| Peer-Reviewed

The Collaborative Governance Mechanism and Enlightenment of Singapore Elderly Security System

Received: 14 June 2018     Accepted: 11 July 2018     Published: 6 August 2018
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The CPF system held by government realize organic combination of housing and pension through purchase allowance and house-for-pension scheme, lifelong income for pension plans guarantees knock-down security. The CPF system has a certain function of redistribution. The government opposes generous welfare system and emphasizes the traditional family values and self-support; through the organic combination of law, principle and emotion, and the employment benefits, the family-support and self-support are unity. Enterprises have the inherent power to hire the elderly. Social organizations in the government’s support and control communicate the government and the people with propaganda publicity and providing support for the elderly. The key mechanism of the pension action for multiple unities is the authority government’s effective intervention. Its security is the government’s strong credibility and public participation mechanism, which is of significance to construct China’s old-age security system.

Published in International Journal of Business and Economics Research (Volume 7, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.12
Page(s) 88-96
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Singapore, Old Age Security System, Cooperative Governance Mechanism

References
[1] Lee Kuan Yew. Memoirs of Lee Kuan Yew (1965-2000) [M]. Hong Kong: Federal Press (New) Pte Ltd, 2000.
[2] Yap, M., Gee, C. Population Outcomes: Singapore 2050 [M]. Singapore: Institute of Policy Studies, 2014.
[3] Jia Hongbo, Mu Huaizhong. Analysis on the Reform of Singapore's Central Provident Fund System [J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University (Social Science Edition), 2009, (4):92-95.
[4] Hu Canwei. The Family Pension Model of Singapore and its Enlightenment [J]. Journal of Yunnan University of Nationalities, 2003, (3):35-38.
[5] Zhou Suqin, Yang Zhizhen. A Brief Analysis of Singapore's Elderly Problem and the Government's Countermeasures [J]. Southeast Asia, 2002(11):44-47.
[6] Liu Yulling. Singapore Observation: the Four-in-one Successful Aging Framework [J]. Special Zone Economy, 2014(5):134-135.
[7] Jiang Xiaoping. Social Governance System Innovation in the Modernization of National Governance [J]. China Administration, 2014, (2):24-28.
[8] Zhou Xiaoli, Dang Xiuyun. Social Governance in Western Countries: Mechanisms, Concepts and Implications [J]. Nanjing Social Science, 2013(10):75-81.
[9] Robert, A. Managing Collaborative Public Performance [J]. Public and Management Review, 2005, 29.
[10] Ansell, C., Alison Gash, A. Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice [J]. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2007,18.
[11] Xu Guochong. Political Implications of “HDB”: Inspiration from Singapore's Housing Policy [J], China Administration, 2017(3):145-150.
[12] Sun Jingfeng, Liu Jiabao. New Theory of "Singapore-style democracy" [J], Journal of social science in Jilin university, 2016(5):73-82.
[13] Fan Ruolan. An Analysis on the Relationship between Women's Rights and Patriarchy in Singapore [J]. Southeast Asian Studies, 2016(1):4-10.
[14] LI Jian: How can the government promote the development of social enterprises? --Experiences from Singapore [J], Economic restructuring, 2016(5):19-24.
[15] He Xiaopei. Singapore Social Organization Survey [J]. Group Article in Heaven and Earth, 2011(16):263-264.
[16] Xu Zhenghua, Hu Ganyong. Commentary on the Law on the Maintenance of Parents in Singapore and its Implications for China [J]. Jiangxi Social Science, 2012(9):151-155.
[17] Chen Zuzhou. From Multiculturalism to Comprehensive Culture: on the Relationship between Confucian Culture and Singapore's Economic Modernization [J]. Journal of Nanjing University, 2004(6):134-141.
[18] Lee Kuan Yew. Changes in Singapore - Premier Li Delivers a Speech to Nus and Nanyang Technological Students [N]. United Morning Post, 1988-8-30.
[19] Wu Yuanhua. Good Governance in Singapore [M]. Beijing: China Social Science Press, 2012:161, 201, 176.
[20] Goh Chok Tong, G. C. Moral Values: The Foundation of a Vibrant State [J]. National Day Rally Address, 21 August 1994,21(8).
[21] Saw, S. H. The Population of Singapore (3rd edn)[M]. Singapore: Institute of South East Asian Studies, 2012.
[22] Yu Juyun. A Comparative Study on "Maintenance of Parents Act" between China and Singapore-- Based on Multiple Coordinate Governance Mechanism [J]. Foreign Social Science, 2017.3:136-144.
[23] Yu Wenxuan. The law is Capricious -- Singapore's Public Administration [M]. Shanghai Sanlian Bookstore,2015:6.
[24] Yu Juyun. The Replacement Rate and Equity Evaluation of Endowment Insurance System before and after Merger [J]. Reform, 2015 (7):82-90.
[25] Mukul, G. A., Nandy, A Singapore’s Policy Responses to Aging, Inequality and Poverty: An Assessment [J]. International Social Security Review, 2008.1
[26] Irene, Y. H. Being Poor in a Rich ‘Nanny State’: Developments in Singapore Social Welfare [J]. The Singapore Economic Review, 2015, 3.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Yu Juyun, Cai Yucen, Ai Ting. (2018). The Collaborative Governance Mechanism and Enlightenment of Singapore Elderly Security System. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 7(4), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Yu Juyun; Cai Yucen; Ai Ting. The Collaborative Governance Mechanism and Enlightenment of Singapore Elderly Security System. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2018, 7(4), 88-96. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Yu Juyun, Cai Yucen, Ai Ting. The Collaborative Governance Mechanism and Enlightenment of Singapore Elderly Security System. Int J Bus Econ Res. 2018;7(4):88-96. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.12,
      author = {Yu Juyun and Cai Yucen and Ai Ting},
      title = {The Collaborative Governance Mechanism and Enlightenment of Singapore Elderly Security System},
      journal = {International Journal of Business and Economics Research},
      volume = {7},
      number = {4},
      pages = {88-96},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijber.20180704.12},
      abstract = {The CPF system held by government realize organic combination of housing and pension through purchase allowance and house-for-pension scheme, lifelong income for pension plans guarantees knock-down security. The CPF system has a certain function of redistribution. The government opposes generous welfare system and emphasizes the traditional family values and self-support; through the organic combination of law, principle and emotion, and the employment benefits, the family-support and self-support are unity. Enterprises have the inherent power to hire the elderly. Social organizations in the government’s support and control communicate the government and the people with propaganda publicity and providing support for the elderly. The key mechanism of the pension action for multiple unities is the authority government’s effective intervention. Its security is the government’s strong credibility and public participation mechanism, which is of significance to construct China’s old-age security system.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Collaborative Governance Mechanism and Enlightenment of Singapore Elderly Security System
    AU  - Yu Juyun
    AU  - Cai Yucen
    AU  - Ai Ting
    Y1  - 2018/08/06
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.12
    T2  - International Journal of Business and Economics Research
    JF  - International Journal of Business and Economics Research
    JO  - International Journal of Business and Economics Research
    SP  - 88
    EP  - 96
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-756X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20180704.12
    AB  - The CPF system held by government realize organic combination of housing and pension through purchase allowance and house-for-pension scheme, lifelong income for pension plans guarantees knock-down security. The CPF system has a certain function of redistribution. The government opposes generous welfare system and emphasizes the traditional family values and self-support; through the organic combination of law, principle and emotion, and the employment benefits, the family-support and self-support are unity. Enterprises have the inherent power to hire the elderly. Social organizations in the government’s support and control communicate the government and the people with propaganda publicity and providing support for the elderly. The key mechanism of the pension action for multiple unities is the authority government’s effective intervention. Its security is the government’s strong credibility and public participation mechanism, which is of significance to construct China’s old-age security system.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Tax and Public Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, China

  • Department of Tax and Public Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, China

  • Department of Tax and Public Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, China

  • Sections