Pure titanium (Ti), titanium alloys, and different types of stainless steel are often employed for applications in orthopedic implants. Among these, titanium is considered the “gold standard.” However, tissue reactions around these metal surfaces and the changing trend to leave orthopedic devices in the body have led to a new examination of the preferred material. Nowadays various metallic materials are commonly employed to improve the life time of bioimplants. Three types of metals (SS-316L, SS-304L and pure Titanium) were used for a comparative study by considering adsorption properties of all. Metallic materials are attractive due to properties like less coefficient friction, high hardness value, and chemically inert in nature which make them attractive to be used in biochemical devices. The surface of these metals was prepared to study the adhesion of different type of animal proteins adhesion on their surface. Protein growth on these materials was studied by using AFM (atomic force microscope), SEM and FTIR at different time intervals (24h, 48h, 72h, 96h). The difference in density and weight of the samples before and after the adsorption of protein on substrates confirms the proliferation process on metals. Promising results were obtained at time interval of 96 hours. Overall, all the samples show similar behavior.
Published in | International Journal of Biomedical Materials Research (Volume 11, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijbmr.20231101.11 |
Page(s) | 1-5 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Biocompatibility, Bovine Serum, Comparative Study, Metallic Materials
[1] | W. B. Tsai, J. M. Grunkemeier, T. A. Horbett, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 44 (1999) 130–139. |
[2] | C. R. Jenney, J. M. Anderson, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 49 (2000) 435–447. |
[3] | R. M. Wyre, S. Downes, Biomaterials 23 (2002) 357–364. |
[4] | D. F. William. Biomaterials, 30, 5879, 2009. |
[5] | K. Anselme, Biomaterials 21 (2000), 667-681. |
[6] | S. Bauer, P. Schmuki, K. von der Mark, J. Park, engineering biocompatible implant surface: part1: materials and surfaces, Prog. Mater Sci. 58 (2013) 261-326. |
[7] | S. J. Lee, D. N. Heo, J. S. Park, S. K. Kwon, J. H. Lee, J. H. Lee, W. D. Kim, I. K. Kwon, S. A. Park, Characterization and preparation of bio-tubular scaffolds for fabricating artificial vascular grafts by combining electrospinning and a 3D printing system, PCCP 17 (2015) 2996–2999. |
[8] | X. Liu, P. K. Chu, C. Ding, Surface modification of titanium, titanium alloys, and related materials for biomedical applications, Mater. Sci. Eng.: R: Rep. 47 (2004) 49–121. |
[9] | R. Tejero, E. Anitua, G. Orive, Toward the biomimetic implant surface, biopolymers on titanium-based implants for bone regeneration, Prog. Polym. Sci. 39 (2014) 1406–1447. |
[10] | N. Afara, S. Omanovic, M. Asghari-Khiavi, Functionalization of a gold surface with fibronectin (FN) covalently bound to mixed alkanethiol self-assembled monolayers (SAMs): the influence of SAM composition on its physicochemical properties and FN surface secondary structure, Thin Solid Films 522 (2012) 381–389. |
[11] | M. C. Siebers, P. J. terBrugge, X. F. Walboomers, J. A. Jansen, Biomaterials 26 (2005) 137-146. |
[12] | V. Hlady, and j. Buijis. Curr Opin Biotechnol (1996) 7 (1), 72-77. |
[13] | A. Bhogale, N. Patel, P. Sarpotdar, J. Mariam, P. M. Dongre, A. Miotello, D. C. Kothari, Systematic investigation on the interaction of bovine serum albumin with ZnO nanoparticles using fluorescence spectroscopy, colloids surf, B: Biointerfaces 102 (2013) 257–264. |
[14] | D. R. Schmidt, H. Waldeck, W. J. Kao, D. A. Puleo, R. Bizios (Eds.), Biol. Interact. Mater. Surf. Springer, US, 2009, pp. 1–18. |
[15] | P. Silva-Bermudez, S. E. Rodil, An overview of protein adsorption on metal oxide coatings for biomedical implants, Surf. Coat. Technol. 233 (2013) 147–158. |
[16] | J. D. Andrade, V. Hlady, Biopolym.-Exclusion HPLC, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1986, pp. pp. 1–63. |
[17] | Nosheen, S., Alam, S., Irfan, M., Waseem, B., Shahid, M., Soomro, B., & Syed, Q. (2017). Proliferation of Bovine Albumin Serum on Nano-Scale Titanium Nitride Coated Stainless Steel Substrates for Biomedical Applications. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 5 (5), 64-67. |
[18] | G. T. Burstein and C. Liu, Corros. Sci. 49 (2007) 4296-4306. |
[19] | M. Lundin, Y. Hedberg, T. Jiang, G. Herting, X. Wang, E. Thormann, E. Blomberg, I. O. Wallinder. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 366 (2012) 155-164. |
APA Style
Nosheen, S., Habib, F., Irfan, M., Waseem, B., Iqbal, W. (2023). Comparative Study of Proliferation of Bovine Albumin Serum on Different Metallic Substrates for Biomedical Applications. International Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 11(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbmr.20231101.11
ACS Style
Nosheen, S.; Habib, F.; Irfan, M.; Waseem, B.; Iqbal, W. Comparative Study of Proliferation of Bovine Albumin Serum on Different Metallic Substrates for Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2023, 11(1), 1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbmr.20231101.11
AMA Style
Nosheen S, Habib F, Irfan M, Waseem B, Iqbal W. Comparative Study of Proliferation of Bovine Albumin Serum on Different Metallic Substrates for Biomedical Applications. Int J Biomed Mater Res. 2023;11(1):1-5. doi: 10.11648/j.ijbmr.20231101.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijbmr.20231101.11, author = {Sumaira Nosheen and Farzana Habib and Muhammad Irfan and Bilal Waseem and Waqas Iqbal}, title = {Comparative Study of Proliferation of Bovine Albumin Serum on Different Metallic Substrates for Biomedical Applications}, journal = {International Journal of Biomedical Materials Research}, volume = {11}, number = {1}, pages = {1-5}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijbmr.20231101.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbmr.20231101.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijbmr.20231101.11}, abstract = {Pure titanium (Ti), titanium alloys, and different types of stainless steel are often employed for applications in orthopedic implants. Among these, titanium is considered the “gold standard.” However, tissue reactions around these metal surfaces and the changing trend to leave orthopedic devices in the body have led to a new examination of the preferred material. Nowadays various metallic materials are commonly employed to improve the life time of bioimplants. Three types of metals (SS-316L, SS-304L and pure Titanium) were used for a comparative study by considering adsorption properties of all. Metallic materials are attractive due to properties like less coefficient friction, high hardness value, and chemically inert in nature which make them attractive to be used in biochemical devices. The surface of these metals was prepared to study the adhesion of different type of animal proteins adhesion on their surface. Protein growth on these materials was studied by using AFM (atomic force microscope), SEM and FTIR at different time intervals (24h, 48h, 72h, 96h). The difference in density and weight of the samples before and after the adsorption of protein on substrates confirms the proliferation process on metals. Promising results were obtained at time interval of 96 hours. Overall, all the samples show similar behavior. }, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Comparative Study of Proliferation of Bovine Albumin Serum on Different Metallic Substrates for Biomedical Applications AU - Sumaira Nosheen AU - Farzana Habib AU - Muhammad Irfan AU - Bilal Waseem AU - Waqas Iqbal Y1 - 2023/12/05 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbmr.20231101.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijbmr.20231101.11 T2 - International Journal of Biomedical Materials Research JF - International Journal of Biomedical Materials Research JO - International Journal of Biomedical Materials Research SP - 1 EP - 5 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7579 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijbmr.20231101.11 AB - Pure titanium (Ti), titanium alloys, and different types of stainless steel are often employed for applications in orthopedic implants. Among these, titanium is considered the “gold standard.” However, tissue reactions around these metal surfaces and the changing trend to leave orthopedic devices in the body have led to a new examination of the preferred material. Nowadays various metallic materials are commonly employed to improve the life time of bioimplants. Three types of metals (SS-316L, SS-304L and pure Titanium) were used for a comparative study by considering adsorption properties of all. Metallic materials are attractive due to properties like less coefficient friction, high hardness value, and chemically inert in nature which make them attractive to be used in biochemical devices. The surface of these metals was prepared to study the adhesion of different type of animal proteins adhesion on their surface. Protein growth on these materials was studied by using AFM (atomic force microscope), SEM and FTIR at different time intervals (24h, 48h, 72h, 96h). The difference in density and weight of the samples before and after the adsorption of protein on substrates confirms the proliferation process on metals. Promising results were obtained at time interval of 96 hours. Overall, all the samples show similar behavior. VL - 11 IS - 1 ER -