The main purpose of this research is to examine the impact of knowledge management processes on human resource productivity. Knowledge management processes included knowledge acquisition, creation, storage, distribution and application, in addition the human resource productivity included twofold of productivity such as; effectiveness and efficiency. This research is a correlate on al research and is concerns about finding relationship between variables. The population includes all the employees in Tehran channel of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting and 185 subjects were selected as sample using Cochran sampling method. Data were collected by two questionnaires. To testing the hypotheses, correlation test and regression analysis were used. The results showed that the distribution and application of knowledge plays important role in the productivity of human resources. The stages of knowledge acquisition, creation and storage of knowledge have little to do with performance. This result is reasonable, because acquisition, creation and storage of knowledge are the previous stages for involving people in the organization but the role of people has become more tangible and has a positive influence on human resource productivity. The variance was calculated for each component of the study using ANOVA between groups and within groups. The test results indicate that all components of research in different educational levels did not differ.
| Published in | Engineering and Applied Sciences (Volume 2, Issue 4) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.eas.20170204.11 |
| Page(s) | 59-65 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Knowledge Management Processes, Knowledge Acquisition, Knowledge Distribution, Human Resource Productivity
| [1] | Isakhani, A. (2008), organization with superior performance, Tadbir magazine, Vol. 19, No. 192. |
| [2] | Argote, L. & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82 (1), 150–169. |
| [3] | Barney, J. B. (2001), Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes, Academy of Management Review, 26, 41–56. |
| [4] | Barney, J. B. (1991), Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 100–120. |
| [5] | Chang, M. Y., Hung, Y. C., Yen, D. C. ND Tseng, P. T., 2009, "The research on the critical success factorsof knowledge management and classification framework project in the Executive Yuan of Taiwan Government", Expert Systems with Applications, 9(12), pp. 5376-5386. |
| [6] | Motwani, J., Gopalakrishna, P & Subramanian, R., 2003. Source of knowledge acquisition by U. S managers: An empirical analysis. Idea group publishing. |
| [7] | Skyrme, D. (2003). “Knowledge management making sense of anoxymoron”. http:// Skyrme. Com. |
| [8] | Wang, E., Klein, G., & Jiang, J. J. (2007). “IT support in manufacturing firms for a knowledge management dynamic capability link to performance”. International Journal of Production Research, Vol .45, No. 11, PP: 2419-2434. |
| [9] | Chen, C., 2004, "The effects of knowledge attribute, alliance characteristics, and absorptive capacity on knowledge transfer performance", R&D Management, 3(9), pp. 311-321. |
| [10] | Holsapple CW, Jones K.(2005) Exploring secondary activities of the knowledge chain. Knowledge and Process Management; 12(1): 3–31. |
| [11] | Santosus, M. & Surmacz, J.(2004), The ABCS of knowledge management, Knowledge Management Research Center, http://www.cio.com/research/ Knowledge based assets. |
| [12] | Collis, D. J. & Montgomery, C. A. (1995), Competing or resources: strategy in the 1990s, Harvard Business Review, Vol.73, No. 4, pp. 118-28. |
| [13] | Marakas, G. M. (1999), Decision Support Systems in the Twenty-first Century, prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. |
| [14] | Lynn, G. S. Morone, J. G. & Paulson, A. S. (1996). Marketing and discontinuous innovation: the probe and learn process, California Management Review, Vol. 38, pp.8-37. |
| [15] | Bhatt, G. (2000), Organizing Knowledge in the Knowledge development cycle, Journal of Knowledge Management, Journal of Business Transformation, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 15-26. |
| [16] | Nonaka, I. & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. |
| [17] | Makovec-Brencic, M., & Zabkar, V. (2001). Competitive Advantage as a Result of Non-price Factors: Application of the Structural Equation Model, Economic and Business Review, Ljubljana, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 25-4. |
| [18] | Cater, T., & Alfirevic, N. (2003). Sources of Competitive Success of Large Enterprises in Transition: The case of Croatia and Slovenia. In: Enterprise in Transition: 5th International Conference, Tučepi, 22-24 May 2003, Faculty of economics, Split, pp. 2372-2392. |
| [19] | Amiri, M & Hadinejad, F (2016). Assessment and analysis of indicators of productivity in manufacturing industries with using PROMETHEE technique, Quarterly journal of Productivity Management, Vol. 9,No 35, pp. 7-38. |
| [20] | Zack, M. H. (1999). Developing a knowledge strategy, California Management Review, 41(3). |
| [21] | Riesenberger, J. R. (1998), Knowledge-The Source of Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Journal of International Marketing, East Lansing, Vol. 6, No. 3. |
| [22] | McElroy, M. W.(2000), "Integrating complexity theory, knowledge management and organizational learning", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 4, Iss: 3, pp. 195 – 203. |
| [23] | Martenson, M. (2000), Evaluation of knowledge management point as a management tool, translation: M. Majdam, Tadbir Magazine, No. 110. |
| [24] | Ozbag, G. K., Esen, M., &Esen, D. (2013). The Influence of HRM Capabilities on Innovation Mediated by Knowledge Management Capability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99, 784–793. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.550. |
| [25] | Rajaeipour, S. & Rahimi, H. (2008), Survey of relationship between knowledge management transformation process and performance of faculty members, Humanities and Social Sciences, 8 (4 (Special Management 31)): 59-76.[In persian]. |
| [26] | Zahedi, Sh. & Najjari, R. (2008), The productivity of human resources and knowledge management, Peyke Nour, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp 2-13.[In persian]. |
| [27] | Svetlik & Stavrou-Costea, E.(2007). Connecting human resources management and knowledge management, International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4): 197-206. |
APA Style
Mohammad Naderi Moghaddam, Sajjad Habibian, Farhad Hadinejad. (2017). Evaluation of the Effect of Knowledge Management Process on Human Resource Productivity. Engineering and Applied Sciences, 2(4), 59-65. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eas.20170204.11
ACS Style
Mohammad Naderi Moghaddam; Sajjad Habibian; Farhad Hadinejad. Evaluation of the Effect of Knowledge Management Process on Human Resource Productivity. Eng. Appl. Sci. 2017, 2(4), 59-65. doi: 10.11648/j.eas.20170204.11
AMA Style
Mohammad Naderi Moghaddam, Sajjad Habibian, Farhad Hadinejad. Evaluation of the Effect of Knowledge Management Process on Human Resource Productivity. Eng Appl Sci. 2017;2(4):59-65. doi: 10.11648/j.eas.20170204.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.eas.20170204.11,
author = {Mohammad Naderi Moghaddam and Sajjad Habibian and Farhad Hadinejad},
title = {Evaluation of the Effect of Knowledge Management Process on Human Resource Productivity},
journal = {Engineering and Applied Sciences},
volume = {2},
number = {4},
pages = {59-65},
doi = {10.11648/j.eas.20170204.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eas.20170204.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.eas.20170204.11},
abstract = {The main purpose of this research is to examine the impact of knowledge management processes on human resource productivity. Knowledge management processes included knowledge acquisition, creation, storage, distribution and application, in addition the human resource productivity included twofold of productivity such as; effectiveness and efficiency. This research is a correlate on al research and is concerns about finding relationship between variables. The population includes all the employees in Tehran channel of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting and 185 subjects were selected as sample using Cochran sampling method. Data were collected by two questionnaires. To testing the hypotheses, correlation test and regression analysis were used. The results showed that the distribution and application of knowledge plays important role in the productivity of human resources. The stages of knowledge acquisition, creation and storage of knowledge have little to do with performance. This result is reasonable, because acquisition, creation and storage of knowledge are the previous stages for involving people in the organization but the role of people has become more tangible and has a positive influence on human resource productivity. The variance was calculated for each component of the study using ANOVA between groups and within groups. The test results indicate that all components of research in different educational levels did not differ.},
year = {2017}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Evaluation of the Effect of Knowledge Management Process on Human Resource Productivity AU - Mohammad Naderi Moghaddam AU - Sajjad Habibian AU - Farhad Hadinejad Y1 - 2017/07/20 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eas.20170204.11 DO - 10.11648/j.eas.20170204.11 T2 - Engineering and Applied Sciences JF - Engineering and Applied Sciences JO - Engineering and Applied Sciences SP - 59 EP - 65 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1468 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.eas.20170204.11 AB - The main purpose of this research is to examine the impact of knowledge management processes on human resource productivity. Knowledge management processes included knowledge acquisition, creation, storage, distribution and application, in addition the human resource productivity included twofold of productivity such as; effectiveness and efficiency. This research is a correlate on al research and is concerns about finding relationship between variables. The population includes all the employees in Tehran channel of the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting and 185 subjects were selected as sample using Cochran sampling method. Data were collected by two questionnaires. To testing the hypotheses, correlation test and regression analysis were used. The results showed that the distribution and application of knowledge plays important role in the productivity of human resources. The stages of knowledge acquisition, creation and storage of knowledge have little to do with performance. This result is reasonable, because acquisition, creation and storage of knowledge are the previous stages for involving people in the organization but the role of people has become more tangible and has a positive influence on human resource productivity. The variance was calculated for each component of the study using ANOVA between groups and within groups. The test results indicate that all components of research in different educational levels did not differ. VL - 2 IS - 4 ER -
Information
Email: