Social Status and Class Identity of the Organized Working Class in Serbia

Nada Novakovic; Marija Obradovic

doi:doi:10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17

| Peer-Reviewed

Social Status and Class Identity of the Organized Working Class in Serbia

Nada Novakovic, Marija Obradovic

Published in Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 6)

Received: 15 October 2021 Accepted: 13 November 2021 Published: 27 November 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between the European identity of the organized working class and its class power in Serbian society. We understand the collective European identity of the organized working class in Serbia to primarily mean adherence to the European social model embodied in collective bargaining, that is, in a social dialogue among social partners: the trade unions, employers, and the state. The European identity of the organized working class in Serbia is also reflected in its support for the values of human rights, private property, the market economy, and multi-party parliamentary democracy. We understand “trade union power” to mean the extent of its capacity to achieve set goals. That is, how much the commitment and the efforts of the representative trade unions in Serbia: The Confederation of Autonomous Trade Unions of Serbia (SSSS/CATUS) and The Trade Union Confederation (UGS/TUC) “Nezavisnost” („Independence”) to join the European trade union movement and become members of the European Trade Union Confederation, the only representative European trade union organization and the recognized social partner at the level of the European Union, contributed to the more prominent role and a more remarkable power of these trade unions in Serbia. Our research is based on the critical discourse analysis (CDA) – discourse-historical approach (DHA), and economic history context.

Published in	Humanities and Social Sciences (Volume 9, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17
Page(s)	258-272
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Social Status, Class Identity, Serbia, Working-class

References

[1]	International Monetary Fund, World Global Update, April 2016, www.imf.org; accessed on 20 October 2016.
[2]	Džozef E. Stiglic, Velika podela. Društva nejednakosti I šta da radimo sa njima (The Great Divide: Unequal Societies and What We can Do About The.), Akademska knjiga, Novi Sad, 2015, p. 95.
[3]	World Employment and Social Outlook, Trends 2017, International Labor Organization, 12 January 2017.
[4]	Nada Novaković, “Kriza, štrajkovi i protesti građana” (“Crisis, Strikes and Civil Protests”), Nacionalni interes, vol. 22, br. 1 (2015), pp. 93-97, 104.
[5]	Oxfam International, ttps://www.oxfam.org/en/research/inequality-virus.
[6]	Own publication: Trade Union Confederation (UGS/TUC) “Nezavisnost,” Međunarodna saradnja (International cooperation).
[7]	Immanuel Wallenstein, The Decline of American Power. The US in a Chaotic World. New York, New Press, 2003.
[8]	Branko Milanović, Globalna nejednakost. Novi pristup za doba globalizacije (Global Inequality. A New Approach for the Age of Globalization), Akademska knjiga, Novi Sad, 2016.
[9]	Friedrich von Hayek, Road to Serfdom (Put u ropstvo), Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2012.
[10]	Milton Friedman, Capitalism and Freedom (Kapitalizam i sloboda, Službeni glasnik, Beograd, 2012.
[11]	Jovan B. Dušanić, Neoliberalizam: rasprave u Akademiji ekonomskih nauka (Neoliberalism: discussion in the Academy of Economic Sciences), Catena mundi, 2015, Beograd, p. 142.
[12]	Katić Nebojša, Iz drugog ugla (From a Different Aspect), Catena mundi, Beograd, 2015, p. 13.
[13]	Liberalni forum (Liberal Forum), 14 October 2020, https://liberalniforum.com/2020/10/14/margaret-thatcher-zena-koja-je-promijenila-svijet/;accessed on 21 February 2021.
[14]	Financijski klub (Financial Club), 12 May 2016, http://finance.hr/ekonomske-politike-margaret-thatcher/,accessed 16 July 2020.
[15]	The Telegraph, 8 August 2010.
[16]	Ona Magazine, 24 May 2021, http://www.onamagazin.com/margaret-tacer-baronica-celicnih-principa/retrievedon 11th June 2021.
[17]	B 92, 9 April 2013, https://www.b92.net/biz/vesti/svet.php?yyyy=2013&mm=04&dd=09&nav_id=703358, retrieved on 14 May 2013.
[18]	According to the Guardian 29th of March 2012; https://bif.rs/2012/04/kratka-istorija-britanske-privatizacije-1979-2012-3/retrieved on 22nd May 2020.
[19]	Dejvid Harvi, Kratka istorija neoliberalizma (A Short Histoty of Neoliberalism), Mediteran Publishing, Novi Sad, 2012, pp. 15, 22-24.
[20]	Gregory Albo, „Neoliberalism from Reagan to Clinton“, Monthly Review, New York, 52 (11), pp. 81-89.
[21]	Goran Musić, Radnička klasa Srbije u tranziciji 1988-2013 (Working-class in Serbia Under Transition 1988-2013), Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, Regionalna kancelarija za Jugoistočnu Evropu, Beograd, 2014, p. 36.
[22]	Slobodan Cvejić, “Penzioneri i nezaposleni u klasnoj analizi. Slučaj Srbije”(“Retirees and Unemployed in a Class Analysis. The Case of Serbia”) in Promene osnovnih struktura društva Srbije u periodu ubrzane transformacije (Changes in Basic Social Structure Under Rapid Transformation), editors: Mladen Lazić and Slobodan Cvejić, Institut za sociološka istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta, Beograd, 2013, pp. 66, 68.
[23]	Goran Musić, Radnička klasa Srbije u tranziciji 1988-2013 (Working-class in Serbia Under Transition 1988-2013), Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, Regionalna kancelarija za Jugoistočnu Evropu, Beograd, 2014, p. p. 38, 42.
[24]	Gradimir Ivanić, “Promene u sindikalnim organizacijama” (“Changes to Syndicate Organization”) in Srećko Mihailović, Zoran Stojiljković, Gradimir Ivanić, Sindikalni barometar 3. Istraživanje javnog mnjenja zaposlenih. Sindikat u promenama. Promene u sindikatima (Syndicate Barometer3. A Public Opinion Research of Employees. Syndicates in Changes), Ujedinjeni granski sindikati „Nezavisnost“, Beograd, 2004, p. 39.
[25]	Zoran Stojiljković, Srećko Mihailović, Stanje socijalnog dijaloga u Srbiji posle dvadeset godina tranzicije (Social Dialogue Status in Serbia after Twenty Years of Transition), SWISS LABOUR ASSISTANCE, Beograd, 2010, p. 35.
[26]	Srećko Mihailović, Evropeizacija sindikata Srbije. Sindikati Srbije pred izazovima sudelovanja u procesima pridruživanja i u odnosima sa evropskim sindikalnim organizacijama (Europeanization of Serbia’s Union. Unions in Serbia Facing Challenges in the Process of Accession and Relations with European Unions), Fondacija, Fridrih Ebert, Centar za razvoj sindikalizma, Beograd, 2015, p. 15.
[27]	Anthony Gidens, Sociology, (Fourth edition), Polity Press, Cambridge, 2001, p. 32.
[28]	Anthony Gidens, Sociology, (Fourth edition), Polity Press, Cambridge, 2001, p. 288.
[29]	World Bank/UN, https://youtu.be/HpVnA-kwCgw.
[30]	Srećko Mihailović, “Uvod: Drukčije vreme traži drukčije sindikate” (“Introduction: Different Times Call for Different Unions”) in Srećko Mihailović, Zoran Stojiljković, Gradimir Ivanić, Sindikalni barometar 3. Istraživanje javnog mnjenja zaposlenih. Sindikat u promenama Promene u sindikatima (Syndicate Barometer 3. A Public Opinion Research of Employees. Syndicates in Changes), Ujedinjeni granski sindikati „Nezavisnost“, Beograd, 2004, p. 8.
[31]	Zoran Stojiljković, Srećko Mihailović, Stanje socijalnog dijaloga u Srbiji posle dvadeset godina tranzicije (Social Dialogue Status in Serbia after Twenty Years of Transition), SWISS LABOUR ASSISTANCE, Beograd, 2010, p. 37.
[32]	Nada Novaković, “Štrajkovi, sindikati i tranzicija u Srbiji” (“Strikes, Unions and Transition”), Sociološki pregled, vol. XLVII (2013), no. 1, p. 47.
[33]	Nada Novaković, “Štrajkovi u Srbiji od 2000. do 2005.godine” (“Strikes in Serbia from 2000 to 2005”), Sociološki pregled, vol. XXXIX (2005), br. 3, p. 323.
[34]	Goran Musić, Radnička klasa Srbije u tranziciji 1988-2013 (Working-class in Serbia Under Transition 1988-2013), Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, Regionalna kancelarija za Jugoistočnu Evropu, Beograd, 2014, p. 48.
[35]	“Protest tri sindikata komunalaca Srbije. Stop štetnim zakonima” (“Protest of Public Utility Workers in Serbia. Stop Damaging Laws”), Sindikalni poverenik, double issue 3124/403-404, 30. 11. 2011., 67, Radnička štampa, Beograd, p. 14.
[36]	Milan Grujić: “Nećemo stati do ispunjenje zahteva” (“We will not Stop until Demands are Met”), Sindikalni poverenik, double issue3124/405-406, 27^th December 2011; 67, Radnička štampa, Beograd, p. 20.
[37]	Program restruktuiranja javno-komunalnih preduzeća u Republici Srbiji (Restructuring of Public Utility Companies in the Republic of Serbia), Savez samostalnih sindikata Srbije (SSSS), Beograd, 2009, pp, 2-5, 34-36.
[38]	Marija Obradović, Hronika tranzicionog groblja. Privatizacija društvenog kapitala u Srbiji 1989-2012. Ekonomsko-istorijska analiza (Chronicle of the Transition Cemetery. Privatization of Socially Owned Capital in Serbia 1989-2012. Economic and Historical Analysis), Nova srpska politička misao, Institut za istoriju radničkog pokreta Srbije, Beograd, 2017.
[39]	“The Global Balkans collective interview with Secretary of the Coordinating Committee for Workers Protest in Serbia Milenko Srećković, from Freedom Fight movement in Serbia”, in Deindustrijalizacija i radnički otpor. Borbe i inicijative za očuvanje radnih mesta u periodu tranzicije (Deindustrialization and Labor Resistance: Combative and Initiatives for Preservation of Employment in Transition), edited by Vladislav Bailović…et al., Pokret za slobodu, Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, Beograd, 2011, pp. 110-111, 341, 342, 343.
[40]	Danas, 19^th December 2013.
[41]	Deindustrijalizacija i radnički otpor. Borbe i inicijative za očuvanje radnih mesta u periodu tranzicije (Deindustrialization and Labor Resistance: Combative and Initiatives for Preservation of Employment in Transition), edited by Vladislav Bailović…et al., Pokret za slobodu, Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, Beograd, 2011, pp. 239-251.
[42]	Službeni glasnik RS, broj 55, 27th July 2011.
[43]	Politika, 17^th November 2013, p. 11.
[44]	Ljubodrag Savić, „Nova strategija industrijalizacije kao osnov brzog oporavka“(“New Industrial Strategy as Basis of Rapid Recovery”) in Deindustrijalizacija u Srbiji. Mogućnosti revitalizacije industrijskog sektora (Deindustrialization in Serbia. Possibilities for Industrial Sector revival in Serbia), redaktor Božo Drašković, Institut ekonomskih nauka, 2014, Beograd.
[45]	Zakon o privrednim društvima (Law on Economic Enterprises), Službeni glasnik RS, br. 36/2011, br. 83/2014, br. 95/2018; Službeni glasnik RS, br. 83/2014.
[46]	Zakon o privatizaciji (Privatization Law) Službeni glasnik RS, br. 38/2001, 18/2003, 45/2005, 123/2007, 83/2014 i 20/2016.
[47]	Zakon o penzijskom i invalidskom osiguranju (Pension and Disability Law), Službeni glasnik RS, br. 34, 2003, 64/2005, 5/2009 i 86/2019.
[48]	Zakon o stečaju (Bankruptcy Law), Službeni glasnik RS, br. 107/2009 i 95/2018; Porodični zakon (Family Law), Službeni glasnik RS, br. 18/2005 i 6/2015.
[49]	Zakon o zapošljavanju i osiguranju za slučaj nezaposlenosti (Employment Law and Unemployment Insurance), Službeni glasnik RS, br 36/2009, 38/2015 i 113/2017.
[50]	Article 60 of the Constitution of The Republic of Serbia: Ustav Republike Srbije, Službeni glasnik RS, br. 98/2006.
[51]	Labor Law, Službeni glasnik RS, br. 74/2014.
[52]	Labor Law Article 51, Službeni glasnik RS, br. 74/2014.
[53]	Sarita Bardaš, Luka Petrović, Protiv prekarnog rada-za dostojanstven rad. Priručnik za sindikalne predstavnike (Against Precarious Employment for Dignified Labor. A Manuel for Trade Unions’ Representatives), Fondacija Centar za demokratiju, Beograd, 2019, p. 5.
[54]	G. Vlaović, „Nezadovoljni radnici po ugovoru u EPS Distribuciji“ (“Dissatisfied Workers on Contract Employment”), Danas, 13 June 2018, Marija Brakočević, “Privremeni poslovi – problem stalni” (“Temporary Work – Constant Problems”), Politika, 14^th September 2016.
[55]	Zakon o bezbednosti i zdravlju na radu (Law on Safety and Health in Work Place), Službeni glasnik RS, br. 91/2015 i 113/2017.
[56]	A DIS /supermarket chain/ employee was fired for taking a toilet break Danas, 27 June 2017.
[57]	Nada Novaković, Radnička klasa i tranzicija u Srbiji od 1990. do 2015. godine (Working-class and Transition in Serbia from 1990 to 2015), Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung Southeast Europe, Institut društvenih nauka, Beograd, 2017, p. 230.
[58]	Zakon o mirnom rešavanju radnih sporova (Mediation Law), Službeni glasnik RS, br. 125/2004, 104/2009 i 50/2018.
[59]	Zakon o dualnom obrazovanju (Dual Education Law), Službeni glasnik RS, br. 101/2017.
[60]	Zakoni o finansijskoj pomoći porodici sa decom (Law on Financial Aid for Families with children), Službeni glasnik RS, br. 113/2017 i 50/2018.
[61]	Simo Vuković, Standardi u javnom zdravstvu i EU- Poglavlje 28 (Public Health Standards and EU – Chapter 28), Beograd, 2020, p. p. 2, 4.
[62]	Zakon o štrajku (Strike Law), Službeni list SRJ, br. 29/96, Službeni glasnik RS, br. 101/2005.
[63]	ILO manual: second version, International Labor Office, Geneva, 2013, retrieved from at: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/--dg reports/--stat/documents/publication/wcms_223121.pdf (Accessed on 10^th of July 2021).
[64]	Anketa o radnoj snazi (Employment Poll), Republika Srbija, Republički zavod za statistiku, SAOPŠTENJE, broj 182, god. LXXI, 30^th June 2021.
[65]	Srećko Mihailović, Evropeizacija sindikata Srbije. Sindikati Srbije pred izazovima sudelovanja u procesima pridruživanja i u odnosima sa evropskim sindikalnim organizacijama (Europeanization of Serbia’s Union. Unions in Serbia Facing Challenges in the Process of Accession and Relations with European Unions), Fondacija Fridrih Ebert, Centar za razvoj sindikalizma, Beograd, 2015, p. 31.
[66]	Archive of Konfederacija slobodnih sindikata, 25. maj 2011.
[67]	Socijalno-ekonomski savet Republike Srbije, Izveštaj o radu Socijalno-ekonomskog saveta i Sekretarijata u 2015. godini (The Socio-Economic Council of Republic of Serbia, Report on the work of the Socio-Economic Council and Secretariat in 2015), Beograd, 46/2016.
[68]	Srećko Mihailović, Evropeizacija sindikata Srbije. Sindikati Srbije pred izazovima sudelovanja u procesima pridruživanja i u odnosima sa evropskim sindikalnim organizacijama (Europeanization of Serbia’s Union. Unions in Serbia Facing Challenges in the Process of Accession and Relations with European Unions), Fondacija Fridrih Ebert, Centar za razvoj sindikalizma, Beograd, 2015, p. 28.
[69]	Politika, 20^thJuly 2021, p. 10.
[70]	Politika, 15^thJuly 2021, p. 11
[71]	Srećko Mihailović, Evropeizacija sindikata Srbije. Sindikati Srbije pred izazovima sudelovanja u procesima pridruživanja i u odnosima sa evropskim sindikalnim organizacijama (Europeanization of Serbia’s Union. Unions in Serbia Facing Challenges in the Process of Accession and Relations with European Unions), Fondacija Fridrih Ebert, Centar za razvoj sindikalizma, Beograd, 2015, p. 36.
[72]	EU-Serbia Civil Society Joint Consultative Committee, 3rd meeting 7 October 2016, www.eesc.europa.eu?/i=portal.en.serbia; accessed on 20^th October 2016.
[73]	Srećko Mihailović, Evropeizacija sindikata Srbije. Sindikati Srbije pred izazovima sudelovanja u procesima pridruživanja i u odnosima sa evropskim sindikalnim organizacijama (Europeanization of Serbia’s Union. Unions in Serbia Facing Challenges in the Process of Accession and Relations with European Union), Fondacija Fridrih Ebert, Centar za razvoj sindikalizma, Beograd, 2015, p. 35.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Nada Novakovic, Marija Obradovic. (2021). Social Status and Class Identity of the Organized Working Class in Serbia. Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(6), 258-272. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Nada Novakovic; Marija Obradovic. Social Status and Class Identity of the Organized Working Class in Serbia. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2021, 9(6), 258-272. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Nada Novakovic, Marija Obradovic. Social Status and Class Identity of the Organized Working Class in Serbia. Humanit Soc Sci. 2021;9(6):258-272. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17,
  author = {Nada Novakovic and Marija Obradovic},
  title = {Social Status and Class Identity of the Organized Working Class in Serbia},
  journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences},
  volume = {9},
  number = {6},
  pages = {258-272},
  doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20210906.17},
  abstract = {This article explores the relationship between the European identity of the organized working class and its class power in Serbian society. We understand the collective European identity of the organized working class in Serbia to primarily mean adherence to the European social model embodied in collective bargaining, that is, in a social dialogue among social partners: the trade unions, employers, and the state. The European identity of the organized working class in Serbia is also reflected in its support for the values of human rights, private property, the market economy, and multi-party parliamentary democracy. We understand “trade union power” to mean the extent of its capacity to achieve set goals. That is, how much the commitment and the efforts of the representative trade unions in Serbia: The Confederation of Autonomous Trade Unions of Serbia (SSSS/CATUS) and The Trade Union Confederation (UGS/TUC) “Nezavisnost” („Independence”) to join the European trade union movement and become members of the European Trade Union Confederation, the only representative European trade union organization and the recognized social partner at the level of the European Union, contributed to the more prominent role and a more remarkable power of these trade unions in Serbia. Our research is based on the critical discourse analysis (CDA) – discourse-historical approach (DHA), and economic history context.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Social Status and Class Identity of the Organized Working Class in Serbia
AU  - Nada Novakovic
AU  - Marija Obradovic
Y1  - 2021/11/27
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17
DO  - 10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17
T2  - Humanities and Social Sciences
JF  - Humanities and Social Sciences
JO  - Humanities and Social Sciences
SP  - 258
EP  - 272
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8184
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17
AB  - This article explores the relationship between the European identity of the organized working class and its class power in Serbian society. We understand the collective European identity of the organized working class in Serbia to primarily mean adherence to the European social model embodied in collective bargaining, that is, in a social dialogue among social partners: the trade unions, employers, and the state. The European identity of the organized working class in Serbia is also reflected in its support for the values of human rights, private property, the market economy, and multi-party parliamentary democracy. We understand “trade union power” to mean the extent of its capacity to achieve set goals. That is, how much the commitment and the efforts of the representative trade unions in Serbia: The Confederation of Autonomous Trade Unions of Serbia (SSSS/CATUS) and The Trade Union Confederation (UGS/TUC) “Nezavisnost” („Independence”) to join the European trade union movement and become members of the European Trade Union Confederation, the only representative European trade union organization and the recognized social partner at the level of the European Union, contributed to the more prominent role and a more remarkable power of these trade unions in Serbia. Our research is based on the critical discourse analysis (CDA) – discourse-historical approach (DHA), and economic history context.
VL  - 9
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Nada Novakovic

Institute of Social Sciences, Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Marija Obradovic

Institute for Recent History of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Nada Novakovic, Marija Obradovic. (2021). Social Status and Class Identity of the Organized Working Class in Serbia. Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(6), 258-272. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Nada Novakovic; Marija Obradovic. Social Status and Class Identity of the Organized Working Class in Serbia. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2021, 9(6), 258-272. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Nada Novakovic, Marija Obradovic. Social Status and Class Identity of the Organized Working Class in Serbia. Humanit Soc Sci. 2021;9(6):258-272. doi: 10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17,
  author = {Nada Novakovic and Marija Obradovic},
  title = {Social Status and Class Identity of the Organized Working Class in Serbia},
  journal = {Humanities and Social Sciences},
  volume = {9},
  number = {6},
  pages = {258-272},
  doi = {10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.hss.20210906.17},
  abstract = {This article explores the relationship between the European identity of the organized working class and its class power in Serbian society. We understand the collective European identity of the organized working class in Serbia to primarily mean adherence to the European social model embodied in collective bargaining, that is, in a social dialogue among social partners: the trade unions, employers, and the state. The European identity of the organized working class in Serbia is also reflected in its support for the values of human rights, private property, the market economy, and multi-party parliamentary democracy. We understand “trade union power” to mean the extent of its capacity to achieve set goals. That is, how much the commitment and the efforts of the representative trade unions in Serbia: The Confederation of Autonomous Trade Unions of Serbia (SSSS/CATUS) and The Trade Union Confederation (UGS/TUC) “Nezavisnost” („Independence”) to join the European trade union movement and become members of the European Trade Union Confederation, the only representative European trade union organization and the recognized social partner at the level of the European Union, contributed to the more prominent role and a more remarkable power of these trade unions in Serbia. Our research is based on the critical discourse analysis (CDA) – discourse-historical approach (DHA), and economic history context.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Social Status and Class Identity of the Organized Working Class in Serbia
AU  - Nada Novakovic
AU  - Marija Obradovic
Y1  - 2021/11/27
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17
DO  - 10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17
T2  - Humanities and Social Sciences
JF  - Humanities and Social Sciences
JO  - Humanities and Social Sciences
SP  - 258
EP  - 272
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8184
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.hss.20210906.17
AB  - This article explores the relationship between the European identity of the organized working class and its class power in Serbian society. We understand the collective European identity of the organized working class in Serbia to primarily mean adherence to the European social model embodied in collective bargaining, that is, in a social dialogue among social partners: the trade unions, employers, and the state. The European identity of the organized working class in Serbia is also reflected in its support for the values of human rights, private property, the market economy, and multi-party parliamentary democracy. We understand “trade union power” to mean the extent of its capacity to achieve set goals. That is, how much the commitment and the efforts of the representative trade unions in Serbia: The Confederation of Autonomous Trade Unions of Serbia (SSSS/CATUS) and The Trade Union Confederation (UGS/TUC) “Nezavisnost” („Independence”) to join the European trade union movement and become members of the European Trade Union Confederation, the only representative European trade union organization and the recognized social partner at the level of the European Union, contributed to the more prominent role and a more remarkable power of these trade unions in Serbia. Our research is based on the critical discourse analysis (CDA) – discourse-historical approach (DHA), and economic history context.
VL  - 9
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download