| Peer-Reviewed

Systematic Study and Reflection on Planning Paradigms of German Urban Renewal

Received: 23 November 2021    Accepted: 6 December 2021    Published: 11 December 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Urban renewal plays a crucial role in promoting sustainable spatial development and structural growth for cities in respect of urban planning and landscape architecture. It is defined as a complex process involving demographic, physical and socio-economic dimensions. The time-tested process of urban renewal in Germany has provided both theoretical and practical experience for the rest of the world. In this context, a systematic and diachronic method is adopted to elaborate on three planning paradigms of German urban renewal. Reflective of the prosperity and reconstruction, structural changes and shrinking process of cities, the critical evolution of urban renewal planning paradigms is subjected to the profound influence from spatial, historic, social, and political factors in different periods. Therefore, according to the needs for urban development, this study focuses on analyzing three essential paradigms of total-demolition reconstruction, careful urban renewal and critical reconstruction, and urban regeneration. On this basis, the evolution of urban renewal is reflected on from such perspectives as institutional guarantee of the federal-state-local framework, the financial support through multiple funding projects, and the critical urban landscape conceptions. In conclusion, there are three aspects of planning paradigms. The first one is critical thinking as a key factor in the scientific analysis of urban spaces and structures. The second one is a full understanding of urban renewal based on the establishment of a complex system. The last one is the positive changes to the evolution of cities and the formation of resilient urban landscapes in the future.

Published in International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications (Volume 7, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20210704.14
Page(s) 131-136
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Germany, Planning Paradigm, Urban Renewal, Urban Regeneration

References
[1] Stampe, E. (2002). Wohnungssuche 1951 2. http://www.hdg.de/lemo/zeitzeugen/edith-stampe-wohnungssuche.html. 2021, August 31.
[2] Zabel, R., Kwon, Y. (2021). Evolution of Urban Development and Regeneration Funding Programs in German Cities. Cities The International Journal of Urban Policy and Planning, 111 (4), 1-13.
[3] Alisch, M. (2007). Empowerment und governance: Interdisziplinäre Gestaltung in der sozialen Stadtentwicklung. Die Stadt in der Sozialen Arbeit. D. Baum. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 305–315.
[4] Kleihues, J., Hämer, H. (1989). Berlin Modern Architecture. Berlin: Gernot & Nalbach.
[5] Pahl-Weber, E., Henckel, D. (2008). The Planning System and Planning Terms in Germany A Glossary. Hannover: ARL•Hannover.
[6] Kühn, M., Liebmann, H. (2012). Urban Regeneration- Strategies of Shrinking Cities in Eastern Germany. Die Erde 143, 135-152.
[7] Keim, K. -D. (2001). Regenerierung schrumpfender Städte -zur Umbaudebatte in Ostdeutschland. Erkner: REGIO Transfer 1.
[8] Holm, A. (2014). Gentrification im langen Schatten der Behutsamen Stadterneuerung. https://zeithistorische-forschungen.de/2-2014/5105?language=en. 2021, August 31.
[9] Schöbel, S. (2018). Landschaftsvertrag zur kritischen Rekonstruktion der Kulturlandschaft. Berlin: Jovis.
[10] Bodenschatz H. (2013). Berlin Urban Design. A Brief History of a European City. Berlin: DOM Publishers.
[11] Dong, N. (2011). Interim Use of Open Space in Urban Renewal of the Federal Republic of Germany. Urban Planning International, 26 (1), 105-108.
[12] Internationale Bauausstellungen. IBA Berlin Die Innenstadt als Wohnort. https://www.internationale-bauausstellungen.de/geschichte/1979-1984-87-iba-berlin-die-innenstadt-als-wohnort/. 2021, April 10.
[13] Yi, X., Kunzmann, K. (2017). Learning from Urban Germany: Challenges and Strategies of Spatial Development in Germany. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.
[14] Couch, C. (2011). Thirty Years of Urban Regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The Importance of the Context and Path Dependency. Progress in Planning, 75, 1-52.
[15] Couch, C., Fraser, C., Percy, S. (2003). Urban Regeneration in Europe. Oxford.
[16] Häussermann, H., Siebel, W. (1988). Die schrumpfende Stadt und die Stadtsoziologie. In: Fridrichs, J. Soziologische Stadtforschung. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Opladen: Sonderheft 29, 78-94.
[17] Van Meerkerk, I., Boonstra, B., Edelenbos, J. (2013). Self-Organization in Urban Regeneration: A Two-Case Comparative Research. Eur. Plan. Stud, 21, 1630–1652.
[18] Xie, F., Liu, G., Zhuang, T. (2021). A Comprehensive Review of Urban Regeneration Governance for Developing Appropriate Governance Arrangements. Land, 10, 1-28.
[19] Roberts, P., Sykes, H. (2000). Urban Regeneration: a Handbook. California: Sage.
[20] Yi, X., Bodenschatz, H., Frick, D., Hofmann, A. (2017). Europäischer Städtebau Zukunftsweisende Beispiele. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press.
[21] Di, L., Tang, J., Zhao, X., Liu, H. (2021). A Comparative Study of Urban Regeneration Systems in the Developed Countries and Their Enlightenment to China: Taking France, Germany, Japan, Britain and the United States as Examples. Urban Planning International, 36 (3), 50-58.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Mengyixin Li. (2021). Systematic Study and Reflection on Planning Paradigms of German Urban Renewal. International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications, 7(4), 131-136. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20210704.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Mengyixin Li. Systematic Study and Reflection on Planning Paradigms of German Urban Renewal. Int. J. Archit. Arts Appl. 2021, 7(4), 131-136. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20210704.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Mengyixin Li. Systematic Study and Reflection on Planning Paradigms of German Urban Renewal. Int J Archit Arts Appl. 2021;7(4):131-136. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20210704.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijaaa.20210704.14,
      author = {Mengyixin Li},
      title = {Systematic Study and Reflection on Planning Paradigms of German Urban Renewal},
      journal = {International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications},
      volume = {7},
      number = {4},
      pages = {131-136},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijaaa.20210704.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20210704.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaaa.20210704.14},
      abstract = {Urban renewal plays a crucial role in promoting sustainable spatial development and structural growth for cities in respect of urban planning and landscape architecture. It is defined as a complex process involving demographic, physical and socio-economic dimensions. The time-tested process of urban renewal in Germany has provided both theoretical and practical experience for the rest of the world. In this context, a systematic and diachronic method is adopted to elaborate on three planning paradigms of German urban renewal. Reflective of the prosperity and reconstruction, structural changes and shrinking process of cities, the critical evolution of urban renewal planning paradigms is subjected to the profound influence from spatial, historic, social, and political factors in different periods. Therefore, according to the needs for urban development, this study focuses on analyzing three essential paradigms of total-demolition reconstruction, careful urban renewal and critical reconstruction, and urban regeneration. On this basis, the evolution of urban renewal is reflected on from such perspectives as institutional guarantee of the federal-state-local framework, the financial support through multiple funding projects, and the critical urban landscape conceptions. In conclusion, there are three aspects of planning paradigms. The first one is critical thinking as a key factor in the scientific analysis of urban spaces and structures. The second one is a full understanding of urban renewal based on the establishment of a complex system. The last one is the positive changes to the evolution of cities and the formation of resilient urban landscapes in the future.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Systematic Study and Reflection on Planning Paradigms of German Urban Renewal
    AU  - Mengyixin Li
    Y1  - 2021/12/11
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20210704.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20210704.14
    T2  - International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications
    JF  - International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications
    JO  - International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications
    SP  - 131
    EP  - 136
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2472-1131
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20210704.14
    AB  - Urban renewal plays a crucial role in promoting sustainable spatial development and structural growth for cities in respect of urban planning and landscape architecture. It is defined as a complex process involving demographic, physical and socio-economic dimensions. The time-tested process of urban renewal in Germany has provided both theoretical and practical experience for the rest of the world. In this context, a systematic and diachronic method is adopted to elaborate on three planning paradigms of German urban renewal. Reflective of the prosperity and reconstruction, structural changes and shrinking process of cities, the critical evolution of urban renewal planning paradigms is subjected to the profound influence from spatial, historic, social, and political factors in different periods. Therefore, according to the needs for urban development, this study focuses on analyzing three essential paradigms of total-demolition reconstruction, careful urban renewal and critical reconstruction, and urban regeneration. On this basis, the evolution of urban renewal is reflected on from such perspectives as institutional guarantee of the federal-state-local framework, the financial support through multiple funding projects, and the critical urban landscape conceptions. In conclusion, there are three aspects of planning paradigms. The first one is critical thinking as a key factor in the scientific analysis of urban spaces and structures. The second one is a full understanding of urban renewal based on the establishment of a complex system. The last one is the positive changes to the evolution of cities and the formation of resilient urban landscapes in the future.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • The School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Faculty of Landscape Architecture, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing, China

  • Sections