Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Regime-Dependent Exchange Rate Volatility in Nigeria: Persistence, Clustering and Implications for Growth Stability

Received: 15 August 2026     Accepted: 31 August 2026     Published: 27 September 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This study investigates whether exchange-rate volatility in Nigeria is regime-dependent, and how its persistence and clustering bear on growth stability over the period 2000Q1–2023Q4. The sample is partitioned into a broad-based growth regime (2000Q1–2014Q4), when output expanded at roughly seven per cent annually, and a slowdown regime (2015Q1–2023Q4), when growth decelerated and per-capita output flattened. An Exponential Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (E-GARCH) model is used to characterise volatility persistence and clustering in each regime; a Non-linear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model captures the asymmetric long- and short-run effects of positive and negative volatility shocks on growth; and a threshold regression identifies the lending-rate ceiling consistent with growth. Augmented Dickey–Fuller and Zivot–Andrews tests confirm a mixed I(0)/I(1) integration order and an endogenous break around 2015. The E-GARCH estimates reveal statistically significant ARCH and GARCH effects in both regimes, with volatility persistence markedly higher and covariance-non-stationary in the slowdown regime, indicating that shocks become near-permanent once growth weakens. The NARDL results show that the long-run impact of overall volatility on growth is negative and significant, while the partial-sum responses are asymmetric: positive volatility raises growth by about 0.51 per cent and negative volatility lowers it by about 0.10 per cent, though neither partial effect is individually significant at five per cent. Interest rate exerts a significant negative long-run effect on growth, and the optimal lending-rate threshold is estimated at 26.69 per cent. The findings imply that volatility, rather than its direction, is the binding constraint on growth stability. The study recommends export diversification, unification of the exchange-rate windows under a market-based regime, and anchoring the policy rate so that market lending rates remain at or below the estimated threshold.

Published in International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences (Volume 14, Issue 5)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijefm.20261405.20
Page(s) 393-405
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Exchange-rate Volatility, Volatility Persistence, Volatility Clustering, E-GARCH, NARDL, Growth Stability, Nigeria

References
[1] Adegoke, T. D., Azeez, B. A., Ogiamien, F. O., & Osasona, V. A. (2021). The relationship between interest rate and economic growth in Nigeria: ARDL approach. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 5(7), 350–355.
[2] Adekunle, O., Adodo, F. L., & Akindutire, T. (2018). Interest rate and growth nexus in Nigeria: The ARDL-bound test approach. The International Journal of Business Management and Technology, 2(4), 1–13.
[3] Cassel, G. (1918). Abnormal deviations in international exchanges. The Economic Journal, 28(112), 413–415.
[4] Central Bank of Nigeria. (2023). Monetary policy decisions and statistical bulletin. CBN.
[5] Chiadikobi, O. J., Oladipo, J., & Dean, U. C. (2022). Impact of exchange rate volatility on economic growth: Evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management, 4(11), 1063–1080.
[6] Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366), 427–431.
[7] Ehikioya, B. I. (2021). The impact of exchange rate volatility on the Nigerian economic growth: An empirical investigation. Journal of Economics and Management, 37(3), 45–68.
[8] Emmanuel, U., & Sunday, I. N. (2021). Dynamic effects of exchange rate movements on productivity levels: New evidence from Nigeria based on NARDL. Journal of Development Policy and Practice, 7(1), 96–111.
[9] Erinma, N. (2016). Impact of rising interest rate on the performance of the Nigerian manufacturing sector. European Journal of Business and Management, 8(10), 125–134.
[10] Evans, O. (2019). How much is too much? The threshold effects of interest rate on growth and investment in Nigeria. Journal of Management and Administration, 4(1), 69–98.
[11] Eze, W. (2022). The relationship between exchange rate volatility, interest rate differentials and stock market performance in Nigeria [Master's thesis, Ahmadu Bello University].
[12] Fatbardha, M., Eglantina, H., Uğur, E., Mirela, P., & Marian, C. V. (2020). The effect of exchange rate volatility on economic growth: Case of the CEE countries. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(8), 177–192.
[13] Fisher, I. (1930). The theory of interest. Macmillan.
[14] Iheanachor, N., & Ozegbe, A. E. (2021). The consequences of exchange rate fluctuations on Nigeria's economic performance: An autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach. International Journal of Management, Economics and Social Sciences, 10(2–3), 68–87.
[15] International Monetary Fund. (2022). Nigeria: Request for an arrangement under the Extended Credit Facility (IMF Country Report). IMF.
[16] Miftahu, I. (2019). Monetary policy and economic growth in developing countries: Evaluating the policy nexus in Nigeria. International Journal of Business and Economics Research, 8(5), 303–313.
[17] Mohammed, S. J., & Omale, S. E. (2020). Relationship between exchange rate and economic growth: Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Economic Studies, 17(1), 180–194.
[18] Moses, K., Tule, I., Audu, K. O., Oji, V. U., Oboh, S. Z., & Ajayi, K. J. (2015). Determination of the floor and optimal threshold of lending rates in Nigeria (CBN Working Paper Series CBN/WPS/01/2015/03). Central Bank of Nigeria.
[19] Nelson, D. B. (1991). Conditional heteroskedasticity in asset returns: A new approach. Econometrica, 59(2), 347–370.
[20] Okoro, C. U., & Charles, F. B. (2019). Naira exchange rate variation and Nigeria economic growth: A time series study. American Economic & Social Review, 5(2), 13–36.
[21] Okosu, N. D. (2022). Assessing exchange rate volatility and economic growth in Nigeria: A GARCH model approach. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 6(7), 152–163.
[22] Oloyede, A. J., & Oladapo, F. (2018). Effect of exchange rate volatility on economic growth in Nigeria (1986–2014). ResearchGate.
[23] Perron, P. (1989). The great crash, the oil price shock, and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica, 57(6), 1361–1401.
[24] Qian, Y., & Varangis, P. (1992). Does exchange rate volatility hinder export growth? Additional evidence (Policy Research Working Paper No. 911). The World Bank.
[25] Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. In W. Horrace & R. Sickles (Eds.), Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt (pp. 281–314). Springer.
[26] Solomon, L. A., & Kofi, K. (2020). Interest rate and its threshold effect on private investment: Evidence from Ghana. African Journal of Economic Review, 8(2), 1–16.
[27] Tabo, W., Briven, M. S., Nyau, M., & Phiri, J. (2024). Assessing the effects of exchange rate volatility on Zambia's economic growth: Evidence from ARDL and NARDL models. Economies, 12(9), 224.
[28] Ubong, E. E. (2020). Interest rate and real sector output growth in Nigeria: Empirical evidence. East African Scholars Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(10), 781–788.
[29] Ufoeze, L. O., Odimgbe, S. O., Ezeabalisi, V. N., & Alajekwu, U. B. (2018). Effect of monetary policy on economic growth in Nigeria: An empirical investigation. Annals of Spiru Haret University Economic Series, 18(1), 123–140.
[30] World Bank. (2023). The World Bank in Nigeria: Overview. World Bank.
[31] Zivot, E., & Andrews, D. W. K. (1992). Further evidence on the great crash, the oil-price shock, and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 10(3), 251–270.
[32] Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326.
[33] Bukola, A. (2021). The impact of exchange rate volatility on economic growth in Nigeria: A dynamic econometric approach. African Journal of Business and Economic Development, 1(5), 1–16.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Drisu, A., Idris, M. (2026). Regime-Dependent Exchange Rate Volatility in Nigeria: Persistence, Clustering and Implications for Growth Stability. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 14(5), 393-405. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20261405.20

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Drisu, A.; Idris, M. Regime-Dependent Exchange Rate Volatility in Nigeria: Persistence, Clustering and Implications for Growth Stability. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2026, 14(5), 393-405. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20261405.20

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Drisu A, Idris M. Regime-Dependent Exchange Rate Volatility in Nigeria: Persistence, Clustering and Implications for Growth Stability. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2026;14(5):393-405. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20261405.20

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijefm.20261405.20,
      author = {Abdul Drisu and Miftahu Idris},
      title = {Regime-Dependent Exchange Rate Volatility in Nigeria: Persistence, Clustering and Implications for Growth Stability},
      journal = {International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences},
      volume = {14},
      number = {5},
      pages = {393-405},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijefm.20261405.20},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20261405.20},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijefm.20261405.20},
      abstract = {This study investigates whether exchange-rate volatility in Nigeria is regime-dependent, and how its persistence and clustering bear on growth stability over the period 2000Q1–2023Q4. The sample is partitioned into a broad-based growth regime (2000Q1–2014Q4), when output expanded at roughly seven per cent annually, and a slowdown regime (2015Q1–2023Q4), when growth decelerated and per-capita output flattened. An Exponential Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (E-GARCH) model is used to characterise volatility persistence and clustering in each regime; a Non-linear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model captures the asymmetric long- and short-run effects of positive and negative volatility shocks on growth; and a threshold regression identifies the lending-rate ceiling consistent with growth. Augmented Dickey–Fuller and Zivot–Andrews tests confirm a mixed I(0)/I(1) integration order and an endogenous break around 2015. The E-GARCH estimates reveal statistically significant ARCH and GARCH effects in both regimes, with volatility persistence markedly higher and covariance-non-stationary in the slowdown regime, indicating that shocks become near-permanent once growth weakens. The NARDL results show that the long-run impact of overall volatility on growth is negative and significant, while the partial-sum responses are asymmetric: positive volatility raises growth by about 0.51 per cent and negative volatility lowers it by about 0.10 per cent, though neither partial effect is individually significant at five per cent. Interest rate exerts a significant negative long-run effect on growth, and the optimal lending-rate threshold is estimated at 26.69 per cent. The findings imply that volatility, rather than its direction, is the binding constraint on growth stability. The study recommends export diversification, unification of the exchange-rate windows under a market-based regime, and anchoring the policy rate so that market lending rates remain at or below the estimated threshold.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Regime-Dependent Exchange Rate Volatility in Nigeria: Persistence, Clustering and Implications for Growth Stability
    AU  - Abdul Drisu
    AU  - Miftahu Idris
    Y1  - 2026/09/27
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20261405.20
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijefm.20261405.20
    T2  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    JF  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    JO  - International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences
    SP  - 393
    EP  - 405
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2326-9561
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijefm.20261405.20
    AB  - This study investigates whether exchange-rate volatility in Nigeria is regime-dependent, and how its persistence and clustering bear on growth stability over the period 2000Q1–2023Q4. The sample is partitioned into a broad-based growth regime (2000Q1–2014Q4), when output expanded at roughly seven per cent annually, and a slowdown regime (2015Q1–2023Q4), when growth decelerated and per-capita output flattened. An Exponential Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (E-GARCH) model is used to characterise volatility persistence and clustering in each regime; a Non-linear Autoregressive Distributed Lag (NARDL) model captures the asymmetric long- and short-run effects of positive and negative volatility shocks on growth; and a threshold regression identifies the lending-rate ceiling consistent with growth. Augmented Dickey–Fuller and Zivot–Andrews tests confirm a mixed I(0)/I(1) integration order and an endogenous break around 2015. The E-GARCH estimates reveal statistically significant ARCH and GARCH effects in both regimes, with volatility persistence markedly higher and covariance-non-stationary in the slowdown regime, indicating that shocks become near-permanent once growth weakens. The NARDL results show that the long-run impact of overall volatility on growth is negative and significant, while the partial-sum responses are asymmetric: positive volatility raises growth by about 0.51 per cent and negative volatility lowers it by about 0.10 per cent, though neither partial effect is individually significant at five per cent. Interest rate exerts a significant negative long-run effect on growth, and the optimal lending-rate threshold is estimated at 26.69 per cent. The findings imply that volatility, rather than its direction, is the binding constraint on growth stability. The study recommends export diversification, unification of the exchange-rate windows under a market-based regime, and anchoring the policy rate so that market lending rates remain at or below the estimated threshold.
    VL  - 14
    IS  - 5
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections