The main goal of this study was to histologically evaluate the healing of surgically created defects on the tibiae of adult rats after implantation of bioactive glass. Twenty adult Wistar rats (body weight of 300g) were divided into two groups: bioglass treated group (n=10) and control group (n=10). Unicortical bone defects with 3-mm diameter were performed in both tibiae of the animals and filled with bioglass particles. The rats were then sacrificed at 14, 30 , 60 and 90 days, and the tissues were prepared for histological processing, sectioning, and staining with hematoxylin and eosin, as well as Mallory trichrome, and analyzed under light microscope. Within 7-14 days, both groups presented connective tissue septa with new bone formation, more intense in bioglass treated group. In the subsequent periods (30, 60 and 90 days), these groups presented more mature bone tissue around the glass particles. Bone trabeculae formed in all experimental periods were juxtaposed to the glass particles. It can be concluded that bioglass materials promoted bone formation over the entire extension of the defect, independently of the size of the granules, thus confirming their biological osteoconductive property.
| Published in | International Journal of Clinical and Developmental Anatomy (Volume 1, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijcda.20150102.11 |
| Page(s) | 13-21 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Bioglass, Albino Rat, Tibial Repair, Bone Healing
| [1] | Claes L, Willie B.: The enhancement of bone regeneration by ultrasound. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2007; 93:384–98. |
| [2] | Gautier E.: Sommer guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury. 2003; 34:B63–76. (Review). |
| [3] | Demers C, Hamdy CR, Corsi K, Chellat F, Tabrizian M, Yahia L.: Natural coral exoskeleton as a bone graft substitute: a review. Biomed Mater Eng 2002; 12:15–35. |
| [4] | Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Schneider R, Willenegger H, eds. Manual of Internal Fixation, 3rd ed. New York: Springer, 1995. |
| [5] | Wildemann B, Kadow-Romacker A, Haas NP, Schmidmaier G.: Quantification of various growth factors in different demineralized bone matrix preparations. J Biomed Mater Res, 2007; 81:437–42. |
| [6] | Boyce T, Edwards J, Scarborough N.: Allograft bone. The influence of processing on safety and performance. Orthop Clin North Am 1999; 30:571–81. |
| [7] | Ryan G, Pandit A, Apatsidis DP. :Fabrication methods of porous metals for use in orthopedic applications. Biomaterials 2006; 27:2651–70. |
| [8] | Mahony O, Jones JR.: Porous bioactive nanostructured scaffolds for bone regeneration: a sol-gel solution. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2008; 3:233–45. |
| [9] | Ohtsuki C, Kamitakahara M, Miyazaki T. Bioactive ceramic-based materials with designed reactivity for bone tissue regeneration. J R Soc Interface 2009; 6 (Suppl 3):S349–60. |
| [10] | Yu NY, Schindeler A, Little DG, Ruys AJ. Biodegradable poly (alpha-hydroxy acid) polymer scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010; 93:285–95. |
| [11] | Bohner M.: Calcium orthophosphates in medicine: from ceramics to calcium phosphate cements. Injury 2000; 31, (Suppl 4):37–47. |
| [12] | Jarcho M.: Calcium phosphate ceramics as hard tissue 1988, 523, 268-271. |
| [13] | Daculsi G, Hartmann DJ, Heughebaert M, Hamel LLe: Bioceramics. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol 1988, 20, 379- 384. |
| [14] | Wilson J. and Low SB.: Bioactive ceramics for periodontal treatment. Comparative studies in the Patus monkey. J Appl Biomater 1992; 3:123-9. |
| [15] | Low SB, King C, Krieger J.: An evaluation of bioactive ceramic in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997; 17:359-67.M (Eds.). Operative Orthopedics. pp. 139-149, JB Lippincott, |
| [16] | Turunen T, Peltola J, Helenius H, Yli-Urpo A, Happonen RP.: Bioactive glass and calcium carbonate granules as filler material around titanium and bioactive glass implants in the marrow space of the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997; 8:96-102. |
| [17] | Zamet JS, Darbar UR, Griffiths GS. : Particulate Bioglasses a grafting material in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24:410-8. 3. |
| [18] | Shapoff CA, Alexander DC, Clark AE.: Clinical use of a bioactive glass particulate in the treatment of human osseous defects. Compend Contin Educ Dent 1997; 18:352-63.Shors EC. Coralline bone graft substitutes. Orthop Clin the porosity and physical chemistry of calcium phosphate. |
| [19] | Schepers E, De Clercq M, Ducheyn P.: Bioactive glass particulate material as filler for bone lesions. J Oral Rehabil, 1991; 18:439-52. |
| [20] | Oonishi H, Kushitani S, Yasukawa E, Iwaki H, Hench LL, and Wilson J, et al.: Particulate Bio Glass compared with hydroxyapatiteas a bone graft substitute. Clin Orthopaedics 1997; 334:316-25. |
| [21] | Hench LL, Xynos ID, Polak JM.: Bioactive glasses for in situ tissue regeneration. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed. 2004; 15:543–62. |
| [22] | Hench LL, Paschal HA.: Direct chemical bond of bioactive glass ceramic materials to bone and muscle. J Biomed Mater Res 1970; 7:25-42. |
| [23] | Thomas MV, Puleo DA, Al-Sabbagh M.: Bioactive glass three decades on. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2005; 15:585–97. |
| [24] | Xynos ID, Edgar AJ, Buttery LD, and Hench LL, Polak JM.: Ionic products of bioactive glass dissolution increase proliferation of human osteoblasts and induce insulin-like growth factor II mRNA expression and protein synthesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2000; 276:461–5. |
| [25] | Loty C, Sautier JM, Loty S, Hattar S, Asselin A, and Oboeuf M, et al.: The biomimetics of bone: engineered glass-ceramics a paradigm for in vitro biomineralization studies. Connect Tissue Res.2002; 43:524–8. |
| [26] | Gough JE, Notingher I, Hench LL.: Osteoblast attachment and mineralized nodule formation on rough and smooth 45S5 bioactive glass monoliths. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2004; 68:640–50. |
| [27] | Renata N. Granito Æ Daniel Araki Ribeiro Æ Ana Claudia M. Renno´ Æ Christian Ravagnani Æ Paulo S. Bossini Æ Oscar Peitl-Filho Æ Edgar D. Zanotto Æ Nivaldo A. Parizotto Æ Jorge Oishi.: Effects of biosilicate and bioglass 45S5 on tibial bone consolidation on rats: a biomechanical and a histological study. J Mater Sci: Mater Med (2009) 20:2521–2526 DOI 10.1007/s10856-009-3824-z |
| [28] | Ribeiro DA and Matsumoto MA.: Low-level laser therapy improves bone repair in rats treated with anti-inflammatory drugs. J Oral Rehabil. 2008; 35:925–33. |
| [29] | Matsumoto MA, Ferino RV, and Monteleone GF, Ribeiro DA.: Low level laser therapy modulates cyclo-oxygenase-2 expression during bone repair in rats. Lasers Med Sci. 2009; 24:195–201. |
| [30] | Hamadouche M, Sedel, L.: Ceramics in orthopedics. J Bone Joint Surg. (Br) 2000; 82-B (8):1095-9. |
| [31] | Xin Liu, Mohamed N. Rahaman , and Qiang Fu: Bone regeneration in strong porous bioactive glass (13-93) scaffolds with an oriented microstructure implanted in rat calvarial defects. Acta Biomaterialia Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2013, Pages 4889–4898 |
| [32] | Maryam Seyedmajidi, Seyedmahmood Rabiee, Sina Haghanifar, Seyedkamal Seyedmajidi, Seyed Gholam ali Jorsaraei, Homayoun Alaghehmand Naghmeh Jamaatlu, and Ali Bijani: Histopathological, Histomorphometrical, and Radiographical Evaluation of Injectable Glass-Ceramic-Chitosan Nanocomposite in Bone Reconstruction of Rat International Journal of Biomaterials Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 719574, 8 pages |
| [33] | Mikos AG, McIntire LV, Anderson JM, Babensee JE (1998). Host response to tissue engineered devices. Adv. Drug .Deliv. Rev., 33: 111–139. |
| [34] | Wiley, Y.: Periodicals, Inc. J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 2001. |
| [35] | Wheeler DL, Montfort MJ, Mc Loughlin SW. Differential healing Hydroxyapatite and 45S5 bioactive glass. J Biomed Mater Res. 2001; 55:603–12. |
| [36] | Nelson Luiz de Macedo, Fábio da Silva Matuda, Luís Guilherme Scavonne de Macedo, Michel Borges Gonzalez, Suzana Martins Ouchi, Yasmin Rodarte Carvalho: Bone defect regeneration with bioactive glass implantation in rats. J Appl Oral Sci 2004; 12(2):137-43 |
| [37] | Vogell M, Voigt T, Gross U, Muk, C.: In vivo comparison of Particulate bioglass compared with hydroxyapatite as bioactive glass particles in rabbits. Biomaterials. 2001; 29:357–62. |
APA Style
Gamal Abdel Salam, Ali M. Ali, Osama F. Ahmed, Ibrahim S. Ali. (2015). Histological Study of the Effect of Bioactive Glass on Tibial Bone Repair in Rats. International Journal of Clinical and Developmental Anatomy, 1(2), 13-21. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcda.20150102.11
ACS Style
Gamal Abdel Salam; Ali M. Ali; Osama F. Ahmed; Ibrahim S. Ali. Histological Study of the Effect of Bioactive Glass on Tibial Bone Repair in Rats. Int. J. Clin. Dev. Anat. 2015, 1(2), 13-21. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcda.20150102.11
AMA Style
Gamal Abdel Salam, Ali M. Ali, Osama F. Ahmed, Ibrahim S. Ali. Histological Study of the Effect of Bioactive Glass on Tibial Bone Repair in Rats. Int J Clin Dev Anat. 2015;1(2):13-21. doi: 10.11648/j.ijcda.20150102.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijcda.20150102.11,
author = {Gamal Abdel Salam and Ali M. Ali and Osama F. Ahmed and Ibrahim S. Ali},
title = {Histological Study of the Effect of Bioactive Glass on Tibial Bone Repair in Rats},
journal = {International Journal of Clinical and Developmental Anatomy},
volume = {1},
number = {2},
pages = {13-21},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijcda.20150102.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcda.20150102.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijcda.20150102.11},
abstract = {The main goal of this study was to histologically evaluate the healing of surgically created defects on the tibiae of adult rats after implantation of bioactive glass. Twenty adult Wistar rats (body weight of 300g) were divided into two groups: bioglass treated group (n=10) and control group (n=10). Unicortical bone defects with 3-mm diameter were performed in both tibiae of the animals and filled with bioglass particles. The rats were then sacrificed at 14, 30 , 60 and 90 days, and the tissues were prepared for histological processing, sectioning, and staining with hematoxylin and eosin, as well as Mallory trichrome, and analyzed under light microscope. Within 7-14 days, both groups presented connective tissue septa with new bone formation, more intense in bioglass treated group. In the subsequent periods (30, 60 and 90 days), these groups presented more mature bone tissue around the glass particles. Bone trabeculae formed in all experimental periods were juxtaposed to the glass particles. It can be concluded that bioglass materials promoted bone formation over the entire extension of the defect, independently of the size of the granules, thus confirming their biological osteoconductive property.},
year = {2015}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Histological Study of the Effect of Bioactive Glass on Tibial Bone Repair in Rats AU - Gamal Abdel Salam AU - Ali M. Ali AU - Osama F. Ahmed AU - Ibrahim S. Ali Y1 - 2015/06/11 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcda.20150102.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijcda.20150102.11 T2 - International Journal of Clinical and Developmental Anatomy JF - International Journal of Clinical and Developmental Anatomy JO - International Journal of Clinical and Developmental Anatomy SP - 13 EP - 21 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-8008 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijcda.20150102.11 AB - The main goal of this study was to histologically evaluate the healing of surgically created defects on the tibiae of adult rats after implantation of bioactive glass. Twenty adult Wistar rats (body weight of 300g) were divided into two groups: bioglass treated group (n=10) and control group (n=10). Unicortical bone defects with 3-mm diameter were performed in both tibiae of the animals and filled with bioglass particles. The rats were then sacrificed at 14, 30 , 60 and 90 days, and the tissues were prepared for histological processing, sectioning, and staining with hematoxylin and eosin, as well as Mallory trichrome, and analyzed under light microscope. Within 7-14 days, both groups presented connective tissue septa with new bone formation, more intense in bioglass treated group. In the subsequent periods (30, 60 and 90 days), these groups presented more mature bone tissue around the glass particles. Bone trabeculae formed in all experimental periods were juxtaposed to the glass particles. It can be concluded that bioglass materials promoted bone formation over the entire extension of the defect, independently of the size of the granules, thus confirming their biological osteoconductive property. VL - 1 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: