| Peer-Reviewed

Analysis of the Relationship Between Efficiency and Fairness in a Supply Chain

Received: 30 October 2022    Accepted: 18 November 2022    Published: 29 November 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

In addition to efficiency, supply chain members’ fairness concerns cannot be ignored in supply chain management. Without certain fairness, the supply chain is likely to be unstable. This paper aims to analyze the relationship between fairness and efficiency in a supply chain through an incentive contract with revenue sharing. When determining contract parameters, the contract designer (supplier) should not only focus on her own interests, but should also consider the fairness of the distribution of the supply chain profits. In this model, the fairness concerns of the retailer are reflected with a profit distribution fairness constraint. A numerical example shows that the retailer’s fairness concerns have an important impact on the efficiency of the supply chain and the distribution of supply chain profits. The supply chain’s and the retailer’s profits increase with the retailer’s fairness concerns, whereas the supplier’s profit decreases with the retailer’s fairness concerns. In both cases where the profit distribution of the supply chain is very fair and unfair, respectively, the efficiency of the supply chain may be very high. But the second situation will cause retailer dissatisfaction. This will affect the stable operation of the supply chain, and also will have a negative influence on the supplier. Therefore, the supplier should pay attention to the retailer’s fairness concerns in designing the incentive contract.

Published in International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.18
Page(s) 368-376
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Efficiency, Fairness, Profit Distribution, Revenue Sharing Contract, Supply Chain

References
[1] Hjaila K, Laínez-Aguirre JM, Puigjaner L, Espuña A. Decentralized manufacturing supply chains coordination under uncertain competitiveness. Procedia Engineering, 2015, 132: 942-949.
[2] Christoph HL, Yaozhong Wu. Social preferences and supply chain performance: an experimental study. Management Science, 2008, 54 (11): 1835-1849.
[3] Stephen A Samaha, Robert W Palmatier, Rajiv P Dant. Poisoning relationships: perceived unfairness in channels of distribution. Journal of Marketing, 2011, 5 (3): 99-117.
[4] Yuling Sun, Zehua Liu, Hui Yang. How does suppliers’ fairness affect the relationship quality of agricultural product supply chains? Journal of Food Quality, 2018, 2018: 1-15.
[5] Yong Luo, Shizhao Wang, Xiaochen Sun, Oscar DC. Analysis of retailers’ coalition stability for supply chain based on LCS and stable set. International Journal of Production Research, 2016, 54 (1): 170-185.
[6] Dana JD, Spier KE. Revenue sharing and vertical control in the video rental industry. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 2001, 49 (3): 223-245.
[7] Mortimer JH. Vertical contracts in the video rental industry. Review of Economic Studies, 2008, 75 (1): 165-199.
[8] Cachon GP, Lariviere MA. Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: strengths and limitations. Management Science, 2005, 51 (1): 30-44.
[9] Cetiner D, Kimms A. Assessing fairness of selfish revenue sharing mechanisms for airline alliances. Omega, 2013, 41 (4): 641-652.
[10] Xing Hu, René Caldentey, Gustavo Vulcano. Revenue sharing in airline alliances. Management Science, 2013, 59 (5): 1177- 1195.
[11] Govindan K, Popiuc MN. Reverse supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contract: a case for the personal computers industry. European Journal of Operational Research, 2014, 233 (2): 326-336.
[12] Choe Byeongho, Keunjae Choi, Sung Hee. The determinants of movie run length in the Korean movie industry: revenue sharing, opportunity cost of running, and vertical integration. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 2014, 27 (2): 607-633.
[13] Omkar D Palsule-Desai. Supply chain coordination using revenue-dependent revenue sharing contracts. Omega- International Journal of Management Science, 2013, 41 (4): 780-796.
[14] Kanghwa Choi. A system perspective on revenue sharing in the mobile value chain: an evidence from China mobile video ecosystem. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 2018, 12 (3): 136-152.
[15] Guixia Qian, Yipin Zhang, Jianguo Wu, Yuehong Pan. Revenue sharing in dairy industry supply chain-a case study of Hohhot, China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2013, 12 (12): 2300-2309.
[16] Giannoccaro I, Pontrandolfo P. Supply chain coordination by revenue sharing contracts. International Journal of Production Economics, 2004, 89 (2): 131-139.
[17] Tiaojun Xiao, Danqin Yang, Houcai Shen. Coordinating a supply chain with quality assurance policy via revenue-sharing contract. International Journal of Production Research, 2011, 49 (1): 99-120.
[18] WeiGuo zhang, Junhui Fu, Hongyi Li, Weijun Xu. Coordination of supply chain with a revenue-sharing contract under demand disruptions when retailers compete. International Journal of Production Economics, 2012, 138 (1): 68-75.
[19] Yao Z, Leung SCH, Lai KK. Manufacturer’s revenue-sharing contract and retail competition. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 186 (2): 637-651.
[20] Yunzeng Wang, Li Jiang, ZuoJun Shen. Channel performance under consignment contract with revenue sharing. Management Science, 2004, 50 (1): 34-47.
[21] Yumei Hou, Fangfang Wei, Susan X Li, et al. Coordination and performance analysis for a three-echelon supply chain with a revenue sharing contract. International Journal of Production Research, 2017, 55 (1): 202- 227.
[22] Huihui Song, Xuexian Gao. Green supply chain game model and analysis under revenue-sharing contract. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 170: 183-192.
[23] Sushil Kumar Dey, Bibhas C Giri. Coordination of a sustainable reverse supply chain with revenue sharing contract. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022, 18 (1): 487-510.
[24] ZhenSong Chen, Sheng Wu, Kannan Govindan, et al. Optimal pricing decision in a multi-channel supply chain with a revenue-sharing contract. Annals of Operations Research, 2022.
[25] Elena Katok, Valery Pavlov. Fairness in supply chain contracts: a laboratory study. Journal of Operations Management, 2013, 31 (3): 129-137.
[26] Tony Haitao Cui, Jagmohan S Raju, Z John Zhang. Fairness and channel coordination. Management Science, 2007, 53 (8): 1303-1314.
[27] QingHua Li, Bo Li. Dual-channel supply chain equilibrium problems regarding retail services and fairness concerns. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 2016, 40 (15-16): 7349-7367.
[28] Mondal Chirantan, Giri Bibhas C. Investigating a green supply chain with product recycling under retailer's fairness behavior. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 2022, 18 (5): 3641-3677.
[29] Abhishek Sharma, Deepika Jain. A game theoretic analysis of dual-channel supply chain with Nash bargaining fairness concern. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 2019, 35 (2): 244-259.
[30] Zelong Yi, Yulan Wang, Yun Liu, YingJu Chen. The impact of consumer fairness seeking on distribution channel selection: direct selling vs. agent selling. Production and Operations Management, 2018, 27 (6): 1148-1167.
[31] Cachon GP. Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management, 2003, 11: 227-339.
[32] Omkar D. Palsule-Desai, Devanath Tirupati, Pankaj Chandra. Stability issues in supply chain networks: implications for coordination mechanisms. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 142 (1): 179-193.
[33] Yuming Xiao, Xianyu Wang. Early-warning analysis on stability of supply chain based on entropy theory. Journal of Industrial Engineering/Engineering Management, 2008, 22 (3): 57-63.
[34] Xianyu Wang, Yuming Xiao, Sheng Zhong. Analysis on supply chain risk from resource-based view. Soft Science, 2008, 22 (7): 1-6.
[35] Saaty TL. How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990, 48 (1): 9-26.
[36] Saaty TL. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 2008, 1 (1): 83-98.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Yuming Xiao. (2022). Analysis of the Relationship Between Efficiency and Fairness in a Supply Chain. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 10(6), 368-376. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.18

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Yuming Xiao. Analysis of the Relationship Between Efficiency and Fairness in a Supply Chain. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2022, 10(6), 368-376. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.18

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Yuming Xiao. Analysis of the Relationship Between Efficiency and Fairness in a Supply Chain. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2022;10(6):368-376. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.18

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.18,
      author = {Yuming Xiao},
      title = {Analysis of the Relationship Between Efficiency and Fairness in a Supply Chain},
      journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences},
      volume = {10},
      number = {6},
      pages = {368-376},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.18},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.18},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20221006.18},
      abstract = {In addition to efficiency, supply chain members’ fairness concerns cannot be ignored in supply chain management. Without certain fairness, the supply chain is likely to be unstable. This paper aims to analyze the relationship between fairness and efficiency in a supply chain through an incentive contract with revenue sharing. When determining contract parameters, the contract designer (supplier) should not only focus on her own interests, but should also consider the fairness of the distribution of the supply chain profits. In this model, the fairness concerns of the retailer are reflected with a profit distribution fairness constraint. A numerical example shows that the retailer’s fairness concerns have an important impact on the efficiency of the supply chain and the distribution of supply chain profits. The supply chain’s and the retailer’s profits increase with the retailer’s fairness concerns, whereas the supplier’s profit decreases with the retailer’s fairness concerns. In both cases where the profit distribution of the supply chain is very fair and unfair, respectively, the efficiency of the supply chain may be very high. But the second situation will cause retailer dissatisfaction. This will affect the stable operation of the supply chain, and also will have a negative influence on the supplier. Therefore, the supplier should pay attention to the retailer’s fairness concerns in designing the incentive contract.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Analysis of the Relationship Between Efficiency and Fairness in a Supply Chain
    AU  - Yuming Xiao
    Y1  - 2022/11/29
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.18
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.18
    T2  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    JF  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    JO  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    SP  - 368
    EP  - 376
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-9561
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.18
    AB  - In addition to efficiency, supply chain members’ fairness concerns cannot be ignored in supply chain management. Without certain fairness, the supply chain is likely to be unstable. This paper aims to analyze the relationship between fairness and efficiency in a supply chain through an incentive contract with revenue sharing. When determining contract parameters, the contract designer (supplier) should not only focus on her own interests, but should also consider the fairness of the distribution of the supply chain profits. In this model, the fairness concerns of the retailer are reflected with a profit distribution fairness constraint. A numerical example shows that the retailer’s fairness concerns have an important impact on the efficiency of the supply chain and the distribution of supply chain profits. The supply chain’s and the retailer’s profits increase with the retailer’s fairness concerns, whereas the supplier’s profit decreases with the retailer’s fairness concerns. In both cases where the profit distribution of the supply chain is very fair and unfair, respectively, the efficiency of the supply chain may be very high. But the second situation will cause retailer dissatisfaction. This will affect the stable operation of the supply chain, and also will have a negative influence on the supplier. Therefore, the supplier should pay attention to the retailer’s fairness concerns in designing the incentive contract.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

  • Sections