The ultimate dream and goal of every State under the membership of the United Nations is to live every single day in peace without any fear of terror. As reflected in the aims and objectives of the United Nations in its Charter, this is one of the major reasons why the Organization was in fact established. Unfortunately, we now live in a world where no State can afford to sleep even with one eye closed. This is the tragedy of a world lived in fear of terror. Although terrorism is not a new development, modern international terrorism is and most states, especially the Western States, live in constant fear of any imminent Terrorist attack. Be it freedom fighters or terrorists, the truth is no good words can be used to describe any act of terror because of its effects on innocent civilians and the whole community/state at large. This paper explains terrorism in the context of countering it by evaluating the efforts of the United Nations and how these efforts have helped in suppressing and eradicating its evils. It also seeks to evaluate the collective effort of states in fighting this evil menace.
| Published in | Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 1, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.hss.20130101.15 |
| Page(s) | 28-45 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2013. Published by Science Publishing Group |
International Terrorism, State Responsibility, Human Rights
| [1] | A Cassesse, International Criminal Law, (2nd ed, OUP, 2008) 162-165; |
| [2] | A Cassesse, ‘Terrorism as an International Crime’, in A Bianchi (ed), Enforcing International Law Norms Against Terrorism (Hart Publishing, 2004) |
| [3] | A Schmid, "The Response Problem as a Definition Problem" in J Lutz and B Lutz (eds), Global |
| [4] | A Roberts, ‘Terrorism and International Order’ in L Freedman et al (eds), Terrorism and International Order, (Routledge & Keegan Paul, 1986) 7 |
| [5] | A. Nussbaum, A Concise History of the Law of Nations, (Macmillan, 1954) 1-2 |
| [6] | A. Abass, Proving State Responsibility for Genocide: The ICJ in Bosnia v. Serbia and the International Commission of Inquiry for Darfur, 31 FORDHAM INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 871 (2008). |
| [7] | Abbott, K.W. Economic Sanctions and International Terrorism, 20 VANDERBILT JOURNAL OF TRANSNATIONAL LAW 289 (2007). |
| [8] | Abbott, K.W. International Relations Theory, International Law, and the Regime Governing Atrocities in International Conflicts, 93 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 361 (1999). |
| [9] | Abbott, K.W. Modern International Relations Theory: A Prospectus for International Lawyers, 14 YALE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 335 (1989). |
| [10] | Abeyratne, R. The Responsibility of Somalia for the Acts of the Somali Pirates, 2 JOURNAL OF TRANSPORTATION SECURITY 63-76 (2009). |
| [11] | Abramowitz, D. The President, Congress, and Use of Force: Legal and Political Considerations in Authorizing Use of Force Against International Terrorism, HARVARD INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 71-103 (2002). |
| [12] | Addicott, J.F. Legal and Policy Implications for a New Era: The "War on Terror", THE SCHOLAR: ST. MARY’S LAW REVIEW ON MINORITY ISSUES 209 (2002). |
| [13] | Ahdieh, R.B. Between Dialogue and Decree: International Review of National Courts, NEW YORK UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 2029 (2004). |
| [14] | Aldrich, G.H. The Taliban, Al Qaeda, and the Determination of Illegal Combatants, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 891 (2002). |
| [15] | Alvarez, J.E. Hegemonic International Law Revisited, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 873 (2003). |
| [16] | Amerasinghe, C.F. The Essence of the Structure of International Responsibility, in Maurizio Ragazzi (ed.), INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY TODAY: ESSAYS IN MEMORY OF OSCAR SCHACHTER 3-6 (2005). |
| [17] | Arai-Takahashi, Y. Shifting Boundaries of the Right of Self-Defence – Appraising the Impact of the September 11 Attacks on Jus Ad Bellum, INTERNATIONAL LAWYER 1081-1102 (2002). |
| [18] | Article 39 of the UN Charter |
| [19] | Atapattu, S. Sustainable Development and Terrorism: International Linkages and a Case Study of Sri Lanka, 30 WILLIAM & MARY ENVIRONMENTAL LAW & POLICY REVIEW 273 (2006). |
| [20] | Bâli, A. Stretching the Limits of International Law: The Challenge of Terrorism, ILSA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW 403-416 (2002). |
| [21] | Banks, M.M.D. Addressing State (Ir-)Responsibility: The Use of Military Force as Self-Defense in International Counter-Terrorism Operations, 200 MILITARY LAW REVIEW 54 (2009). |
| [22] | Bassiouni, M.C. Legal Control of International Terrorism: A Policy-Oriented Assessment, HARVARD INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 83-103 (2002). |
| [23] | Battaglini, G. War Against Terrorism Extra Moenia, Self-Defence and Responsibility: A Pure Judicial Approach, in Maurizio Ragazzi (ed.), INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY TODAY: ESSAYS IN MEMORY OF OSCAR SCHACHTER 137-149 (2005). |
| [24] | Bederman, D.J. Counterintuiting Countermeasures, AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 817 (2002). |
| [25] | Bedjaoui, M. Responsibility of States, Fault and Strict Liability, ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW 358-362 (1987). |
| [26] | Bennouna, M. La Protection diplomatique: Du standard minimum de traitement des étrangers aux droits de l’Homme, MELANGES EN L’HONNEUR DE KALLIOPI KOUFA 1-6 (2010). |
| [27] | Benvenisti, E. The US and the Use of Force: Double-Edged Hegemony and the Management of Global Emergencies, EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 677 (2004). |
| [28] | Bilder, R.B. The Role of Apology in International Law and Diplomacy, VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 433 (2006). |
| [29] | Bloom, C. The Classification of Hezbollah in Both International and Non-International Armed Conflicts, ANNUAL SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL ANDCOMPARATIVE LAW 61 (2008). |
| [30] | Boyle, A.E. Globalising Environmental Liability: The Interplay of National and International Law, JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW 3 (2005). |
| [31] | Brazilian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Celso Lafer, in his speech at the XXII Meeting of Consultation of the ministers of Foreign Affairs in the Organization of American States of Washington DC (September 21, 2001), available at http://www.patriotresource.com/wtc/intl/0921/brazil.html accessed 4 July 2012 |
| [32] | Brenner, S. At Light Speed: Attribution and Response to Cybercrime/Terrorism/Warfare, JOURNAL OF CRIMINAL LAW AND CRIMINOLOGY 379 (2007). |
| [33] | Brown, D. Use of force Against Terrorism After September 11th: State Responsibility, Self-Defense and Other Responses, CARDOZO JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW 1-53 (2003) |
| [34] | B. Kellman, State Responsibility for Preventing Bioterrorism, THE INTERNATIONAL LAWYER 29-38 (2002). |
| [35] | Brunnée J. and Toope S.J. The Use of Force: International Law After Iraq, INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY 785-806 (2004). |
| [36] | Brunnée, J. International Legal Accountability Through the Lens of the Law of State Responsibility, NETHERLANDS YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 21-56 (2005). |
| [37] | Byers, M. Terrorism, the Use of Force and International Law After September, THE INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY 401- 414 (2002). |
| [38] | Calamita, N.J. Sanctions, Countermeasures, and the Iranian Nuclear Issue, VANDERBILT JOURNAL OF TRANSNATIONAL LAW 1393 (2009). |
| [39] | Charney, J.I. Third State Remedies in International Law, 10 MICHIGAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 57-101 (1989), reprinted in René Provost (ed.), STATE RESPONSIBILITY IN INTERNATIONAL LAW 205-250 (2002). |
| [40] | Cohen, H.G. Can International Law Work? A Constructivist Expansion, BERKELEY JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 636 (2009). |
| [41] | Dalton, J.G. The United States National Security Strategy: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow, NAVAL LAW REVIEW 60 (2005). |
| [42] | De Brabandere, E. Non-State Actors, State-Centrism and Human Rights Obligations, LEIDEN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 191 (2009). |
| [43] | Drumbl, M.A. Terrorist Crime, Taliban Guilt, Western Victims, and International Law, DENVER JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW & POLICY 69-79 (2002). |
| [44] | Duffy M.T. and Provost R. Constitutional Canaries and the Elusive Quest to Legitimize Security Detentions, CASE WESTERN RESERVE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 531 (2009). |
| [45] | Ellis, J. Has International Law Outgrown Trail Smelter?, in R.M. Bratspies and R.A. Miller (eds.), TRANSBOUNDARY HARM IN INTERNATIONAL LAW: LESSONS FROM THE TRAIL SMELTER ARBITRATION 56-65 (2006). |
| [46] | Frischmann, B. A Dynamic Institutional Theory of International Law, BUFFALO LAW REVIEW 689 (2003). |
| [47] | Gathii, J. Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda) (International Decision), AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW (2007) |
| [48] | Giles-Carnero, R. Terrorist Acts as Threats to International Peace and Security, in Pablo Antonio Fernández-Sánchez (ed.), INTERNATIONAL LEGAL DIMENSION OF TERRORISM 55-71 (2009). |
| [49] | G. Scott, The Rise and Fall of the League of Nations, (London 1973) 19-42. |
| [50] | Gill, T.D. The Eleventh of September and the Right of Self-Defense, in Wybo P. Heere (ed.), TERRORISM AND THE MILITARY: INTERNATIONAL LEGAL IMPLICATIONS 23-42 (2003). |
| [51] | Glennon, M.J. Does International Law Matter? AMERICAN SOCIETY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW PROCEEDINGS 315 (2004). |
| [52] | Glennon, M.J. The Fog of Law: Self-Defense, Inherence, and Incoherence in Article 51 of the United Nations Charter, HARVARD JOURNAL OF LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY 539 (2002). |
| [53] | Goodman R. and Jinks D. International Law, War Powers, and the Global War on Terrorism, HARVARD LAW REVIEW 2653-2662 (2005). |
| [54] | Hamid, A.G. Maritime Terrorism, the Straits of Malacca, and the Issue of State Responsibility, TULANE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW 155 (2006). |
| [55] | Henderson, C.M. Michael Byers, War Law: International Law and Armed Conflict, JOURNAL OF CONFLICT AND SECURITY LAW 150 (2007). |
| [56] | Intelligence and Security Committee Report into the London Terrorist Attacks on 7 July 2005, Presented to the Parliament by the Prime Minister by command of Her Majesty, May 2006, available at http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm67/6785/6785.pdf accessed 4 July 2012 |
| [57] | I. Brownlie, The Responsibility of States for the Acts of International Organizations, in Maurizio Ragazzi (ed.), INTERNATIONAL RESPONSIBILITY TODAY: ESSAYS IN MEMORY OF OSCAR SCHACHTER 355-362 (2005). |
| [58] | J Austin and J Brown (eds), The Austinian Theory of Law: Being an Edition of Lectures I, V, and VI of Austin’s "Jurisprudence" and of Austin’s "Essay on the Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence" with Critical Notes and Excurses, (London: J Murray, 1906) 331 |
| [59] | J Maogoto, Battling Terrorism: Legal Perspectives on the Use of Force and the War on Terror, (Ashgate Publishing Ltd, 2005) |
| [60] | K. Abbott, R. Keohane, A. Moravcsik, A-M. Slaughter and D. Snidal, The Concept of Legalization, 54 INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION 401 (2000). |
| [61] | M. Koskenniemi and P. Leino, Fragmentation of International Law?: Postmodern Anxieties, LEIDEN JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 553-579 (2002). |
| [62] | M. Lippman, The New Terrorism and International Law. TULSA JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE & INTERNATIONAL LAW 297-368 (2003). |
| [63] | M Dixon and R McCorquodale, Cases and Materials on International Law, (4th Ed, OUP, 2003) |
| [64] | M. Shaw, International Law, 6th Edition, Cambridge |
| [65] | Martinez, L. Prosecuting Terrorists at the International Criminal Court: Possibilities and Problems, RUTGERS LAW JOURNAL 1 (2002). |
| [66] | M. O’Connell, Lawful and Unlawful Wars Against Terrorism, in Ved P. Nanda (ed.), LAW IN THE WAR ON INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM 79-96 (2005). |
| [67] | N. Babbic and D. Zolo, ‘Hans Kelsen, The Theory of Law and the International Legal System: A Talk’, (1998) 9 EJIL 355-667 |
| [68] | P. Okowa, Case Concerning Armed Activities on the Territory of the Congo (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Uganda), INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY 742 (2006). |
| [69] | P Robinson, ‘The Missing Crimes’ in A Cassesse et al (eds), The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: A Commentary, (Vol I, OUP, 2002) 497-525; |
| [70] | R Chandrasekaran, "Taliban Refuses to Surrender bin Laden: US Develops Options for Military Action", 19 Sept 2001 Washington Post at A1 |
| [71] | R. McCorquodale and P. Simons, Responsibility Beyond Borders: State Responsibility for Extraterritorial Violations by Corporations of International Human Rights Law, MODERN LAW REVIEW 598-625 (2007). |
| [72] | R. Keohane, The Public Delegitimation of Terrorism and Coalition Politics, in Ken Booth and Tim Dunne (eds.), WORLDS IN COLLISION: TERROR AND THE FUTURE OF GLOBAL ORDER 141-151 (2002). |
| [73] | R Jennings and A Watts, Oppenheim’s International Law, (Vol I, OUP, 9th Ed, 1992) 4 |
| [74] | R. Bernhardt, Encyclopedia of Public International Law, (Vol VII, North-Holland, 1984) 150 |
| [75] | S. Rosenberg, Promoting Equality After Genocide, TULANE JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW 329 (2008). |
| [76] | S Lyman (ed), The China White Paper, (Stanford, 1967) 10; G Scott, The Rise and Fall of the League of Nation |
| [77] | S Murphy, "Terrorism and the Concept of ‘Armed Attack’ in Article 51 of the UN Charter", (2002) 43 Harvard Int’l Law Journal, p 41 |
| [78] | Terrorism (Vol I, SAGE, 2008) 7; R Cryer, "Terrorism and the International Criminal Court" (2003) 82 REFORM: Journal of the Australian Law Reform Commission, pp 14-16 |
| [79] | V Proulx, "Rethinking the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court in the Post-September 11th Era: Should Acts of Terrorism Qualify as Crimes against Humanity?" (2004) American University International Law Review, Vol 19, No 5, pp 1009-1089; |
| [80] | V Lenin, The National Liberation Movement in the East, (Foreign Language Publishing House, Moscow, 1957) 240 |
| [81] | Y Korovin et al, International Law (Academy of Sciences of the USSR Institute of Law, Foreign Languages Publishing House, Moscow) 15-18. |
APA Style
Tobiloba O. Awotoye. (2013). State Responsibility as a Panacea to International Terrorism. Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20130101.15
ACS Style
Tobiloba O. Awotoye. State Responsibility as a Panacea to International Terrorism. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2013, 1(1), 28-45. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20130101.15
AMA Style
Tobiloba O. Awotoye. State Responsibility as a Panacea to International Terrorism. Humanit Soc Sci. 2013;1(1):28-45. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20130101.15
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.hss.20130101.15,
author = {Tobiloba O. Awotoye},
title = {State Responsibility as a Panacea to International Terrorism},
journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences},
volume = {1},
number = {1},
pages = {28-45},
doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20130101.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20130101.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20130101.15},
abstract = {The ultimate dream and goal of every State under the membership of the United Nations is to live every single day in peace without any fear of terror. As reflected in the aims and objectives of the United Nations in its Charter, this is one of the major reasons why the Organization was in fact established. Unfortunately, we now live in a world where no State can afford to sleep even with one eye closed. This is the tragedy of a world lived in fear of terror. Although terrorism is not a new development, modern international terrorism is and most states, especially the Western States, live in constant fear of any imminent Terrorist attack. Be it freedom fighters or terrorists, the truth is no good words can be used to describe any act of terror because of its effects on innocent civilians and the whole community/state at large. This paper explains terrorism in the context of countering it by evaluating the efforts of the United Nations and how these efforts have helped in suppressing and eradicating its evils. It also seeks to evaluate the collective effort of states in fighting this evil menace.},
year = {2013}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - State Responsibility as a Panacea to International Terrorism AU - Tobiloba O. Awotoye Y1 - 2013/07/10 PY - 2013 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20130101.15 DO - 10.11648/j.hss.20130101.15 T2 - Humanities and Social Sciences JF - Humanities and Social Sciences JO - Humanities and Social Sciences SP - 28 EP - 45 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8184 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20130101.15 AB - The ultimate dream and goal of every State under the membership of the United Nations is to live every single day in peace without any fear of terror. As reflected in the aims and objectives of the United Nations in its Charter, this is one of the major reasons why the Organization was in fact established. Unfortunately, we now live in a world where no State can afford to sleep even with one eye closed. This is the tragedy of a world lived in fear of terror. Although terrorism is not a new development, modern international terrorism is and most states, especially the Western States, live in constant fear of any imminent Terrorist attack. Be it freedom fighters or terrorists, the truth is no good words can be used to describe any act of terror because of its effects on innocent civilians and the whole community/state at large. This paper explains terrorism in the context of countering it by evaluating the efforts of the United Nations and how these efforts have helped in suppressing and eradicating its evils. It also seeks to evaluate the collective effort of states in fighting this evil menace. VL - 1 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: