Aim: This ex-vivo study evaluated the efficiency of an Er, Cr: YSGG laser (2780 nm) at different power settings to remove smear layer from the apical third of mesial roots of first lower molars by using SEM. Materials & Methods: 42 mesial root canals of first mandibular molars (type II Vertucci) were divided into 4 groups of 10 teeth each. The rest 2 teeth were used as control groups. After coronal access, all teeth were instrumented by Protaper Gold rotary files up to size F2 (25/0.08), followed an irrigation protocol with saline. Then, the experimental groups were irradiated by Er, Cr: YSGG laser. Four different output powers were tested, namely 1.25 W, 1.5 W, 2 W, 2.5 W was used to irradiate the roots in Group 1 (G1), Group 2 (G2), Group 3 (G3) and Group 4 (G4) respectively. Control group (n=2) was instrumented as experimental groups but not irradiated. Teeth were sectioned longitudinally and observed under SEM. Results were statistically analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis Test and Mann-Whitney Test. Results: None of the tested groups succeeded in removing completely the smear layer from apical dentinal walls. The results showed no statistically significant differences between laser groups in removing smear layer from apical third of lower molars. Group 3 (2 W) showed better outcomes but it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The outcome of the present study showed that laser-assisted smear layer removal with an Er, Cr: YSGG laser with the tested parameters is not predicable for the apical third of root canals. Clinical significance: The presence of chelating factor may play an important role in the mechanism of laser-assisted removal of smear layer in the apical third of root canals. Further research needs to be performed in order to find the optimal irradiation protocol.
Published in | International Journal of Dental Medicine (Volume 7, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijdm.20210702.12 |
Page(s) | 20-24 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Smear Layer Removal, Er, Cr: YSGG Laser, Mesial Root, Molars
[1] | Mader CL, Baumgartner JC, Peters DD. Scanning electron microscopic in¬vestigation of the smeared layer on root canal walls. J Endod 1984; 10 (10): 477-83. |
[2] | Kennedy WA, Walker III WA, Gough RW, Smear layer removal effects on apical leakage. January 1986; 12 (1): 21-27. |
[3] | Soares TF, Varella CH, Pileggi R, Adewumi A, Guelmann M. Impact of Er, Cr: YSGG laser therapy on the cleanliness of the root canal walls of primary teeth. J Endod 2008; 34: 474–7. |
[4] | Yamazaki R, Goya C, Yu DG, Kimura Y, Matsumoto K. Effects of erbium, chromium: YSGG laser irradiation on root canal walls: a scanning electron microscopic and thermographic study. J Endod 2001; 27 (1): 9-12. |
[5] | George R, Walsh LJ. Apical extrusion of root canal irrigants when using Er: YAG and Er, Cr: YSGG lasers with optical fibers: an in vitro dye study. Journal of Endodontics 2008; 34: 706–712. |
[6] | Blanken J, De Moor RJG, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R. Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 1: A visualization study. Lasers Surg Med 2009; 41 (7): 514-519. |
[7] | De Moor RJG, Blanken J, Meire M, Verdaasdonk R. Laser induced explosive vapor and cavitation resulting in effective irrigation of the root canal. Part 2: Evaluation of the efficacy. Lasers Surg Med 2009; 41 (7): 520-523. |
[8] | De Groot SD, Verhaagen B, Versluis M, Wu MK, Wesselink PR, van der Sluis. LW. Laser-activated irrigation within root canals: cle¬aning efficacy and flow visualization. Int Endod J. 2009; 42: 1077-83. |
[9] | Blanken JW, Verdaasdonk RM. Cavitation as a working mechanism of the Er, Cr: YSGG Laser in endodontics: a visualization study. Journal of Oral Laser Applications 2007; 7: 97–106. |
[10] | Al-Mafrachi RM, Awazli LG, Al-Maliky MA. Investigation of the Effect of Er: Cr: Ysgg Laser 2780 nm in Comparison with XP-Endo Finisher on Root Canal Dentin Permeability and Smear Layer Removal: An In Vitro Study. Dent Health Curr Res 2017; 4: 1. |
[11] | Schoop U, Barylyak A, Goharkhay K, et al. The impact of an erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet laser with radial-firing tips on endodontic treatment. Lasers in Medical Science. 2009; 24 (1): 59–65. |
[12] | Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanent teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984; 58: 589–99. |
[13] | Tomaszewska IM, Skinningsrud B, Jarzębska A, Pękala JR, Tarasiuk J, Iwanaga. Internal and external morphology of mandibular molars: An original micro-CT study and meta-analysis with review of implications for endodontic therapy. Clinical Anatomy March 2018; 31 (6). |
[14] | Gulabivala, K., Aung, T. H., Alavi, A., & Ng, Y. L. Root and canal morphology of Burmese mandibular molars. International Endodontic Journal 2001; 34 (5): 359–70. |
[15] | Ali MN, Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Matsuola E, Kinoshita J-I, Matsumoto K. Irradiation with Crown-Down Technique in Vitro. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery 2005; 23 (2): 196–201. |
[16] | Bolhari B, Ehsani S, Etemadi A, Shafaq M, Nosrat A. Efficacy of Er, Cr: YSGG laser in removing smear layer and debris with two different output powers. Photomed Laser Surg 2014; 32: 527–32. |
[17] | Brugnera A JR, Zanin F, Barbin EL, Spano JC, Santana R, Pecora JD. Effects of Er: YAG and Nd: YAG laser irradiation on radicular dentine permeability using different irrigating solutions. Lasers Surg Med 2003; 33: 256–9. |
[18] | Shahriari S, Kasraei S, Roshanaei G, Karkeabadi H, Davanloo H. Efficacy of Sodium Hypochlorite Activated With Laser in Intracanal Smear Layer Removal: An SEM Study. J Lasers Med Sci 2017 Winter; 8 (1): 36-41. |
[19] | Al-Karadaghi TS, Gutknecht N, Jawad HA, Vanweersch L, Franzen R. Evaluation of Temperature Elevation During Root Canal Treatment with Dual Wavelength Laser: 2780 nm Er, Cr: YSGG and 940 nm Diode. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015 Sep; 33 (9): 460-6. |
[20] | Torabinejad M, Khademi AA, Babagoli J, Cho Y, Johnson WB, Bozhilov K, Kim J, Shabahang S. A new solution for the removal of the smear layer. J Endod 2003; 29: 170-5. |
[21] | Arslan H, Ayrancı LB, Karatas E, Topcuoglu HS, Yavuz MS, and Kesim B. Effect of Agitation of EDTA with 808-Nanometer Diode Laser on Removal of Smear Layer. J Endod 2013; 39: 1589–1592. |
[22] | Ribeiro RG, Marchesan MA, Silva RG, Sousa-Neto MD, Pécora JD. Dentin permeability of the apical third in different groups of teeth. Braz Dent J 2010; 21: 216-219. |
[23] | Ruddle CJ. The ProTaper technique. Shaping the future of endodontics. In: Castellucci A, ed. Endodontics, Florence: II Tridente; 2005; 2: 548-563. |
[24] | Nielsen BA, Baumgartner JC. Comparison of the EndoVac system to needle irrigation of root canals. J Endod 2007; 33: 611-615. |
[25] | Pasricha SK, Makkar S, Gupta P. Pressure alteration techniques in endodontics-a review of literature. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR. 2015; 9: ZE01. |
[26] | Khedmat S, Shokouhinejad N. Comparison of the efficacy of three chelating agents in smear layer removal. J Endod 2008; 34: 599–602. |
[27] | Gutknecht N. Lasers in Endodontics. Journal of the Laser and Health Academy 2008; 4 (1). |
[28] | Mohammadi Z. Laser applications in endodontics: an update review. Int Dent J 2009; 59 (1): 35–46. |
[29] | Martins MR, Franzen R, Depraet F, Gutknecht N. Rationale for using a double-wavelength (940 nm + 2780 nm) laser in endodontics: literature overview and proof-of-concept. Lasers in Dental Science 2018; 2: 29–41. |
[30] | Cercadillo-Ibarguren I, Espana-Tost A, Arnabat-Dominguez J, Valmaseda-Castellon E, Berini-Aytes L, Gay-Escoda C. Histologic evaluation of thermal damage produced on soft tissues by CO2, Er, Cr: YSGG and diode lasers. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15 (6): 912. |
APA Style
Evrykleia Kourti, Dimitris Strakas, Ourania Pantelidou-Papadopoulou, Kosmas Tolidis. (2021). Smear Layer Removal by Means of Erbium, Chromium: Yttrium Scandium Gallium Garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) Laser Irradiation from Apical Third of Mesial Root Canals. International Journal of Dental Medicine, 7(2), 20-24. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdm.20210702.12
ACS Style
Evrykleia Kourti; Dimitris Strakas; Ourania Pantelidou-Papadopoulou; Kosmas Tolidis. Smear Layer Removal by Means of Erbium, Chromium: Yttrium Scandium Gallium Garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) Laser Irradiation from Apical Third of Mesial Root Canals. Int. J. Dent. Med. 2021, 7(2), 20-24. doi: 10.11648/j.ijdm.20210702.12
AMA Style
Evrykleia Kourti, Dimitris Strakas, Ourania Pantelidou-Papadopoulou, Kosmas Tolidis. Smear Layer Removal by Means of Erbium, Chromium: Yttrium Scandium Gallium Garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) Laser Irradiation from Apical Third of Mesial Root Canals. Int J Dent Med. 2021;7(2):20-24. doi: 10.11648/j.ijdm.20210702.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijdm.20210702.12, author = {Evrykleia Kourti and Dimitris Strakas and Ourania Pantelidou-Papadopoulou and Kosmas Tolidis}, title = {Smear Layer Removal by Means of Erbium, Chromium: Yttrium Scandium Gallium Garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) Laser Irradiation from Apical Third of Mesial Root Canals}, journal = {International Journal of Dental Medicine}, volume = {7}, number = {2}, pages = {20-24}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijdm.20210702.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdm.20210702.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijdm.20210702.12}, abstract = {Aim: This ex-vivo study evaluated the efficiency of an Er, Cr: YSGG laser (2780 nm) at different power settings to remove smear layer from the apical third of mesial roots of first lower molars by using SEM. Materials & Methods: 42 mesial root canals of first mandibular molars (type II Vertucci) were divided into 4 groups of 10 teeth each. The rest 2 teeth were used as control groups. After coronal access, all teeth were instrumented by Protaper Gold rotary files up to size F2 (25/0.08), followed an irrigation protocol with saline. Then, the experimental groups were irradiated by Er, Cr: YSGG laser. Four different output powers were tested, namely 1.25 W, 1.5 W, 2 W, 2.5 W was used to irradiate the roots in Group 1 (G1), Group 2 (G2), Group 3 (G3) and Group 4 (G4) respectively. Control group (n=2) was instrumented as experimental groups but not irradiated. Teeth were sectioned longitudinally and observed under SEM. Results were statistically analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis Test and Mann-Whitney Test. Results: None of the tested groups succeeded in removing completely the smear layer from apical dentinal walls. The results showed no statistically significant differences between laser groups in removing smear layer from apical third of lower molars. Group 3 (2 W) showed better outcomes but it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The outcome of the present study showed that laser-assisted smear layer removal with an Er, Cr: YSGG laser with the tested parameters is not predicable for the apical third of root canals. Clinical significance: The presence of chelating factor may play an important role in the mechanism of laser-assisted removal of smear layer in the apical third of root canals. Further research needs to be performed in order to find the optimal irradiation protocol.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Smear Layer Removal by Means of Erbium, Chromium: Yttrium Scandium Gallium Garnet (Er, Cr: YSGG) Laser Irradiation from Apical Third of Mesial Root Canals AU - Evrykleia Kourti AU - Dimitris Strakas AU - Ourania Pantelidou-Papadopoulou AU - Kosmas Tolidis Y1 - 2021/09/04 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdm.20210702.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijdm.20210702.12 T2 - International Journal of Dental Medicine JF - International Journal of Dental Medicine JO - International Journal of Dental Medicine SP - 20 EP - 24 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-1387 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijdm.20210702.12 AB - Aim: This ex-vivo study evaluated the efficiency of an Er, Cr: YSGG laser (2780 nm) at different power settings to remove smear layer from the apical third of mesial roots of first lower molars by using SEM. Materials & Methods: 42 mesial root canals of first mandibular molars (type II Vertucci) were divided into 4 groups of 10 teeth each. The rest 2 teeth were used as control groups. After coronal access, all teeth were instrumented by Protaper Gold rotary files up to size F2 (25/0.08), followed an irrigation protocol with saline. Then, the experimental groups were irradiated by Er, Cr: YSGG laser. Four different output powers were tested, namely 1.25 W, 1.5 W, 2 W, 2.5 W was used to irradiate the roots in Group 1 (G1), Group 2 (G2), Group 3 (G3) and Group 4 (G4) respectively. Control group (n=2) was instrumented as experimental groups but not irradiated. Teeth were sectioned longitudinally and observed under SEM. Results were statistically analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis Test and Mann-Whitney Test. Results: None of the tested groups succeeded in removing completely the smear layer from apical dentinal walls. The results showed no statistically significant differences between laser groups in removing smear layer from apical third of lower molars. Group 3 (2 W) showed better outcomes but it was not statistically significant. Conclusion: The outcome of the present study showed that laser-assisted smear layer removal with an Er, Cr: YSGG laser with the tested parameters is not predicable for the apical third of root canals. Clinical significance: The presence of chelating factor may play an important role in the mechanism of laser-assisted removal of smear layer in the apical third of root canals. Further research needs to be performed in order to find the optimal irradiation protocol. VL - 7 IS - 2 ER -