Screw metal implants with rough or the smooth polished were introduced surface in a tibial bone proximal condyle of not purebred rabbits. Within 6 months after operation the considerable distinctions of radiological data were revealed not. 2 months later after introduction of implants with a rough surface the effort enclosed for its twisting is, much more, than for removal of the polished product. However, stability of fixing of implants was practically made even at 6 months. On remote rough implants there is a set of tissue scraps whereas on products with a smooth surface the tissue remains were much less. Surrounding tissues strongly join a rough surface, grow into cavities, and during removal of such products there is a considerable trauma of tissues round an implantation place. Smooth implants have the smaller area of contact with organism tissues, they are fixed due to bicortical implantation, during removal easily get out and don't break off surrounding tissues.
| Published in | International Journal of Dental Medicine (Volume 2, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijdm.20160201.11 |
| Page(s) | 1-4 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Screw Metal Dentistry Implants, Intra Bone Implantation, Durability of Implant Fixing, Features of Implant Removal
| [1] | Günter W. E., Dambayev G. Ts., Sysolyatin P. G., etc. Medical materials and implants with shape memory. Tomsk: Publishing house Tomsk un-that, 1998. 487 p. |
| [2] | Maĭborodin I. V., Iakushenko V. K., Maĭborodina V. I. Interaction of nickelide-titanium implant with tissues in human. Arkh Patol. 2002, vol. 64, № 2, p. 50-52. |
| [3] | Maĭborodin I. V., Shevela A. I., Matveeva V. A. et al. Morphological tissue changes after the implantation of elastic lamellar foreign bodies in the experiment. Morfologiia. 2012, vol. 141, № 2, p. 54-60. |
| [4] | Maiborodin I. V., Kuznetsova I. V., Beregovoy E. A. et al. Tissue reactions during the degradation of polylactide implants in the body. Morfologiia. 2013, vol. 143, № 3, p. 59-65. |
| [5] | Maĭborodin I. V., Shevela A. I., Kuznetsova I. V. et al. Tissue responses to silicone materials in the body. Arkh Patol. 2013, vol. 75, № 4, p. 28-33. |
| [6] | Miro-Mur F., Hindié M., Kandhaya-Pillai R. et al. Medical-grade silicone induces release of proinflammatory cytokines in peripheral blood mononuclear cells without activating T cells. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 2009, vol. 90, № 2, p. 510-520. |
| [7] | Rodriguez A. and Anderson J. M. Evaluation of clinical biomaterial surface effects on T lymphocyte activation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A., 2010, vol. 92, № 1, p. 214-220. |
| [8] | Rodriguez A., Meyerson H. and Anderson J.M. Quantitative in vivo cytokine analysis at synthetic biomaterial implant sites. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A., 2009, vol. 89, № 1, p. 152-159. |
| [9] | Gabriel S. E., Woods J. E., O'Fallon W.M. et al. Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. N. Engl. J. Med., 1997, vol. 336, № 10, p. 677-682. |
| [10] | Kanhai R. C., Hage J. J., Karim R. B., Mulder J.W. Exceptional presenting conditions and outcome of augmentation mammaplasty in male-to-female transsexuals. Ann. Plast. Surg., 1999, vol. 43, № 5, p. 476-483. |
| [11] | Tebbetts J. B. A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., 2002, vol. 109, № 4, p. 1396-1409. |
APA Style
Michael S. Toder, Andrew I. Shevela, Alexander A. Shevela, Paul A. Zheleznyi, Anna P. Zheleznaia, et al. (2016). Some Features of the Dental Metal Implant Changes with Different Character of a Surface After Administration into Bone Tissue of Rabbits. International Journal of Dental Medicine, 2(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdm.20160201.11
ACS Style
Michael S. Toder; Andrew I. Shevela; Alexander A. Shevela; Paul A. Zheleznyi; Anna P. Zheleznaia, et al. Some Features of the Dental Metal Implant Changes with Different Character of a Surface After Administration into Bone Tissue of Rabbits. Int. J. Dent. Med. 2016, 2(1), 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.ijdm.20160201.11
AMA Style
Michael S. Toder, Andrew I. Shevela, Alexander A. Shevela, Paul A. Zheleznyi, Anna P. Zheleznaia, et al. Some Features of the Dental Metal Implant Changes with Different Character of a Surface After Administration into Bone Tissue of Rabbits. Int J Dent Med. 2016;2(1):1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.ijdm.20160201.11
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijdm.20160201.11,
author = {Michael S. Toder and Andrew I. Shevela and Alexander A. Shevela and Paul A. Zheleznyi and Anna P. Zheleznaia and Igor V. Mayborodin},
title = {Some Features of the Dental Metal Implant Changes with Different Character of a Surface After Administration into Bone Tissue of Rabbits},
journal = {International Journal of Dental Medicine},
volume = {2},
number = {1},
pages = {1-4},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijdm.20160201.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdm.20160201.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijdm.20160201.11},
abstract = {Screw metal implants with rough or the smooth polished were introduced surface in a tibial bone proximal condyle of not purebred rabbits. Within 6 months after operation the considerable distinctions of radiological data were revealed not. 2 months later after introduction of implants with a rough surface the effort enclosed for its twisting is, much more, than for removal of the polished product. However, stability of fixing of implants was practically made even at 6 months. On remote rough implants there is a set of tissue scraps whereas on products with a smooth surface the tissue remains were much less. Surrounding tissues strongly join a rough surface, grow into cavities, and during removal of such products there is a considerable trauma of tissues round an implantation place. Smooth implants have the smaller area of contact with organism tissues, they are fixed due to bicortical implantation, during removal easily get out and don't break off surrounding tissues.},
year = {2016}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Some Features of the Dental Metal Implant Changes with Different Character of a Surface After Administration into Bone Tissue of Rabbits AU - Michael S. Toder AU - Andrew I. Shevela AU - Alexander A. Shevela AU - Paul A. Zheleznyi AU - Anna P. Zheleznaia AU - Igor V. Mayborodin Y1 - 2016/06/16 PY - 2016 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdm.20160201.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijdm.20160201.11 T2 - International Journal of Dental Medicine JF - International Journal of Dental Medicine JO - International Journal of Dental Medicine SP - 1 EP - 4 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-1387 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdm.20160201.11 AB - Screw metal implants with rough or the smooth polished were introduced surface in a tibial bone proximal condyle of not purebred rabbits. Within 6 months after operation the considerable distinctions of radiological data were revealed not. 2 months later after introduction of implants with a rough surface the effort enclosed for its twisting is, much more, than for removal of the polished product. However, stability of fixing of implants was practically made even at 6 months. On remote rough implants there is a set of tissue scraps whereas on products with a smooth surface the tissue remains were much less. Surrounding tissues strongly join a rough surface, grow into cavities, and during removal of such products there is a considerable trauma of tissues round an implantation place. Smooth implants have the smaller area of contact with organism tissues, they are fixed due to bicortical implantation, during removal easily get out and don't break off surrounding tissues. VL - 2 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: