Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

The Question of Evil in Philosophy: A Critical Reading of Leibniz’s Thinking

Received: 8 October 2024     Accepted: 6 November 2024     Published: 27 December 2024
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Among the major themes that govern, the question of evil is one of the most troubling issues that many theologians and philosophers have been confronted with. Many thinkers have clearly admitted their dismay and uncertainties in the face of this problem, and others have complained of their inability to provide a satisfactory answer. Many atheists have tried to take advantage of this difficulty. They have then used this question to try to call into question the existence of God and thus arouse doubt in believers. More than a theme, it is a guiding idea although it changes value during the journey. Thus, the question of evil, which raises different types of questions, interests mythology, theology and philosophy. Evil is this transhistorical and inescapable pandemic, to which it is useless to add, is universal. It is indifferent to no one and the adiaphoras of the Stoics only concern what does not depend on us. In the very extension of the concept, several possible approaches must be taken into account: does evil come from our physical suffering, from the sensible; or is it moral in the sense that it touches on sin? Or finally, is it simply a metaphysical evil, this anguish of man in the face of his imperfection? Some philosophers, including Leibniz, have looked into the question. This article presents some reflections of philosophers and especially a critical reflection of the thought of the illustrious man of science Leibniz, on the subject.

Published in International Journal of Education, Culture and Society (Volume 9, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.20
Page(s) 368-376
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

God, Evil, Responsible, Theodicy, Origin

References
[1] Scholasticism is a philosophical teaching which was given in Europe from the 10th to the 16th century. and which consisted of linking Christian dogmas and Revelation to traditional philosophy in a complete formalism on the level of discourse. (This teaching was based on grammatical, logical, syllogistic and ontological concepts from Aristotle.)
[2] Manichaeism is, in its contemporary meaning, in the figurative and literary sense, an attitude consisting of simplifying the relationships of the world, reduced to a simple opposition of good and evil.
[3] Emmanuel Kant, Religion within the limits of simple reason, 1, 4, Éd. Vrin, trad. J. Gibelin revew by M. Naar, 1983, pp. 82-83.
[4] Paul Ricœur, Evil: a challenge to philosophy and theology, in Lectures 3, Ed. Seuil, 1994, pp. 229-230.
[5] Leibniz, citing the mentality of certain philosophers. Theodicy at Garnier, Flam-marion-France, 1969, § 7.
[6] Leibniz, citing the mentality of certain philosophers. Theodicy at Garnier, Flam-marion-France, 1969, § 18.
[7] Leibniz, citing the mentality of certain philosophers. Theodicy at Garnier, Flam-marion-France, 1969, § 20.
[8] The Molists share the theory of Luis de Molina, born on September 29, 1535 in Cuenca (Spain) and died on October 12, 1600 in Madrid. He was one of the most famous Spanish Jesuit theologians of the 16th century. It is at the origin of a particular theory of the relations between divine grace and human freedom which has since been called molinism.
[9] Action in the ordinary sense and not the opposite of passion.
[10] Leibniz, citing the mentality of certain philosophers. Theodicy at Garnier, Flam-marion-France, 1969, § 91.
[11] German expression meaning literally: "situation in life"; can also be the cultural background, social background or historical context in which a work is produced.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Kuate, H. D. (2024). The Question of Evil in Philosophy: A Critical Reading of Leibniz’s Thinking. International Journal of Education, Culture and Society, 9(6), 368-376. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.20

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Kuate, H. D. The Question of Evil in Philosophy: A Critical Reading of Leibniz’s Thinking. Int. J. Educ. Cult. Soc. 2024, 9(6), 368-376. doi: 10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.20

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Kuate HD. The Question of Evil in Philosophy: A Critical Reading of Leibniz’s Thinking. Int J Educ Cult Soc. 2024;9(6):368-376. doi: 10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.20

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.20,
      author = {Herve Djilo Kuate},
      title = {The Question of Evil in Philosophy: A Critical Reading of Leibniz’s Thinking
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Education, Culture and Society},
      volume = {9},
      number = {6},
      pages = {368-376},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.20},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.20},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijecs.20240906.20},
      abstract = {Among the major themes that govern, the question of evil is one of the most troubling issues that many theologians and philosophers have been confronted with. Many thinkers have clearly admitted their dismay and uncertainties in the face of this problem, and others have complained of their inability to provide a satisfactory answer. Many atheists have tried to take advantage of this difficulty. They have then used this question to try to call into question the existence of God and thus arouse doubt in believers. More than a theme, it is a guiding idea although it changes value during the journey. Thus, the question of evil, which raises different types of questions, interests mythology, theology and philosophy. Evil is this transhistorical and inescapable pandemic, to which it is useless to add, is universal. It is indifferent to no one and the adiaphoras of the Stoics only concern what does not depend on us. In the very extension of the concept, several possible approaches must be taken into account: does evil come from our physical suffering, from the sensible; or is it moral in the sense that it touches on sin? Or finally, is it simply a metaphysical evil, this anguish of man in the face of his imperfection? Some philosophers, including Leibniz, have looked into the question. This article presents some reflections of philosophers and especially a critical reflection of the thought of the illustrious man of science Leibniz, on the subject.
    },
     year = {2024}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Question of Evil in Philosophy: A Critical Reading of Leibniz’s Thinking
    
    AU  - Herve Djilo Kuate
    Y1  - 2024/12/27
    PY  - 2024
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.20
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.20
    T2  - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society
    JF  - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society
    JO  - International Journal of Education, Culture and Society
    SP  - 368
    EP  - 376
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2575-3363
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijecs.20240906.20
    AB  - Among the major themes that govern, the question of evil is one of the most troubling issues that many theologians and philosophers have been confronted with. Many thinkers have clearly admitted their dismay and uncertainties in the face of this problem, and others have complained of their inability to provide a satisfactory answer. Many atheists have tried to take advantage of this difficulty. They have then used this question to try to call into question the existence of God and thus arouse doubt in believers. More than a theme, it is a guiding idea although it changes value during the journey. Thus, the question of evil, which raises different types of questions, interests mythology, theology and philosophy. Evil is this transhistorical and inescapable pandemic, to which it is useless to add, is universal. It is indifferent to no one and the adiaphoras of the Stoics only concern what does not depend on us. In the very extension of the concept, several possible approaches must be taken into account: does evil come from our physical suffering, from the sensible; or is it moral in the sense that it touches on sin? Or finally, is it simply a metaphysical evil, this anguish of man in the face of his imperfection? Some philosophers, including Leibniz, have looked into the question. This article presents some reflections of philosophers and especially a critical reflection of the thought of the illustrious man of science Leibniz, on the subject.
    
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections