Drip irrigation, combined with mulch and deficit water application, can significantly improve the water efficiency of irrigated agriculture. Study at Ambo Agricultural Research Center during the 2021/22 and 2022/23 irrigation seasons aimed to determine the most suitable deficit levels and mulch for drip-irrigated onion. The experiment used a randomized complete block design with two factors: irrigation levels (at 55%, 70%, 85%, and 100% of the Evapotranspiration of the crop) and mulch types (un-mulched, plastic, and straw mulch), resulting in a total of twelve treatment combinations replicated three times. The results showed that irrigation levels and mulch significantly affect bulb yield, water productivity, and yield-attributing parameters. Applying 100% ETc level and straw mulch resulted in the highest yields of 39450 kg/ha and 41038 kg/ha, respectively. On the other hand, the lowest yields were obtained with 55% ETc levels and un-mulched treatments, with respective values of 30913 kg/ha and 33969 kg/ha. Water productivity was also higher for irrigation levels at 55% and 70% ETc compared to 85% and 100% ETc, with values of 10.1 kg/m3 and 9.7 kg/m3, respectively. Additionally, straw mulch application resulted in significantly higher water productivity. Economic analysis indicated that straw mulch had a higher net return with 369% MRR (Marginal Rate of Return) and a benefit-cost ratio of 32.8, while applying a 70% ETc level resulted in a 125% MRR. Based on the results, 70% ETc level with straw mulch for onion production is recommended for the study area, considering bulb yield, water productivity, and economic viability.
Published in | International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.14 |
Page(s) | 297-309 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Economic Return, Irrigation Level, Onion, Straw Mulch, and Water Productivity
[1] | Eshete DG, Sinshaw BG, Legese KG. Critical review on improving irrigation water use efficiency : Advances, challenges, and opportunities in the Ethiopia context. Water-Energy Nexus 2020 (3): 143–54. |
[2] | Yang P, Wu L, Cheng M, Fan J, Li S, Wang H, et al. Review on Drip Irrigation: Impact on Crop Yield, Quality, and Water Productivity in China. Water (Switzerland) 2023; (15): 1–18. |
[3] | Osman R, Ferrari E, Mcdonald S. Water Scarcity and Irrigation Ef fi ciency in Egypt. J Water Econ Policy 2016; (2): 1–28. |
[4] | Asres LA. Alternative Techniques of Irrigation Water Management for Improving Crop Water Productivity. J Agric Sci 2023; (11): 36–53. |
[5] | Ali A, Chunping X, Cheng J, Muhammad Faisal. Investment profitability and economic efficiency of the drip irrigation system : Evidence from Egypt *. J Irrig Drain 2020: 1–18. |
[6] | Alcon F, Navarro N, Dolores M, Balbo AL. Drip Irrigation Technology : Analysis of Adoption and Diffusion Processes. J Sustain Solut Food Secur 2019: 269–85. |
[7] | Gebremicael GGTG, Hagos H, Teferi G, Kifl M. Farmers’ perception towards the challenges and determinant factors in the adoption of drip irrigation in the semi-arid areas of Tigray, Ethiopia. Sustain Water Resour Manag 2018; (4): 527–37. |
[8] | Enius MAG, Oundouri PHK, Auges CÉN, Zouvelekas VAT. Information Transmission in Irrigation Technology Adoption and Diffusion: Social Learning, Extension Services, and Spatial Effects. Am J OfAgricultural Appl Econ 2013; (96): 328–44. |
[9] | Zakhem BA, Ain FAL, Hafez R. Assessment of Field Water Budget Components for Increasing Water Productivity Under Drip Irrigation in Arid and Semi-Arid Areas, Syria. J Irrig Drain 2019: 1–12. |
[10] | SK B, AR A, Rahman MS, MA H. Effect of drip irrigation and mulching on yield, water-use efficiency and economics of tomato. J Plant Soil Environ 2015; (61): 97–102. |
[11] | Berbel J, Expósito A, Gutiérrez-martín C, Mateos L. Effects of the Irrigation Modernization in Spain 2002 – 2015. J Water Resour Manag 2019; (33): 1835–49. |
[12] | Shock CC. Sustainable agriculture techniques Drip Irrigation : An Introduction. U. S: 2013. |
[13] | Sujeewa RM, Mikunthan T, Sayanthan S, Thushyanthi Y, Piraphaharan M. Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Growth and Yield of Red Onion (Allium cepa) in Drip Irrigation System. Sch J Agric Vet Sci 2020; (7): 144–50. |
[14] | Fereres E, Rabanales CU De. Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. J Exp Bot 2007; (58): 147–59. |
[15] | Kirda C. Deficit irrigation scheduling based on plant growth stages showing water stress tolerance 2002; (22): 3–10. |
[16] | Enchalew B, Sl G, Rabo M, Hindaye B, Kedir M, Musa Y, et al. Irrigation & Drainage Systems Engineering Effect of Deficit Irrigation on Water Productivity of Onion (Allium cepal.) under Drip Irrigation. J Irrig Drain Syst Eng 2016; (5): 5–8. |
[17] | Abdelkhalik A, Pascual-seva N, Nájera I, Domene MÁ, Baixauli C, Pascual B. Effect of Deficit Irrigation on the Productive Response of Drip-irrigated Onion (Allium cepa L.) in Mediterranean Conditions Effect of Deficit Irrigation on the Productive Response of Drip-irrigated Onion (Allium cepa L.) in Mediterranean Conditions. J Japanese Socity Hortic Sci 2019: 1–12. |
[18] | El-Metwally IM, El-Wakeel MA. Comparison of safe weed control methods with chemical herbicide in potato field. Bull Natl Res Cent 2019; (43): 1–7. |
[19] | Inusah BIY, Wiredu AN, Yirzagla J, Mawunya M, Haruna M. Effect of different mulches on the yield and productivity of drip irrigated onions under tropical conditions. Int J Adv Agric Res 2013: 133–40. |
[20] | Lakew WJ, Anteneh BA, Ayalew LT. Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Mulched Drip-Irrigated Onion in Low Land Region of Amhara, North Central Ethiopia. Univers J Agric Res 2014; (2): 203–10. |
[21] | Metwally I El, Geries L, Saudy H. Interactive effect of soil mulching and irrigation regime on yield, irrigation water use efficiency and weeds of trickle – irrigated onion. Arch Agron Soil Sci 2021: 1–13. |
[22] | Teame G, Tsegay A, Abrha B. Effect of Organic Mulching on Soil Moisture, Yield, and Yield Contributing Components of Sesame (Sesamum indicum L.). Int J Agron 2017: 1–7. |
[23] | Megersa HG. Onion (Allium cepa L.) Yield Improvement Progress in Ethiopia: A Review. Int J Ournal Agric Biosci 2018; (6): 265–71. |
[24] | Alemu D, Kitila C, Garedew W, Jule L, Badassa B, Nagaprasad N, et al. Growth, yield, and yield variables of onion (Allium Cepa L.) varieties as influenced by plantspacing at DambiDollo, Western Ethiopia. Sci Rep 2022: 1–9. |
[25] | Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D. Crop evapotranspiration guidelines for computing crop requirements. FAO Irrig. Drain. Report modeling and application Article. Rome, Italy: 1998. |
[26] | Robi AT, Gemeda F, Ahmed B, Bedaso N. Evaluating Water Productivity of Onion under Deficit Irrigation using Drip Irrigation System for Small Holder Farmers 2023; (7): 7–20. |
[27] | Yacoubi S, Zayani K, Slatni A, Playán E. Assessing Sprinkler Irrigation Performance Using Field Evaluations at the Medjerda Lower Valley of Tunisia 2012; (4): 682–91. |
[28] | Zwart SJ, Bastiaanssen WGM. Review of measured crop water productivity values for irrigated wheat, rice, cotton and maize. Agric Water Manag 2004; (69): 115–33. |
[29] | Hassene JN, Seid MT. Comparative Performance Evaluation of Alternate and Convectional Furrow Irrigation under Different Water Application Level on Cabbage Water Use Efficiency and Economic Analysis. Am J Environ Resour Econ 2017; (2): 123–31. |
[30] | Doorenbos J, Kassam AH. Yield response to water. FAO Irrigation and Drainage, Paper 33 1979: 203. |
[31] | CIMMYT. From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An Economics Training Manual. Completely revised edition. Mexico. D. F: 1988. |
[32] | Biswas SK, Roy DK, Sarker K, Mila A. Effects of Deficit Irrigation and Mulching on Seed Yield and Water Use of Onion Effects of Deficit Irrigation and Mulching on Seed Yield and Water Use of Onion (Allium cepa L.). Int J Plant Soil Sci 2017; (20): 1–11. |
[33] | Mishra S, Pyasi SK, Awasthi MK, Shrivastava RN. Improving water efficiency and crop yield of drip- irrigated onions through the application of deficit irrigation, mulching, and fertigation. Pharma Innov J 2023; (12): 2368–71. |
[34] | Sali AM, Alemayehu Y, Hordofa T. Effects Deficit Irrigation and Mulching on Yield and Water Productivity of Furrow Irrigated Onion (Allium Cepa L.) Under Haramaya Condition, Eastern Ethiopia. Turkish J Agric - Food Sci Technol 2022; (10): 360–7. |
[35] | Mubarak I, Altayeb H. Onion Crop Response to Regulated Deficit Irrigation Under Mulching in Dry Mediterranean Region. J Hortic Res 2018; (26): 87–94. |
APA Style
Bekele, S., Firissa, O. (2024). Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Mulch Application on Onion (Allium cepa L.) Bulb Yield and Water Productivity Under Drip Irrigation at Ambo, West Shoa, Ethiopia. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences, 10(6), 297-309. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.14
ACS Style
Bekele, S.; Firissa, O. Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Mulch Application on Onion (Allium cepa L.) Bulb Yield and Water Productivity Under Drip Irrigation at Ambo, West Shoa, Ethiopia. Int. J. Appl. Agric. Sci. 2024, 10(6), 297-309. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.14
AMA Style
Bekele S, Firissa O. Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Mulch Application on Onion (Allium cepa L.) Bulb Yield and Water Productivity Under Drip Irrigation at Ambo, West Shoa, Ethiopia. Int J Appl Agric Sci. 2024;10(6):297-309. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.14
@article{10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.14, author = {Selamawit Bekele and Oli Firissa}, title = {Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Mulch Application on Onion (Allium cepa L.) Bulb Yield and Water Productivity Under Drip Irrigation at Ambo, West Shoa, Ethiopia }, journal = {International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences}, volume = {10}, number = {6}, pages = {297-309}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaas.20241006.14}, abstract = {Drip irrigation, combined with mulch and deficit water application, can significantly improve the water efficiency of irrigated agriculture. Study at Ambo Agricultural Research Center during the 2021/22 and 2022/23 irrigation seasons aimed to determine the most suitable deficit levels and mulch for drip-irrigated onion. The experiment used a randomized complete block design with two factors: irrigation levels (at 55%, 70%, 85%, and 100% of the Evapotranspiration of the crop) and mulch types (un-mulched, plastic, and straw mulch), resulting in a total of twelve treatment combinations replicated three times. The results showed that irrigation levels and mulch significantly affect bulb yield, water productivity, and yield-attributing parameters. Applying 100% ETc level and straw mulch resulted in the highest yields of 39450 kg/ha and 41038 kg/ha, respectively. On the other hand, the lowest yields were obtained with 55% ETc levels and un-mulched treatments, with respective values of 30913 kg/ha and 33969 kg/ha. Water productivity was also higher for irrigation levels at 55% and 70% ETc compared to 85% and 100% ETc, with values of 10.1 kg/m3 and 9.7 kg/m3, respectively. Additionally, straw mulch application resulted in significantly higher water productivity. Economic analysis indicated that straw mulch had a higher net return with 369% MRR (Marginal Rate of Return) and a benefit-cost ratio of 32.8, while applying a 70% ETc level resulted in a 125% MRR. Based on the results, 70% ETc level with straw mulch for onion production is recommended for the study area, considering bulb yield, water productivity, and economic viability. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Deficit Irrigation and Mulch Application on Onion (Allium cepa L.) Bulb Yield and Water Productivity Under Drip Irrigation at Ambo, West Shoa, Ethiopia AU - Selamawit Bekele AU - Oli Firissa Y1 - 2024/11/29 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.14 T2 - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JF - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences JO - International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences SP - 297 EP - 309 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-7885 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaas.20241006.14 AB - Drip irrigation, combined with mulch and deficit water application, can significantly improve the water efficiency of irrigated agriculture. Study at Ambo Agricultural Research Center during the 2021/22 and 2022/23 irrigation seasons aimed to determine the most suitable deficit levels and mulch for drip-irrigated onion. The experiment used a randomized complete block design with two factors: irrigation levels (at 55%, 70%, 85%, and 100% of the Evapotranspiration of the crop) and mulch types (un-mulched, plastic, and straw mulch), resulting in a total of twelve treatment combinations replicated three times. The results showed that irrigation levels and mulch significantly affect bulb yield, water productivity, and yield-attributing parameters. Applying 100% ETc level and straw mulch resulted in the highest yields of 39450 kg/ha and 41038 kg/ha, respectively. On the other hand, the lowest yields were obtained with 55% ETc levels and un-mulched treatments, with respective values of 30913 kg/ha and 33969 kg/ha. Water productivity was also higher for irrigation levels at 55% and 70% ETc compared to 85% and 100% ETc, with values of 10.1 kg/m3 and 9.7 kg/m3, respectively. Additionally, straw mulch application resulted in significantly higher water productivity. Economic analysis indicated that straw mulch had a higher net return with 369% MRR (Marginal Rate of Return) and a benefit-cost ratio of 32.8, while applying a 70% ETc level resulted in a 125% MRR. Based on the results, 70% ETc level with straw mulch for onion production is recommended for the study area, considering bulb yield, water productivity, and economic viability. VL - 10 IS - 6 ER -