7 mg.g-1, respectively) has been observed in drought tolerant chickpea genotypes. Also, the results obtained showed that the P contents in the aerial parts are generally higher for plants with a high biomass, such as the case of genotypes V36 and V32. This tends to prove the positive effect of P on plant growth. After analysis of the various parameters, the results obtained allowed us to classify the tolerant genotypes:, V36, V38 andV41, intermediates: V40 and V4 and sensitive: V17 and V28.
VL  - 6
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Khadraji Ahmed

Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, University Cadi Ayyd, Marrakesh, Morocco
Hind El Hari

Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, University Cadi Ayyd, Marrakesh, Morocco
Chafika Houasli

National Institute for Agricultural Research (INRA), Settat, Morocco
Ghoulam Cherki

Faculty of Sciences and Techniques, University Cadi Ayyd, Marrakesh, Morocco

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Khadraji Ahmed, Hind El Hari, Chafika Houasli, Ghoulam Cherki. (2021). Effect of Drought on Various Agro-physical Parameters of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes in a Field Experiment. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 6(4), 68-73. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Khadraji Ahmed; Hind El Hari; Chafika Houasli; Ghoulam Cherki. Effect of Drought on Various Agro-physical Parameters of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes in a Field Experiment. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2021, 6(4), 68-73. doi: 10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Khadraji Ahmed, Hind El Hari, Chafika Houasli, Ghoulam Cherki. Effect of Drought on Various Agro-physical Parameters of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes in a Field Experiment. Chem Biomol Eng. 2021;6(4):68-73. doi: 10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11,
  author = {Khadraji Ahmed and Hind El Hari and Chafika Houasli and Ghoulam Cherki},
  title = {Effect of Drought on Various Agro-physical Parameters of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes in a Field Experiment},
  journal = {Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering},
  volume = {6},
  number = {4},
  pages = {68-73},
  doi = {10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cbe.20210604.11},
  abstract = {Drought stress is one of the major factors limiting the growth and development of legumes. In order to improve water deficit tolerance of this crop, several techniques have been put into practice such as seed priming or the selection of tolerant genotypes to water stress. In 2020, field experiment was conducted to assess the drought tolerance of thirty-six chickpea genotypes (C. arietinum) by analyzing the behaviour of certain physiological and biochemical parameters of plants harvested in a randomized field experiment. The genotypes analysed presented a diversity of behavior concerning the accumulation of mineral elements under drought. The results showed an accumulation of inorganic ions, especially calcium and potassium (1.8 and 2 mg.g-1, respectively) and increased proline and protein content (3.4 and 1.7 mg.g-1, respectively) has been observed in drought tolerant chickpea genotypes. Also, the results obtained showed that the P contents in the aerial parts are generally higher for plants with a high biomass, such as the case of genotypes V36 and V32. This tends to prove the positive effect of P on plant growth. After analysis of the various parameters, the results obtained allowed us to classify the tolerant genotypes:, V36, V38 andV41, intermediates: V40 and V4 and sensitive: V17 and V28.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Effect of Drought on Various Agro-physical Parameters of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Genotypes in a Field Experiment
AU  - Khadraji Ahmed
AU  - Hind El Hari
AU  - Chafika Houasli
AU  - Ghoulam Cherki
Y1  - 2021/11/17
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11
T2  - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
JF  - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
JO  - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
SP  - 68
EP  - 73
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-8884
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20210604.11
AB  - Drought stress is one of the major factors limiting the growth and development of legumes. In order to improve water deficit tolerance of this crop, several techniques have been put into practice such as seed priming or the selection of tolerant genotypes to water stress. In 2020, field experiment was conducted to assess the drought tolerance of thirty-six chickpea genotypes (C. arietinum) by analyzing the behaviour of certain physiological and biochemical parameters of plants harvested in a randomized field experiment. The genotypes analysed presented a diversity of behavior concerning the accumulation of mineral elements under drought. The results showed an accumulation of inorganic ions, especially calcium and potassium (1.8 and 2 mg.g-1, respectively) and increased proline and protein content (3.4 and 1.7 mg.g-1, respectively) has been observed in drought tolerant chickpea genotypes. Also, the results obtained showed that the P contents in the aerial parts are generally higher for plants with a high biomass, such as the case of genotypes V36 and V32. This tends to prove the positive effect of P on plant growth. After analysis of the various parameters, the results obtained allowed us to classify the tolerant genotypes:, V36, V38 andV41, intermediates: V40 and V4 and sensitive: V17 and V28.
VL  - 6
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download