The birth of globalization has brought about the introduction of new technologies and means of production which exposes developing countries to greater competition. This has resulted in the alteration of the business environment, thereby changing the dynamics of firm characteristics. In view of the foregoing, this paper examines whether or not attributes count of a firm (FAC) influences the Management Accounting Practices (MAPs) adopted. This effort is hinged on the manufacturing sphere, using primary data sourced through the issuance of structured questionnaires. Firm attributes count was discriminated on the basis of; size, intensity of market competition, grade of accounting staff and technology deployed. A sample size of 80 firms was adopted, with the Spearman correlation coefficient method employed to analyse the data. The empirical outcome of this effort unveils that, all the firm attributes count deployed in this study significantly influence MAPs. Therefore, the study concludes that the type of management accounting tool deployed in any firm, is firm size, intensity of market competition, quality of accounting staff and the level and nature of tech dependent, and that domain differences does tinker with the nature of the effect of these variables. On the basis of the foregoing, it is recommended that smaller firms should deploy outsourcing of management accounting services to augment the lack of quality accounting staff, explore opportunities of alternatives of improved, but cheaper, technology to deploy towards improving the competitiveness, and deploy firm-clustering paradigm to take advantage of combined resource utilisation.
Published in | International Journal of Business and Economics Research (Volume 9, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijber.20200903.11 |
Page(s) | 94-102 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Firm, Attributes, Management Accounting Practices, Size, Competition, Technology
[1] | Abdel-Kader, M., & Luther, R. (2008). The impact of firm characteristics on management accounting practices: A UK-based empirical analysis. British Accounting Review, 40, 2–27. |
[2] | Ahmad, K (2012). Factors explaining the extent of use of MAPs in Malaysian medium firms. Asian Entrepreneurship Conference 2012. |
[3] | Ahmad, K. (2014). The adoption of MAPs in Malaysian small and medium-sized enterprise. Asian Social Science, 10 (2), 236-249. |
[4] | Ajibolade, S. O. (2013). Drivers of Choice of Management Accounting System Designs in Nigerian Manufacturing Companies. International Journal of Business and Social Research (IJBSR), 3, 45–57. |
[5] | Albu, N., & Albu, C. (2012). Factors associated with the adoption and use of management accounting techniques in developing countries: The case of Romania. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting, 23 (3), 245-276. |
[6] | Askarany, D., & Smith, M. (2008). Diffusion of innovation and business size: A longitudinal study of PACIA. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23, 900–916. |
[7] | Askarany, D., Smith, M., & Yazdifar, H. (2007). Technological Innovation, Activity Based Costing and Satisfaction. Journal of Accounting – Business &Management, 14, 53–63. |
[8] | Axelsson, B.; Laage-hellman, J. & Nilsson, U. (2002). Modern management accounting for modern purchasing. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 8 (1), 53-62. |
[9] | Ayodele, A. S., & Falokun, G. (2003). The Nigerian Economy: Structure and Pattern of Development. Ibadan: Jodab Publishers. |
[10] | Badem, A. C., Ergin, E., & Dury, C. (2013). Is Standard Costing Still Used? Evidence from Turkish Automotive Industry. International Business Research, 6 (7). |
[11] | Baines, A., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2003). Antecedents to management accounting change: A structural equation approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28 (7–8), 675–698. |
[12] | Bhimani, A. (2003). Management Accounting in the Digital Economy. Oxford University Press. |
[13] | Bhimani, A., & Bromwich, M. (2010). Management Accounting: Prospect and Retrospect. Great Britan: ELSEVIER. |
[14] | Brown, A., Booth, P., & Giacobbe, F. (2004). Technological and organizational influences on the adoption of activity-based costing in Australia. Accounting and Finance, 44 (3), 329-356. |
[15] | Cadez, S., & Guilding, C. (2008). An exploratory investigation of an integrated contingency model of strategic management accounting. Accounting, Organization and Society, 33, 836-863. |
[16] | Donaldson, L. (2001). The contingency theory of organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. |
[17] | Gichaaga, P. M. (2014). Effects of MAP on financial performance of manufacturing companies in Kenya. Master of Science in Finance Dissertation, School of Business, University of Nairobi. |
[18] | Golan, E.; Krissoff, B.; Kuchler, F. F.; Nelson, K.; Price, G.; & Kelvin L. (2003). Traceability in the US food supply chain: dead end or superhighway? In Choices Vol. 2nd quarter. |
[19] | Haldma, T., & Laats, K. (2002). Influencing contingencies on MAP in Estonian manufacturing companies. University of Tartu - Economics and Business Administration Working Paper No. 13. |
[20] | Hopper, T., & Bui, B. (2016). Has Management Accounting Research been critical? Management Accounting Research, 31. |
[21] | Hopper, T., Tsamenyi, M., Uddin, S., & Wickramasinghe, D. (2009). Management Accounting in Less Developed Countries: What is Known and Needs Knowing Management accounting in less developed countries: what is known and needs knowing. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22 (3), 469– 514. |
[22] | Horngren, C. T., Datar, S., Foster, G., Rajan, M., & Ittner, C. (2009). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis (13th ed.). New Jersey.: Prentice Hall. |
[23] | Islam, M. A., Khan, M. A., Obaidullah, A. Z. M., & Alam, M. S. (2011). Effect of entrepreneur and firm characteristics on the business success of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Bangladesh. International Journal of Business and Management, 6 (3), 289. |
[24] | Ismail, T. H., & Mahmoud, C. (2012). The influence of Organizational and environmental Factors in Cost Systems Design in Egypt. British Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, Vol. 4 (2), 31-51. |
[25] | Jhonson, H. T., & Kaplan, R. S. (1987). Relevance lost: The rise and fall of management accounting. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. |
[26] | Kaplan, R. S. (1984). The Evolution of Management Accounting. Accounting Review, 59 (3), 390–418. |
[27] | Kariuki, S. N & Kamau, C. G. (2016). Organizational contingencies influencing th adoption of strategic MAP among manufacturing firms in Kenya. International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, 5 (4), 167-182. |
[28] | Kassim, M. Y., Md-Mansur, K., & Idris, S. (2003). Globalization and its impact on Malaysia economy. Reinventing Sabah: Global Challenges and Policy Responses, 95–111. |
[29] | Leite, A. A, Fernandes, P. O., & Leite, J. M. (2015). Contingent factors that influence the use of MAP in the Portuguese textile and clothing sector. The International Journal of Management Science and Information Technology. Special Issue: Spanish-Portuguese Scientific Management Conference, (59-77). |
[30] | López, O. L., & Hiebl, M. R. W. (2015). Management Accounting in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: Current Knowledge and Avenues for Further Research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 27 (1), 81–119. |
[31] | Luther, R. G., & Longden, S. (2001). Management accounting in companies adapting to structural change and volatility in transition economies: A South African study. Management Accounting Research, 12, 299-320. |
[32] | Mat, T. Z. T. (2010). Management Accounting and Organizational Change: Impact of Alignment of Management Accounting Systems, Structure and Strategy on Performance. Edith Cowan University, Perth Western Australia. |
[33] | Mat, T. Z. T., & Smith, M. (2014). The Impact of Changes in Environment and AMT on MAP and Organizational Strategy, Structure and Performance. Journal of Applied Management Accounting Research, 12 (1), 55–82. |
[34] | Mbawuni, J., & Anertey, A. (2014). Exploring MAP in emerging telecommunication market in Ghana. Accounting and Finance Research, 3 (4), 71-85. |
[35] | Ndwiga, N. M. (2011). The Role of Management Accounting in Creating and Sustaining Competitive Advantage. A Case Study of Equity Bank, Kenya. Master of Commerce in accounting dissertation. University of South Africa. Pretoria. |
[36] | Nuhu, N. A.; Baird, K. & Appuhami, R. (2016). The Association between the Use of MAP with Organizational Change and Organizational Performance. In Marc J.; Epstein, Mary & Malina, A. ed. Advances in Management Accounting (Advances in Management Accounting, Volume 26, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 67-98. |
[37] | O’Sullivan, D., Abela, A. V. & Hutchinson, M. (2009). Marketing performance measurement and firm performance. European Journal of Marketing, 43 (5/6): 843-862. |
[38] | Otley, D. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting research: achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 5 (4), 413-428. |
[39] | Oyerogba, O. E. (2015). The Use of Voluntary Disclosure in Determining the Quality of Financial Statements: Evidence from the Nigerian listed companies. Serbian Journal of Management, 9 (2), 263–280. |
[40] | Söderbom, M., Teal, F., & Wambugu, A. (2002). Does firm size really affect earnings? |
[41] | Stock, G. N. & Tatikonda, M. V. (2000). A Typology of Project-level Technology Transfer Processes. Journal of Operations Management, 26 (4): 719-737. |
[42] | Shuaibu, k., Ibrahim, A., & Amin, I. M. (2019). Company Attributes and Firm Value of Listed Consumer Goods Companies in Nigeria. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science Volume 7 (5) 40-49. |
[43] | Tuanmat, T. Z., & Smith, M. (2011). Changes in MAP in Malaysia. Asian Review of Accounting, 19 (3), 221-242. |
[44] | Watts, D., Yapa, P. W., & Dellaportas, S. (2014). The Case of a Newly Implemented Modern Management Accounting system in a Multinational Manufacturing Companies. Australian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 8 (2), 2-13. |
[45] | Waweru, N. M. (2010). The origin and evolution of management accounting: a review of the theoretical framework. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 8 (3), 165, 182. |
[46] | Waweru, N., & Uliana, E. (2008). Predicting change in management accounting systems: a contingent approach. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 6 (2), 72–84. |
[47] | Wie, T. K. (2003). The major channels of International Technology Transfer to Indonesia: An Assessment. Conference Sun Catch-Up Growth and Technology Transfer, University of Groningen, Groningen. |
[48] | Zehir, C., Muceildili, B., Akyuz, B., & Celep, A. (2010). The Impact of Technology Investment on Firm Performance in National and Multinational Companies. Journal of Global Strategic Management, 1: 143-154. |
APA Style
Stanley Ogoun, Sawyerr Ayaundu. (2020). Firm Attributes Count and Management Accounting Practices in an Emerging Market. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 9(3), 94-102. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20200903.11
ACS Style
Stanley Ogoun; Sawyerr Ayaundu. Firm Attributes Count and Management Accounting Practices in an Emerging Market. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2020, 9(3), 94-102. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20200903.11
AMA Style
Stanley Ogoun, Sawyerr Ayaundu. Firm Attributes Count and Management Accounting Practices in an Emerging Market. Int J Bus Econ Res. 2020;9(3):94-102. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20200903.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijber.20200903.11, author = {Stanley Ogoun and Sawyerr Ayaundu}, title = {Firm Attributes Count and Management Accounting Practices in an Emerging Market}, journal = {International Journal of Business and Economics Research}, volume = {9}, number = {3}, pages = {94-102}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijber.20200903.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20200903.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijber.20200903.11}, abstract = {The birth of globalization has brought about the introduction of new technologies and means of production which exposes developing countries to greater competition. This has resulted in the alteration of the business environment, thereby changing the dynamics of firm characteristics. In view of the foregoing, this paper examines whether or not attributes count of a firm (FAC) influences the Management Accounting Practices (MAPs) adopted. This effort is hinged on the manufacturing sphere, using primary data sourced through the issuance of structured questionnaires. Firm attributes count was discriminated on the basis of; size, intensity of market competition, grade of accounting staff and technology deployed. A sample size of 80 firms was adopted, with the Spearman correlation coefficient method employed to analyse the data. The empirical outcome of this effort unveils that, all the firm attributes count deployed in this study significantly influence MAPs. Therefore, the study concludes that the type of management accounting tool deployed in any firm, is firm size, intensity of market competition, quality of accounting staff and the level and nature of tech dependent, and that domain differences does tinker with the nature of the effect of these variables. On the basis of the foregoing, it is recommended that smaller firms should deploy outsourcing of management accounting services to augment the lack of quality accounting staff, explore opportunities of alternatives of improved, but cheaper, technology to deploy towards improving the competitiveness, and deploy firm-clustering paradigm to take advantage of combined resource utilisation.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Firm Attributes Count and Management Accounting Practices in an Emerging Market AU - Stanley Ogoun AU - Sawyerr Ayaundu Y1 - 2020/04/17 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20200903.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijber.20200903.11 T2 - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JF - International Journal of Business and Economics Research JO - International Journal of Business and Economics Research SP - 94 EP - 102 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-756X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20200903.11 AB - The birth of globalization has brought about the introduction of new technologies and means of production which exposes developing countries to greater competition. This has resulted in the alteration of the business environment, thereby changing the dynamics of firm characteristics. In view of the foregoing, this paper examines whether or not attributes count of a firm (FAC) influences the Management Accounting Practices (MAPs) adopted. This effort is hinged on the manufacturing sphere, using primary data sourced through the issuance of structured questionnaires. Firm attributes count was discriminated on the basis of; size, intensity of market competition, grade of accounting staff and technology deployed. A sample size of 80 firms was adopted, with the Spearman correlation coefficient method employed to analyse the data. The empirical outcome of this effort unveils that, all the firm attributes count deployed in this study significantly influence MAPs. Therefore, the study concludes that the type of management accounting tool deployed in any firm, is firm size, intensity of market competition, quality of accounting staff and the level and nature of tech dependent, and that domain differences does tinker with the nature of the effect of these variables. On the basis of the foregoing, it is recommended that smaller firms should deploy outsourcing of management accounting services to augment the lack of quality accounting staff, explore opportunities of alternatives of improved, but cheaper, technology to deploy towards improving the competitiveness, and deploy firm-clustering paradigm to take advantage of combined resource utilisation. VL - 9 IS - 3 ER -