Adsorption processes for the remediation of wastewater have been in literature for decades, it is conventional to make use of instruments such as; Centrifuge, Oven, water-bath shaker and others, during the synthesis of nanoparticle as an adsorbent. The above-mentioned instruments make the process costlier and cumbersome. Combining the synthesis and the adsorption processes into a single chamber proffer a locally practicable, cost effective and highly efficient methodology. The remediation of simulated mixed vat-dye wastewater during the formation of copper nanoparticles (Cu NPs) is presented in this work; abundance of flavonoids, saponin, terpenoids and catechins phytochemicals were noticed in the extracts which serves as the reducing agent, the sorption optimization results show that Chrysophyllum albidum aqueous extract effected a 100% dye removal at optimum pH of 9 (alkaline medium) while, Mimusops Coriacea aqueous extract had a 92.9% dye removal ability at the optimum pH of 5 (acidic medium). the reaction optimum time stands at 48 hours. Characterization of the sludge i.e., dye particles and copper nanoparticles revealed from the calculated X-ray diffraction (XRD) average crystal sizes of 5.89nm and 17.23nm for Mimusops Coriacea and Chrysophyllum albidum respectively. The FTIR shows presence of O-H, N-H, conjugation of C═O and C═C bands. The research presented the biosynthesized Cu NPs with aqueous extract Chrysophyllum albidum as reducing agent to be more efficient in degrading the dye mixture compared to Mimusops Coriacea aqueous extract. The study achieved a less laborious and a cost-effective method of remediating dye wastewater through the use of biosynthesized nanoparticle, which makes the process environment friendly.
Published in | International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology (Volume 10, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijee.20251003.15 |
Page(s) | 71-89 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Water Remediation, Simulated Dye Effluent, Aqueous Extract, Nanotechnology, Sorption
Plant leaves | Sample label |
---|---|
Chrysophyllum albidum | 1 |
Mimusops coriacea | 2 |
Extract Test | Chrysophyllum albidum | Mimusops coriacea |
---|---|---|
Alkaloids | + | - |
Polyphenols | ++ | ++ |
Tannins | ++ | ++ |
Saponin | ++ | +++ |
Flavonoids | + | +++ |
Catechins | ++ | +++ |
Terpenoids | ++ | +++ |
Anthocyanins | - | - |
Coumarins | + | - |
Polysterol | - | - |
Sample label | Initial Concentration (g/L) | Actual Concentration (g/L) | Final Concentration (g/L) | Percentage Removal% |
---|---|---|---|---|
A | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0.00 | 100 |
B | 1.00 x 100 | 5.00 x 10-1 | 0.021732 | 95.7 |
C | 5.00 x 10-1 | 2.50 x 10-1 | 0.017668 | 93.0 |
D | 2.50 x 10-1 | 1.25 x 10-1 | 0.019102 | 84.8 |
E | 1.25 x 10-1 | 6.25 x 10-2 | 0.017907 | 71.4 |
F | 6.25 x 10-2 | 3.13 x 10-2 | 0.020537 | 34.3 |
G | 3.13 x 10-2 | 1.56 x 10-2 | 0.020298 | -30.0 |
H | 1.56 x 10-2 | 7.81 x 10-3 | 0.01982 | -153.7 |
Sample label | Initial Concentration (g/L) | Actual Concentration (g/L) | Final Concentration (g/L) | Percentage Removal% |
---|---|---|---|---|
A | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0.71461 | 92.9 |
B | 1.00 x 100 | 5.00 x 10-1 | 0.055443 | 89.0 |
C | 5.00 x 10-1 | 2.50 x 10-1 | 0.21254 | 91.5 |
D | 2.50 x 10-1 | 1.25 x 10-1 | 0.019581 | 84.4 |
E | 1.25 x 10-1 | 6.25 x 10-2 | 0.019342 | 69.1 |
F | 6.25 x 10-2 | 3.13 x 10-2 | 0.020089 | 35.9 |
G | 3.13 x 10-2 | 1.56 x 10-2 | 0.01983 | -26.9 |
H | 1.56 x 10-2 | 7.81 x 10-3 | 0.01982 | -153.7 |
pH | Initial Concentration (g/L) | Actual Concentration (g/L) | Final Concentration (g/L) | Percentage Removal (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0.5185 | 48.2 |
3 | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0.6870 | 31.3 |
5 | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0.0215 | 97.9 |
7 | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0.0117 | 98.9 |
9 | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0.0100 | 99.0 |
11 | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0.0693 | 93.1 |
pH | Initial Concentration (g/L) | Actual Concentration (g/L) | Final Concentration (g/L) | Percentage Removal% |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0.2209 | 11.7 |
3 | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0.2462 | 1.60 |
5 | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0.0186 | 92.6 |
7 | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0.0918 | 63.3 |
9 | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0.0483 | 80.7 |
11 | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0.2453 | 1.90 |
Sample | Time | Initial Concentration (g/L) | Actual Concentration (g/L) | Final Concentration (g/L) | Percentage Removal% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | At 12 hours | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0.182155 | 81.8 |
A | At 24 hours | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0.061181 | 93.9 |
A | At 48 hours | 2.00 x 100 | 1.00 x 100 | 0 | 100 |
B | At 12 hours | 1.00 x 100 | 5.00 x 10-1 | 0.068831 | 86.3 |
B | At 24 hours | 1.00 x 100 | 5.00 x 10-1 | 0.032969 | 93.5 |
B | At 48 hours | 1.00 x 100 | 5.00 x 10-1 | 0.021732 | 95.7 |
C | At 12 hours | 5.00 x 10-1 | 2.50 x 10-1 | 0.029144 | 88.4 |
C | At 24 hours | 5.00 x 10-1 | 2.50 x 10-1 | 0.018863 | 92.5 |
C | At 48 hours | 5.00 x 10-1 | 2.50 x 10-1 | 0.017668 | 93 |
D | At 12 hours | 2.50 x 10-1 | 1.25 x 10-1 | 0.028666 | 77.1 |
D | At 24 hours | 2.50 x 10-1 | 1.25 x 10-1 | 0.019102 | 84.8 |
D | At 48 hours | 2.50 x 10-1 | 1.25 x 10-1 | 0.018385 | 85.3 |
E | At 12 hours | 1.25 x 10-1 | 6.25 x 10-2 | 0.017907 | 71.4 |
E | At 24 hours | 1.25 x 10-1 | 6.25 x 10-2 | 0.017668 | 71.8 |
E | At 48 hours | 1.25 x 10-1 | 6.25 x 10-2 | 0.010017 | 84.0 |
F | At 12 hours | 6.25 x 10-2 | 3.13 x 10-2 | 0.020537 | 34.3 |
F | At 24 hours | 6.25 x 10-2 | 3.13 x 10-2 | 0.018863 | 39.7 |
F | At 48 hours | 6.25 x 10-2 | 3.13 x 10-2 | 0.010257 | 67.2 |
G | At 12 hours | 3.13 x 10-2 | 1.56 x 10-2 | 0.010017 | 35.9 |
G | At 24 hours | 3.13 x 10-2 | 1.56 x 10-2 | 0.015994 | -2.4 |
G | At 48 hours | 3.13 x 10-2 | 1.56 x 10-2 | 0.020298 | -30 |
H | At 12 hours | 1.56 x 10-2 | 7.81 x 10-3 | 0.010017 | -28.3 |
H | At 24 hours | 1.56 x 10-2 | 7.81 x 10-3 | 0.015755 | -101.7 |
H | At 48 hours | 1.56 x 10-2 | 7.81 x 10-3 | 0.01982 | -153.7 |
Sample | Time | Initial Concentration (g/L) | Final Concentration (g/L) | Percentage Removal% |
---|---|---|---|---|
A | At 12 hours | 1.00 x 100 | 0.71461 | 92.9 |
A | At 24 hours | 1.00 x 100 | 0.055443 | 94.5 |
A | At 48 hours | 1.00 x 100 | 0.029622 | 97.1 |
B | At 12 hours | 5.00 x 10-1 | 0.055443 | 89.0 |
B | At 24 hours | 5.00 x 10-1 | 0.036077 | 92.8 |
B | At 48 hours | 5.00 x 10-1 | 0.01284 | 95.1 |
C | At 12 hours | 2.50 x 10-1 | 0.021254 | 91.5 |
C | At 24 hours | 2.50 x 10-1 | 0.020537 | 91.8 |
C | At 48 hours | 2.50 x 10-1 | 0.010017 | 96 |
D | At 12 hours | 1.25 x 10-1 | 0.020059 | 84 |
D | At 24 hours | 1.25 x 10-1 | 0.019581 | 84.4 |
D | At 48 hours | 1.25 x 10-1 | 0.010017 | 92 |
E | At 12 hours | 6.25 x 10-2 | 0.019581 | 68.7 |
E | At 24 hours | 6.25 x 10-2 | 0.019342 | 69.1 |
E | At 48 hours | 6.25 x 10-2 | 0.010017 | 84.0 |
F | At 12 hours | 3.13 x 10-2 | 0.020089 | 35.9 |
F | At 24 hours | 3.13 x 10-2 | 0.016712 | 46.6 |
F | At 48 hours | 3.13 x 10-2 | 0.010257 | 67.2 |
G | At 12 hours | 1.56 x 10-2 | 0.010496 | 32.9 |
G | At 24 hours | 1.56 x 10-2 | 0.016712 | -7 |
G | At 48 hours | 1.56 x 10-2 | 0.01983 | -26.9 |
H | At 12 hours | 7.81 x 10-3 | 0.010496 | -34.4 |
H | At 24 hours | 7.81 x 10-3 | 0.016473 | -110.9 |
H | At 48 hours | 7.81 x 10-3 | 0.01982 | -153.7 |
Band (cm-1) | Position of some characteristics absorption | Discussion |
---|---|---|
3778.31 | Free O-H stretch | It can be from moisture content and most of the phytochemicals contain O-H |
3376.00 | Intramolecular hydrogen bonding in O-H, Polyphenol OH, N-H | Indanthrene has two NH group in its structure, being confirmed by the band, water molecule is being picked up and polyphenol presence is confirmed in the extract |
2918.00 | C-H stretch | Organic structure being confirmed |
2360.17 | C=C conjugation | Anthraquinone being the Chromophore presence in vat dye is being confirmed |
1595.00 | Aromatic ring | Presence of ring structure attributed to the vat and extract compounds |
1369.00 | C-H defiance in CH3, C-O of primary alcohol | Hydrocarbon of the organic compounds. |
1032.00 | C-O-C ester, C-N, Silica SiO2 | Silica is an inclusion of impurities |
Band (cm-1) | Position of some characteristics absorption | Discussion |
---|---|---|
3779.84 | Free O-H group | It can be from moisture content and most of the phytochemicals contain O-H |
3416.00 | N-H stretch, OH of polyphenol, intermolecular O-H | Indanthrene has two NH group in its structure, being confirmed by the band, water molecule is being picked up and polyphenol presence is confirmed in the extract |
2926.42 | C-H stretch | Hydrocarbon component of the molecules |
2354.30 | C=C conjugation | Anthraquinone being the Chromophore presence in vat dye is being confirmed |
1723.86 | C=O conjugation | The carbonyl in the anthraquinone is being confirmed |
1597.30 | Aromatic ring | Presence of ring structure attributed to the vat and extract compounds |
2θ | Θ | Cos θ |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
26.5 | 13.3 | 0.973 | 0.051 | 0.1449 | 2.84nm |
31.5 | 15.8 | 0.962 | 0.017 | 0.1449 | 8.52nm |
38.0 | 19.0 | 0.946 | 0.049 | 0.1449 | 2.96nm |
45.0 | 22.5 | 0.924 | 0.003 | 0.1449 | 48.30nm |
48.0 | 24.0 | 0.914 | 0.035 | 0.1449 | 4.14nm |
54.0 | 27.0 | 0.891 | 0.050 | 0.1449 | 2.90nm |
62.5 | 31.3 | 0.855 | 0.027 | 0.1449 | 5.37nm |
66.0 | 33.0 | 0.839 | 0.002 | 0.1449 | 72.45nm |
68.5 | 34.3 | 0.826 | 0.019 | 0.1449 | 7.62nm |
2θ | θ | Sin θ |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
26.5 | 13.3 | 0.2301 | 0.4602 | 0.1542 | 0.34nm |
31.5 | 15.8 | 0.2723 | 0.5446 | 0.1542 | 0.28nm |
38.0 | 19.0 | 0.3256 | 0.6512 | 0.1542 | 0.24nm |
45.0 | 22.5 | 0.3827 | 0.7654 | 0.1542 | 0.20nm |
48.0 | 24.0 | 0.4067 | 0.8134 | 0.1542 | 0.19nm |
54.0 | 27.0 | 0.4540 | 0.9080 | 0.1542 | 0.17nm |
62.5 | 31.3 | 0.5195 | 1.0390 | 0.1542 | 0.15nm |
66.0 | 33.0 | 0.5446 | 1.0892 | 0.1542 | 0.14nm |
68.5 | 34.3 | 0.5635 | 1.1270 | 0.1542 | 0.14nm |
2θ | θ | Cos θ |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
26.0 | 13.0 | 0.974 | 0.051 | 0.1449 | 2.84nm |
31.0 | 15.5 | 0.964 | 0.017 | 0.1449 | 8.52nm |
38.0 | 19.0 | 0.946 | 0.033 | 0.1449 | 4.39nm |
47.5 | 23.8 | 0.915 | 0.024 | 0.1449 | 6.04nm |
55.0 | 27.5 | 0.887 | 0.046 | 0.1449 | 3.15nm |
63.5 | 31.8 | 0.850 | 0.031 | 0.1449 | 4.67nm |
69.5 | 34.8 | 0.821 | 0.017 | 0.1449 | 8.52nm |
72.0 | 36.0 | 0.809 | 0.014 | 0.1449 | 10.35nm |
76.0 | 38.0 | 0.788 | 0.032 | 0.1449 | 4.53nm |
2θ | θ | Sin θ |
|
|
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
26.0 | 13.0 | 0.2250 | 0.45 | 0.1542 | 0.34nm |
31.0 | 15.5 | 0.2672 | 0.53 | 0.1542 | 0.29nm |
38.0 | 19.0 | 0.3256 | 0.65 | 0.1542 | 0.24nm |
47.5 | 23.8 | 0.4036 | 0.81 | 0.1542 | 0.19nm |
55.0 | 27.5 | 0.4618 | 0.92 | 0.1542 | 0.17nm |
63.5 | 31.8 | 0.5270 | 1.05 | 0.1542 | 0.15nm |
69.5 | 34.8 | 0.5707 | 1.14 | 0.1542 | 0.14nm |
72.0 | 36.0 | 0.5878 | 1.18 | 0.1542 | 0.13nm |
76.0 | 38.0 | 0.6157 | 1.23 | 0.1542 | 0.13nm |
BASF | Baden Aniline & Soda Factory |
ICDD | International Center for Diffraction Data) |
JCPDC | Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standards |
XRD | X-ray Diffractometer |
FT-IR | Fourier Transform Infra Red |
Cu NPs | Copper Nanoparticles |
Concentration (g/L) | Absorbance |
---|---|
0.028 | 0.101 |
0.056 | 0.205 |
0.110 | 0.395 |
0.220 | 0.813 |
0.330 | 1.398 |
0.440 | 1.789 |
[1] |
United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Sustainable Development. Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all – Goal 6.
https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/ [Accessed 20 July, 2023]. |
[2] | Tiseo I. (2023) Global urban and rural drinking water coverage 2020. Energy and Environment, water & wastewater. Statista |
[3] | Isai K., Anil V. and Shankar S., (2019) Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue using ZnO and 2%Fe–ZnO semiconductor nanomaterials synthesized by sol–gel method: a comparative study. Springer Nature Switzerland. 1: 1247 | |
[4] | Al-Tohamy R., Sameh S. A., Fanghua L., Kamal M., Yehia A. G. Mahmood, Tamer E., Haixin J., Yinyi F., Jianzhong S. (2022) A critical review on the treatment of dye-containing wastewater: Ecotoxicology and health concerns of Textile dyes and possible remediation approaches for environmental safety. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 231: 113160. |
[5] | Veeraco colourants pvt ltd (2022) all about vat dyes. Veeraco.com/blog/all about vat dyes, accessed on September 9, 2023. Indian. |
[6] | Rafique M. A, Kiran S., Ashraf A., Mukhtar N., Rizwan S., Ashraf M. (2022) Effective removal of direct orange 26 dye using copper nanoparticles synthesized from tilapia fish scale. Global NEST journal. 24(2) 311-317. |
[7] | Rajeshkumar S., M. Vanaja, and Arunachalam K. (2021) Degradation of Toxic Dye Using Phytomediated Copper Nanoparticles and Its Free-Radical Scavenging Potential and Antimicrobial Activity against Environmental Pathogens. Hindawi Bioinorganic Chemistry and Applications. 2021 (1222908): 1-10. |
[8] | Oyetola E. O. (2023) Comparative Studies of Biosynthesized Zinc Oxide Nanoparticles. Nanochem Res, 8(1): 31-39. |
[9] | Okoli J. B. and Okere S. O. (2010) Antimicrobial activity of the phytochemical constituents of chrysophyllum albidum (African star apple) plant. Journal of research of the national institute of standards and technology. 8(1): 301-311. |
[10] | Saraswathi S., Raghavender M. P, Devihalli C. M., Raveesha K. A. (2008) Antifungal activity of a known medicinal plant mimusops elengi L. against grain moulds. Journal of Agricultural Technology. 4(1): 151-165. |
APA Style
Oyetola, E. O., Nwosu, F. O., Obasi, A. E. (2025). A Synthesis/Sorption Approach in the Remediation of Mixed Vat Dye Aqueous Solution Using Biosynthesized Copper Nanoparticles. International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology, 10(3), 71-89. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20251003.15
ACS Style
Oyetola, E. O.; Nwosu, F. O.; Obasi, A. E. A Synthesis/Sorption Approach in the Remediation of Mixed Vat Dye Aqueous Solution Using Biosynthesized Copper Nanoparticles. Int. J. Ecotoxicol. Ecobiol. 2025, 10(3), 71-89. doi: 10.11648/j.ijee.20251003.15
@article{10.11648/j.ijee.20251003.15, author = {Emmanuel Oladeji Oyetola and Friday Onyekwere Nwosu and Amarachi Esther Obasi}, title = {A Synthesis/Sorption Approach in the Remediation of Mixed Vat Dye Aqueous Solution Using Biosynthesized Copper Nanoparticles }, journal = {International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology}, volume = {10}, number = {3}, pages = {71-89}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijee.20251003.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20251003.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijee.20251003.15}, abstract = {Adsorption processes for the remediation of wastewater have been in literature for decades, it is conventional to make use of instruments such as; Centrifuge, Oven, water-bath shaker and others, during the synthesis of nanoparticle as an adsorbent. The above-mentioned instruments make the process costlier and cumbersome. Combining the synthesis and the adsorption processes into a single chamber proffer a locally practicable, cost effective and highly efficient methodology. The remediation of simulated mixed vat-dye wastewater during the formation of copper nanoparticles (Cu NPs) is presented in this work; abundance of flavonoids, saponin, terpenoids and catechins phytochemicals were noticed in the extracts which serves as the reducing agent, the sorption optimization results show that Chrysophyllum albidum aqueous extract effected a 100% dye removal at optimum pH of 9 (alkaline medium) while, Mimusops Coriacea aqueous extract had a 92.9% dye removal ability at the optimum pH of 5 (acidic medium). the reaction optimum time stands at 48 hours. Characterization of the sludge i.e., dye particles and copper nanoparticles revealed from the calculated X-ray diffraction (XRD) average crystal sizes of 5.89nm and 17.23nm for Mimusops Coriacea and Chrysophyllum albidum respectively. The FTIR shows presence of O-H, N-H, conjugation of C═O and C═C bands. The research presented the biosynthesized Cu NPs with aqueous extract Chrysophyllum albidum as reducing agent to be more efficient in degrading the dye mixture compared to Mimusops Coriacea aqueous extract. The study achieved a less laborious and a cost-effective method of remediating dye wastewater through the use of biosynthesized nanoparticle, which makes the process environment friendly. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - A Synthesis/Sorption Approach in the Remediation of Mixed Vat Dye Aqueous Solution Using Biosynthesized Copper Nanoparticles AU - Emmanuel Oladeji Oyetola AU - Friday Onyekwere Nwosu AU - Amarachi Esther Obasi Y1 - 2025/09/19 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20251003.15 DO - 10.11648/j.ijee.20251003.15 T2 - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology JF - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology JO - International Journal of Ecotoxicology and Ecobiology SP - 71 EP - 89 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1735 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijee.20251003.15 AB - Adsorption processes for the remediation of wastewater have been in literature for decades, it is conventional to make use of instruments such as; Centrifuge, Oven, water-bath shaker and others, during the synthesis of nanoparticle as an adsorbent. The above-mentioned instruments make the process costlier and cumbersome. Combining the synthesis and the adsorption processes into a single chamber proffer a locally practicable, cost effective and highly efficient methodology. The remediation of simulated mixed vat-dye wastewater during the formation of copper nanoparticles (Cu NPs) is presented in this work; abundance of flavonoids, saponin, terpenoids and catechins phytochemicals were noticed in the extracts which serves as the reducing agent, the sorption optimization results show that Chrysophyllum albidum aqueous extract effected a 100% dye removal at optimum pH of 9 (alkaline medium) while, Mimusops Coriacea aqueous extract had a 92.9% dye removal ability at the optimum pH of 5 (acidic medium). the reaction optimum time stands at 48 hours. Characterization of the sludge i.e., dye particles and copper nanoparticles revealed from the calculated X-ray diffraction (XRD) average crystal sizes of 5.89nm and 17.23nm for Mimusops Coriacea and Chrysophyllum albidum respectively. The FTIR shows presence of O-H, N-H, conjugation of C═O and C═C bands. The research presented the biosynthesized Cu NPs with aqueous extract Chrysophyllum albidum as reducing agent to be more efficient in degrading the dye mixture compared to Mimusops Coriacea aqueous extract. The study achieved a less laborious and a cost-effective method of remediating dye wastewater through the use of biosynthesized nanoparticle, which makes the process environment friendly. VL - 10 IS - 3 ER -