The Construction of the Quality Evaluation System of Multi-angle Tourism Higher Education

Lina Zhong; Xiaonan Li; Baolin Deng

doi:doi:10.11648/j.her.20190405.12

| Peer-Reviewed

The Construction of the Quality Evaluation System of Multi-angle Tourism Higher Education

Lina Zhong, Xiaonan Li, Baolin Deng

Published in Higher Education Research (Volume 4, Issue 5)

Received: 10 October 2019 Accepted: 31 October 2019 Published: 9 November 2019

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The booming development of tourism also makes some scholars gradually pay attention to the research on the quality of higher education in tourism-related majors, and some research results have been produced in recent years. Many scholars believe that studying the quality standards of tourism higher education is of great significance to the development of tourism higher education. This paper reviews the research contents of higher education quality assessment at home and abroad, and finds that scholars at home and abroad have different views on education quality assessment. Therefore, this paper collects the research articles of domestic and foreign scholars on higher education, classifies and compares their research contents, finds out the shortcomings of domestic education quality evaluation, refers to foreign research experience on education quality evaluation, and explores new directions suitable for domestic education quality evaluation. It is found that the quality assessment of higher education in foreign countries is earlier than that in China. Most of the higher education quality assessment in China is teaching-oriented, while some scholars are teacher-oriented. Only a few scholars conduct teaching assessment comprehensively from the aspects of school, teaching and students. Foreign scholars regard students as the important object of teaching evaluation and give them the most important status. Based on the current research results, this paper constructs a student-centered and multi-perspective tourism higher education quality evaluation system from five perspectives: teaching resources, curriculum evaluation, teaching evaluation and monitoring, teaching output and overall satisfaction of students.

Published in	Higher Education Research (Volume 4, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.her.20190405.12
Page(s)	70-74
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Tourism Management Major, Evaluation of Education Quality, Student Centered

References

[1]	Xiong Jihong. Study on teaching effectiveness evaluation system of tourism management major in colleges and universities [J]. Journal of higher correspondence (natural science edition), 2009, (01): 25-26.
[2]	Hong Meixiang, he zhenrui. Construction of tourism talent cultivation quality evaluation system based on AHP [J]. Journal of economic research, 2011, (03): 173-174.
[3]	Wang Zhongjun. Construction of internship teaching quality evaluation system for tourism management specialty [J]. Higher education BBS, 2010, (03): 33-35.
[4]	Wang Fuqiang. Construction and implementation of the evaluation system of internship teaching quality of tourism management major [J]. Inner Mongolia education (vocational education edition), 2013, (07): 9-10.
[5]	Wang Fengxia. Study on construction of education quality evaluation system for tourism management specialty [J]. Tourism overview (second half), 2014, (07): 325-326.
[6]	Gao Weiquan. Construction and implementation of practical teaching quality evaluation system for tourism management major in liaoning province [J]. Journal of jixi university, 2016, 16 (03): 22-25.
[7]	Wang Zhongjun. Construction of internship teaching quality evaluation system for tourism management specialty [J]. Higher education BBS, 2010, (03): 33-35. Liu Zhentian. The perfection of China's higher education evaluation system and evaluation market [J]. Higher education development and evaluation, 2014, 30 (04): 19-28.
[8]	Liu Zhentian. The perfection of China's higher education evaluation system and evaluation market [J]. Higher education development and evaluation, 2014, 30(04): 19-28.
[9]	Huang Xiujuan, Zhu Jiajia, lai qifu. Evaluation of practical teaching objectives in tourism management -- a case study of fujian agriculture and forestry university [J]. Heilongjiang education (higher education research and evaluation), 2018, (02): 1-3.
[10]	Yin Fang. Evaluation of teaching quality of tourism management courses based on multi-level fuzzy comprehensive evaluation [J]. Journal of Yellow River conservancy technical college, 2017, 29 (01): 85-87.
[11]	Qi Ying. Construction of teaching quality evaluation system for tourism management major [J]. Continuing education research, 2012, (06): 159-160.
[12]	Zhou Pingru. Application of humanistic learning theory in teaching [J]. Journal of chongqing three gorges university, 2001, (S1): 221-222.
[13]	Xu Jiahui, Zhao Huijuan, Liu Xiulan, et al. "student-centered" evaluation index system of innovation and entrepreneurship education quality in colleges and universities [J]. Heilongjiang animal husbandry and veterinary medicine, 2018, (09): 230-232.
[14]	Su Linqin, Sun Qinjuan. Student-centered evaluation: strategic transformation of higher education evaluation [J]. Journal of Beijing xuanwu hongqi amateur university, 2013, (02): 12-13.
[15]	Zhang Jia. Practical research on integrated development and implementation of integrated practical activity curriculum and school-based curriculum [J]. Teaching and management, 2015, (09): 33-36.
[16]	Wang Junhong, Yu Bo. Evaluation criteria of student-centered English writing textbook [J]. Journal of hubei radio and television university, 2009, 29 (10): 135-136.
[17]	Tian Fang. Deepening the teaching reform of higher vocational education by referring to British BTEC teaching model [J]. Journal of hunan university of science and technology, 2006, (03): 236-238.
[18]	He Lin. What is the closed-loop structure of student participation assessment in British higher education [J]. Cultural and educational materials, 2018, (28): 88-89.
[19]	Wei Rongxia. A brief analysis of the difference between "student-centered" teaching concept and results-oriented education concept [J]. Contemporary education practice and teaching research, 2018, (03): 52-53.
[20]	Liu Haiyan. "student-centered learning": the core proposition of teaching reform in higher education in Europe [J]. Education research, 2017, 38 (12): 119-128.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Lina Zhong, Xiaonan Li, Baolin Deng. (2019). The Construction of the Quality Evaluation System of Multi-angle Tourism Higher Education. Higher Education Research, 4(5), 70-74. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20190405.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Lina Zhong; Xiaonan Li; Baolin Deng. The Construction of the Quality Evaluation System of Multi-angle Tourism Higher Education. High. Educ. Res. 2019, 4(5), 70-74. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20190405.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Lina Zhong, Xiaonan Li, Baolin Deng. The Construction of the Quality Evaluation System of Multi-angle Tourism Higher Education. High Educ Res. 2019;4(5):70-74. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20190405.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.her.20190405.12,
  author = {Lina Zhong and Xiaonan Li and Baolin Deng},
  title = {The Construction of the Quality Evaluation System of Multi-angle Tourism Higher Education},
  journal = {Higher Education Research},
  volume = {4},
  number = {5},
  pages = {70-74},
  doi = {10.11648/j.her.20190405.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20190405.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.her.20190405.12},
  abstract = {The booming development of tourism also makes some scholars gradually pay attention to the research on the quality of higher education in tourism-related majors, and some research results have been produced in recent years. Many scholars believe that studying the quality standards of tourism higher education is of great significance to the development of tourism higher education. This paper reviews the research contents of higher education quality assessment at home and abroad, and finds that scholars at home and abroad have different views on education quality assessment. Therefore, this paper collects the research articles of domestic and foreign scholars on higher education, classifies and compares their research contents, finds out the shortcomings of domestic education quality evaluation, refers to foreign research experience on education quality evaluation, and explores new directions suitable for domestic education quality evaluation. It is found that the quality assessment of higher education in foreign countries is earlier than that in China. Most of the higher education quality assessment in China is teaching-oriented, while some scholars are teacher-oriented. Only a few scholars conduct teaching assessment comprehensively from the aspects of school, teaching and students. Foreign scholars regard students as the important object of teaching evaluation and give them the most important status. Based on the current research results, this paper constructs a student-centered and multi-perspective tourism higher education quality evaluation system from five perspectives: teaching resources, curriculum evaluation, teaching evaluation and monitoring, teaching output and overall satisfaction of students.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Construction of the Quality Evaluation System of Multi-angle Tourism Higher Education
AU  - Lina Zhong
AU  - Xiaonan Li
AU  - Baolin Deng
Y1  - 2019/11/09
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20190405.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.her.20190405.12
T2  - Higher Education Research
JF  - Higher Education Research
JO  - Higher Education Research
SP  - 70
EP  - 74
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-935X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20190405.12
AB  - The booming development of tourism also makes some scholars gradually pay attention to the research on the quality of higher education in tourism-related majors, and some research results have been produced in recent years. Many scholars believe that studying the quality standards of tourism higher education is of great significance to the development of tourism higher education. This paper reviews the research contents of higher education quality assessment at home and abroad, and finds that scholars at home and abroad have different views on education quality assessment. Therefore, this paper collects the research articles of domestic and foreign scholars on higher education, classifies and compares their research contents, finds out the shortcomings of domestic education quality evaluation, refers to foreign research experience on education quality evaluation, and explores new directions suitable for domestic education quality evaluation. It is found that the quality assessment of higher education in foreign countries is earlier than that in China. Most of the higher education quality assessment in China is teaching-oriented, while some scholars are teacher-oriented. Only a few scholars conduct teaching assessment comprehensively from the aspects of school, teaching and students. Foreign scholars regard students as the important object of teaching evaluation and give them the most important status. Based on the current research results, this paper constructs a student-centered and multi-perspective tourism higher education quality evaluation system from five perspectives: teaching resources, curriculum evaluation, teaching evaluation and monitoring, teaching output and overall satisfaction of students.
VL  - 4
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Lina Zhong

School of Tourism Sciences, Beijing International Studies University, Beijing, China
Xiaonan Li

School of Tourism Sciences, Beijing International Studies University, Beijing, China
Baolin Deng

School of Tourism Sciences, Beijing International Studies University, Beijing, China

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Lina Zhong, Xiaonan Li, Baolin Deng. (2019). The Construction of the Quality Evaluation System of Multi-angle Tourism Higher Education. Higher Education Research, 4(5), 70-74. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20190405.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Lina Zhong; Xiaonan Li; Baolin Deng. The Construction of the Quality Evaluation System of Multi-angle Tourism Higher Education. High. Educ. Res. 2019, 4(5), 70-74. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20190405.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Lina Zhong, Xiaonan Li, Baolin Deng. The Construction of the Quality Evaluation System of Multi-angle Tourism Higher Education. High Educ Res. 2019;4(5):70-74. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20190405.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.her.20190405.12,
  author = {Lina Zhong and Xiaonan Li and Baolin Deng},
  title = {The Construction of the Quality Evaluation System of Multi-angle Tourism Higher Education},
  journal = {Higher Education Research},
  volume = {4},
  number = {5},
  pages = {70-74},
  doi = {10.11648/j.her.20190405.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20190405.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.her.20190405.12},
  abstract = {The booming development of tourism also makes some scholars gradually pay attention to the research on the quality of higher education in tourism-related majors, and some research results have been produced in recent years. Many scholars believe that studying the quality standards of tourism higher education is of great significance to the development of tourism higher education. This paper reviews the research contents of higher education quality assessment at home and abroad, and finds that scholars at home and abroad have different views on education quality assessment. Therefore, this paper collects the research articles of domestic and foreign scholars on higher education, classifies and compares their research contents, finds out the shortcomings of domestic education quality evaluation, refers to foreign research experience on education quality evaluation, and explores new directions suitable for domestic education quality evaluation. It is found that the quality assessment of higher education in foreign countries is earlier than that in China. Most of the higher education quality assessment in China is teaching-oriented, while some scholars are teacher-oriented. Only a few scholars conduct teaching assessment comprehensively from the aspects of school, teaching and students. Foreign scholars regard students as the important object of teaching evaluation and give them the most important status. Based on the current research results, this paper constructs a student-centered and multi-perspective tourism higher education quality evaluation system from five perspectives: teaching resources, curriculum evaluation, teaching evaluation and monitoring, teaching output and overall satisfaction of students.},
 year = {2019}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Construction of the Quality Evaluation System of Multi-angle Tourism Higher Education
AU  - Lina Zhong
AU  - Xiaonan Li
AU  - Baolin Deng
Y1  - 2019/11/09
PY  - 2019
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20190405.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.her.20190405.12
T2  - Higher Education Research
JF  - Higher Education Research
JO  - Higher Education Research
SP  - 70
EP  - 74
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-935X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20190405.12
AB  - The booming development of tourism also makes some scholars gradually pay attention to the research on the quality of higher education in tourism-related majors, and some research results have been produced in recent years. Many scholars believe that studying the quality standards of tourism higher education is of great significance to the development of tourism higher education. This paper reviews the research contents of higher education quality assessment at home and abroad, and finds that scholars at home and abroad have different views on education quality assessment. Therefore, this paper collects the research articles of domestic and foreign scholars on higher education, classifies and compares their research contents, finds out the shortcomings of domestic education quality evaluation, refers to foreign research experience on education quality evaluation, and explores new directions suitable for domestic education quality evaluation. It is found that the quality assessment of higher education in foreign countries is earlier than that in China. Most of the higher education quality assessment in China is teaching-oriented, while some scholars are teacher-oriented. Only a few scholars conduct teaching assessment comprehensively from the aspects of school, teaching and students. Foreign scholars regard students as the important object of teaching evaluation and give them the most important status. Based on the current research results, this paper constructs a student-centered and multi-perspective tourism higher education quality evaluation system from five perspectives: teaching resources, curriculum evaluation, teaching evaluation and monitoring, teaching output and overall satisfaction of students.
VL  - 4
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download