@article{10.11648/j.hep.20200501.12,
  author = {Hans Rudolf Weiss},
  title = {Treatment of Spinal Deformities - The Appearance of a Conflict of Interest},
  journal = {International Journal of Health Economics and Policy},
  volume = {5},
  number = {1},
  pages = {9-14},
  doi = {10.11648/j.hep.20200501.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hep.20200501.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hep.20200501.12},
  abstract = {The majority of patients with spinal deformities need some type of treatment. Typically, physiotherapy and bracing are sufficient and a minority of cases require surgical treatment. However, in many international papers on spinal deformities surgical issues are investigated while conservative management of spinal deformities is definitively underrepresented. The purpose of this survey is to look more deeply into the implications of the surgical societies and spine surgeons lobbyism on the payroll of industry and how these groups influence payments (reimbursement) made by national health services or health insurance systems worldwide for the treatments of patients with spinal deformities. Materials and methods: An international network of specialists for the conservative treatment of spinal deformities have performed a survey analyzing the cost of spinal surgery for spinal deformities (scoliosis), the cost of a brace and whether insurance/the NHS reimbursement applies with surgery or bracing. Results: In most countries surgery is paid without co-payments by the patient. In Japan, China and Ukraine co-payments are necessary for surgery. There are more restrictions when looking at payments for braces. In some countries, braces are not covered by the health care systems or insurance companies at all (China, Indonesia) in others the amount covered is only minimal (Turkey, Ukraine). Conclusions: Evidence in scientific literature is not reflected in the political decision making in parliaments. Evidence based treatment approaches for patients with spinal deformities are not necessarily reimbursed by local health care systems while surgery without scientific evidence is reimbursed more easily although it is more expensive. The most economic approach would be to pay for high quality conservative treatment in order to largely prevent the need for surgery. Surgical indications should be approved by an independent non-surgical specialist for spinal deformites.},
 year = {2020}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Treatment of Spinal Deformities - The Appearance of a Conflict of Interest
AU  - Hans Rudolf Weiss
Y1  - 2020/05/28
PY  - 2020
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hep.20200501.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.hep.20200501.12
T2  - International Journal of Health Economics and Policy
JF  - International Journal of Health Economics and Policy
JO  - International Journal of Health Economics and Policy
SP  - 9
EP  - 14
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-9309
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hep.20200501.12
AB  - The majority of patients with spinal deformities need some type of treatment. Typically, physiotherapy and bracing are sufficient and a minority of cases require surgical treatment. However, in many international papers on spinal deformities surgical issues are investigated while conservative management of spinal deformities is definitively underrepresented. The purpose of this survey is to look more deeply into the implications of the surgical societies and spine surgeons lobbyism on the payroll of industry and how these groups influence payments (reimbursement) made by national health services or health insurance systems worldwide for the treatments of patients with spinal deformities. Materials and methods: An international network of specialists for the conservative treatment of spinal deformities have performed a survey analyzing the cost of spinal surgery for spinal deformities (scoliosis), the cost of a brace and whether insurance/the NHS reimbursement applies with surgery or bracing. Results: In most countries surgery is paid without co-payments by the patient. In Japan, China and Ukraine co-payments are necessary for surgery. There are more restrictions when looking at payments for braces. In some countries, braces are not covered by the health care systems or insurance companies at all (China, Indonesia) in others the amount covered is only minimal (Turkey, Ukraine). Conclusions: Evidence in scientific literature is not reflected in the political decision making in parliaments. Evidence based treatment approaches for patients with spinal deformities are not necessarily reimbursed by local health care systems while surgery without scientific evidence is reimbursed more easily although it is more expensive. The most economic approach would be to pay for high quality conservative treatment in order to largely prevent the need for surgery. Surgical indications should be approved by an independent non-surgical specialist for spinal deformites.
VL  - 5
IS  - 1
ER  - 

Copy | Download