| Peer-Reviewed

The Impact of Growth Opportunities on the Relationship Between Firm Debt and Abnormal Accruals - Evidence from Europe

Received: 27 November 2022    Accepted: 20 December 2022    Published: 29 December 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This study aims at exploring the way in which managers of levered firms use accruals in the financial reporting process. Particularly, we examine the relationship between firm debt level and the signed value of abnormal accruals, and whether expected growth opportunities shape the above relation. The analysis is based on a large panel of European non-financial listed companies over the period 2005-2014, with 16,176 firm-year observations. We focus on the European Union, recognizing the importance of specific institutional features (such as the prominence of bank debt and the creditor protection rational) in determining reporting choices. Our findings show that levered firms are more likely to use income-decreasing accruals. This result is consistent with prior studies that emphasize the monitoring role of debt over aggressive accounting policies. However, we also find that, as investment opportunities increase, managers of levered firms shift to a more aggressive use of their discretion. This result shows that growth expectations play a critical role in shaping the relationship between firm leverage and managerial discretion. Overall, our findings suggest that debt plays a monitoring role over managerial discretion, restricting managers’ ability to boost earnings. However, the monitoring role of debt is weakened by the expected growth opportunities, as they constitute a stronger incentive to move earnings upward.

Published in International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.24
Page(s) 416-426
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Abnormal Accruals, Leverage, Growth Opportunities, Europe, Earnings Management

References
[1] Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50 (2), 344-401.
[2] Bowen, R. M., Noreen, E. W., & Lacey, J. M. (1981). Determinants of the corporate decision to capitalize interest. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3 (2), 151-179.
[3] LaBelle, R. (1990). Bond covenants and changes in accounting policy: Canadian evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 6 (2), 677-698.
[4] Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1986). In: Positive Accounting Theory. Prentice-Hall Inc.
[5] Franz, D. R., HassabElnaby, H. R., & Lobo, G. J. (2014). Impact of proximity to debt covenant violation on earnings management. Review of Accounting Studies, 19 (1), 473-505.
[6] Isidro, H., & Raonic, I. (2012). Firm incentives, institutional complexity and the quality of “harmonized” accounting numbers. The International Journal of Accounting, 47 (4), 407-436.
[7] Ahmed, A. S., Billings, B. K., Morton, R. M., & Stanford-Harris, M. (2002). The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder-shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt costs. The Accounting Review, 77 (4), 867-890.
[8] Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and Implications. Accounting Horizons, 17 (3), 207-221.
[9] Zhang, J. (2008). The contracting benefits of accounting conservatism to lenders and borrowers. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 45 (1), 27-54.
[10] Balsam, S., Haw, I. M., & Lilien, S. B. (1995). Mandated accounting changes and managerial discretion. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20 (1), 3-29.
[11] DeFond, M. L., & Jiambalvo, J. (1994). Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17 (1), 145-176.
[12] Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P. D. (2003). Earnings management and investor protection: an international comparison. Journal of financial economics, 69 (3), 505-527.
[13] García Lara, J. M., García Osma, B., & Mora, A. (2005). The effect of earnings management on the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 32 (3-4), 691-726.
[14] Aerts, W., Cheng, P., & Tarca, A. (2013). Management's earnings justification and earnings management under different institutional regimes. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 21 (1), 93-115.
[15] Ball, R., Robin, A., & Wu, J. S. (2003). Incentives versus standards: properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36 (1), 235-270.
[16] Holthausen, R. W. (2003). Testing the relative power of accounting standards versus incentives and other institutional features to influence the outcome of financial reporting in an international setting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36 (1), 271-283.
[17] Burgstahler, D. C., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2006). The importance of reporting incentives: Earnings management in European private and public firms. The Accounting Review, 81 (5), 983-1016.
[18] García Lara, J. M., García Osma, B. G., & Penalva, F. (2009). Accounting conservatism and corporate governance. Review of Accounting Studies, 14 (1), 161-201.
[19] Haller, A. (1998). Accounting in Germany. In P. Walton, A. Haller, & B. Raffournier (Eds.), International accounting (Chap. 4). London: International Thomson Business Press.
[20] Nobes, C. (1998). Major international differences in financial reporting. In C. Nobes, & R. Parker (Eds.), Comparative international accounting (5th ed., Chap. 3). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
[21] Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. The Journal of Finance, 52 (2), 737–783.
[22] Leftwich, R. (1983). Accounting information in private markets: Evidence from private lending agreements. The Accounting Review, 58 (1), 23-42.
[23] Linck, J. S., Netter, J., & Shu, T. (2013). Can managers use discretionary accruals to ease financial constraints? Evidence from discretionary accruals prior to investment. The Accounting Review, 88 (6), 2117-2143.
[24] Chaney, P. K., & Lewis, C. M. (1995). Earnings management and firm valuation under asymmetric information. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1 (3), 319-345.
[25] Demski, J. S. (1998). Performance measure manipulation. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15 (3), 261-285.
[26] Subramanyam, K. R. (1996). The pricing of discretionary accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22 (1), 249-281.
[27] Hao, Q., & Li, K. (2015). The Bright Side of Discretionary Accruals: Evidence from Finance and Innovation. European Financial Management.
[28] Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting review, 70 (2), 193-225.
[29] Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., & Wasley, C. E. (2005). Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39 (1), 163-197.
[30] Chaney, P. K., Faccio, M., & Parsley, D. (2011). The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51 (1), 58-76.
[31] Kaplan, S. N., & Zingales, L. (1997). Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints?. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112 (1), 169-215.
[32] Filip, A., & Raffournier, B. (2014). Financial Crisis And Earnings Management: The European Evidence. The International Journal of Accounting, 49 (4), 455-478.
[33] Isidro, H., & Marques, A. (2015). The role of institutional and economic factors in the strategic use of non-GAAP disclosures to beat earnings benchmarks. European Accounting Review, 24 (1), 95-128.
[34] Isidro, H., Nanda, D. D., & Wysocki, P. D. (2020). On the relation between financial reporting quality and country attributes: Research challenges and opportunities. The Accounting Review, 95 (3), 279-314.
[35] Hussein, M. E. (1996). A comparative study of cultural influences on financial reporting in the US and the Netherlands. The International Journal of accounting, 31 (1), 95-120.
[36] Othman, H. B., & Zeghal, D. (2006). A study of earnings-management motives in the Anglo-American and Euro-Continental accounting models: The Canadian and French cases. The International Journal of Accounting, 41 (4), 406-435.
[37] Boot, A. W. (2000). Relationship banking: What do we know? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9 (1), 7-25.
[38] Cascino, S., Pugliese, A., Mussolino, D., & Sansone, C. (2010). The influence of family ownership on the quality of accounting information. Family Business Review, 23 (3), 246-265.
[39] Arnedo, L., Lizarraga, F., & Sánchez, S. (2007). Does public/private status affect the level of earnings management in code-law contexts outside the United States? A study based on the Spanish case. The International Journal of Accounting, 42 (3), 305-328.
[40] Emanuel, D., Wong, J., & Wong, N. (2003). Efficient contracting and accounting. Accounting & Finance, 43 (2), 149-166.
[41] Emanuel, D. M. (1976). Protecting the debenture-holder. Australian Business Law Review, 4, 13-39.
[42] Smith, C. W., & Warner, J. B. (1979). On financial contracting: An analysis of bond covenants. Journal of Financial Economics, 7 (2), 117-161.
[43] Whittred, G., & Zimmer, I. (1986). Accounting information in the market for debt. Accounting & Finance, 26 (2), 19-33.
[44] El-Gazzar, S., & Pastena, V. (1990). Negotiated accounting rules in private financial contracts. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12 (4), 381-396.
[45] Shahzad, F., Rehman, I. U., Hanif, W., Asim, G. A., & Baig, M. H. (2019). The influence of financial reporting quality and audit quality on investment efficiency: Evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management.
[46] Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13 (1), 1-36.
[47] Dechow, P. M., Ge, W., Larson, C. R., & Sloan, R. G. (2011). Predicting Material Accounting Misstatements. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28 (1), 17-82.
[48] Roosenboom, P., Van der Goot, T., & Mertens, G. (2003). Earnings management and initial public offerings: Evidence from the Netherlands. The International Journal of Accounting, 38 (3), 243-266.
[49] Teoh, S. H., Welch, I., & Wong, T. J. (1998). Earnings management and the underperformance of seasoned equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics, 50 (1), 63-99.
[50] Teoh, S. H., Welch, I., & Wong, T. J. (1998). Earnings management and the long-run market performance of initial public offerings. The Journal of Finance, 53 (6), 1935-1974.
[51] Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5 (2), 147-175.
[52] Myers, S., & Majluf, N. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13 (2), 187–221.
[53] Ashbaugh, H., LaFond, R., & Mayhew, B. W. (2003). Do non-audit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review, 78 (3), 611-639.
[54] Doyle, J. T., Ge, W., & McVay, S. (2007). Accruals quality and internal control over financial reporting. The Accounting Review, 82 (5), 1141-1170.
[55] Burgstahler, D., & Dichev, I. (1997). Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24 (1), 99-126.
[56] Zmijewski, M. E. (1984). Methodological issues related to the estimation of financial distress prediction models. Journal of Accounting Research, 22, 59-82.
[57] Doyle, J., Ge, W., & McVay, S. (2007b). Determinants of weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44 (1), 193-223.
[58] Bowen, R. M., DuCharme, L., & Shores, D. (1995). Stakeholders' implicit claims and accounting method choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20 (3), 255-295.
[59] Dichev, I. D., Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2013). Earnings quality: Evidence from the field. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 56 (2), 1-33.
[60] Biddle, G. C., & Hilary, G. (2006). Accounting quality and firm-level capital investment. The Accounting Review, 81 (5), 963-982.
[61] Biddle, G. C., Hilary, G., & Verdi, R. S. (2009). How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48 (2), 112-131.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Claudia Frisenna, Davide Rizzotti. (2022). The Impact of Growth Opportunities on the Relationship Between Firm Debt and Abnormal Accruals - Evidence from Europe. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 10(6), 416-426. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.24

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Claudia Frisenna; Davide Rizzotti. The Impact of Growth Opportunities on the Relationship Between Firm Debt and Abnormal Accruals - Evidence from Europe. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2022, 10(6), 416-426. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.24

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Claudia Frisenna, Davide Rizzotti. The Impact of Growth Opportunities on the Relationship Between Firm Debt and Abnormal Accruals - Evidence from Europe. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2022;10(6):416-426. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.24

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.24,
      author = {Claudia Frisenna and Davide Rizzotti},
      title = {The Impact of Growth Opportunities on the Relationship Between Firm Debt and Abnormal Accruals - Evidence from Europe},
      journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences},
      volume = {10},
      number = {6},
      pages = {416-426},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.24},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.24},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20221006.24},
      abstract = {This study aims at exploring the way in which managers of levered firms use accruals in the financial reporting process. Particularly, we examine the relationship between firm debt level and the signed value of abnormal accruals, and whether expected growth opportunities shape the above relation. The analysis is based on a large panel of European non-financial listed companies over the period 2005-2014, with 16,176 firm-year observations. We focus on the European Union, recognizing the importance of specific institutional features (such as the prominence of bank debt and the creditor protection rational) in determining reporting choices. Our findings show that levered firms are more likely to use income-decreasing accruals. This result is consistent with prior studies that emphasize the monitoring role of debt over aggressive accounting policies. However, we also find that, as investment opportunities increase, managers of levered firms shift to a more aggressive use of their discretion. This result shows that growth expectations play a critical role in shaping the relationship between firm leverage and managerial discretion. Overall, our findings suggest that debt plays a monitoring role over managerial discretion, restricting managers’ ability to boost earnings. However, the monitoring role of debt is weakened by the expected growth opportunities, as they constitute a stronger incentive to move earnings upward.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Impact of Growth Opportunities on the Relationship Between Firm Debt and Abnormal Accruals - Evidence from Europe
    AU  - Claudia Frisenna
    AU  - Davide Rizzotti
    Y1  - 2022/12/29
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.24
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.24
    T2  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    JF  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    JO  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    SP  - 416
    EP  - 426
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-9561
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20221006.24
    AB  - This study aims at exploring the way in which managers of levered firms use accruals in the financial reporting process. Particularly, we examine the relationship between firm debt level and the signed value of abnormal accruals, and whether expected growth opportunities shape the above relation. The analysis is based on a large panel of European non-financial listed companies over the period 2005-2014, with 16,176 firm-year observations. We focus on the European Union, recognizing the importance of specific institutional features (such as the prominence of bank debt and the creditor protection rational) in determining reporting choices. Our findings show that levered firms are more likely to use income-decreasing accruals. This result is consistent with prior studies that emphasize the monitoring role of debt over aggressive accounting policies. However, we also find that, as investment opportunities increase, managers of levered firms shift to a more aggressive use of their discretion. This result shows that growth expectations play a critical role in shaping the relationship between firm leverage and managerial discretion. Overall, our findings suggest that debt plays a monitoring role over managerial discretion, restricting managers’ ability to boost earnings. However, the monitoring role of debt is weakened by the expected growth opportunities, as they constitute a stronger incentive to move earnings upward.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Economics and Business, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

  • Department of Economics and Business, University of Catania, Catania, Italy

  • Sections