The experiment was conducted in Shashsssamene district with the objective to evaluate the optimal seeding rates of Alfalfa integrated with Desho grass for better biomass yield and quality forage production. The study conducted by randomized complete block design with three replications and six treatments with four integration levels of Alfalfa seed rates (100%, 75%, 50%, and 25%) and two sole (Desho and Alfalfa). Alfalfa FG-10-09 cultivar and Desho grass Areka-DZF #590 variety were used for the experiment. Alfalfa was sown between rows of Desho grass established via root splits. Important agronomic data collected included dry matter yield, plant height, tiller number and leaf-to-stem ratio. Integration of Alfalfa and Desho grass significantly (P < 0.005) affect Desho grass plant height, number of tillers per plant, leaf number per plant, leaf-to-stem ratio, and total dry matter yield. Integrating Desho with Alfalfa at 50% and 75% seed rates resulted in significantly taller Desho plants (88-94.81 cm), higher tiller numbers (29.57-31.60), and greater dry matter yield compared to the sole Desho. Forage quality was significantly influenced by integrating (P < 0.001). Crude protein content increased in integrated treatments and the highest value (21.10%) was observed in sole Alfalfa, and intermediate values (15.5-15.38%) in 75% and 50% Desho grass integrated with Alfalfa. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) contents were lower in integrated plots, indicating improved digestibility and palatability of the forage. Overall, the 50% and 75% Alfalfa seed rates provided optimal balance between yield and nutritional quality. This finding indicates the integration these forage considered as a sustainable strategy for improving both productivity and feed quality in forage-based livestock systems. Further demonstrations of Desho grass integrated with alfalfa at 50 and 75% seed rates are recommended to maximize both biomass yield and forage quality in the study area and similar agroecology
| Published in | Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (Volume 11, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.cbe.20261102.11 |
| Page(s) | 19-25 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Alfalfa, Desho Grass, Integration, Biomass Yield, Nutritive Value
Treatments | Description | Treatments | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
T1 | Desho grass established with 100% Alfalfa seed rate | T4 | Desho grass established with 25% Alfalfa seed rate |
T2 | Desho grass established with 75% Alfalfa seed rate | T5 | Desho grass established sole |
T3 | Desho grass established with 50% Alfalfa seed rate | T6 | Alfalfa established sole |
Source variation | DF | PHd | PHa | NTPPd | DMY | LSRd | LSRa | NLPP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rep | 2 | 4.39ns | 5.44ns | 2.06ns | 4.390*** | 0.0509ns | 0.03ns | 0.136ns |
Trt | 5 | 11.0** | 5.36ns | 323.5** | 167.4*** | 0.6006** | 0.33ns | 60.161* |
Year | 2 | 3.61ns | 6.32ns | 2.12* | 7.34* | 3.54ns | 0.76ns | 4.02ns |
Trt * year | 5 | 3.48ns | 23.12ns | 17.76ns | 3.65ns | 11.71* | 5.31ns | 21.11ns |
Error | 38 | 5.34 | 1.09 | 1.78 | 0.98 | 0.10 | 0.27 | 0.59 |
Treatments | PH (cm) | NTP | DM (t/ha) | LSR | NLPP | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Desho | Alfalf | Desho | Desho | Alfal | TDM | Desh | Alfal | Desho | |
Desho+100% Alfalfa | 92.74a | 65.22 | 31.60a | 20.68b | 1.28c | 21.96ᵇ | 3.40ab | 2.06 | 10.31a |
Desho+75% Alfalfa | 94.81a | 65.26 | 30.91a | 24.9a | 3.39b | 28.37ᵃ | 3.62a | 1.91 | 10.54a |
Desho+50% Alfalfa | 90.33a | 65.07 | 30.11a | 21.1ab | 3.10b | 24.2ᵃᵇ | 3.61a | 1.82 | 10.04a |
Desho+25% Alfalfa | 88.70a | 66.9 | 29.57a | 20.4b | 1.28c | 21.65b | 3.12b | 1.70 | 9.87b |
Desho sole | 71.6b | - | 23.8b | 20.5b | - | 20.5ᵇ | 3.06b | - | 7.95b |
Alfalfa sole | - | 63.93 | - | - | 6.46a | 6.46c | - | 1.85 | - |
Mean | 87.63 | 65.28 | 29.21 | 21.54 | 3.07 | 20.53 | 3.36 | 1.87 | 9.74 |
CV% | 12.9 | 3.6 | 12.9 | 13.6 | 27.8 | 20.7 | 8.9 | 30.5 | 12.9 |
LSD (0.05) | 10.81 | 2.210 | 3.602 | 0.38 | 0.81 | 0.56 | 0.29 | 0.54 | 1.56 |
P-Value | <.001 | NS | <.001 | 0.009 | <.001 | <.005 | <.001 | NS | <.001 |
Treatments | Yields of intercropped Desho grass | Yields of intercropped Alfalfa | Total LER (combined) |
|---|---|---|---|
Desho+100% Alfalfa | 1.01 | 0.20 | 1.21 |
Desho+75% Alfalfa | 1.21 | 0.52 | 1.74 |
Desho+50% Alfalfa | 1.03 | 0.48 | 1.51 |
Desho+25% Alfalfa | 1.00 | 0.20 | 1.19 |
Desho sole | - | - | - |
Alfalfa sole | - | - | - |
Treatments | Chemical compositions | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DM% | Ash% | CP% | NDF% | ADF% | ADL% | |
Desho+100% Alfalfa | 89.20ab | 11.10bc | 13.83c | 36.41ab | 28.07b | 6.07ab |
Desho +75% Alfalfa | 89.43ab | 12.15b | 15.5b | 32.82bc | 26.20b | 4.55b |
Desho + 50% Alfalfa | 89.73a | 11.97b | 15.38bc | 36.92ab | 27.02b | 5.37ab |
Desho +25% Alfalfa | 89.08b | 11.25bc | 13.97bc | 37.86ab | 27.76b | 5.43ab |
Desho sole | 88.14c | 10.52c | 10.06d | 41.00a | 35.34a | 7.67a |
Alfalfa sole | 89.30ab | 13.78a | 21.10a | 30.12c | 26.15b | 4.51b |
Mean | 89.15 | 11.80 | 14.97 | 35.86 | 28.42 | 5.60 |
CV% | 3.9 | 4.1 | 4 | 5.2 | 4.2 | 9.2 |
LSD (0.05) | 0.38 | 0.86 | 1.065 | 3.29 | 2.10 | 1.90 |
P-value | <.001 | <.001 | <.001 | <.001 | <.001 | 0.031 |
ADF | Acid Detergent Fiber |
ADL | Acid Detergent Lignin |
CP | Crude Protein |
DM | Dry Matter |
LER | Land Equivalent Ratio |
NDF | Neutral Detergent Fiber |
| [1] | Adugna Tolera, 2007. Feed resources for producing export quality meat and livestock in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards and Livestock and Meat Marketing Program (SPS-LMM), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
| [2] | Daniel Wana, Dawit Abate, Lalisa Diriba, Belete Shenkute, Fiqadu Nemera, Nebi Husein, Meseret Tilahun.2025. Effect of Cultivars, Row Spacing and Seeding Rates on Yield and Yield Components of Alfalfa (Medicagosativa) Advances in Applied Sciences Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 38-44. |
| [3] | Dhima KV, Lithourgidis AS, Vasilakoglou IB, Dordas CA, 2007. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercrops in two seeding ratios. Field Crop Res.100: 249-56. |
| [4] |
Ecocrop, 2010. Ecocrop database. FAO.
http://ecocrop.fao.org/ecocrop/srven/home (Accessed 02 February 2015) |
| [5] | Eskandar Hamdollah, 2012b. Effect of complementarity of intercrop components on resource consumption, dry matter production and legumes forage quality. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(1): 355-360. |
| [6] | Fekede Fayissa, Getenet Asefa, Lulseged G/Hiwot, Muluneh Minta and Tadesse T/Tsadik., 2003. Evaluation of Napier grass-vetch mixture to improve total herbage yield in the central highlands.156 13th ESAP-Proceedings. |
| [7] | Husein N, Diriba L, 2021. Cluster based Oat-vetch mixtures for forage production in Dodola district of West Arsi Zone, Ethiopia. J Agric Sc Food Technol 7(3): 359-363. |
| [8] | Kamil Temam Mossa, 2022. The Effect of Urea Fertilizer Rate and Spacing on Dry Matter Yield of Desho Grass-Alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L) Mixture in Mid Altitude of Southern Ethiopia. |
| [9] | Kung, L., Jr., J. H. Chen, J. A. O'Mara, and C. M. Dickerson, 2000. Microbial populations, fermentation end-products, and aerobic stability of alfalfa, big bluestem, and corn silages treated with microbial inoculants and enzymes. J. Dairy Sci. 83: 1017-1026. |
| [10] | Lithourgidis AS, Dordas CA, 2010. Forage yield, growth rate, and nitrogen uptake of faba bean intercrops with wheat, barley and rye in three seeding ratios. Crop Sci 50: 2148-2158. Link: |
| [11] | McDonald P, Edwards RA, Greenhalgh JFD, Morgan CA, Sinclair LA, Wilkinson RG. 2010. Animal nutrition, 7th ed. England, London: Prentice hall, Harlow. |
| [12] | Minichle Yegrem Gedamu, Berhanu Alemu and Asnakew Awuke, 2019. Dry Matter Yield and Nutritional Value of Desho and Setaria Grasses Mixed With Greenleaf Desmodium at Different Harvesting. |
| [13] | Moreira and Fageria, 2010. Liming influence on soil chemical properties, nutritional status and yield of alfalfa grown in acid soil. |
| [14] | Nebi Husein and Daniel Wana, 2022. Evaluation of Desho (Pennisetum pedicellatum) grasses for adaptability and yield performance in different agro-ecologies of East Shewa and West Arsi Zone of Oromia, Ethiopia. |
| [15] | Nyfeler, D., Huguenin-Elie, O., Suter, M., Frossard, E., and Lüscher, A, 2011. Grass-legume mixtures can yield more nitrogen than monocultures. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 140, 457-465. |
| [16] | Statistical Analysis System (SAS) Institute. 2004. SAS/STAT user’s guide. Proprietary software version 9.00. SAS Institute. |
| [17] | Tarawali, A. Lirbi and J. Hanson, 1995. Method for the evaluation of Forage legumes, Grasses and Fodder Trees for Feed Use as Livestock Feed. International Livestock research Institute; Nairobi, Kenya. |
| [18] | Temperton, V. M., Mwangi, P. N., Scherer-Lorenzen, M., Schmid, B., & Buchmann, N, 2007. Positive interactions between legumes and grasses. Oecologia, 151, 190-205. |
| [19] | Truset, T. 2019. Effect of Integrating Vetch Species and Harvesting Age on Morphological Characteristics, Forage Yield and Chemical Composition of Desho Grass (Pennisetum pedicellatum) and Vetch Species in North Mecha District, Ethiopia |
| [20] | Van dermeer, J. (1989). The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge University Press. |
| [21] | Van Soest, P. V., Robertson, J. B. and Lewis, B. A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74 (10): 3583-3597. |
| [22] | Wamatu, J., Alkhtib, A., Alemu, T., Mersha, A., Wegi. T., Kemal, S., and Rischkowsky, B.2017. Feeds and forage development: African RISING science, innovation and technologies with scaling potential from the Ethiopian ICARD Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
| [23] | Welle, S., Chantawarangul, K., Nontananandh, S. and Jantawat, S., 2006. Effectiveness of grass strips as barriers against runoff and soil loss in Jijiga area, northern part of Somalia region, Ethiopia. Kasetsart Journal: Natural Science 40: 549-558. |
| [24] | Yuksel, O., Albayrak, S., Türk, M. and Sevimay, C. 2016. Dry Matter Yields and Some Quality Features of Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) Cultivars under Two Different Locations of Turkey. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(2). |
APA Style
Husein, N., Tilahun, M. (2026). Evaluation of Herbage Yield and Nutritive Value of Desho Grass Integrated with Alfalfa at Different Seeding Rates in Shashemene District, Ethiopia. Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, 11(2), 19-25. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20261102.11
ACS Style
Husein, N.; Tilahun, M. Evaluation of Herbage Yield and Nutritive Value of Desho Grass Integrated with Alfalfa at Different Seeding Rates in Shashemene District, Ethiopia. Chem. Biomol. Eng. 2026, 11(2), 19-25. doi: 10.11648/j.cbe.20261102.11
@article{10.11648/j.cbe.20261102.11,
author = {Nebi Husein and Meseret Tilahun},
title = {Evaluation of Herbage Yield and Nutritive Value of Desho Grass Integrated with Alfalfa at Different Seeding Rates in Shashemene District, Ethiopia},
journal = {Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering},
volume = {11},
number = {2},
pages = {19-25},
doi = {10.11648/j.cbe.20261102.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20261102.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.cbe.20261102.11},
abstract = {The experiment was conducted in Shashsssamene district with the objective to evaluate the optimal seeding rates of Alfalfa integrated with Desho grass for better biomass yield and quality forage production. The study conducted by randomized complete block design with three replications and six treatments with four integration levels of Alfalfa seed rates (100%, 75%, 50%, and 25%) and two sole (Desho and Alfalfa). Alfalfa FG-10-09 cultivar and Desho grass Areka-DZF #590 variety were used for the experiment. Alfalfa was sown between rows of Desho grass established via root splits. Important agronomic data collected included dry matter yield, plant height, tiller number and leaf-to-stem ratio. Integration of Alfalfa and Desho grass significantly (P < 0.005) affect Desho grass plant height, number of tillers per plant, leaf number per plant, leaf-to-stem ratio, and total dry matter yield. Integrating Desho with Alfalfa at 50% and 75% seed rates resulted in significantly taller Desho plants (88-94.81 cm), higher tiller numbers (29.57-31.60), and greater dry matter yield compared to the sole Desho. Forage quality was significantly influenced by integrating (P < 0.001). Crude protein content increased in integrated treatments and the highest value (21.10%) was observed in sole Alfalfa, and intermediate values (15.5-15.38%) in 75% and 50% Desho grass integrated with Alfalfa. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) contents were lower in integrated plots, indicating improved digestibility and palatability of the forage. Overall, the 50% and 75% Alfalfa seed rates provided optimal balance between yield and nutritional quality. This finding indicates the integration these forage considered as a sustainable strategy for improving both productivity and feed quality in forage-based livestock systems. Further demonstrations of Desho grass integrated with alfalfa at 50 and 75% seed rates are recommended to maximize both biomass yield and forage quality in the study area and similar agroecology},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of Herbage Yield and Nutritive Value of Desho Grass Integrated with Alfalfa at Different Seeding Rates in Shashemene District, Ethiopia AU - Nebi Husein AU - Meseret Tilahun Y1 - 2026/09/09 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20261102.11 DO - 10.11648/j.cbe.20261102.11 T2 - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering JF - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering JO - Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering SP - 19 EP - 25 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-8884 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.cbe.20261102.11 AB - The experiment was conducted in Shashsssamene district with the objective to evaluate the optimal seeding rates of Alfalfa integrated with Desho grass for better biomass yield and quality forage production. The study conducted by randomized complete block design with three replications and six treatments with four integration levels of Alfalfa seed rates (100%, 75%, 50%, and 25%) and two sole (Desho and Alfalfa). Alfalfa FG-10-09 cultivar and Desho grass Areka-DZF #590 variety were used for the experiment. Alfalfa was sown between rows of Desho grass established via root splits. Important agronomic data collected included dry matter yield, plant height, tiller number and leaf-to-stem ratio. Integration of Alfalfa and Desho grass significantly (P < 0.005) affect Desho grass plant height, number of tillers per plant, leaf number per plant, leaf-to-stem ratio, and total dry matter yield. Integrating Desho with Alfalfa at 50% and 75% seed rates resulted in significantly taller Desho plants (88-94.81 cm), higher tiller numbers (29.57-31.60), and greater dry matter yield compared to the sole Desho. Forage quality was significantly influenced by integrating (P < 0.001). Crude protein content increased in integrated treatments and the highest value (21.10%) was observed in sole Alfalfa, and intermediate values (15.5-15.38%) in 75% and 50% Desho grass integrated with Alfalfa. Neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), and acid detergent lignin (ADL) contents were lower in integrated plots, indicating improved digestibility and palatability of the forage. Overall, the 50% and 75% Alfalfa seed rates provided optimal balance between yield and nutritional quality. This finding indicates the integration these forage considered as a sustainable strategy for improving both productivity and feed quality in forage-based livestock systems. Further demonstrations of Desho grass integrated with alfalfa at 50 and 75% seed rates are recommended to maximize both biomass yield and forage quality in the study area and similar agroecology VL - 11 IS - 2 ER -