First Study of the Turkey (<i>Meleagris Gallopavo</i>) in Cameroon: Assessing Turkey Biodiversity in the Highlands of West-Cameroon

Tegadjoue Sindze Aubin; Meutchieye Felix; Djiotsa Dongmo Francis; Kamta Tchoffo Romeo Omer; Fogang Tagasine Aristide; Manjeli Yacouba

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13

First Study of the Turkey (Meleagris Gallopavo) in Cameroon: Assessing Turkey Biodiversity in the Highlands of West-Cameroon

Tegadjoue Sindze Aubin, Meutchieye Felix, Djiotsa Dongmo Francis, Kamta Tchoffo Romeo Omer, Fogang Tagasine Aristide, Manjeli Yacouba

Published in International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology (Volume 2, Issue 1)

Received: 29 October 2016 Accepted: 25 February 2017 Published: 17 March 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The study was undertaken from November 2015 to January 2016. It had as a general objective to contribute to the knowledge of turkey’s biodiversity of the Highlands of West-Cameroon for their safeguard and for their genetic improvement. More specifically, it was aimed at evaluating turkeys’ morphobiometric diversity and estimating correlation coefficients between measurements and Live Weight. To achieve these goals, a sample of 236 adult turkeys whose 141 females and 95 males was randomly selected in four Divisions in the zone of study. The principal results show that the turkey’s plumage colouring in the Highlands of West-Cameroon is very varied, with a prevalence of bronzed (54.50%). Head colouring is also very variable, but the blue-red (28.94%) and pink (23.86%) are more frequent. Shanks are most often pink (36.85%), but can also be black-red (21.30%) or clear-pink (20.30%). Eyes are black-chestnut (63.13%), chestnut (16.95%) and grey-black (12.18%). In the same way, studied quantitative characters are very variable, with a sexual dimorphism in favour of the males. Thus, the average weight of the studied animals is of 6.11 ± 0.19 Kg with a variation coefficient of 49%. However, males are approximately 23% heavier (7.93 ± 0.19 Kg) than females (4.89 ± 0.25 Kg). In addition, studied body measurements are significantly (P < 0.05) higher in tom turkeys, although variable with the considered Divisions. All the correlations are positive, but correlations between Live Weight and the length of the snood (r = 0.55) and the thoracic circumference (r = 0.53) are the highest ones.

Published in	International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology (Volume 2, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13
Page(s)	16-23
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Turkey, Biodiversity, Morphobiometry, Correlations, West-Cameroon

References

[1]	United Nations for the Development, 2014. Sustainable Objectives for the Development. 10 November 2014: 14p. www.sustainabledevelopment.un.org/focussdgs.html.
[2]	Aslam M. L., Bastiaansen J. W. M., Crooijmans R. P. M. A., Vereijken A. and Groenen M. A. M., 2011. Whole genome QTL mapping for growth, meat quality and breast meat yield traits in turkey. Genetics: 12: 61p.
[3]	Bidima Iréné Modeste, 2013. Techninical Sheet, Turkey: A bird very interesting for its flesh. La voix du Paysan - Mensuel de l’Entrepreneur Rural, 1: 9-10.
[4]	Dave Wilson, 1976. Poultry: A guide to anatomy and selected species. Information Technology and Communication Services: 197p. http://www.aces.uiuc.edu/ITCS/IM.
[5]	Agri-Nouvelles, 2011. The tom turkey is not a jest. Agri-Marché: 30-31.
[6]	Ahmed Barkok, 2011. Structures of production of turkeys. Ministère de l’Agriculture et de la Pêche Maritime: 15p.
[7]	Naves M., Alexandre G., Mahieu M., Gourdine J. L. and Mandonnet N., 2011. Local animal breeds: bases of innovation and sustainable development of livestock in the Antilles. Innovations Agronomiques, 16: 193-205.
[8]	Zohra F. M., Gaouar S. B. S., Tabet-Aoul N., Tixier-Boichard M. and Saïdi-Mehtar N., 2014. Morpho-biometric characteristics and breeding systems of local chickens in the Oranie Region. Animal Genetic Resources, 14: 7-22.
[9]	FAO/UNEP, 2000. World Watch List for Domestic Animal Diversity. Rome, 3: 746p.
[10]	American Standard of Perfection, 1910. A complete description of all recognized varieties of fowls. American Poultry Association, 34^th and 35^th ed: 134p.
[11]	Ekarius Carol, 2007. Storey’s illustrated guide to poultry breeds. Storey Publishing, 3: 170p.
[12]	Jacquie J. and Pescatore T., 2013. Selecting turkeys. Animal and Food Sciences, 40: 5-46.
[13]	Keambou T. C., Manjeli Y., Tchoumboué J., Téguia A. and Iroumé R. N., 2008. Morpho-biométric caracterization of local chicken genetic resources on the High Lands of West-Cameroon. Livestock Research for Rural Development, 19: 107p. http://www.Irrd.org/Irrd19/8/keam19107.htm.
[14]	Akouango F., Mouangou F. and Ganongo G., 2004. Phenotypes and breeding performances of local populations of fowls of Gallus gallus in Congo. Cahiers Agricules, 13: 257-262.
[15]	Resse F. R., Marjorie B. D., Phillip S., Danny W. and Jeannette B., 2013. Selecting Your Best Turkeys for Breeding. American Livestock Breeds Conservancy: 28p. www.google.cm/search?q=selcting+your+turkeys+for+breeding-proper.pdf.
[16]	Ogah D. M., 2011. Assessing size and conformation of the body of Nigerian indigenous turkey. Slovak Journal of Animal Science, 44 (1): 21-27.
[17]	Ganselelet K. and Neubauer H., 1974. Present developments in breeding, reproduction and production of turkeys and further problems in the period up to 1980. Tierzucht, 28 (6): 1972-1975.
[18]	Popescu V. S. and Puscatu I., 1979. Genetic parameters of some external characters in broiler turkeys. Zootehnie, 6: 75-80.
[19]	Meijerhof R., 1991. Turkeys grow better with intermittent light. Misset-World Poultry, 7 (1): 33-39.
[20]	Aksoy T., 1996. The slaughter results of Bronze turkey’s nourishing in the farm conditions in Tekirdag Province/Turkey. National Zootechnical Science Congress: 48-54.
[21]	Bachev N. and Lalev M., 1990. The relationship of body measurements with body weight in turkeys. Zhivotnov’dni Nauki, 27 (4): 31-34.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Tegadjoue Sindze Aubin, Meutchieye Felix, Djiotsa Dongmo Francis, Kamta Tchoffo Romeo Omer, Fogang Tagasine Aristide, et al. (2017). First Study of the Turkey (Meleagris Gallopavo) in Cameroon: Assessing Turkey Biodiversity in the Highlands of West-Cameroon. International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology, 2(1), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Tegadjoue Sindze Aubin; Meutchieye Felix; Djiotsa Dongmo Francis; Kamta Tchoffo Romeo Omer; Fogang Tagasine Aristide, et al. First Study of the Turkey (Meleagris Gallopavo) in Cameroon: Assessing Turkey Biodiversity in the Highlands of West-Cameroon. Int. J. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 2(1), 16-23. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Tegadjoue Sindze Aubin, Meutchieye Felix, Djiotsa Dongmo Francis, Kamta Tchoffo Romeo Omer, Fogang Tagasine Aristide, et al. First Study of the Turkey (Meleagris Gallopavo) in Cameroon: Assessing Turkey Biodiversity in the Highlands of West-Cameroon. Int J Food Sci Biotechnol. 2017;2(1):16-23. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13,
  author = {Tegadjoue Sindze Aubin and Meutchieye Felix and Djiotsa Dongmo Francis and Kamta Tchoffo Romeo Omer and Fogang Tagasine Aristide and Manjeli Yacouba},
  title = {First Study of the Turkey (Meleagris Gallopavo) in Cameroon: Assessing Turkey Biodiversity in the Highlands of West-Cameroon},
  journal = {International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology},
  volume = {2},
  number = {1},
  pages = {16-23},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijfsb.20170201.13},
  abstract = {The study was undertaken from November 2015 to January 2016. It had as a general objective to contribute to the knowledge of turkey’s biodiversity of the Highlands of West-Cameroon for their safeguard and for their genetic improvement. More specifically, it was aimed at evaluating turkeys’ morphobiometric diversity and estimating correlation coefficients between measurements and Live Weight. To achieve these goals, a sample of 236 adult turkeys whose 141 females and 95 males was randomly selected in four Divisions in the zone of study. The principal results show that the turkey’s plumage colouring in the Highlands of West-Cameroon is very varied, with a prevalence of bronzed (54.50%). Head colouring is also very variable, but the blue-red (28.94%) and pink (23.86%) are more frequent. Shanks are most often pink (36.85%), but can also be black-red (21.30%) or clear-pink (20.30%). Eyes are black-chestnut (63.13%), chestnut (16.95%) and grey-black (12.18%). In the same way, studied quantitative characters are very variable, with a sexual dimorphism in favour of the males. Thus, the average weight of the studied animals is of 6.11 ± 0.19 Kg with a variation coefficient of 49%. However, males are approximately 23% heavier (7.93 ± 0.19 Kg) than females (4.89 ± 0.25 Kg). In addition, studied body measurements are significantly (P < 0.05) higher in tom turkeys, although variable with the considered Divisions. All the correlations are positive, but correlations between Live Weight and the length of the snood (r = 0.55) and the thoracic circumference (r = 0.53) are the highest ones.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY - JOUR
T1 - First Study of the Turkey (Meleagris Gallopavo) in Cameroon: Assessing Turkey Biodiversity in the Highlands of West-Cameroon
AU - Tegadjoue Sindze Aubin
AU - Meutchieye Felix
AU - Djiotsa Dongmo Francis
AU - Kamta Tchoffo Romeo Omer
AU - Fogang Tagasine Aristide
AU - Manjeli Yacouba
Y1 - 2017/03/17
PY - 2017
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13
DO - 10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13
T2 - International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology
JF - International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology
JO - International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology
SP - 16
EP - 23
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2578-9643
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13
AB - The study was undertaken from November 2015 to January 2016. It had as a general objective to contribute to the knowledge of turkey’s biodiversity of the Highlands of West-Cameroon for their safeguard and for their genetic improvement. More specifically, it was aimed at evaluating turkeys’ morphobiometric diversity and estimating correlation coefficients between measurements and Live Weight. To achieve these goals, a sample of 236 adult turkeys whose 141 females and 95 males was randomly selected in four Divisions in the zone of study. The principal results show that the turkey’s plumage colouring in the Highlands of West-Cameroon is very varied, with a prevalence of bronzed (54.50%). Head colouring is also very variable, but the blue-red (28.94%) and pink (23.86%) are more frequent. Shanks are most often pink (36.85%), but can also be black-red (21.30%) or clear-pink (20.30%). Eyes are black-chestnut (63.13%), chestnut (16.95%) and grey-black (12.18%). In the same way, studied quantitative characters are very variable, with a sexual dimorphism in favour of the males. Thus, the average weight of the studied animals is of 6.11 ± 0.19 Kg with a variation coefficient of 49%. However, males are approximately 23% heavier (7.93 ± 0.19 Kg) than females (4.89 ± 0.25 Kg). In addition, studied body measurements are significantly (P < 0.05) higher in tom turkeys, although variable with the considered Divisions. All the correlations are positive, but correlations between Live Weight and the length of the snood (r = 0.55) and the thoracic circumference (r = 0.53) are the highest ones.
VL - 2
IS - 1
ER -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Tegadjoue Sindze Aubin

Laboratory of Biotechnologies and Bioinformatics, Department of Animal Productions, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences (FASA), University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
Meutchieye Felix

Laboratory of Biotechnologies and Bioinformatics, Department of Animal Productions, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences (FASA), University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
Djiotsa Dongmo Francis

Laboratory of Biotechnologies and Bioinformatics, Department of Animal Productions, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences (FASA), University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
Kamta Tchoffo Romeo Omer

Laboratory of Biotechnologies and Bioinformatics, Department of Animal Productions, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences (FASA), University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
Fogang Tagasine Aristide

Laboratory of Biotechnologies and Bioinformatics, Department of Animal Productions, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences (FASA), University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
Manjeli Yacouba

Laboratory of Biotechnologies and Bioinformatics, Department of Animal Productions, Faculty of Agronomy and Agricultural Sciences (FASA), University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Tegadjoue Sindze Aubin, Meutchieye Felix, Djiotsa Dongmo Francis, Kamta Tchoffo Romeo Omer, Fogang Tagasine Aristide, et al. (2017). First Study of the Turkey (Meleagris Gallopavo) in Cameroon: Assessing Turkey Biodiversity in the Highlands of West-Cameroon. International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology, 2(1), 16-23. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Tegadjoue Sindze Aubin; Meutchieye Felix; Djiotsa Dongmo Francis; Kamta Tchoffo Romeo Omer; Fogang Tagasine Aristide, et al. First Study of the Turkey (Meleagris Gallopavo) in Cameroon: Assessing Turkey Biodiversity in the Highlands of West-Cameroon. Int. J. Food Sci. Biotechnol. 2017, 2(1), 16-23. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Tegadjoue Sindze Aubin, Meutchieye Felix, Djiotsa Dongmo Francis, Kamta Tchoffo Romeo Omer, Fogang Tagasine Aristide, et al. First Study of the Turkey (Meleagris Gallopavo) in Cameroon: Assessing Turkey Biodiversity in the Highlands of West-Cameroon. Int J Food Sci Biotechnol. 2017;2(1):16-23. doi: 10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13,
  author = {Tegadjoue Sindze Aubin and Meutchieye Felix and Djiotsa Dongmo Francis and Kamta Tchoffo Romeo Omer and Fogang Tagasine Aristide and Manjeli Yacouba},
  title = {First Study of the Turkey (Meleagris Gallopavo) in Cameroon: Assessing Turkey Biodiversity in the Highlands of West-Cameroon},
  journal = {International Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology},
  volume = {2},
  number = {1},
  pages = {16-23},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijfsb.20170201.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijfsb.20170201.13},
  abstract = {The study was undertaken from November 2015 to January 2016. It had as a general objective to contribute to the knowledge of turkey’s biodiversity of the Highlands of West-Cameroon for their safeguard and for their genetic improvement. More specifically, it was aimed at evaluating turkeys’ morphobiometric diversity and estimating correlation coefficients between measurements and Live Weight. To achieve these goals, a sample of 236 adult turkeys whose 141 females and 95 males was randomly selected in four Divisions in the zone of study. The principal results show that the turkey’s plumage colouring in the Highlands of West-Cameroon is very varied, with a prevalence of bronzed (54.50%). Head colouring is also very variable, but the blue-red (28.94%) and pink (23.86%) are more frequent. Shanks are most often pink (36.85%), but can also be black-red (21.30%) or clear-pink (20.30%). Eyes are black-chestnut (63.13%), chestnut (16.95%) and grey-black (12.18%). In the same way, studied quantitative characters are very variable, with a sexual dimorphism in favour of the males. Thus, the average weight of the studied animals is of 6.11 ± 0.19 Kg with a variation coefficient of 49%. However, males are approximately 23% heavier (7.93 ± 0.19 Kg) than females (4.89 ± 0.25 Kg). In addition, studied body measurements are significantly (P < 0.05) higher in tom turkeys, although variable with the considered Divisions. All the correlations are positive, but correlations between Live Weight and the length of the snood (r = 0.55) and the thoracic circumference (r = 0.53) are the highest ones.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download