Social Division of Labour as an Explanatory Principle and as a Foundation for Legitimation

Odaci Luiz Coradini

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Social Division of Labour as an Explanatory Principle and as a Foundation for Legitimation

Odaci Luiz Coradini

Published in International Journal of Education, Culture and Society (Volume 7, Issue 3)

Received: 27 March 2022 Accepted: 15 April 2022 Published: 8 June 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The article presents results of the analysis of the conceptions and uses of the social division of labour by the statistical classification schemes and by the social sciences. The general hypothesis pursued is that the social division of labour is used as an explanatory principle and as a basis for legitimation of the social structures. These uses encompass both the current statistical classification schemes and the social sciences involved. In addition to the introduction, a second item discusses the origins and meanings of the social division of labour for the social sciences and its relations with theoretical problems such as the multidimensionality of social structures. Next, the synthesis of the conception and uses of the social division of labour by the main statistical classification schemes in vogue is presented. The high degree of redundancy of statistical classifications is exposed below, particularly with regard to occupations and status in employment. The categories of managers are particularly examined as the main empirical reference. The next item presents the results of the examination of the overlapping of categories linked management with the condition of the employer and the overvaluation of the amount of schooling. Finally, the last item discusses general issues related to the uses of the social division of labour and its limits and relationships with theoretical foundations of the social sciences.

Published in	International Journal of Education, Culture and Society (Volume 7, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13
Page(s)	137-144
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Social Division of Labour, Social Structure, Social Hierarchy, Occupational and Statistical Classifications, Sociological Theory

References

[1]	Boltanski, L and Chiapello, E (1999) Le Nouvel Esprit du Capitalisme ((The new spirit of capitalism). Paris: Gallimard.
[2]	Bourdieu P (1979) La Distinction; Critique Sociales du Jugement (The distinction; Social Critique of Judgment). Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
[3]	Bourdieu P (1980) Le Sens Pratique (The Practical Sense). Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
[4]	Bourdieu P (1989) La Noblesse d´État; Grandes Écoles et Esprit de Corps State Nobility; Grandes Ecoles and Esprit de Corps). Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.
[5]	Chauvel L et al. (2002) Enjeux et usages des categories socioprofessionelles; Traditions nationales, comparaisons internationals et standardization européenne (Issues and uses of socio-professional categories; National traditions, international comparisons and European standardization). Presses de Sciences Po, no. 45-46: 157-185.
[6]	Desrosières A (2005) Décrire l´État ou Explorer La societé: les deus sources de la statistique publique (Describing the State or Exploring Society: the two sources of official statistics), Gèneses, no. 58: 4-27.
[7]	Desrosières A (2008) Pour une Sociologie de la Quantification; l´Argument Statistique I (For a Sociology of Quantification; Statistical Argument I). Paris: Paristech.
[8]	https://international.ipums.org/international/ Minnesota Population Center. (2018). Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota. (Accessed 03 mars 2018).
[9]	Hunter D (2015) Review of the International Classification of Status in Employment (ICSE). Paper prepared the Expert Group on International Statistical Classifications. New York: International Labour Office.
[10]	International Labor Organization (ILO) (2012b) http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/stat/isco/index.htm October, 2012.
[11]	International Labour Office (2012) International Standard Classification of Occupation. ISCO-08; Vol 1 Structure, group definitions and correspondence tables. Geneva: International Labour Office.
[12]	Leiulfsrud H, Bison I. and Jensberg H (2005) Social Class in Europe. European Social Survey 2002/3. Trondheim: NTNU Social Research Ltd.
[13]	Weber M. 1983. Fundamentos de Sociologia (Fundamentals of Sociology). Porto: Rés Editora.
[14]	Weber M (1984) Economia y Sociedade; Esbozo de Sociología Comprensiva Economy and Society; Comprehensive Sociology Outline). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
[15]	Wright E O (1980) Class and Occupation. Theory and Society, 9 (1): 177-214.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Odaci Luiz Coradini. (2022). Social Division of Labour as an Explanatory Principle and as a Foundation for Legitimation. International Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 7(3), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Odaci Luiz Coradini. Social Division of Labour as an Explanatory Principle and as a Foundation for Legitimation. Int. J. Educ. Cult. Soc. 2022, 7(3), 137-144. doi: 10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Odaci Luiz Coradini. Social Division of Labour as an Explanatory Principle and as a Foundation for Legitimation. Int J Educ Cult Soc. 2022;7(3):137-144. doi: 10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13,
  author = {Odaci Luiz Coradini},
  title = {Social Division of Labour as an Explanatory Principle and as a Foundation for Legitimation},
  journal = {International Journal of Education, Culture and Society},
  volume = {7},
  number = {3},
  pages = {137-144},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijecs.20220703.13},
  abstract = {The article presents results of the analysis of the conceptions and uses of the social division of labour by the statistical classification schemes and by the social sciences. The general hypothesis pursued is that the social division of labour is used as an explanatory principle and as a basis for legitimation of the social structures. These uses encompass both the current statistical classification schemes and the social sciences involved. In addition to the introduction, a second item discusses the origins and meanings of the social division of labour for the social sciences and its relations with theoretical problems such as the multidimensionality of social structures. Next, the synthesis of the conception and uses of the social division of labour by the main statistical classification schemes in vogue is presented. The high degree of redundancy of statistical classifications is exposed below, particularly with regard to occupations and status in employment. The categories of managers are particularly examined as the main empirical reference. The next item presents the results of the examination of the overlapping of categories linked management with the condition of the employer and the overvaluation of the amount of schooling. Finally, the last item discusses general issues related to the uses of the social division of labour and its limits and relationships with theoretical foundations of the social sciences.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Social Division of Labour as an Explanatory Principle and as a Foundation for Legitimation
AU  - Odaci Luiz Coradini
Y1  - 2022/06/08
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13
T2  - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society
JF  - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society
JO  - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society
SP  - 137
EP  - 144
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3363
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13
AB  - The article presents results of the analysis of the conceptions and uses of the social division of labour by the statistical classification schemes and by the social sciences. The general hypothesis pursued is that the social division of labour is used as an explanatory principle and as a basis for legitimation of the social structures. These uses encompass both the current statistical classification schemes and the social sciences involved. In addition to the introduction, a second item discusses the origins and meanings of the social division of labour for the social sciences and its relations with theoretical problems such as the multidimensionality of social structures. Next, the synthesis of the conception and uses of the social division of labour by the main statistical classification schemes in vogue is presented. The high degree of redundancy of statistical classifications is exposed below, particularly with regard to occupations and status in employment. The categories of managers are particularly examined as the main empirical reference. The next item presents the results of the examination of the overlapping of categories linked management with the condition of the employer and the overvaluation of the amount of schooling. Finally, the last item discusses general issues related to the uses of the social division of labour and its limits and relationships with theoretical foundations of the social sciences.
VL  - 7
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Odaci Luiz Coradini

Institute of Philosophy and Human Sciences, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Odaci Luiz Coradini. (2022). Social Division of Labour as an Explanatory Principle and as a Foundation for Legitimation. International Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 7(3), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Odaci Luiz Coradini. Social Division of Labour as an Explanatory Principle and as a Foundation for Legitimation. Int. J. Educ. Cult. Soc. 2022, 7(3), 137-144. doi: 10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Odaci Luiz Coradini. Social Division of Labour as an Explanatory Principle and as a Foundation for Legitimation. Int J Educ Cult Soc. 2022;7(3):137-144. doi: 10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13,
  author = {Odaci Luiz Coradini},
  title = {Social Division of Labour as an Explanatory Principle and as a Foundation for Legitimation},
  journal = {International Journal of Education, Culture and Society},
  volume = {7},
  number = {3},
  pages = {137-144},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijecs.20220703.13},
  abstract = {The article presents results of the analysis of the conceptions and uses of the social division of labour by the statistical classification schemes and by the social sciences. The general hypothesis pursued is that the social division of labour is used as an explanatory principle and as a basis for legitimation of the social structures. These uses encompass both the current statistical classification schemes and the social sciences involved. In addition to the introduction, a second item discusses the origins and meanings of the social division of labour for the social sciences and its relations with theoretical problems such as the multidimensionality of social structures. Next, the synthesis of the conception and uses of the social division of labour by the main statistical classification schemes in vogue is presented. The high degree of redundancy of statistical classifications is exposed below, particularly with regard to occupations and status in employment. The categories of managers are particularly examined as the main empirical reference. The next item presents the results of the examination of the overlapping of categories linked management with the condition of the employer and the overvaluation of the amount of schooling. Finally, the last item discusses general issues related to the uses of the social division of labour and its limits and relationships with theoretical foundations of the social sciences.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Social Division of Labour as an Explanatory Principle and as a Foundation for Legitimation
AU  - Odaci Luiz Coradini
Y1  - 2022/06/08
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13
T2  - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society
JF  - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society
JO  - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society
SP  - 137
EP  - 144
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-3363
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20220703.13
AB  - The article presents results of the analysis of the conceptions and uses of the social division of labour by the statistical classification schemes and by the social sciences. The general hypothesis pursued is that the social division of labour is used as an explanatory principle and as a basis for legitimation of the social structures. These uses encompass both the current statistical classification schemes and the social sciences involved. In addition to the introduction, a second item discusses the origins and meanings of the social division of labour for the social sciences and its relations with theoretical problems such as the multidimensionality of social structures. Next, the synthesis of the conception and uses of the social division of labour by the main statistical classification schemes in vogue is presented. The high degree of redundancy of statistical classifications is exposed below, particularly with regard to occupations and status in employment. The categories of managers are particularly examined as the main empirical reference. The next item presents the results of the examination of the overlapping of categories linked management with the condition of the employer and the overvaluation of the amount of schooling. Finally, the last item discusses general issues related to the uses of the social division of labour and its limits and relationships with theoretical foundations of the social sciences.
VL  - 7
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download