Adoption of Piped Water Source in an Arsenic Affected Area

Sanjana Chakraborty; Vivekananda Mukherjee

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18

| Peer-Reviewed

Adoption of Piped Water Source in an Arsenic Affected Area

Sanjana Chakraborty, Vivekananda Mukherjee

Published in International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment (Volume 6, Issue 5)

Received: 24 September 2021 Accepted: 22 October 2021 Published: 29 October 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The paper studies adoption of piped water source as mitigation strategy against arsenic contamination in an arsenic affected village of West Bengal, India. It finds that the households affected by arsenicosis are more likely to adopt an arsenic-safe source than the unaffected households. The paper also analyses the role of factors like the extensiveness of arsenicosis, intensity of symptoms and the years of experience about the health and social hazards associated with it at the household level on the adoption decision of the households. It finds that although the marginal impact of these factors on the adoption decision is small, the effect of years of suffering is stronger than the other two factors. The results derived in the paper have important policy implications. The results suggest that greater adoption of piped water sources in arsenic affected villages can be facilitated if the awareness is spread through the households, who suffered from arsenicosis for a long time. The piped water sources must be located more evenly in the clustered villages for greater adoption. A more continuous supply of piped water may remove the observed high-income bias from adoption of piped water in arsenic affected villages, where it is freely provided.

Published in	International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment (Volume 6, Issue 5)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18
Page(s)	124-133
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Arsenicosis, Arsenic-safe Water Source, Mitigation, Adoption

References

[1]	Aftab, Sonia; Haque, A. K. Enamul and Khan, M. Zakir Hossain (2006): “Adoption of Arsenic-Safe Drinking Water Practice in Rural Bangladesh: An Averting Behavior Model”, Journal of Bangladesh Studies, rainforum.org.
[2]	Ahmad, Junaid; Goldarb, B. N.; Misra, Smita and Jakariya, M. (2003): “Fighting Arsenic: Listening to Rural Communities Willingness to Pay for Arsenic-Free, Safe Drinking Water in Bangladesh“, Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee, Public Disclosure Authorized Water and Sanitation Program-South Asia C/o The World Bank, 31251, printed by PS Press Services Pvt. Ltd.
[3]	Ahmad, Junaid; Goldarb, Bishwanath and Misra, Smita (2005): “Value of Arsenic-Free Drinking Water to Rural Households in Bangladesh”, Journal of Environmental Management, 74, 173–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.07.011.
[4]	Amrose, Susan; Burt, Zachary and Ray, Isha (2015): “Safe Drinking Water for Low-Income Regions”, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 40: 203–231. doi: 10.1146/annurev-environ-031411-091819.
[5]	Balasubramaniam, Divya; Chatterjee, Santanu and Mustard, David (2014): “Got Water? Social Divisions and Access to Public Goods in Rural India”, Economica, 81, 140–160.
[6]	BGS; DPHE (2001): “Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater in Bangladesh”, Summary. British Geological Survey WC/00/19; Kinniburgh, D. G., Smedley, P. L., Editors; British Geological Survey: Keyworth, UK, Vol. 1, 1-15.
[7]	Chakraborti, Dipankar; Singh, Sushant K.; Rahman, M. Mahmudur; Dutta, Rathindra Nath; Mukherjee, Subhas Chandra; Pati, Shyamapada and Kar, Probir Bijoy (2018): “Groundwater Arsenic Contamination in the Ganga River Basin: A Future Health Danger”, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15 (2): 180. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020180.
[8]	Chakraborty, Sanjana and Mukherjee, Vivekananda (2020): “Revisiting the Economic Costs of Arsenicosis: A PSM Approach”, RESEARCH PAPER, Ecology, Economy and Society–the INSEE Journal 3 (2): 33–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37773/ees.v3i2.134
[9]	Choudhuri, Pallavi and Desai, Sonalde (2020): “Gender Inequalities and Household Fuel Choice in India”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121487.
[10]	Dasgupta, Indraneel and Pal, Sarmistha (2021): “Touch Thee Not: Group Conflict, Caste Power, and Untouchability in Rural India”, Journal of Comparative Economics, 49 (2), 442-466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2020.12.003.
[11]	Delaire, Caroline; Das, Abhijit; Amrose, Susan; Gadgil, Ashok; Roy, Joyashree and Ray, Isha (2017): “Determinants of the Use of Alternatives to Arsenic contaminated Shallow Groundwater: An Exploratory Study in Rural West Bengal, India”, Journal of Water and Health, 15. 5. doi: 10.2166/wh.2017.321.
[12]	Devoto, Florencia; Duflo, Esther; Dupas, Pascaline; Parienté, William and Pons, Vincent (2012): “Happiness on Tap: Piped Water Adoption in Urban Morocco”, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 4 (4), 68–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/pol.4.4.68
[13]	Duflo, Esther (2012): “Women Empowerment and Economic Development”, Journal of Economic Literature, 50 (4), 1051–1079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.50.4.1051
[14]	Inauen, Jennifer; Hossain, Mohammad Mojahidul; Johnston, B. Richard and Mosler, Hans-Joachim (2013): “Acceptance and Use of Eight Arsenic-Safe Drinking Water Options in Bangladesh”, J. Christopher States, University of Louisville, United States of America, PLOSONE, Vol.8, Issue 1, e53640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053640.
[15]	Jalan, Jyotsna and Ravallion, Martin (2003): “Does Piped Water Reduce Diarrhoea for Children in Rural India?”, Journal of Econometrics, 112 (1), 153-173. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-4076(02)00158-6.
[16]	Kapaj, S.; Peterson, H.; Liber, K. and Bhattacharya, P. (2006): “Human Health Effects from Chronic Arsenic Poisoning-A Review”, Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 41 (10), 2399-2428. DOI: 10.1080/10934520600873571.
[17]	Khan, M. Zakir Hossain (2007): “Managing the Arsenic Disaster in Water Supply: Risk Measurement, Costs of Illness and Policy Choices for Bangladesh,” Working Paper No. 27–07. Kathmandu: South Asian Network for Development and Environmental Economics (SANDEE). http://www.sandeeonline.org/uploads/documents/publication/749_PUB_working_paper_27.pdf.
[18]	Larsen, Bjorn (2016): “Benefits and Costs of Drinking Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Interventions”, This work has been produced as a part of the Bangladesh Priorities project, a collaboration between Copenhagen Consensus Center and BRAC Research and Evaluation Department.
[19]	Mahanta, Ratul; Chowdhury, Jayashree and Nath, Hiranya K. (2016): “Health Costs of Arsenic Contamination of Drinking Water in Assam, India.” Economic Analysis and Policy 49 (March): 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2015.11.013.
[20]	Mandal, Badal Kumar; Chowdhury, Tarit Roy; Samanta, Gautam; Basu, Gautam Kumar; Chowdhury, Partha Pratim; Chanda, Chitta Ranjan; Lodh, Dilip; Karan, Nirmal Kumar; Dhar, Ratan Kumar; Tamili, Dipak Kumar; Das, Dipankar; Saha, Kshitish Chandra and Chakraborti, Dipankar (1996): “Arsenic in Groundwater in Seven Districts of West Bengal, India: The Biggest Arsenic Calamity in the World”, Current Science; 70 (11), 976-986. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24111635.DOI:10.2307/24111635.
[21]	Milton, A. H. (2003): “Health Effects of Arsenic Toxicity, Clinical Manifestation and Health Management in Arsenic Contamination: Bangladesh Perspective”, edited by M. Feroz Ahmed, ITN Bangladesh, Centre for Water Supply and Waste Management, BUET, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 281-297.
[22]	Nahar, Nurun; Hossain, Faisal and Hossain, M. Delawer (2008): “Health and Socioeconomic Effects of Groundwater Arsenic Contamination in Rural Bangladesh: New Evidence from Field Surveys”, Journal of Environmental Health, 70 (9), 42-47. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18517153.
[23]	Nandi, Arindam; Megiddo, Itamar; Ashok, Ashvin; Verma, Amit and Laxminarayan, Ramanan (2016): “Reduced burden of childhood diarrheal diseases through increased access to water and sanitation in India: A modeling analysis”, Social Science & Medicine, 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.049
[24]	Onjala, Joseph; Ndiritu, Simon Wagura and Stage, Jesper (2013): “Risk Perception, Choice of Drinking Water, and Water Treatment: Evidence from Kenyan Towns”, Discussion Paperdp-13-10-efd, Resources for the Future.
[25]	Quamruzzaman, Q.; Mahmuder, R. and Khordekar A. (2003): “Effects of Arsenic on Health in Arsenic Contamination: Bangladesh Perspective”, edited by BUET, Dhaka, Bangladesh, 257-267.
[26]	Rahut, Bahadur Dil; Ali, Akhter; Chhetri, Bahadur Nar; Behera, Bhagirath and Jena, Ranjan Pradyot (2016): “Access to safe drinking water and human health: empirical evidence from rural Bhutan”, Water Supply, 16 (5), 1349–1360. doi: 10.2166/ws.2016.063.
[27]	Roy, Joyashree (2008): “Economic Benefits of Arsenic Removal from Ground Water-A Case Study from West Bengal, India”, Science of the Total Environment, 397 (1-3): 1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.02.007.
[28]	Singh, K. Sushant (2017): “An Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of Arsenic Mitigation Technologies: Implications for Public Policy”, International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 6, 522-535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.10.004
[29]	Suzuki, Akiko and Sakamoto, Maiko (2018): “The Effect of Social Network on Acceptability of New Technology in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Piped Water Adoption in Rural India”, Environment and Natural Resources Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education. doi: 10.5539/enrr.v8n2p1.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Sanjana Chakraborty, Vivekananda Mukherjee. (2021). Adoption of Piped Water Source in an Arsenic Affected Area. International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment, 6(5), 124-133. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Sanjana Chakraborty; Vivekananda Mukherjee. Adoption of Piped Water Source in an Arsenic Affected Area. Int. J. Econ. Energy Environ. 2021, 6(5), 124-133. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Sanjana Chakraborty, Vivekananda Mukherjee. Adoption of Piped Water Source in an Arsenic Affected Area. Int J Econ Energy Environ. 2021;6(5):124-133. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18,
  author = {Sanjana Chakraborty and Vivekananda Mukherjee},
  title = {Adoption of Piped Water Source in an Arsenic Affected Area},
  journal = {International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment},
  volume = {6},
  number = {5},
  pages = {124-133},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijeee.20210605.18},
  abstract = {The paper studies adoption of piped water source as mitigation strategy against arsenic contamination in an arsenic affected village of West Bengal, India. It finds that the households affected by arsenicosis are more likely to adopt an arsenic-safe source than the unaffected households. The paper also analyses the role of factors like the extensiveness of arsenicosis, intensity of symptoms and the years of experience about the health and social hazards associated with it at the household level on the adoption decision of the households. It finds that although the marginal impact of these factors on the adoption decision is small, the effect of years of suffering is stronger than the other two factors. The results derived in the paper have important policy implications. The results suggest that greater adoption of piped water sources in arsenic affected villages can be facilitated if the awareness is spread through the households, who suffered from arsenicosis for a long time. The piped water sources must be located more evenly in the clustered villages for greater adoption. A more continuous supply of piped water may remove the observed high-income bias from adoption of piped water in arsenic affected villages, where it is freely provided.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Adoption of Piped Water Source in an Arsenic Affected Area
AU  - Sanjana Chakraborty
AU  - Vivekananda Mukherjee
Y1  - 2021/10/29
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18
T2  - International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment
JF  - International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment
JO  - International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment
SP  - 124
EP  - 133
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-5021
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18
AB  - The paper studies adoption of piped water source as mitigation strategy against arsenic contamination in an arsenic affected village of West Bengal, India. It finds that the households affected by arsenicosis are more likely to adopt an arsenic-safe source than the unaffected households. The paper also analyses the role of factors like the extensiveness of arsenicosis, intensity of symptoms and the years of experience about the health and social hazards associated with it at the household level on the adoption decision of the households. It finds that although the marginal impact of these factors on the adoption decision is small, the effect of years of suffering is stronger than the other two factors. The results derived in the paper have important policy implications. The results suggest that greater adoption of piped water sources in arsenic affected villages can be facilitated if the awareness is spread through the households, who suffered from arsenicosis for a long time. The piped water sources must be located more evenly in the clustered villages for greater adoption. A more continuous supply of piped water may remove the observed high-income bias from adoption of piped water in arsenic affected villages, where it is freely provided.
VL  - 6
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Sanjana Chakraborty

Department of Economics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
Vivekananda Mukherjee

Department of Economics, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Sanjana Chakraborty, Vivekananda Mukherjee. (2021). Adoption of Piped Water Source in an Arsenic Affected Area. International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment, 6(5), 124-133. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Sanjana Chakraborty; Vivekananda Mukherjee. Adoption of Piped Water Source in an Arsenic Affected Area. Int. J. Econ. Energy Environ. 2021, 6(5), 124-133. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Sanjana Chakraborty, Vivekananda Mukherjee. Adoption of Piped Water Source in an Arsenic Affected Area. Int J Econ Energy Environ. 2021;6(5):124-133. doi: 10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18,
  author = {Sanjana Chakraborty and Vivekananda Mukherjee},
  title = {Adoption of Piped Water Source in an Arsenic Affected Area},
  journal = {International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment},
  volume = {6},
  number = {5},
  pages = {124-133},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijeee.20210605.18},
  abstract = {The paper studies adoption of piped water source as mitigation strategy against arsenic contamination in an arsenic affected village of West Bengal, India. It finds that the households affected by arsenicosis are more likely to adopt an arsenic-safe source than the unaffected households. The paper also analyses the role of factors like the extensiveness of arsenicosis, intensity of symptoms and the years of experience about the health and social hazards associated with it at the household level on the adoption decision of the households. It finds that although the marginal impact of these factors on the adoption decision is small, the effect of years of suffering is stronger than the other two factors. The results derived in the paper have important policy implications. The results suggest that greater adoption of piped water sources in arsenic affected villages can be facilitated if the awareness is spread through the households, who suffered from arsenicosis for a long time. The piped water sources must be located more evenly in the clustered villages for greater adoption. A more continuous supply of piped water may remove the observed high-income bias from adoption of piped water in arsenic affected villages, where it is freely provided.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Adoption of Piped Water Source in an Arsenic Affected Area
AU  - Sanjana Chakraborty
AU  - Vivekananda Mukherjee
Y1  - 2021/10/29
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18
T2  - International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment
JF  - International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment
JO  - International Journal of Economy, Energy and Environment
SP  - 124
EP  - 133
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-5021
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijeee.20210605.18
AB  - The paper studies adoption of piped water source as mitigation strategy against arsenic contamination in an arsenic affected village of West Bengal, India. It finds that the households affected by arsenicosis are more likely to adopt an arsenic-safe source than the unaffected households. The paper also analyses the role of factors like the extensiveness of arsenicosis, intensity of symptoms and the years of experience about the health and social hazards associated with it at the household level on the adoption decision of the households. It finds that although the marginal impact of these factors on the adoption decision is small, the effect of years of suffering is stronger than the other two factors. The results derived in the paper have important policy implications. The results suggest that greater adoption of piped water sources in arsenic affected villages can be facilitated if the awareness is spread through the households, who suffered from arsenicosis for a long time. The piped water sources must be located more evenly in the clustered villages for greater adoption. A more continuous supply of piped water may remove the observed high-income bias from adoption of piped water in arsenic affected villages, where it is freely provided.
VL  - 6
IS  - 5
ER  -

Copy | Download