Background: Plastic waste is a major societal and environmental issue contributing to climate change as well as affecting the health of humans and animals across the globe. Tackling plastic pollution requires dramatic change from everyone because one of the key factors contributing to the amount of plastic waste is consumer behaviour. Objective: The aim of this research is to test the predictive power of the goal-striving reasons framework for plastic waste behaviour of UK households to analyse whether the reasons why people voluntarily engage in plastic reducing actions can predict plastic consumption of households. Method: The predictive power of the goal-striving reasons framework was tested by correlating the overall goal-striving reasons index and, each goal of the six goal-striving reasons individually, with i) a newly developed self-report measure of plastic consumption and; ii) with an objective measure of plastic waste. The objective measure required households to count their plastic waste for three consecutive weeks. The study is based on N = 66 households in Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. Results: Findings suggest that the approach goal-striving reasons of pleasure, altruism and positive consequences are related to self-reported plastic waste whereas the two avoidance reasons of not wanting to feel bad about oneself or to avoid any negative consequences are related to objective plastic waste. Conclusion: The findings of this study highlight the relevance of the goal-striving reasons framework as an important concept for the prediction of plastic waste behaviour of individuals, and as a potential tool for facilitating change behaviour in household plastic waste consumption.
| Published in | Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.hss.20210903.11 |
| Page(s) | 57-66 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Goal-Striving Reasons, Approach Reasons, Avoidance Reasons, Self-reported Plastic Waste, Objective Plastic Waste
| [1] | Royer S-J, Ferrón S, Wilson S. T & Karl D. M. (2018). Production of methane and ethylene from plastic in the environment. PLoS ONE 13 (8). |
| [2] | Heidbreder, L. M., Bablok, I., Drews, S. & Menzel, C. (2019). Tackling the plastic problem: A review on perceptions, behaviors, and interventions. Science of the Total Environment, 668, 1077–1093 |
| [3] | Seltenrich, N. (2015). New link in the food chain? Marine plastic pollution and seafood safety. Environmental Health Perspective, 123 (2), 34–41. |
| [4] | Hodson, M.E., Duffus-Hodson, C.A., Clark, A., Prendergast-Miller, M.T. & Thorpe, K.L., (2017). Plastic bag derived-microplastics as a vector formetal exposure in terrestrial invertebrates. Environmental Science and Technology 51 (8), 4714–4721 |
| [5] | Khan, F., Ahmed, W. & Najmi, A. (2019). Understanding consumers’ behavior intentions towards dealing with the plastic waste: Perspective of a developing country. Resources, Conservation & Recycling 142, 49–58 |
| [6] | de la Mare, T. (2018). Government promises £61m to tackle scourge of ocean plastic pollution with Commonwealth nations. The Independent, 15 April. Available at: https://www.independent.co.uk/environment/theresa-may-commonwealth-plastic-climate-change-ocean-pollution-david-attenborough-blue-planet-a8305721.html (accessed 29 September 2018). |
| [7] | Jennings, F. J.,Allen, M. W., & Phuong, T., L., V. (2020). More Plastic than Fish: Partisan Responses to an Advocacy Video Opposing Single-Use Plastics, Environmental Communication. Online first. |
| [8] | Silva,A. L. P, Prata, J. C.,Walker T. R., Duarte, A.C., Ouyang, W., Barcelò, D. & Rocha-Santos, T. (2020). Increased plastic pollution due to COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges and recommendations, Chemical Engineering Journal, Volume 405, Online first. |
| [9] | UN (2017). ‘Turn the Tide on Plastic’ Urges UN, as Microplastics in the Seas Now Outnumber Stars in Our Galaxy. 23 February. Available at: https://news.un.org/en/story/2017/02/552052-turn-tide-plastic-urges-un-microplastics-seas-now-outnumber-stars-our-galaxy#.WTE4nhOGPsE (accessed 18 February 2020). |
| [10] | Carpenter, E. & Wolverton, S. (2017). Plastic litter in streams: the behavioral archaeology of a pervasive environmental problem. Applied Geography 84, 93–101. |
| [11] | Löhr, A., Savelli, H., Beunen, R., Kalz, M., Ragas, A., & Van Belleghem, F. (2017). Solutions for global marine litter pollution. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 28, 90-99. |
| [12] | Barr, S. (2007). Factors influencing environmental attitudes and behaviors: A UK case study of household waste management. Environment and Behavior, 39, 435–473. |
| [13] | Chan, K. (1998). Mass communication and pro-environmental behaviour: waste recycling in Hong Kong, Journal of Environmental Management, 52, 317-325. |
| [14] | Yamin, P., Fei, M., Lahlou, S. & Levy, S. (2019). Using Social Norms to Change Behavior and Increase Sustainability in the Real World: a Systematic Review of the Literature. Sustainability, 11, 5847. |
| [15] | Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. R. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (p. 151–192). McGraw-Hill. |
| [16] | Bateson, M., Callow, L., Holmes, J.R., Redmond Roche, M.L. & Nettle, D. (2013). Do Images of “watching Eyes” Induce Behaviour That Is More pro-Social or More Normative? A Field Experiment on Littering. PLoS ONE, 8, 1–9 |
| [17] | Schultz, P.W. (1999). Changing Behavior with Normative Feedback Interventions: A Field Experiment on Curbside Recycling. Basic & Applied Social Psychology, 21, 25–36. |
| [18] | Ehrlich, C. (2012). Be careful what you wish for but also why you wish for it: Goal-striving reasons and affective subjective well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 7, 493–503. |
| [19] | Ehrlich, C. (2018). The development of an extended goal-striving reasons framework: Evidence for its relevance in the workplace, for its theoretical difference to self-concordance and for its buffering effect on work intensity. Journal of Positive Psychology and Wellbeing, 2, 1-23. |
| [20] | Ehrlich, C. (2019). The goal-striving reasons framework: Further evidence for its predictive power for subjective well-being on a sub-dimensional level and on an individual goal-striving reasons level as well as evidence for its theoretical difference to self-concordance. Current Psychology, Online First, 1-14. |
| [21] | Ehrlich, C. (2020). Development of the short form of the goal-striving reasons questionnaire. Journal of Well-being Assessment. Online first, 1-22. |
| [22] | Ehrlich, C. & Bipp, T. (2016). Goals and subjective well-being: Further evidence for goal-striving reasons as an additional level of goal analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 89, 92-99 |
| [23] | Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2010). Approach and avoidance temperament as basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality, 78, 865–906. |
| [24] | Ford, M.E. & Nichols, C.W. (1987). A taxonomy of human goals and some possible applications. In M. E. Ford & D. H. Ford (Eds.), Humans as self-constructing systems: Putting the framework to work (pp. 289-311). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum |
| [25] | Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166. |
| [26] | Venhoeven L.A., Bolderdijk J.W. & Steg L. (2016). Why Acting Environmentally-Friendly Feels Good: Exploring the Role of Self-Image. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1846. |
| [27] | Joireman, J., Lasane, T., Bennett, J., Richards, D., & Solaimani, S. (2001). Integrating social value orientation and the consideration of future consequences within the extended norm activation model of pro-environmental behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 133–155. |
| [28] | Schuler, J. (2012). Von der Schwierigkeit des Studiums prosozialen Verhaltens: Weinstein et al. revisited. Master’s thesis, University of Mannheim |
| [29] | Jayaratne, M., Mort, G. & Clare, D’S. (2015). Sustainability Living in a Carbon-Priced Economy: “Shoulds” and “Woulds,” Making Amends and Sustainability Guilt. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 27: 3, 285-306 |
| [30] | Skinner, B. F. (1938). The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis. New York: Appleton-Century |
| [31] | Barr, S., Gilg, A.W. & Ford, N.J. (2001). A conceptual framework for understanding and analysing attitudes towards household waste-management. Environment and Planning A, 33 (11): 2025-2048 |
| [32] | Burgess, J., Harrison, C. M., & Filius, P. (1998). Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1445-1460. |
| [33] | Defra (2019a). UK Statistics on Waste. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/uk-waste-data (accessed 13 February 2020). |
| [34] | Defra (2019b) Statistics on waste managed by local authorities in England in 2018/19. Available at https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/local-authority-collected-waste-management-annual-resultsaccessed 14th February, 2020. |
| [35] | HM Treasury (2018). Tackling the plastic problem: using the tax system or charges to address single-use plastic waste. 13 March. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/tackling-the-plastic-problem (accessed 26 September 2018) |
| [36] | Matsueda, N. and Nagase, Y. (2012). An economic analysis of the Packaging waste Recovery Note System in the UK. Resource and Energy Economics, 34, 669-679. |
| [37] | Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. |
| [38] | Judge, T. A., Bono, J.E., Erez, A., & Locke, E.A. (2005). Core self-evaluations and job and life satisfaction: The role of self-concordance and goal attainment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90 (2), 257-268. |
| [39] | Sheldon K. M, Ryan R. M, Deci E. L, & Kasser T. (2004). The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: it's both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30 (4), 475-486. |
| [40] | Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 482-497. |
| [41] | Sheldon K. M, Elliot A.J., Ryan R.M., Chirkov, V., Kum, Y, Wu, C., Demir, M. & Sun, Z. (2004). Self-Concordance and Subjective Well-Being in Four Cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35 (2), 209-223. |
| [42] | Sheldon, K. M., & Houser-Marko, L. (2001). Self-concordance, goal attainment, and the pursuit of happiness: Can there be an upward spiral? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80 (1), 152–165. |
| [43] | Unsworth, K.L. & McNeill, I. (2017). Increasing Pro-Environmental Behaviors by Increasing Self-Concordance: Testing an Intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102 (1), 88-103. |
| [44] | Locke, E., & Latham, G. (2013).Goal setting theory, 1990.In E. Locke & G. Latham (Eds.), New developments in goal setting and task performance (pp. 3-15). New York: Routledge. |
| [45] | Latkin, C. A., Edwards, C., Davey-Rothwell, M. A., & Tobin, K. E. (2017). The relationship between social desirability bias and self-reports of health, substance use, and social network factors among urban substance users in Baltimore, Maryland. Addictive behaviors, 73, 133–136 |
| [46] | Welsch, H., & Kühling, J. (2009). Determinants of pro-environmental consumption: The role of reference groups and routine behavior, Ecological Economics, 69, 166-176. |
| [47] | Van Liere, K.D. & Dunlap, R.E. (1980) The social bases of environmental concern: a review of hypotheses, explanations and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 181-197 |
| [48] | Deci E. L, Eghrari H., Patrick B.C. & Leone, D.R. (1994). Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality, 62 (1): 119-42. |
APA Style
Christian Ehrlich, Samantha Miles. (2021). Predictive Power of Goal-striving Reasons for Self-reported and Actual Plastic Consumption. Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(3), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20210903.11
ACS Style
Christian Ehrlich; Samantha Miles. Predictive Power of Goal-striving Reasons for Self-reported and Actual Plastic Consumption. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2021, 9(3), 57-66. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20210903.11
AMA Style
Christian Ehrlich, Samantha Miles. Predictive Power of Goal-striving Reasons for Self-reported and Actual Plastic Consumption. Humanit Soc Sci. 2021;9(3):57-66. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20210903.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.hss.20210903.11,
author = {Christian Ehrlich and Samantha Miles},
title = {Predictive Power of Goal-striving Reasons for Self-reported and Actual Plastic Consumption},
journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences},
volume = {9},
number = {3},
pages = {57-66},
doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20210903.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20210903.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20210903.11},
abstract = {Background: Plastic waste is a major societal and environmental issue contributing to climate change as well as affecting the health of humans and animals across the globe. Tackling plastic pollution requires dramatic change from everyone because one of the key factors contributing to the amount of plastic waste is consumer behaviour. Objective: The aim of this research is to test the predictive power of the goal-striving reasons framework for plastic waste behaviour of UK households to analyse whether the reasons why people voluntarily engage in plastic reducing actions can predict plastic consumption of households. Method: The predictive power of the goal-striving reasons framework was tested by correlating the overall goal-striving reasons index and, each goal of the six goal-striving reasons individually, with i) a newly developed self-report measure of plastic consumption and; ii) with an objective measure of plastic waste. The objective measure required households to count their plastic waste for three consecutive weeks. The study is based on N = 66 households in Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. Results: Findings suggest that the approach goal-striving reasons of pleasure, altruism and positive consequences are related to self-reported plastic waste whereas the two avoidance reasons of not wanting to feel bad about oneself or to avoid any negative consequences are related to objective plastic waste. Conclusion: The findings of this study highlight the relevance of the goal-striving reasons framework as an important concept for the prediction of plastic waste behaviour of individuals, and as a potential tool for facilitating change behaviour in household plastic waste consumption.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Predictive Power of Goal-striving Reasons for Self-reported and Actual Plastic Consumption AU - Christian Ehrlich AU - Samantha Miles Y1 - 2021/05/08 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20210903.11 DO - 10.11648/j.hss.20210903.11 T2 - Humanities and Social Sciences JF - Humanities and Social Sciences JO - Humanities and Social Sciences SP - 57 EP - 66 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8184 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20210903.11 AB - Background: Plastic waste is a major societal and environmental issue contributing to climate change as well as affecting the health of humans and animals across the globe. Tackling plastic pollution requires dramatic change from everyone because one of the key factors contributing to the amount of plastic waste is consumer behaviour. Objective: The aim of this research is to test the predictive power of the goal-striving reasons framework for plastic waste behaviour of UK households to analyse whether the reasons why people voluntarily engage in plastic reducing actions can predict plastic consumption of households. Method: The predictive power of the goal-striving reasons framework was tested by correlating the overall goal-striving reasons index and, each goal of the six goal-striving reasons individually, with i) a newly developed self-report measure of plastic consumption and; ii) with an objective measure of plastic waste. The objective measure required households to count their plastic waste for three consecutive weeks. The study is based on N = 66 households in Oxfordshire, United Kingdom. Results: Findings suggest that the approach goal-striving reasons of pleasure, altruism and positive consequences are related to self-reported plastic waste whereas the two avoidance reasons of not wanting to feel bad about oneself or to avoid any negative consequences are related to objective plastic waste. Conclusion: The findings of this study highlight the relevance of the goal-striving reasons framework as an important concept for the prediction of plastic waste behaviour of individuals, and as a potential tool for facilitating change behaviour in household plastic waste consumption. VL - 9 IS - 3 ER -
Information
Email: