The Application of an Outsourcing - Innovation Model

Jeff Readman

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11

| Peer-Reviewed

The Application of an Outsourcing - Innovation Model

Jeff Readman

Published in International Journal of Business and Economics Research (Volume 11, Issue 6)

Received: 1 August 2022 Accepted: 26 August 2022 Published: 4 November 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

While the cost advantages associated with outsourcing are recognized, the impact that outsourcing may have on innovation performance depends on the strategic focus. One perspective suggests that firms outsourcing low value-adding activities will achieve higher innovation performance (that is, better designed or more technologically advanced products or more substantive process improvements) than firms that perform these activities in-house. Another view holds that firms that outsource high value-adding activities may have lower innovation performance than those firms that perform these activities in-house. Moreover, superior innovation performance can be achieved through the effective use of innovation, or dynamic, capabilities. This paper contributes to the outsourcing discourse by investigating the impact different outsourcing strategies can have on product innovation performance. An outsourcing- innovation (OI) model is proposed and applied to UK furniture manufacturing firms. The rational for selecting one industry is advantageous because the investigations allows for a comparison of organizations performing similar business functions. A survey of 78 firms was undertaken. Dichotomous, ordinal and multi measure variables were formulated and ordinal logistic regression was used to test the model. The study revealed that (i) innovation performance did not improve after non-essential functions were outsourced; (ii) performing specific core activities does have a positive influence on innovation performance and (iii) the findings support previous documented relationships that the use of innovation management capabilities has a positive impact on product innovation performance. The findings are relevant to other manufacturing industries, which demonstrate similar innovation performance and outsourcing patterns. The paper also suggests that the OI Model can be developed to include offsetting and interaction of different factors.

Published in	International Journal of Business and Economics Research (Volume 11, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11
Page(s)	304-313
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Outsourcing, Innovation Performance, Operations Strategy

References

[1]	ADLER, P. & SHENHAR, S. 1990. Adapting Your Technological Base: The Organisational Challenge. Sloan Management Review, 2, 25-37.
[2]	BARNEY, J. 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
[3]	BESSANT, J. 1997. High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement. International Journal of Technology Management 14, 7-28.
[4]	BESSANT, J. & RUSH, H. 1995. Building Bridges for Innovation: The Role of Consultants in Technology Transfer. Research Policy.
[5]	BETTIS, R. A., BRADLEY, S. P. & HAMEL, G. 1992. Outsourcing and industrial decline. Academy of Management Executive, 6, 7-22.
[6]	BROWN, S. L. & EISENHARDT, K. M. 1995. Product development: Past research, present findings and future directions. Academy of Management Review, 20, 343-378.
[7]	BRUSONI, S., PRENCIPE, A. & PAVITT, K. 2001. Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46, 597-621.
[8]	CHESBROUGH, H. & CROWTHER, A. K. 2006. Beyond high tech: early adopters of open innovation in other industries. R & D Management, 36, 229-236.
[9]	CHESBROUGH, H. W. & TEECE, D. J. 1996. When is virtual virtuous? Organizing for innovation. Harvard Business Review, 74, 65-73.
[10]	CLARK, K. B. & WHEELWRIGHT, S. C. 1992. Organizing and Leading "Heavyweight" Development Teams. California Management Review, 34, 9-28.
[11]	COASE, R. H. 1988. The firm, the market and the law, Chicago; London, University of Chicago Press.
[12]	COHEN, W. M. & LEVINTHAL, D. A. 1990. Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128-152.
[13]	COOPER, R. G. & KLEINSCHMIDT, E. J. 1995. Benchmarking the Firm's Critical Success Factors in New Product Development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12, 374 - 391.
[14]	D'AVENI, R. A. & GUNTHER, R. E. 1994. Hypercompetition: managing the dynamics of strategic maneuvering, New York, Free Press; New York; Oxford: Maxwell Macmillan International.
[15]	D'AVENI, R. A. & RAVENSCRAFT, D. J. 1994. Economies of integration versus bureaucracy costs: does vertical integration improve performance? Academy of Management Journal, 37, 1167-1206.
[16]	DAY, G. S. 2007. Is It Real? Can We Win? Is It Worth Doing? Harvard Business Review, 85, 110.
[17]	DESS, G. G., RASHEED, A. M. A., MCLAUGHLIN, K. J., PRIEM, R. L. & ROBINSON, G. 1995. The new corporate architecture. The Academy of Management Executive, 9, 7.
[18]	DIMASI, J. A., HANSEN, R. W. & GRABOWSKI, H. G. 2003. The price of innovation: new estimates of drug development costs. Journal of Health Economics, 22, 151-185.
[19]	EISENHARDT, K. M. & MARTIN, J. A. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 1105–1121.
[20]	FONTANA, R., GEUNA, A. & MATT, M. 2006. Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling. Research Policy, 35, 309-323.
[21]	FOWLER, F. J. 2009. Survey research methods, Thousand Oaks; London, Sage Publications.
[22]	GHOSHAL, S. & MORAN, P. 1996. Bad for practice: a critique of the transaction cost theory. Academy of Management Review, 21, 13-47.
[23]	GILLEY, K. M. & RASHEED, A. 2000. Making more by doing less: An analysis of outsourcing and its effects on firm performance. Journal of Management, 26, 763-790.
[24]	GRECO, J. 1997. Outsourcing: The New Partnership. Journal of Business Strategy, 18, 48-54.
[25]	GUPTA, A. K. & WILEMAN, D. L. 1990. Accelerating the Development of Technology-Based New Products. California Management Review, 32, 24-44.
[26]	HANDFIELD, R. B., RAGATZ, G. L., PETERSEN, K. J. & MONCZKA, R. M. 1999. Involving suppliers in new product development. California Management Review, 42, 59-82.
[27]	HARRIGAN, K. R. 1985. Exit barriers and vertical integration. Academy of Management Journal, 28, 686-697.
[28]	HENDERSON, R. M. & CLARK, K. B. 1990. Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 9-30.
[29]	HOECHT, A. & TROTT, P. 2006. Innovation risks of strategic outsourcing. Technovation, 26, 672-681.
[30]	HOLCOMB, T. R. & HITT, M. A. 2007. Toward a model of strategic outsourcing. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 464-481.
[31]	HOWELL, J. M. & SHEA, C. M. 2001. Individual differences, environmental scanning, innovation framing, and champion behavior: key predictors of project performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18, 15-27.
[32]	HSUAN, J. & MAHNKE, V. 2011. Outsourcing R&D: a review, model, and research agenda. R&D Management, 41, 1-7.
[33]	JACOBIDES, M. G. & WINTER, S. G. 2005. The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 395-413.
[34]	KLEINSCHMIDT, E. J. 2006. Rejoinders to “Establishing an NPD Best Practices Framework”. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23, 117-127.
[35]	KOTABE, M. & MURRAY, J. Y. 2004. Global sourcing strategy and sustainable competitive advantage. Industrial Marketing Management, 33, 7-14.
[36]	KUMAR, N., STERN, L. W. & ANDERSON, J. C. 1993. Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 1633-1651.
[37]	LAMPEL, J. & MINTZBERG, H. 1996. Customizing customization. Sloan Management Review, 38, 21-30.
[38]	LAURSEN, K. & SALTER, A. 2004. Searching high and low: what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation? Research Policy, 33, 1201-1215.
[39]	LEI, D. & HITT, M. A. 1995. Strategic restructuring and outsourcing - the effect of mergers and acquisitions and IBOS on building firm skills and capabilities. Journal of Management, 21, 835-859.
[40]	LEYDESDORFF, L. & MEYER, M. 2006. Triple Helix indicators of knowledge-based innovation systems: Introduction to the special issue. Research Policy, 35, 1441-1449.
[41]	MCIVOR, R. 2009. How the transaction cost and resource-based theories of the firm inform outsourcing evaluation. Journal of Operations Management, 27, 45-63.
[42]	MOLLOY, O., TILLEY, S. & WARMAN, E. 1998. Design for manufacturing and assembly: concepts, architectures and implementation, London, Chapman & Hall.
[43]	O'CONNELL, A. A. 2006. Logistic regression models for ordinal response variables, Thousand Oaks, Calif., SAGE Publications.
[44]	OECD 2005. Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Paris, OECD Publishing.
[45]	ONS 2011. UK Business: Activity, Size and Location, 2011. London: Statistical Framework Division, Office for National Statistics.
[46]	PISANO, G. 2015. You Need an Innovation Strategy. Harvard Business Review, 93, 44-54.
[47]	PITELIS, C. N. & PSEIRIDIS, A. N. 1999. Transaction costs versus resource value? Journal of Economic Studies, 26, 221-240.
[48]	PLAMBECK, E. L. & TAYLOR, T. A. 2005. Sell the Plant? The Impact of Contract Manufacturing on Innovation, Capacity, and Profitability. Management Science, 51, 133–150.
[49]	PRAHALAD, C. K. & HAMEL, G. 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 79-91.
[50]	PRENCIPE, A. 1997. Technological competencies and product's evolutionary dynamics - A case study from the aero-engine industry. Research Policy, 25, 1261-1276.
[51]	QUINN, J. B. 1992. Intelligent enterprise: a knowledge and service based paradigm for industry, Free Press, Maxwell Macmillan: Maxwell Macmillan International.
[52]	QUINN, J. B. 1999. Strategic outsourcing: Leveraging knowledge capabilities. Sloan Management Review, 40, 9 -21.
[53]	QUINN, J. B. 2000. Outsourcing innovation: The new engine of growth. Sloan Management Review, 41, 13-28.
[54]	QUINN, J. B. & HILMER, F. G. 1994. Strategic outsourcing. Sloan Management Review, 35, 43-55.
[55]	READMAN, J., BESSANT, J., NEELY, A. & TWIGG, D. 2018. Positioning UK research and technology organizations as outward-facing technology-bases. R&D Management, 48, 109-120.
[56]	RO, Y. K., LIKER, J. K. & FIXSON, S. K. 2007. Modularity as a strategy for supply chain coordination: The case of US auto. Ieee Transactions on Engineering Management, 54, 172-189.
[57]	ROTHAERMEL, F. T., HITT, M. A. & JOBE, L. A. 2006. Balancing vertical integration and strategic outsourcing: Effects on product portfolio, product success, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 1033-1056.
[58]	ROTHWELL, R. 1994. Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 11, 7-31.
[59]	ROY, S. & SIVAKUMAR, K. 2012. Global Outsourcing Relationships and Innovation: A Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29, 513-530.
[60]	RUMELT, R. 1991. How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12, 167-185.
[61]	SHETH, J. N. & PARVATIYAR, A. 1995. The evolution of relationship marketing. International Business Review, 4.
[62]	SPANOS, Y. E. & LIOUKAS, S. 2001. An examination into the causal logic of rent generation: contrasting Porter's competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 907–934.
[63]	SQUIRE, B., BROWN, S., READMAN, J. & BESSANT, J. 2006. The impact of mass customization on manufacturing trade-offs? Production and Operations Management Journal, 15, 10-21.
[64]	SQUIRE, B., READMAN, J., BROWN, S. & BESSANT, J. 2004. Mass customisation: The key to customer value? Journal of Production Planning and Control, 15, 459 - 471.
[65]	SRIVASTAVA, R. K., FAHEY, L. & CHRISTENSEN, H. K. 2001. The resource-based view and marketing: The role of market-based assets in gaining competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 27, 777–802.
[66]	STANKO, M. A. & CALANTONE, R. J. 2011. Controversy in innovation outsourcing research: review, synthesis and future directions. R&D Management, 41, 8-20.
[67]	STOREY, J., QUINTAS, P., TAYLOR, P. & FOWLE, W. 2002. Flexible employment contracts and their implications for product and process innovation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13, 1-18.
[68]	TAKEISHI, A. 2001. Bridging inter- and intra-firm boundaries: Management of supplier involvement in automobile product development. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 403-433.
[69]	TAKEISHI, A. 2002. Knowledge partitioning in the interfirm division of labor: The case of automotive product development. Organization Science, 13, 321-338.
[70]	TAYLOR, P., HYMAN, J., MULVEY, G. & BAIN, P. 2002. Work organization, control and the experience of work in call centres. Work Employment and Society, 16, 133-150.
[71]	TEECE, D. J. 1986. Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15, 285-305.
[72]	TEECE, D. J., PISANO, G. & SHUEN, A. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533.
[73]	THOMKE, S. & VON HIPPEL, E. 2002. Customers as Innovators: A New Way to Create Value. Harvard Business Review, 80, 74-81.
[74]	TIDD, J., BESSANT, J. R. & PAVITT, K. 2005. Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organization change, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons.
[75]	TWISS, B. C. 1992. Managing Technological Innovation, Pitman.
[76]	UEA. 2004. Federation of European Furniture [Online]. Brussels. Available: www.ueanet.com [Accessed 10 June 2004].
[77]	ULRICH, K., SARTORIUS, D., PEARSON, S. & JAKIELA, M. 1993. Including the Value of Time in Design-for-Manufacturing Decision Making. Management Science, 39, 429-447.
[78]	VON TUNZELMANN, N. & ACHA, V. 2005. Innovation in 'Low Tech' Industries. In: FAGERBERG, J., MOWERY, D. & NELSON, R. R. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[79]	WERNERFELT, B. 1984. A Resource-Based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5, 171-180.
[80]	WHEELWRIGHT, S. & CLARK, K. 1992. Revolutionizing product development: quantum leaps in speed, efficiency and quality, New York, The Free Press.
[81]	WILLIAMSON, O. E. 1975. Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications: a study in the economics of internal organization, New York, Free Press; London: Collier Macmillan, 1983.
[82]	WILLIAMSON, O. E. 1999. Strategy research: Governance and competence perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 1087-1108.
[83]	WILLIAMSON, O. E. & MASTEN, S. E. 1995. Transaction cost economics, Aldershot, Edward Elgar.
[84]	ZAHRA, S. A. & GEORGE, G. 2002. Absorptive capacity: a review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27, 185-203.
[85]	ZHU, Z., HSU, K. & LILLIE, J. 2001. Outsourcing – a strategic move: the process and the ingredients for success. Management Decision, 39, 373-378.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Jeff Readman. (2022). The Application of an Outsourcing - Innovation Model. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 11(6), 304-313. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Jeff Readman. The Application of an Outsourcing - Innovation Model. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2022, 11(6), 304-313. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Jeff Readman. The Application of an Outsourcing - Innovation Model. Int J Bus Econ Res. 2022;11(6):304-313. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11,
  author = {Jeff Readman},
  title = {The Application of an Outsourcing - Innovation Model},
  journal = {International Journal of Business and Economics Research},
  volume = {11},
  number = {6},
  pages = {304-313},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijber.20221106.11},
  abstract = {While the cost advantages associated with outsourcing are recognized, the impact that outsourcing may have on innovation performance depends on the strategic focus. One perspective suggests that firms outsourcing low value-adding activities will achieve higher innovation performance (that is, better designed or more technologically advanced products or more substantive process improvements) than firms that perform these activities in-house. Another view holds that firms that outsource high value-adding activities may have lower innovation performance than those firms that perform these activities in-house. Moreover, superior innovation performance can be achieved through the effective use of innovation, or dynamic, capabilities. This paper contributes to the outsourcing discourse by investigating the impact different outsourcing strategies can have on product innovation performance. An outsourcing- innovation (OI) model is proposed and applied to UK furniture manufacturing firms. The rational for selecting one industry is advantageous because the investigations allows for a comparison of organizations performing similar business functions. A survey of 78 firms was undertaken. Dichotomous, ordinal and multi measure variables were formulated and ordinal logistic regression was used to test the model. The study revealed that (i) innovation performance did not improve after non-essential functions were outsourced; (ii) performing specific core activities does have a positive influence on innovation performance and (iii) the findings support previous documented relationships that the use of innovation management capabilities has a positive impact on product innovation performance. The findings are relevant to other manufacturing industries, which demonstrate similar innovation performance and outsourcing patterns. The paper also suggests that the OI Model can be developed to include offsetting and interaction of different factors.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Application of an Outsourcing - Innovation Model
AU  - Jeff Readman
Y1  - 2022/11/04
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11
T2  - International Journal of Business and Economics Research
JF  - International Journal of Business and Economics Research
JO  - International Journal of Business and Economics Research
SP  - 304
EP  - 313
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-756X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11
AB  - While the cost advantages associated with outsourcing are recognized, the impact that outsourcing may have on innovation performance depends on the strategic focus. One perspective suggests that firms outsourcing low value-adding activities will achieve higher innovation performance (that is, better designed or more technologically advanced products or more substantive process improvements) than firms that perform these activities in-house. Another view holds that firms that outsource high value-adding activities may have lower innovation performance than those firms that perform these activities in-house. Moreover, superior innovation performance can be achieved through the effective use of innovation, or dynamic, capabilities. This paper contributes to the outsourcing discourse by investigating the impact different outsourcing strategies can have on product innovation performance. An outsourcing- innovation (OI) model is proposed and applied to UK furniture manufacturing firms. The rational for selecting one industry is advantageous because the investigations allows for a comparison of organizations performing similar business functions. A survey of 78 firms was undertaken. Dichotomous, ordinal and multi measure variables were formulated and ordinal logistic regression was used to test the model. The study revealed that (i) innovation performance did not improve after non-essential functions were outsourced; (ii) performing specific core activities does have a positive influence on innovation performance and (iii) the findings support previous documented relationships that the use of innovation management capabilities has a positive impact on product innovation performance. The findings are relevant to other manufacturing industries, which demonstrate similar innovation performance and outsourcing patterns. The paper also suggests that the OI Model can be developed to include offsetting and interaction of different factors.
VL  - 11
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Jeff Readman

Grenoble Ecole de Management, Grenoble, France

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Jeff Readman. (2022). The Application of an Outsourcing - Innovation Model. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 11(6), 304-313. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Jeff Readman. The Application of an Outsourcing - Innovation Model. Int. J. Bus. Econ. Res. 2022, 11(6), 304-313. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Jeff Readman. The Application of an Outsourcing - Innovation Model. Int J Bus Econ Res. 2022;11(6):304-313. doi: 10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11,
  author = {Jeff Readman},
  title = {The Application of an Outsourcing - Innovation Model},
  journal = {International Journal of Business and Economics Research},
  volume = {11},
  number = {6},
  pages = {304-313},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijber.20221106.11},
  abstract = {While the cost advantages associated with outsourcing are recognized, the impact that outsourcing may have on innovation performance depends on the strategic focus. One perspective suggests that firms outsourcing low value-adding activities will achieve higher innovation performance (that is, better designed or more technologically advanced products or more substantive process improvements) than firms that perform these activities in-house. Another view holds that firms that outsource high value-adding activities may have lower innovation performance than those firms that perform these activities in-house. Moreover, superior innovation performance can be achieved through the effective use of innovation, or dynamic, capabilities. This paper contributes to the outsourcing discourse by investigating the impact different outsourcing strategies can have on product innovation performance. An outsourcing- innovation (OI) model is proposed and applied to UK furniture manufacturing firms. The rational for selecting one industry is advantageous because the investigations allows for a comparison of organizations performing similar business functions. A survey of 78 firms was undertaken. Dichotomous, ordinal and multi measure variables were formulated and ordinal logistic regression was used to test the model. The study revealed that (i) innovation performance did not improve after non-essential functions were outsourced; (ii) performing specific core activities does have a positive influence on innovation performance and (iii) the findings support previous documented relationships that the use of innovation management capabilities has a positive impact on product innovation performance. The findings are relevant to other manufacturing industries, which demonstrate similar innovation performance and outsourcing patterns. The paper also suggests that the OI Model can be developed to include offsetting and interaction of different factors.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Application of an Outsourcing - Innovation Model
AU  - Jeff Readman
Y1  - 2022/11/04
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11
T2  - International Journal of Business and Economics Research
JF  - International Journal of Business and Economics Research
JO  - International Journal of Business and Economics Research
SP  - 304
EP  - 313
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-756X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijber.20221106.11
AB  - While the cost advantages associated with outsourcing are recognized, the impact that outsourcing may have on innovation performance depends on the strategic focus. One perspective suggests that firms outsourcing low value-adding activities will achieve higher innovation performance (that is, better designed or more technologically advanced products or more substantive process improvements) than firms that perform these activities in-house. Another view holds that firms that outsource high value-adding activities may have lower innovation performance than those firms that perform these activities in-house. Moreover, superior innovation performance can be achieved through the effective use of innovation, or dynamic, capabilities. This paper contributes to the outsourcing discourse by investigating the impact different outsourcing strategies can have on product innovation performance. An outsourcing- innovation (OI) model is proposed and applied to UK furniture manufacturing firms. The rational for selecting one industry is advantageous because the investigations allows for a comparison of organizations performing similar business functions. A survey of 78 firms was undertaken. Dichotomous, ordinal and multi measure variables were formulated and ordinal logistic regression was used to test the model. The study revealed that (i) innovation performance did not improve after non-essential functions were outsourced; (ii) performing specific core activities does have a positive influence on innovation performance and (iii) the findings support previous documented relationships that the use of innovation management capabilities has a positive impact on product innovation performance. The findings are relevant to other manufacturing industries, which demonstrate similar innovation performance and outsourcing patterns. The paper also suggests that the OI Model can be developed to include offsetting and interaction of different factors.
VL  - 11
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download