Multicollinearity is an unavoidable problem being faced by researchers in financial and Economic data. It refers to a situation where the degrees of correlations between two or more independent variables are high. This is to say, one explanatory variable can be used in forecasting the other variable. This creates redundant information in a series under study, skewing the results in regression models. There is need to search for the source of the problem and proffering solution to this problem in Economics and Financial data. The data used was extracted from the record of Federal trade commission (FTC), 2019. The commission usually ranks annually arrays of locally made cigarettes in relation to Tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide components that was made available. Farrah-Glauber test and variance inflation factor were used as methods of detection multicollinearity in this paper. SPSS and J-muliti packages were used to analyse the data collected for empirical illustration. The results of analysis indicated that variance inflation factor of X1 and X2 (Tar and Nicotine) are far above 10 (21.63 and 21.90) must be removed or collapsed from the model in order to correct multicollinearity. So, the preciseness of VIF made it to be preferred to Farrah-Glauber test. In line with the analysis, the use of Variance Inflation Factor is more preferred to Farrah-Glauber method. As VIF not only detected but also pointed to the direction of the problem.
Published in | International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics (Volume 7, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijamtp.20210703.11 |
Page(s) | 62-67 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Multicollinearity, Farrah-Glauber, Predictor, Variance Inflation Factor, Financial and Economic Data, Regression Model
[1] | Alin, A. 2010. Multicollinearity. Journal of WIREs Computational Statistics How does Climate Change affect biodiversity, Vol. 2 No. 3. |
[2] | Ayinde, K; Lukman, AF; Arowolo, OT (2015). Combined parameters estimation methods of linear regression model with multicollinearity and autocorrelation. Journal of Asian Scientific Research 5 (5), 243–250. |
[3] | Belsley, D. A. 1991. Conditioning Diagnostics: Collinearity and Weak Data Regression. John Wiley, New York. |
[4] | Chatfield, C. 1995. Model uncertainty, data mining and statistical inference. Journal of Royal Statistical Society Vol. 158, No. 3: 419-466. |
[5] | Graham, M. H. 2003. Confronting multicollinearity in ecological multiple regression. journal of Ecology society of America Vol. 84, No. 11: 2809-2815. |
[6] | Goldberger, Arthur, 1991. A course in Econometrics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press). |
[7] | Greene, William H., 2003. Econometric Analysis (5th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall). |
[8] | Ismail, B; Manjula, S (2016). Estimation of linear regression model with correlated regressors in the presence of autocorrelation. International Journal of Statistics and Applications 6 (2), 35–39. |
[9] | Kalnins, Arturs, 2018. “Multicollinearity: How common factors cause Type 1 errors in multivariate regression,” Strategic Management Journal 22, issue 10. |
[10] | Kiers, H. A. L. and Smilde, A. K. 2007. A comparison of various methods for multivariate regression with highly collinear variables. Journal of Statistical Methods and Applications Vol. 4, No. 6: 193-228. |
[11] | Lukman, AF; Osowole, O. I; Ayinde, K (2015). Two stage robust method in a linear regression model. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 14 (2), 53–67. |
[12] | Meloun, M., Militiky, J. and Hilli, M. 2002. Crucial problems in regression modelling and their solutions. Journal of Analyst Vol. 12, No. 7: 433-450. |
[13] | Mikolajczyk, DiSilvestro A, Zhang J. 2008. Evaluation of logistic regression reporting in current obstetrics and gynecology literature. Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Vol. 111 No. 10: 413-419. |
[14] | Murray, C. J. L., Kulkarni SC, Michaud C, Tomijima N. and Bulzacchelli. MT, 2006. Eight Americas: Investigating mortality disparity across races, counties, and race-counties in the United States. - PLoS Medicine 3: e260. |
[15] | Olanrewaju, S. O.; Yahaya, H. U. and Nasiru, M. O., (2017). Effects of multicollinearity on some estimators in a system of regression equation. European Journal of Statistics and Probability 5 (3), 1–15. |
[16] | Smith, A. C., Nicola, K., Charles, M. F. and Lenore, F. 2009. Confronting collinearity: comparing methods for disentangling the effects of habitat loss and fragmentation. Journal of Landscape Ecology Vol. 24, No. 2: 1271-1285. |
[17] | Stewart, G. W. (1987). Collinearity and least squares regression. Statistical Science, 68–84. |
[18] | Tyagi, G; Chandra, S (2017). Note on the performance of biased estimators with autocorrelated errors. International Journal of Mathematics and Mathematical Sciences. Volume 2017, 12 Pages, Article ID 2045653. |
[19] | Wooldridge, J., (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. |
APA Style
Mutairu Oyewale Akintunde, Abolade Oludayo Olawale, Ajitoni Simeon Amusan, Adeyinka Ismail Abdul Azeez. (2021). Comparing Two Classical Methods of Detecting Multicollinearity in Financial and Economic Time Series Data. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, 7(3), 62-67. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijamtp.20210703.11
ACS Style
Mutairu Oyewale Akintunde; Abolade Oludayo Olawale; Ajitoni Simeon Amusan; Adeyinka Ismail Abdul Azeez. Comparing Two Classical Methods of Detecting Multicollinearity in Financial and Economic Time Series Data. Int. J. Appl. Math. Theor. Phys. 2021, 7(3), 62-67. doi: 10.11648/j.ijamtp.20210703.11
AMA Style
Mutairu Oyewale Akintunde, Abolade Oludayo Olawale, Ajitoni Simeon Amusan, Adeyinka Ismail Abdul Azeez. Comparing Two Classical Methods of Detecting Multicollinearity in Financial and Economic Time Series Data. Int J Appl Math Theor Phys. 2021;7(3):62-67. doi: 10.11648/j.ijamtp.20210703.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijamtp.20210703.11, author = {Mutairu Oyewale Akintunde and Abolade Oludayo Olawale and Ajitoni Simeon Amusan and Adeyinka Ismail Abdul Azeez}, title = {Comparing Two Classical Methods of Detecting Multicollinearity in Financial and Economic Time Series Data}, journal = {International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics}, volume = {7}, number = {3}, pages = {62-67}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijamtp.20210703.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijamtp.20210703.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijamtp.20210703.11}, abstract = {Multicollinearity is an unavoidable problem being faced by researchers in financial and Economic data. It refers to a situation where the degrees of correlations between two or more independent variables are high. This is to say, one explanatory variable can be used in forecasting the other variable. This creates redundant information in a series under study, skewing the results in regression models. There is need to search for the source of the problem and proffering solution to this problem in Economics and Financial data. The data used was extracted from the record of Federal trade commission (FTC), 2019. The commission usually ranks annually arrays of locally made cigarettes in relation to Tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide components that was made available. Farrah-Glauber test and variance inflation factor were used as methods of detection multicollinearity in this paper. SPSS and J-muliti packages were used to analyse the data collected for empirical illustration. The results of analysis indicated that variance inflation factor of X1 and X2 (Tar and Nicotine) are far above 10 (21.63 and 21.90) must be removed or collapsed from the model in order to correct multicollinearity. So, the preciseness of VIF made it to be preferred to Farrah-Glauber test. In line with the analysis, the use of Variance Inflation Factor is more preferred to Farrah-Glauber method. As VIF not only detected but also pointed to the direction of the problem.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparing Two Classical Methods of Detecting Multicollinearity in Financial and Economic Time Series Data AU - Mutairu Oyewale Akintunde AU - Abolade Oludayo Olawale AU - Ajitoni Simeon Amusan AU - Adeyinka Ismail Abdul Azeez Y1 - 2021/08/18 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijamtp.20210703.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijamtp.20210703.11 T2 - International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics JF - International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics JO - International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics SP - 62 EP - 67 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-5927 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijamtp.20210703.11 AB - Multicollinearity is an unavoidable problem being faced by researchers in financial and Economic data. It refers to a situation where the degrees of correlations between two or more independent variables are high. This is to say, one explanatory variable can be used in forecasting the other variable. This creates redundant information in a series under study, skewing the results in regression models. There is need to search for the source of the problem and proffering solution to this problem in Economics and Financial data. The data used was extracted from the record of Federal trade commission (FTC), 2019. The commission usually ranks annually arrays of locally made cigarettes in relation to Tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide components that was made available. Farrah-Glauber test and variance inflation factor were used as methods of detection multicollinearity in this paper. SPSS and J-muliti packages were used to analyse the data collected for empirical illustration. The results of analysis indicated that variance inflation factor of X1 and X2 (Tar and Nicotine) are far above 10 (21.63 and 21.90) must be removed or collapsed from the model in order to correct multicollinearity. So, the preciseness of VIF made it to be preferred to Farrah-Glauber test. In line with the analysis, the use of Variance Inflation Factor is more preferred to Farrah-Glauber method. As VIF not only detected but also pointed to the direction of the problem. VL - 7 IS - 3 ER -